Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:36:19PM +0200, Bertrik Sikken wrote: > The protocol is weird because it seems to implement some kind of > 'USB-over-USB', i.e. the data payload of the USB control packets > looks like another USB control packet. The payload size never > appears to exceed 8 bytes.
Maybe this is one of the scanners which use a GL660 as a USB2.0 chip and the GL646 (USB 1.1) as the real scan chip? This could explain the USB-over-USB protocol. Bye, Henning
