I just added a comment about a 32-bit failure, if that can be fixed 
relatively soon then we shouldn't have any problem getting it into 10.0!

On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 9:21:38 AM UTC+1 axio...@yahoo.de wrote:

> I realize that it is a big ask, but would it be possible to merge 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35060 soon (most importantly, 
> within sage 10.0)?   It adds a single module, and I'd like to be able to 
> present its functionality saying that it is "in sage".
>
> Related: should I click on the "update branch" button whenever it appears, 
> or would this be unhelpful?
>
> Thanks for everything!
>
> Martin
> On Wednesday, 8 March 2023 at 09:46:05 UTC+1 emanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Le mercredi 8 mars 2023 à 00:12:17 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>> It looks like the graph failures have been reported at 
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35157. Emanuel, are those the 
>> ones you're seeing?
>>
>>
>> Yep !
>>
>> This happens with Debian testing’s nauty, libnauty2 and libnauty2-dev, 
>> whereas the issue you point reports it on a Mac with homebrew.
>> ​
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 8:20:30 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>> The resulting 10.0.beta3 passes ptestlong witrh the two permanent 
>> failures already reported for the previous betas and the final release of 
>> Sage 9.
>>
>> HTH,
>> ​
>> Le dimanche 5 mars 2023 à 13:05:40 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>
>> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM :
>>
>>    - 
>>    
>>    A first attempt to upgrade from 10.0.beta2 apparently succeeded, but 
>>    trying to run make ptestlong failed at the initial build 
>>    documentation step, even after repeated cleanup of documentation.
>>    - 
>>    
>>    A second attempt after make distclean and configuring the use of 
>>    Debian’s Singular froze when configure checked the useabilty of 
>>    Debian’s Singular’s documentation (no progress after abou 15 minutes).
>>    - 
>>    
>>    A configure --with-system-singular=no succeeded.
>>    
>> Currently makeing. I’ll post results later.
>>
>> HTH, 
>> ​
>> Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
>> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>>
>>
>> 46a6105bc49 (github/develop, tag: 10.0.beta3) Updated SageMath version to 
>> 10.0.beta3
>> a822a2132aa gh-35035: make _multiple_x_*() methods work for all n≠0
>> 0847642dbb4 gh-35033: sage.schemes: Replace imports from sage.*.all for 
>> namespace packages
>> b6557a8a14b gh-35027: gitignore another (temporary) autoconf file
>> c0cf5362055 gh-35025: Implement __getitem__ and alias weight methods for 
>> quasimodular forms
>> 35852961c31 gh-35024: fix usage of verbose with positional argument
>> 932112f48ec gh-35023: Remove upstream urls from checksums.ini that point 
>> to trac
>> 61e845ceb8d gh-35021:  Implement check for Lorentzian polynomials #28252
>> bf6c233980b gh-34995: Support for tachyon >= 0.99.2
>> 23ab3802d1c gh-34961: qqbar.clear_denominators: crude but fast 
>> alternative algorithm
>> 52a81cbd161 Revert "add missing # optional - gap3"
>> c017a6a3d68 add missing # optional - gap3
>> 8f5bbd278ae (tag: 10.0.beta2) Updated SageMath version to 10.0.beta2
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/369b6d1b-62df-4df3-bf5e-dbc7af7f93c3n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to