Louis Lagendijk writes: >> > -------------------------------------------------------- >> > At openSUSE we use libusb-1 since openSUSE 12.2 >> > (i.e. we use libusb-1 since about April 2012) >> > via "configure --enable-libusb_1_0". >> > I am not aware of issues because of this. >> > -------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks! > Fedora is using libusb-1 as well. according to > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-Septemb > er/116459.html > this has been the case since at least 1.0.23/ Fedora 18 i 2013
Thanks for the feedback. BTW, I have been thinking of adding a Fedora based builder using clang and use its scan-build static analyser so that everyone can see how good/bad the code is after all the warnings are gone :-) Interested in helping out with the Dockerfile? Hope this helps, -- Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27 GnuPG key: F84A2DD9/B3C0 2F47 EA19 64F4 9F13 F43E B8A4 A88A F84A 2DD9 Support Free Software https://my.fsf.org/donate Join the Free Software Foundation https://my.fsf.org/join -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org