Hi, > One day I had the impression that using unsigned char or uint8_t worked even > if config word was bigger than 8 bits. Am I right?
That's right: the data type is ignored if the address (__at()) refers to a config location. I noticed this when I looked into the problem with the enhanced pic14-devices but decided not to change it. I do not see the "right" way: Specifying uint16_t might trick the reader into believing that 0x2007 and 0x2008 (or 0x8007/8) are set at the same time, since the __at() directive typically uses a byte-based addressing mode. I'd recommend to use a larger type (uint16_t) to prevent changes in the compiler (implicit, early range check and enforcement) from breaking the definition. Raphael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
