Here is my USB snoop file. I do not authorize any party to give away, publish or sell this e-mail address. Its use is only for correspondence with me. I also do not consent to receiving any unsolicited e-mail from any parties.
Help Can the SPAM! --- On Sat, 6/4/11, stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote: From: stef <stef....@free.fr> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Recent NM-1000 To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Cc: "Paul Ericson" <paulsonntagericson at yahoo.ca> Received: Saturday, June 4, 2011, 2:58 AM Le jeudi 2 juin 2011 20:05:25 Paul Ericson, vous avez ?crit : > Removed all old sane and compiled and installed 1.0.22. > Tried a couple of different things. > The mods in /var/lib/misc/usb.ids are adding two lines: >? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1ebb? NuCORE Technology, Inc.Added->? ? ? ???1f44? The > Neat CompanyAdded->? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0001 NM-1000 Mobile Scanner? ? ? ? ? ? >? ? ? ???2001? D-Link Corp. [hex]? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???0001? DWL-120 > WIRELESS ADAPTER #1 Left mods in /var/lib/misc/usb.ids. Here is what > "sane-find-scanner -v -v" shows: Couldn't set configuration: could not set > config 1: Operation not permitted<This USB chip looks like a GL846? > (result from sane-backends 1.0.22)> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1f44, > product=0x0001, chip=GL846?) at libusb:002:004 #2 Left mods in > /var/lib/misc/usb.ids. Here is what "sudo sane-find-scanner -v -v" shows: > <Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip (result from sane-backends > 1.0.22)> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1f44 [The Neat Company? ], > product=0x0001 [Neat Mobile Scanner]) at libusb:002:004 > > #3 Commented out the two added lines above, ran "sane-find-scanner -v -v", > it says: Couldn't set configuration: could not set config 1: Operation not > permitted<This USB chip looks like a GL846? (result from sane-backends > 1.0.22)> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1f44, product=0x0001, chip=GL846?) at > libusb:002:004 > > #4 Commented out the two added lines above, ran "sudo sane-find-scanner -v > -v", it says: > <Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip (result from sane-backends > 1.0.22)> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1f44 [The Neat Company? ], > product=0x0001 [Neat Mobile Scanner]) at libusb:002:004 Interestingly, > when I run sudo sane-find-scanner, it appears to check for more chipsets. > Where as when I run it normally, it stops on GL84x. > > Is "Couldn't set configuration: could not set config 1: Operation not > permitted" as permissions issue or a configuration issue? (Or should I > ignore it?) Thanks, > Paul > I do not authorize any party to give away, publish or sell this e-mail > address. Its use is only for correspondence with me. I also do not consent > to receiving any unsolicited e-mail from any parties. > > > > > > Help Can the SPAM! > > --- On Thu, 6/2/11, stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote: > > From: stef <stef.dev at free.fr> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Recent NM-1000 > To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Cc: "Paul Ericson" <paulsonntagericson at yahoo.ca> > Received: Thursday, June 2, 2011, 4:13 AM > > Le mercredi 1 juin 2011 22:52:26 Paul Ericson, vous avez ?crit : > > I recently got a NM-1000 mobile scanner. I have not been able to get it > > working under sane. I've attached the output from sane-find-scanner -v -v > > and usb-devices (I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 which has no /proc/bus/usb). > > The scanner wouldn't even show up in lsusb until I modified > > /var/lib/misc/usb.ids. Any thoughts on which sane driver and firmware > > file I should try? (I've tried a couple > >? with no >? luck) Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > I do not authorize any party to give away, publish or sell this e-mail > > address. Its use is only for correspondence with me. I also do not > > consent to receiving any unsolicited e-mail from any parties. > > > > > > > > > > > > Help Can the SPAM! > >? ???Hello, > >? ???to help find the exact chip it is, can you run sane-find-scanner from > SANE 1.0.22 (just need to compile it and run the freshly compiled > sane-find- scanner from local directory without installing it). The > version you used is older. There is a possibility it is gl124 based. > >? ???Another source of information is using usbsnoop under windows and send > me the log generated when scanner is plugged in. I'd be able to check if > it is a genesys chip. > >? ???Such scanners are often clones of gt68xx supported scanner. In >? that case, > an USB log will also tell it. > > Regards, >? ???Stef ??? Hello, ??? I checked -with proper permissions- that my optic slim M12 is detected by sane-find-scanner. Since this hasn't been the case for you, I think we may rule out a gt68xx clone. With a gl124 based scanner, the chip is correctly detected. So I relally think that the last option is to use usbsnoop under windows to have a chance of identifying the asic in your scanner. Regards, ??? Stef -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110607/888c91d2/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: USBLog1.usblog Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1296 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110607/888c91d2/attachment-0001.obj>