Or range(abs(t))? Then if there is some numerical noise leading to a tiny imaginary part (your t might be evaluated to
2.573037896825689 - 4.365411232224172e-17*I for example), abs(t) won't care. On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 10:42:32 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > How about range(0, RR(t))? > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 10:11:14 AM UTC-8, Michael Beeson wrote: >> >> Oh, and range(0,n(t)) also crashes. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
