Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp> wrote: Hi,
> :firmware filename [MD5_checksum] > > The filename should probably not contain path information because it > may get installed in different locations on different systems. The > checksum is optional and may be used to verify the file. Yes, no path information. It's useless. > Should multiple :firmware entries for a single model be allowed? > IIRC, there are some Windows drivers out there that include different > versions of the firmware file for the same device. If you're going to put a checksum in there, then yes, you'll have to support multiple firmware attributes. Otherwise it's just pointless and it gets in the way of usability :) Also, if the firwmare is extracted from a Windows driver, you'll have case sensitivity issues to take care of. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org> <jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169