I just added a comment about a 32-bit failure, if that can be fixed relatively soon then we shouldn't have any problem getting it into 10.0!
On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 9:21:38 AM UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > I realize that it is a big ask, but would it be possible to merge > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35060 soon (most importantly, > within sage 10.0)? It adds a single module, and I'd like to be able to > present its functionality saying that it is "in sage". > > Related: should I click on the "update branch" button whenever it appears, > or would this be unhelpful? > > Thanks for everything! > > Martin > On Wednesday, 8 March 2023 at 09:46:05 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Le mercredi 8 mars 2023 à 00:12:17 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : >> >> It looks like the graph failures have been reported at >> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35157. Emanuel, are those the >> ones you're seeing? >> >> >> Yep ! >> >> This happens with Debian testing’s nauty, libnauty2 and libnauty2-dev, >> whereas the issue you point reports it on a Mac with homebrew. >> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 8:20:30 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >> The resulting 10.0.beta3 passes ptestlong witrh the two permanent >> failures already reported for the previous betas and the final release of >> Sage 9. >> >> HTH, >> >> Le dimanche 5 mars 2023 à 13:05:40 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : >> >> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM : >> >> - >> >> A first attempt to upgrade from 10.0.beta2 apparently succeeded, but >> trying to run make ptestlong failed at the initial build >> documentation step, even after repeated cleanup of documentation. >> - >> >> A second attempt after make distclean and configuring the use of >> Debian’s Singular froze when configure checked the useabilty of >> Debian’s Singular’s documentation (no progress after abou 15 minutes). >> - >> >> A configure --with-system-singular=no succeeded. >> >> Currently makeing. I’ll post results later. >> >> HTH, >> >> Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : >> >> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git >> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html >> >> >> 46a6105bc49 (github/develop, tag: 10.0.beta3) Updated SageMath version to >> 10.0.beta3 >> a822a2132aa gh-35035: make _multiple_x_*() methods work for all n≠0 >> 0847642dbb4 gh-35033: sage.schemes: Replace imports from sage.*.all for >> namespace packages >> b6557a8a14b gh-35027: gitignore another (temporary) autoconf file >> c0cf5362055 gh-35025: Implement __getitem__ and alias weight methods for >> quasimodular forms >> 35852961c31 gh-35024: fix usage of verbose with positional argument >> 932112f48ec gh-35023: Remove upstream urls from checksums.ini that point >> to trac >> 61e845ceb8d gh-35021: Implement check for Lorentzian polynomials #28252 >> bf6c233980b gh-34995: Support for tachyon >= 0.99.2 >> 23ab3802d1c gh-34961: qqbar.clear_denominators: crude but fast >> alternative algorithm >> 52a81cbd161 Revert "add missing # optional - gap3" >> c017a6a3d68 add missing # optional - gap3 >> 8f5bbd278ae (tag: 10.0.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 10.0.beta2 >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/369b6d1b-62df-4df3-bf5e-dbc7af7f93c3n%40googlegroups.com.