Louis Lagendijk writes:

>> > --------------------------------------------------------
>> > At openSUSE we use libusb-1 since openSUSE 12.2
>> > (i.e. we use libusb-1 since about April 2012)
>> > via "configure --enable-libusb_1_0".
>> > I am not aware of issues because of this.
>> > --------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks!
> Fedora is using libusb-1 as well. according to
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-Septemb
> er/116459.html
> this has been the case since at least 1.0.23/ Fedora 18 i 2013

Thanks for the feedback.

BTW, I have been thinking of adding a Fedora based builder using clang
and use its scan-build static analyser so that everyone can see how
good/bad the code is after all the warnings are gone :-)

Interested in helping out with the Dockerfile?

Hope this helps,
-- 
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2            FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27
 GnuPG key: F84A2DD9/B3C0 2F47 EA19 64F4 9F13  F43E B8A4 A88A F84A 2DD9
 Support Free Software                        https://my.fsf.org/donate
 Join the Free Software Foundation              https://my.fsf.org/join


-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
             to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Reply via email to