On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:41:32AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > >> Other than that, the backend is conflicting with usblp to claim the > >> USB device; do you have a way to fix that? Would going over the > >> emulated parallel port be possible? > > > > Strangely, as I'm using standard SANE interface to communicate with usb > > device. About parallel port - my device is only using usb, so I really > > don't know much to help about parallel ports. > > The Samsung driver goes over the parallel port, so if the machines are > the same, the xerox should support that mode too, I guess?
Well, I guess protocol should be the same, but I doubt it's over the same wire. There is two interfaces in device, I use sanei_usb_open which is claiming right interface. Bus 001 Device 049: ID 0924:3da4 Xerox bNumInterfaces 2 Interface Descriptor: bInterfaceNumber 0 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 255 Vendor Specific Subclass bInterfaceProtocol 255 Vendor Specific Protocol Interface Descriptor: bInterfaceNumber 1 bInterfaceClass 7 Printer bInterfaceSubClass 1 Printer bInterfaceProtocol 2 Bidirectional [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: found libusb device (0x0924/0x3da4) interface 0 at libusb:001:049 [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: found 1 devices How could it conflict? Is this problem generic with MFP devices?