On Sunday 17 December 2006 22:47, Martin Owens wrote: > Thanks for the link, > > See it sounds like you want to make the same mistakes, instead of > looking for a better way to organise scanning in linux your looking at > how to better organise functionality in sane.
Just for the records: SANE is not intended to be Linux only! > The problem is that the way scanning is organised is crack-pot and out > dated. we are duplicating effort for no good reason other than to be > stuck in our rut. He, he... > I see so many opportunities to make sane a slim line routing code > instead of a bloated detection and scanning library. Okay, go ahead, make some proposals -but keep in mind, that we will not only focus on Linux. - Gerhard [SNIPSNAP]