Hi, On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:39:54PM -0500, m. allan noah wrote: > is there any value to makeing this function call have a more generic name, > like sanei_set_timeout() which could perhaps be a noop in the scsi case > for now? is variable timeout ever going to apply to scsi?
It could be of some use for SCSI, too. However, I don't think the same function should be used for both. One, it may make sense to use different timeouts for USB and SCSI (in backends supporting both busses). Two, I have no clue how to easily implement the same function call for sanei_scsi and sanei_usb without getting trouble when both objects are linked to a lib. Bye, Henning