Results for Debian Project Leader 2024 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Apr 20 00:01:05 2024
Option 1 "Andreas Tille"
Option 2 "Sruthi Chandran"
Option 3 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 201 293
Option 2135 280
Option 3 6466
Looking at row 2, column 1, Sruthi Chandran
received 135 votes over Andreas Tille
Looking at row 1, column 2, Andreas Tille
received 201 votes over Sruthi Chandran.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 293 > 46.3788745012209
Option 2 Reached quorum: 280 > 46.3788745012209
Option 1 passes Majority. 4.578 (293/64) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.242 (280/66) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 201 - 135) = 66 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 293 - 64) = 229 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 280 - 66) = 214 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Andreas Tille"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Andreas Tille"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Andreas Tille\n4.58" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Andreas Tille\n4.58" -> "Sruthi Chandran\n4.24" [ label="66" ];
"Andreas Tille\n4.58" -> "None of the above" [ label="229" ];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.24" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.24" -> "None of the above" [ label="214" ];
"None of the above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp4ELkjaQSw4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Statement about the EU Legislation 'Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive'
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Dec 23 00:02:05 2023
Option 1 "CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS"
Option 2 "CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures"
Option 3 "The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses"
Option 4 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 7271 121
Option 2 67 73 119
Option 3 5864 114
Option 4 353239
Looking at row 2, column 1, CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to
commercial ventures
received 67 votes over CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to
FOSS
Looking at row 1, column 2, CRA and PLD proposals include regulations
detrimental to FOSS
received 72 votes over CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial
ventures.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 121 > 46.2087654022481
Option 2 Reached quorum: 119 > 46.2087654022481
Option 3 Reached quorum: 114 > 46.2087654022481
Option 1 passes Majority. 3.457 (121/35) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.719 (119/32) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 2.923 (114/39) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 72 - 67) =5 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 71 - 58) = 13 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 121 - 35) = 86 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 73 - 64) =9 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 119 - 32) = 87 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 114 - 39) = 75 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to
FOSS"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to
FOSS"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS\n3.46" [
style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg, fontcolor="NavyBlue",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS\n3.46" -> "CRA
and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures\n3.72" [ label="5" ];
"CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS\n3.46" -> "The
EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses\n2.92" [ label="13" ];
"CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to FOSS\n3.46" -> "None
of the above" [ label="86" ];
"CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures\n3.72" [
style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures\n3.72" -> "The
EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses\n2.92" [ label="9" ];
"CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures\n3.72" ->
"None of the above" [ label="87" ];
"The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses\n2.92" [ style="filled" ,
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"The EU should not overrule DFSG 6 and FOSS licenses\n2.92" -> "None of the
above" [ label="75" ];
"None of the above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpKdLohKLvUu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2023 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Apr 15 00:02:42 2023
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 2 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 259
Option 2 15
Looking at row 2, column 1, None of the above
received 15 votes over Jonathan Carter
Looking at row 1, column 2, Jonathan Carter
received 259 votes over None of the above.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 259 > 46.0624575983523
Option 1 passes Majority. 17.267 (259/15) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 259 - 15) = 244 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The total numbers of votes tallied = 279
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Jonathan Carter\n17.27" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Jonathan Carter\n17.27" -> "None of the above" [ label="244" ];
"None of the above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpPc2aTkdoi5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for non-free firmware
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 2 06:33:53 2022
Option 1 "Only one installer, including non-free firmware"
Option 2 "Recommend installer containing non-free firmware"
Option 3 "Allow presenting non-free installers alongside the free one"
Option 4 "Installer with non-free software is not part of Debian"
Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer"
Option 6 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, keep both installers"
Option 7 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
=== === === === === === ===
Option 1 158 206 27072 129 264
Option 2170 235 286 12175 291
Option 314499 294 12784 306
Option 4 806453 7455 135
Option 5229 219 229 279 169 289
Option 6216 253 266 298 163 311
Option 7 916351 1976342
Looking at row 2, column 1, Recommend installer containing non-free firmware
received 170 votes over Only one installer, including non-free firmware
Looking at row 1, column 2, Only one installer, including non-free firmware
received 158 votes over Recommend installer containing non-free firmware.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 264 > 45.8911756223351
Option 2 Reached quorum: 291 > 45.8911756223351
Option 3 Reached quorum: 306 > 45.8911756223351
Option 4 Reached quorum: 135 > 45.8911756223351
Option 5 Reached quorum: 289 > 45.8911756223351
Option 6 Reached quorum: 311 > 45.8911756223351
Option 1 passes Majority. 2.901 (264/91) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.619 (291/63) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 6.000 (306/51) >= 1
Dropping Option 4 because of Majority.
(0.6852791878172588832487309644670050761421) 0.685 (135/197) < 1
Option 5 passes Majority. 4.587 (289/63) >= 3
Option 6 passes Majority. 7.405 (311/42) >= 3
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 170 - 158) = 12 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 206 - 144) = 62 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 1 by ( 229 - 72) = 157 votes.
Option 6 defeats Option 1 by ( 216 - 129) = 87 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 7 by ( 264 - 91) = 173 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 235 - 99) = 136 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 2 by ( 219 - 121) = 98 votes.
Option 6 defeats Option 2 by ( 253 - 75) = 178 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 7 by ( 291 - 63) = 228 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 3 by ( 229 - 127) = 102 votes.
Option 6 defeats Option 3 by ( 266 - 84) = 182 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 7 by ( 306 - 51) = 255 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 6 by ( 169 - 163) =6 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 7 by ( 289 - 63) = 226 votes.
Option 6 defeats Option 7 by ( 311 - 42) = 269 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Only one installer, including non-free firmware\n2.90" [ style="filled" ,
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Only one installer, including non-free firmware\n2.90" -> "Allow presenting
non-free installers alongside the free one\n6.00" [ label="62" ];
"Only one installer, including non-free firmware\n2.90" -> "None of the above"
[ label="173" ];
"Recommend installer containing non-free firmware\n4.62" [ style="filled" ,
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Recommend installer containing non-free firmware\n4.62" -> "Only one
installer, including non-free firmware\n2.90" [ label="12" ];
"Recommend installer containing non-free firmware\n4.62" -> "Allow presenting
non-free installers alongsid
Results for Debian Project Leader 2022 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 17 00:00:19 2022
Option 1 "Felix Lechner"
Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 3 "Hideki Yamane"
Option 4 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 5284 151
Option 2294 266 327
Option 322969 290
Option 41882253
Looking at row 2, column 1, Jonathan Carter
received 294 votes over Felix Lechner
Looking at row 1, column 2, Felix Lechner
received 52 votes over Jonathan Carter.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 151 > 45.8421203698084
Option 2 Reached quorum: 327 > 45.8421203698084
Option 3 Reached quorum: 290 > 45.8421203698084
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority.
(0.8031914893617021276595744680851063829787) 0.803 (151/188) < 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 14.864 (327/22) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 5.472 (290/53) >= 1
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 266 - 69) = 197 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 327 - 22) = 305 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 290 - 53) = 237 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The total numbers of votes tallied = 354
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Felix Lechner\n0.80" [ style="filled" , color="pink", shape=octagon,
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"None of the above" -> "Felix Lechner\n0.80" [ label="37" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.86" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.86" -> "Hideki Yamane\n5.47" [ label="197" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.86" -> "None of the above" [ label="305" ];
"Hideki Yamane\n5.47" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Hideki Yamane\n5.47" -> "None of the above" [ label="237" ];
"None of the above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpwHyyLlpCHV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Voting secrecy
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Mar 27 00:00:09 2022
Option 1 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote"
Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow
verification"
Option 3 "Reaffirm public voting"
Option 4 "None of the above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 72 114 149
Option 2144 142 185
Option 3137 107 163
Option 4 946168
Looking at row 2, column 1, Hide identities of Developers casting a particular
vote and allow verification
received 144 votes over Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote
Looking at row 1, column 2, Hide identities of Developers casting a particular
vote
received 72 votes over Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote
and allow verification.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 149 > 45.8421203698084
Option 2 Reached quorum: 185 > 45.8421203698084
Option 3 Reached quorum: 163 > 45.8421203698084
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority.
(1.585106382978723404255319148936170212766) 1.585 (149/94) < 3
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.033 (185/61) >= 3
Option 3 passes Majority. 2.397 (163/68) >= 1
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 142 - 107) = 35 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 185 - 61) = 124 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 163 - 68) = 95 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and
allow verification"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and
allow verification"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote\n1.59" [
style="filled" , color="pink", shape=octagon, fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"None of the above" -> "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular
vote\n1.59" [ label="-55" ];
"Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow
verification\n3.03" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow
verification\n3.03" -> "Reaffirm public voting\n2.40" [ label="35" ];
"Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow
verification\n3.03" -> "None of the above" [ label="124" ];
"Reaffirm public voting\n2.40" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
"Reaffirm public voting\n2.40" -> "None of the above" [ label="95" ];
"None of the above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpmTrwb7oX1c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Change the resolution process
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Jan 29 00:00:09 2022
Option 1 "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period"
Option 2 "Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period"
Option 3 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 107 180
Option 2 82 188
Option 3 2417
Looking at row 2, column 1, Amend resolution process, allow extension of
discussion period
received 82 votes over Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period
Looking at row 1, column 2, Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion
period
received 107 votes over Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion
period.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 180 > 45.7930125674212
Option 2 Reached quorum: 188 > 45.7930125674212
Option 1 passes Majority. 7.500 (180/24) >= 3
Option 2 passes Majority. 11.059 (188/17) >= 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 107 - 82) = 25 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 180 - 24) = 156 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 188 - 17) = 171 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period\n7.50" [
style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg, fontcolor="NavyBlue",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period\n7.50" -> "Amend
resolution process, allow extension of discussion period\n11.06" [ label="25" ];
"Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period\n7.50" -> "Further
Discussion" [ label="156" ];
"Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period\n11.06" [
style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period\n11.06" ->
"Further Discussion" [ label="171" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpzp207GXkYD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2021 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 18 00:00:43 2021
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 2 "Sruthi Chandran"
Option 3 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 312 421
Option 2102 341
Option 3 3081
Looking at row 2, column 1, Sruthi Chandran
received 102 votes over Jonathan Carter
Looking at row 1, column 2, Jonathan Carter
received 312 votes over Sruthi Chandran.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 421 > 45.6453721641088
Option 2 Reached quorum: 341 > 45.6453721641088
Option 1 passes Majority. 14.033 (421/30) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.210 (341/81) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 312 - 102) = 210 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 421 - 30) = 391 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 341 - 81) = 260 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" -> "Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" [ label="210" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="391" ];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="260" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgppT05R7A76g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 18 00:00:26 2021
Option 1 "Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io"
Option 2 "Call for Stallman's resignation from all FSF bodies"
Option 3 "Discourage collaboration with the FSF while Stallman is in a leading
position"
Option 4 "Call on the FSF to further its governance processes"
Option 5 "Support Stallman's reinstatement, as in rms-support-letter.github.io"
Option 6 "Denounce the witch-hunt against RMS and the FSF"
Option 7 "Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue"
Option 8 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
=== === === === === === === ===
Option 1 113 139 146 218 209 178 203
Option 2137 168 165 239 227 199 222
Option 313190 150 246 235 199 219
Option 4156 132 140 259 245 196 221
Option 5 65575745 591952
Option 6103979277 114 3084
Option 7223 207 203 197 350 339 277
Option 8186 166 173 164 328 301 124
Looking at row 2, column 1, Call for Stallman's resignation from all FSF bodies
received 137 votes over Call for the FSF board removal, as in
rms-open-letter.github.io
Looking at row 1, column 2, Call for the FSF board removal, as in
rms-open-letter.github.io
received 113 votes over Call for Stallman's resignation from all FSF bodies.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 203 > 45.6453721641088
Option 2 Reached quorum: 222 > 45.6453721641088
Option 3 Reached quorum: 219 > 45.6453721641088
Option 4 Reached quorum: 221 > 45.6453721641088
Option 5 Reached quorum: 52 > 45.6453721641088
Option 6 Reached quorum: 84 > 45.6453721641088
Option 7 Reached quorum: 277 > 45.6453721641088
Option 1 passes Majority. 1.091 (203/186) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 1.337 (222/166) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 1.266 (219/173) >= 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 1.348 (221/164) >= 1
Dropping Option 5 because of Majority.
(0.1585365853658536585365853658536585365854) 0.159 (52/328) < 1
Dropping Option 6 because of Majority.
(0.2790697674418604651162790697674418604651) 0.279 (84/301) < 1
Option 7 passes Majority. 2.234 (277/124) >= 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 137 - 113) = 24 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 139 - 131) =8 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 156 - 146) = 10 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 1 by ( 223 - 178) = 45 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 8 by ( 203 - 186) = 17 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 168 - 90) = 78 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 165 - 132) = 33 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 2 by ( 207 - 199) =8 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 8 by ( 222 - 166) = 56 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 150 - 140) = 10 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 3 by ( 203 - 199) =4 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 8 by ( 219 - 173) = 46 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 4 by ( 197 - 196) =1 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 8 by ( 221 - 164) = 57 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 8 by ( 277 - 124) = 153 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 7 "Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 7 "Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io\n1.09" [
style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io\n1.09" ->
"Discourage collaboration with the FSF while Stallman is in a leading
position\n1.27" [ label="8" ];
"Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io\n1.09" ->
"Call on the FSF to f
Results for Debian Project Leader 2021 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 18 00:00:11 2021
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 2 "Sruthi Chandran"
Option 3 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 312 421
Option 2102 341
Option 3 3081
Looking at row 2, column 1, Sruthi Chandran
received 102 votes over Jonathan Carter
Looking at row 1, column 2, Jonathan Carter
received 312 votes over Sruthi Chandran.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 421 > 45.6453721641088
Option 2 Reached quorum: 341 > 45.6453721641088
Option 1 passes Majority. 14.033 (421/30) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.210 (341/81) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 312 - 102) = 210 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 421 - 30) = 391 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 341 - 81) = 260 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" -> "Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" [ label="210" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n14.03" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="391" ];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Sruthi Chandran\n4.21" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="260" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpoDPUeD2K2d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2020 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 19 00:00:07 2020
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 2 "Sruthi Chandran"
Option 3 "Brian Gupta"
Option 4 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 258 281 301
Option 2 57 163 244
Option 3 40 114 194
Option 4 3476 125
Looking at row 2, column 1, Sruthi Chandran
received 57 votes over Jonathan Carter
Looking at row 1, column 2, Jonathan Carter
received 258 votes over Sruthi Chandran.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 301 > 45.3982378512647
Option 2 Reached quorum: 244 > 45.3982378512647
Option 3 Reached quorum: 194 > 45.3982378512647
Option 1 passes Majority. 8.853 (301/34) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.211 (244/76) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 1.552 (194/125) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 258 - 57) = 201 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 281 - 40) = 241 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 301 - 34) = 267 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 163 - 114) = 49 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 244 - 76) = 168 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 194 - 125) = 69 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Jonathan Carter"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Jonathan Carter\n8.85" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Jonathan Carter\n8.85" -> "Sruthi Chandran\n3.21" [ label="201" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n8.85" -> "Brian Gupta\n1.55" [ label="241" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n8.85" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="267" ];
"Sruthi Chandran\n3.21" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Sruthi Chandran\n3.21" -> "Brian Gupta\n1.55" [ label="49" ];
"Sruthi Chandran\n3.21" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="168" ];
"Brian Gupta\n1.55" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Brian Gupta\n1.55" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="69" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpE4uf0fFZoU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Init systems and systemd
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Dec 28 00:00:29 2019
Option 1 "F: Focus on systemd"
Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"
Option 3 "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important"
Option 4 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress"
Option 5 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress"
Option 6 "E: Support for multiple init systems is Required"
Option 7 "G: Support portability and multiple implementations"
Option 8 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
=== === === === === === === ===
Option 1 185 246 223 227 278 243 307
Option 2207 243 211 216 286 240 299
Option 3159 131 113 120 250 165 225
Option 4192 177 235 137 309 261 281
Option 5187 168 222 163 301 246 271
Option 6116 104885351 121 173
Option 7168 145 1769391 207 216
Option 8110 111 166 114 124 214 168
Looking at row 2, column 1, B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
received 207 votes over F: Focus on systemd
Looking at row 1, column 2, F: Focus on systemd
received 185 votes over B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 307 > 45.224440295044
Option 2 Reached quorum: 299 > 45.224440295044
Option 3 Reached quorum: 225 > 45.224440295044
Option 4 Reached quorum: 281 > 45.224440295044
Option 5 Reached quorum: 271 > 45.224440295044
Option 6 Reached quorum: 173 > 45.224440295044
Option 7 Reached quorum: 216 > 45.224440295044
Option 1 passes Majority. 2.791 (307/110) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 2.694 (299/111) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 1.355 (225/166) >= 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 2.465 (281/114) >= 1
Option 5 passes Majority. 2.185 (271/124) >= 1
Dropping Option 6 because of Majority.
(0.8084112149532710280373831775700934579439) 0.808 (173/214) < 1
Option 7 passes Majority. 1.286 (216/168) >= 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 207 - 185) = 22 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 246 - 159) = 87 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 223 - 192) = 31 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 227 - 187) = 40 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 7 by ( 243 - 168) = 75 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 8 by ( 307 - 110) = 197 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 243 - 131) = 112 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 211 - 177) = 34 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 216 - 168) = 48 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 7 by ( 240 - 145) = 95 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 8 by ( 299 - 111) = 188 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 235 - 113) = 122 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 3 by ( 222 - 120) = 102 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 3 by ( 176 - 165) = 11 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 8 by ( 225 - 166) = 59 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 4 by ( 163 - 137) = 26 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 7 by ( 261 - 93) = 168 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 8 by ( 281 - 114) = 167 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 7 by ( 246 - 91) = 155 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 8 by ( 271 - 124) = 147 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 8 by ( 216 - 168) = 48 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
"F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is
Important\n1.36" [ label="87" ];
"F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "D: Support non-systemd systems, without
blocking progress\n2.46"
Results for Debian Project Leader 2019 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 21 00:00:04 2019
Option 1 "Joerg Jaspert"
Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
Option 4 "Martin Michlmayr"
Option 5 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 1 169 128 169 319
Option 2166 109 172 323
Option 3217 206 202 336
Option 4180 174 134 324
Option 5 51372635
Looking at row 2, column 1, Jonathan Carter
received 166 votes over Joerg Jaspert
Looking at row 1, column 2, Joerg Jaspert
received 169 votes over Jonathan Carter.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 319 > 45.0249930594109
Option 2 Reached quorum: 323 > 45.0249930594109
Option 3 Reached quorum: 336 > 45.0249930594109
Option 4 Reached quorum: 324 > 45.0249930594109
Option 1 passes Majority. 6.255 (319/51) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 8.730 (323/37) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 12.923 (336/26) >= 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 9.257 (324/35) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 169 - 166) =3 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 217 - 128) = 89 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 180 - 169) = 11 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 319 - 51) = 268 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 206 - 109) = 97 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 174 - 172) =2 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 323 - 37) = 286 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 202 - 134) = 68 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 336 - 26) = 310 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 324 - 35) = 289 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The total numbers of votes tallied = 378
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="3" ];
"Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="268" ];
"Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Jonathan Carter\n8.73" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="286" ];
"Sam Hartman\n12.92" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ label="89" ];
"Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="97" ];
"Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" [ label="68" ];
"Sam Hartman\n12.92" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="310" ];
"Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10
];
"Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "Joerg Jaspert\n6.25" [ label="11" ];
"Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "Jonathan Carter\n8.73" [ label="2" ];
"Martin Michlmayr\n9.26" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="289" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpjSkuvEzATg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2018 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Tue Apr 17 00:00:17 2018
Option 1 "Chris Lamb"
Option 2 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 315
Option 2 14
Looking at row 2, column 1, None Of The Above
received 14 votes over Chris Lamb
Looking at row 1, column 2, Chris Lamb
received 315 votes over None Of The Above.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 315 > 44.5477272147525
Option 1 passes Majority. 22.500 (315/14) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 315 - 14) = 301 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Chris Lamb"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Chris Lamb"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The total numbers of votes tallied = 333
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Chris Lamb\n22.50" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Chris Lamb\n22.50" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="301" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp25oTYL7oUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2017 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 16 00:00:13 2017
Option 1 "Mehdi Dogguy"
Option 2 "Chris Lamb"
Option 3 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 132 299
Option 2163 303
Option 3 1712
Looking at row 2, column 1, Chris Lamb
received 163 votes over Mehdi Dogguy
Looking at row 1, column 2, Mehdi Dogguy
received 132 votes over Chris Lamb.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 299 > 44.2690636901211
Option 2 Reached quorum: 303 > 44.2690636901211
Option 1 passes Majority. 17.588 (299/17) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 25.250 (303/12) >= 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 163 - 132) = 31 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 299 - 17) = 282 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 303 - 12) = 291 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Chris Lamb"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Chris Lamb"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Mehdi Dogguy\n17.59" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Mehdi Dogguy\n17.59" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="282" ];
"Chris Lamb\n25.25" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Chris Lamb\n25.25" -> "Mehdi Dogguy\n17.59" [ label="31" ];
"Chris Lamb\n25.25" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="291" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpZ39gx4Qo43.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Declassifying debian-private
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 23 00:00:04 2016
Option 1 "Repeal previous GR"
Option 2 "Acknowledge difficulty"
Option 3 "Remain private"
Option 4 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 13783 188
Option 2 83 71 156
Option 3130 148 186
Option 4 376744
Looking at row 2, column 1, Acknowledge difficulty
received 83 votes over Repeal previous GR
Looking at row 1, column 2, Repeal previous GR
received 137 votes over Acknowledge difficulty.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 188 > 43.6806593356831
Option 2 Reached quorum: 156 > 43.6806593356831
Option 3 Reached quorum: 186 > 43.6806593356831
Option 1 passes Majority. 5.081 (188/37) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 2.328 (156/67) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 4.227 (186/44) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 137 - 83) = 54 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 130 - 83) = 47 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 188 - 37) = 151 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 148 - 71) = 77 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 156 - 67) = 89 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 186 - 44) = 142 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 3 "Remain private"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 3 "Remain private"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Repeal previous GR\n5.08" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
"Repeal previous GR\n5.08" -> "Acknowledge difficulty\n2.33" [ label="54" ];
"Repeal previous GR\n5.08" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="151" ];
"Acknowledge difficulty\n2.33" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
"Acknowledge difficulty\n2.33" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="89" ];
"Remain private\n4.23" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Remain private\n4.23" -> "Repeal previous GR\n5.08" [ label="47" ];
"Remain private\n4.23" -> "Acknowledge difficulty\n2.33" [ label="77" ];
"Remain private\n4.23" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="142" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgphXYt06LhGH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Declassifying debian-private
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Aug 21 00:00:12 2016
Option 1 "Allow declassifying parts of debian-private"
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 118
Option 2134
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 134 votes over Allow declassifying parts of debian-private
Looking at row 1, column 2, Allow declassifying parts of debian-private
received 118 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 118 > 43.6548966325657
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority.
(0.880597014925373134328358208955223880597) 0.881 (118/134) < 1
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Allow declassifying parts of debian-private\n0.88" [ style="filled" ,
color="pink", shape=octagon, fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Further Discussion" -> "Allow declassifying parts of debian-private\n0.88" [
label="16" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red", fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpCoIehm_551.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Replace Chairman with Chair throughout the Debian Constitution
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Aug 14 00:00:16 2016
Option 1 "Replace Chairman with Chair"
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 289
Option 2 13
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 13 votes over Replace Chairman with Chair
Looking at row 1, column 2, Replace Chairman with Chair
received 289 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 289 > 43.6548966325657
Option 1 passes Majority. 22.231 (289/13) >= 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 289 - 13) = 276 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Replace Chairman with Chair"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Replace Chairman with Chair"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Replace Chairman with Chair\n22.23" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue",
shape=egg, fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Replace Chairman with Chair\n22.23" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="276" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp1Y0r9uA1Zp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Declassifying debian-private
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Aug 14 00:00:23 2016
Option 1 "Allow declassifying parts of debian-private"
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 86
Option 2 98
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 98 votes over Allow declassifying parts of debian-private
Looking at row 1, column 2, Allow declassifying parts of debian-private
received 86 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 86 > 43.6548966325657
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority.
(0.8775510204081632653061224489795918367347) 0.878 (86/98) < 1
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Allow declassifying parts of debian-private\n0.88" [ style="filled" ,
color="pink", shape=octagon, fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Further Discussion" -> "Allow declassifying parts of debian-private\n0.88" [
label="12" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red", fontname="Helvetica",
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpT_49AIoUcj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2016 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 17 00:00:04 2016
Option 1 "Mehdi Dogguy"
Option 2 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 265
Option 2 13
Looking at row 2, column 1, None Of The Above
received 13 votes over Mehdi Dogguy
Looking at row 1, column 2, Mehdi Dogguy
received 265 votes over None Of The Above.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 265 > 43.0058135604944
Option 1 passes Majority. 20.385 (265/13) >= 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 265 - 13) = 252 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Mehdi Dogguy"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Mehdi Dogguy"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Mehdi Dogguy\n20.38" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Mehdi Dogguy\n20.38" -> "None Of The Above" [ label="252" ];
"None Of The Above" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpsezsXvn2yJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Update Standard Resolution Procedure
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Dec 13 00:00:04 2015
Option 1 "Accept amendment"
Option 2 "Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 208
Option 2 3
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 3 votes over Accept amendment
Looking at row 1, column 2, Accept amendment
received 208 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 208 > 0
Option 1 passes Majority. 69.333 (208/3) >= 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 208 -3) = 205 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Accept amendment"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Accept amendment"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
"Accept amendment\n69.33" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg,
fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
"Accept amendment\n69.33" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="205" ];
"Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red",
fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpMbc1E4AKI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2015 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Wed Apr 15 00:00:04 2015
Option 1 Mehdi Dogguy
Option 2 Gergely Nagy
Option 3 Neil McGovern
Option 4 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 260 119 325
Option 2 47 52 263
Option 3203 278 314
Option 4 217429
Looking at row 2, column 1, Gergely Nagy
received 47 votes over Mehdi Dogguy
Looking at row 1, column 2, Mehdi Dogguy
received 260 votes over Gergely Nagy.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 325 41.4336819507994
Option 2 Reached quorum: 263 41.4336819507994
Option 3 Reached quorum: 314 41.4336819507994
Option 1 passes Majority. 15.476 (325/21) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.554 (263/74) = 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 10.828 (314/29) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 260 - 47) = 213 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 203 - 119) = 84 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 325 - 21) = 304 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 278 - 52) = 226 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 263 - 74) = 189 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 314 - 29) = 285 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 3 Neil McGovern
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 3 Neil McGovern
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Mehdi Dogguy\n15.48 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Mehdi Dogguy\n15.48 - Gergely Nagy\n3.55 [ label=213 ];
Mehdi Dogguy\n15.48 - None Of The Above [ label=304 ];
Gergely Nagy\n3.55 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Gergely Nagy\n3.55 - None Of The Above [ label=189 ];
Neil McGovern\n10.83 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Neil McGovern\n10.83 - Mehdi Dogguy\n15.48 [ label=84 ];
Neil McGovern\n10.83 - Gergely Nagy\n3.55 [ label=226 ];
Neil McGovern\n10.83 - None Of The Above [ label=285 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp80N0_7HhoV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Limiting the term of the technical committee membersStart_Time = 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Fri Jan 9 00:00:07 2015
Option 1 Option 1
Option 2 Option 2
Option 3 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 133 208
Option 2 75 196
Option 3 2536
Looking at row 2, column 1, Option 2
received 75 votes over Option 1
Looking at row 1, column 2, Option 1
received 133 votes over Option 2.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 208 40.5277682583189
Option 2 Reached quorum: 196 40.5277682583189
Option 1 passes Majority. 8.320 (208/25) = 3
Option 2 passes Majority. 5.444 (196/36) = 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 133 - 75) = 58 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 208 - 25) = 183 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 196 - 36) = 160 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Option 1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Option 1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Option 1\n8.32 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Option 1\n8.32 - Option 2\n5.44 [ label=58 ];
Option 1\n8.32 - Further Discussion [ label=183 ];
Option 2\n5.44 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Option 2\n5.44 - Further Discussion [ label=160 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpc_teKwbn2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for init system coupling
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Wed Nov 19 00:02:03 2014
Option 1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
Option 2 Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory
Option 3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide
Option 4 General Resolution is not required
Option 5 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 1 133 183 147 241
Option 2313 251 180 366
Option 3263 172 135 286
Option 4323 280 308 358
Option 521299 16695
Looking at row 2, column 1, Support for other init systems is recommended, but
not mandatory
received 313 votes over Packages may not (in general) require a specific init
system
Looking at row 1, column 2, Packages may not (in general) require a specific
init system
received 133 votes over Support for other init systems is recommended, but not
mandatory.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 241 47.5762545814611
Option 2 Reached quorum: 366 47.5762545814611
Option 3 Reached quorum: 286 47.5762545814611
Option 4 Reached quorum: 358 47.5762545814611
Option 1 passes Majority. 1.137 (241/212) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.697 (366/99) = 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 1.723 (286/166) = 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 3.768 (358/95) = 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 313 - 133) = 180 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 263 - 183) = 80 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 323 - 147) = 176 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 241 - 212) = 29 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 251 - 172) = 79 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 280 - 180) = 100 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 366 - 99) = 267 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 308 - 135) = 173 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 286 - 166) = 120 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 358 - 95) = 263 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 4 General Resolution is not required
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 4 General Resolution is not required
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system\n1.14 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system\n1.14 -
Further Discussion [ label=29 ];
Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory\n3.70 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory\n3.70 -
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system\n1.14 [
label=180 ];
Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory\n3.70 -
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide\n1.72 [
label=79 ];
Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory\n3.70 -
Further Discussion [ label=267 ];
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide\n1.72 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide\n1.72 -
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system\n1.14 [
label=80 ];
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide\n1.72 -
Further Discussion [ label=120 ];
General Resolution is not required\n3.77 [ style=filled ,
color=powderblue, shape=egg, fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
General Resolution is not required\n3.77 - Packages may not (in general)
require a specific init system\n1.14 [ label=176 ];
General Resolution is not required\n3.77 - Support for other init systems
is recommended, but not mandatory\n3.70 [ label=100 ];
General Resolution is not required\n3.77 - Packages may require specific
init systems if maintainers decide\n1.72 [ label=173 ];
General Resolution is not required\n3.77 - Further Discussion [
label=263 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgptj4wmwlebc.pgp
Results for init system coupling
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Tue Nov 4 14:42:41 2014
Option 1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
Option 2 Support alternative init systems as much as possible
Option 3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide
Option 4 General Resolution is not required
Option 5 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 10 0 0 0
Option 2 0 0 0 0
Option 3 0 0 0 0
Option 4 0 0 0 0
Option 5 0 0 0 0
Looking at row 2, column 1, Support alternative init systems as much as possible
received 0 votes over Packages may not (in general) require a specific init
system
Looking at row 1, column 2, Packages may not (in general) require a specific
init system
received 0 votes over Support alternative init systems as much as possible.
Dropping Option1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
because of Quorum
Dropping Option2 Support alternative init systems as much as possible because
of Quorum
Dropping Option3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers
decide because of Quorum
Dropping Option4 General Resolution is not required because of Quorum
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 5 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 5 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Support alternative init systems as much as possible [ style=filled ,
color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
General Resolution is not required [ style=filled , color=pink,
shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpkzCluLKWXu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for init system coupling
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Tue Nov 4 14:43:12 2014
Option 1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
Option 2 Support alternative init systems as much as possible
Option 3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide
Option 4 General Resolution is not required
Option 5 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 10 0 0 0
Option 2 0 0 0 0
Option 3 0 0 0 0
Option 4 0 0 0 0
Option 5 0 0 0 0
Looking at row 2, column 1, Support alternative init systems as much as possible
received 0 votes over Packages may not (in general) require a specific init
system
Looking at row 1, column 2, Packages may not (in general) require a specific
init system
received 0 votes over Support alternative init systems as much as possible.
Dropping Option1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
because of Quorum
Dropping Option2 Support alternative init systems as much as possible because
of Quorum
Dropping Option3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers
decide because of Quorum
Dropping Option4 General Resolution is not required because of Quorum
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 5 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 5 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Support alternative init systems as much as possible [ style=filled ,
color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
General Resolution is not required [ style=filled , color=pink,
shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpNwdplsN8nc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Code of conduct
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Mon Apr 28 00:00:04 2014
Option 1 Accept CoC, DPL can update it
Option 2 Accept CoC, updates via GR
Option 3 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 128 205
Option 2141 228
Option 3 7253
Looking at row 2, column 1, Accept CoC, updates via GR
received 141 votes over Accept CoC, DPL can update it
Looking at row 1, column 2, Accept CoC, DPL can update it
received 128 votes over Accept CoC, updates via GR.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 205 47.4815753740332
Option 2 Reached quorum: 228 47.4815753740332
Option 1 passes Majority. 2.847 (205/72) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.302 (228/53) = 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 141 - 128) = 13 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 205 - 72) = 133 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 228 - 53) = 175 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 Accept CoC, updates via GR
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 Accept CoC, updates via GR
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Accept CoC, DPL can update it\n2.85 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Accept CoC, DPL can update it\n2.85 - Further Discussion [ label=133 ];
Accept CoC, updates via GR\n4.30 [ style=filled , color=powderblue,
shape=egg, fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Accept CoC, updates via GR\n4.30 - Accept CoC, DPL can update it\n2.85 [
label=13 ];
Accept CoC, updates via GR\n4.30 - Further Discussion [ label=175 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpQRoymAjRi4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2014 ElectionStart_Time = 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Mon Apr 14 00:00:17 2014
Option 1 Lucas Nussbaum
Option 2 Neil McGovern
Option 3 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 205 364
Option 2158 363
Option 3 3128
Looking at row 2, column 1, Neil McGovern
received 158 votes over Lucas Nussbaum
Looking at row 1, column 2, Lucas Nussbaum
received 205 votes over Neil McGovern.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 364 47.5052628663394
Option 2 Reached quorum: 363 47.5052628663394
Option 1 passes Majority. 11.742 (364/31) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 12.964 (363/28) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 205 - 158) = 47 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 364 - 31) = 333 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 363 - 28) = 335 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Lucas Nussbaum
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Lucas Nussbaum
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.74 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.74 - Neil McGovern\n12.96 [ label=47 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.74 - None Of The Above [ label=333 ];
Neil McGovern\n12.96 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Neil McGovern\n12.96 - None Of The Above [ label=335 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp1jiGTwA56J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2013 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 14 00:00:03 2013
Option 1 Gergely Nagy
Option 2 Moray Allan
Option 3 Lucas Nussbaum
Option 4 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 8862 319
Option 2252 141 355
Option 3279 210 353
Option 4 512430
Looking at row 2, column 1, Moray Allan
received 252 votes over Gergely Nagy
Looking at row 1, column 2, Gergely Nagy
received 88 votes over Moray Allan.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 319 47.1487009365051
Option 2 Reached quorum: 355 47.1487009365051
Option 3 Reached quorum: 353 47.1487009365051
Option 1 passes Majority. 6.255 (319/51) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 14.792 (355/24) = 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 11.767 (353/30) = 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 252 - 88) = 164 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 279 - 62) = 217 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 319 - 51) = 268 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 210 - 141) = 69 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 355 - 24) = 331 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 353 - 30) = 323 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 3 Lucas Nussbaum
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 3 Lucas Nussbaum
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Gergely Nagy\n6.25 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Gergely Nagy\n6.25 - None Of The Above [ label=268 ];
Moray Allan\n14.79 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Moray Allan\n14.79 - Gergely Nagy\n6.25 [ label=164 ];
Moray Allan\n14.79 - None Of The Above [ label=331 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.77 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.77 - Gergely Nagy\n6.25 [ label=217 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.77 - Moray Allan\n14.79 [ label=69 ];
Lucas Nussbaum\n11.77 - None Of The Above [ label=323 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpCiOYsLm8rH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Diversity statement
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Jun 3 00:00:06 2012
Option 1 Ratify diversity statement
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 251
Option 2 19
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 19 votes over Ratify diversity statement
Looking at row 1, column 2, Ratify diversity statement
received 251 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 251 46.2574318353278
Option 1 passes Majority. 13.211 (251/19) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 251 - 19) = 232 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Ratify diversity statement
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Ratify diversity statement
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Ratify diversity statement\n13.21 [ style=filled , color=powderblue,
shape=egg, fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Ratify diversity statement\n13.21 - Further Discussion [ label=232 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpWP3EM1tjc3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2012 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 15 00:00:52 2012
Option 1 Wouter Verhelst
Option 2 Gergely Nagy
Option 3 Stefano Zacchiroli
Option 4 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 20337 310
Option 2 97 34 281
Option 3347 354 385
Option 4 607812
Looking at row 2, column 1, Gergely Nagy
received 97 votes over Wouter Verhelst
Looking at row 1, column 2, Wouter Verhelst
received 203 votes over Gergely Nagy.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 310 46.184412955022
Option 2 Reached quorum: 281 46.184412955022
Option 3 Reached quorum: 385 46.184412955022
Option 1 passes Majority. 5.167 (310/60) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.603 (281/78) = 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 32.083 (385/12) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 203 - 97) = 106 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 347 - 37) = 310 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 310 - 60) = 250 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 354 - 34) = 320 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 281 - 78) = 203 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 385 - 12) = 373 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 3 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 3 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Wouter Verhelst\n5.17 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Wouter Verhelst\n5.17 - Gergely Nagy\n3.60 [ label=106 ];
Wouter Verhelst\n5.17 - None Of The Above [ label=250 ];
Gergely Nagy\n3.60 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Gergely Nagy\n3.60 - None Of The Above [ label=203 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n32.08 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n32.08 - Wouter Verhelst\n5.17 [ label=310 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n32.08 - Gergely Nagy\n3.60 [ label=320 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n32.08 - None Of The Above [ label=373 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpLfHq7JFpec.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2011 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sat Apr 16 00:00:13 2011
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
Option 2 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 385
Option 2 5
Looking at row 2, column 1, None Of The Above
received 5 votes over Stefano Zacchiroli
Looking at row 1, column 2, Stefano Zacchiroli
received 385 votes over None Of The Above.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 385 45.2741648183597
Option 1 passes Majority. 77.000 (385/5) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 385 -5) = 380 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Stefano Zacchiroli\n77.00 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n77.00 - None Of The Above [ label=380 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpoZC397q5OK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian project members
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Tue Oct 19 10:00:39 2010
Option 1 Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 285
Option 2 14
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 14 votes over Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members
Looking at row 1, column 2, Welcome non-packaging contributors as project
members
received 285 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 285 44.7744346697979
Option 1 passes Majority. 20.357 (285/14) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 285 - 14) = 271 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members\n20.36 [
style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg, fontcolor=NavyBlue,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Welcome non-packaging contributors as project members\n20.36 - Further
Discussion [ label=271 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgprNEUdLjntS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2010 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Fri Apr 16 16:47:16 2010
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
Option 2 Wouter Verhelst
Option 3 Charles Plessy
Option 4 Margarita Manterola
Option 5 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5
=== === === === ===
Option 1 300 373 271 395
Option 2102 334 177 375
Option 3 3347 53 217
Option 4124 207 332 366
Option 5 2839 18348
Looking at row 2, column 1, Wouter Verhelst
received 102 votes over Stefano Zacchiroli
Looking at row 1, column 2, Stefano Zacchiroli
received 300 votes over Wouter Verhelst.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 395 44.6486281984117
Option 2 Reached quorum: 375 44.6486281984117
Option 3 Reached quorum: 217 44.6486281984117
Option 4 Reached quorum: 366 44.6486281984117
Option 1 passes Majority. 14.107 (395/28) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 9.615 (375/39) = 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 1.186 (217/183) = 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 7.625 (366/48) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 300 - 102) = 198 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 373 - 33) = 340 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 271 - 124) = 147 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 395 - 28) = 367 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 334 - 47) = 287 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 207 - 177) = 30 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 375 - 39) = 336 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 332 - 53) = 279 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 217 - 183) = 34 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 366 - 48) = 318 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.11 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.11 - Wouter Verhelst\n9.62 [ label=198 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.11 - Charles Plessy\n1.19 [ label=340 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.11 - Margarita Manterola\n7.62 [ label=147 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.11 - None Of The Above [ label=367 ];
Wouter Verhelst\n9.62 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Wouter Verhelst\n9.62 - Charles Plessy\n1.19 [ label=287 ];
Wouter Verhelst\n9.62 - None Of The Above [ label=336 ];
Charles Plessy\n1.19 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Charles Plessy\n1.19 - None Of The Above [ label=34 ];
Margarita Manterola\n7.62 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Margarita Manterola\n7.62 - Wouter Verhelst\n9.62 [ label=30 ];
Margarita Manterola\n7.62 - Charles Plessy\n1.19 [ label=279 ];
Margarita Manterola\n7.62 - None Of The Above [ label=318 ];
None Of The Above [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgprVaFpJPdP4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2009 Election
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 12 00:01:06 2009
Option 1 Stefano Zacchiroli
Option 2 Steve McIntyre
Option 3 None Of The Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 142 323
Option 2185 329
Option 3 2322
Looking at row 2, column 1, Steve McIntyre
received 185 votes over Stefano Zacchiroli
Looking at row 1, column 2, Stefano Zacchiroli
received 142 votes over Steve McIntyre.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 323 47.7414913885186
Option 2 Reached quorum: 329 47.7414913885186
Option 1 passes Majority. 14.043 (323/23) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 14.955 (329/22) = 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 185 - 142) = 43 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 323 - 23) = 300 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 329 - 22) = 307 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 Steve McIntyre
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 Steve McIntyre
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.04 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.04 - None Of The Above
[ label=300 ];
Steve McIntyre\n14.95 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Steve McIntyre\n14.95 - Stefano Zacchiroli\n14.04 [ label=43 ];
Steve McIntyre\n14.95 - None Of The Above
[ label=307 ];
None Of The Above
[ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgppASQ7bE7di.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for General Resolution: Lenny and resolving DFSG violations
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Dec 28 00:03:02 2008
Option 1 Reaffirm the Social Contract
Option 2 Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]
Option 3 Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations [3:1]
Option 4 Empower the release team to decide about allowing DFSG violations
[3:1]
Option 5 Assume blobs comply with GPL unless proven otherwise
Option 6 Exclude source requirements for firmware (defined) [3:1]
Option 7 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
=== === === === === === ===
Option 1 4660727389 117
Option 2281 160 160 171 177 224
Option 325561 125 137 151 204
Option 4253 121 146 160 166 194
Option 5234 105 128 135 136 191
Option 6220 118 134 125 134 180
Option 7226 129 145 153 160 169
Looking at row 2, column 1, Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware
[3:1]
received 281 votes over Reaffirm the Social Contract
Looking at row 1, column 2, Reaffirm the Social Contract
received 46 votes over Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1].
Option 1 Reached quorum: 117 47.8591684006314
Option 2 Reached quorum: 224 47.8591684006314
Option 3 Reached quorum: 204 47.8591684006314
Option 4 Reached quorum: 194 47.8591684006314
Option 5 Reached quorum: 191 47.8591684006314
Option 6 Reached quorum: 180 47.8591684006314
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority.
(0.5176991150442477876106194690265486725664) 0.518 (117/226) 1
Dropping Option 2 because of Majority.
(1.736434108527131782945736434108527131783) 1.736 (224/129) 3
Dropping Option 3 because of Majority.
(1.406896551724137931034482758620689655172) 1.407 (204/145) 3
Dropping Option 4 because of Majority.
(1.267973856209150326797385620915032679739) 1.268 (194/153) 3
Option 5 passes Majority. 1.194 (191/160) = 1
Dropping Option 6 because of Majority.
(1.065088757396449704142011834319526627219) 1.065 (180/169) 3
Option 5 defeats Option 7 by ( 191 - 160) = 31 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 5 Assume blobs comply with GPL unless proven otherwise
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 5 Assume blobs comply with GPL unless proven otherwise
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ style=filled , color=pink,
shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion - Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ label=109 ];
Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]\nMajority=1.74 -
Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ label=235, style=dotted,
color=pink ];
Empower the release team to decide about allowing DFSG violations
[3:1]\nMajority=1.27 - Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ label=181,
style=dotted, color=pink ];
Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations [3:1]\nMajority=1.41 -
Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ label=195, style=dotted,
color=pink ];
Exclude source requirements for firmware (defined) [3:1]\nMajority=1.07 -
Reaffirm the Social Contract\n0.52 [ label=131, style=dotted,
color=pink ];
Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]\n1.74 [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Further Discussion - Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware
[3:1]\n1.74 [ label=-95 ];
Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations [3:1]\n1.41 [ style=filled ,
color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion - Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations
[3:1]\n1.41 [ label=-59 ];
Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware [3:1]\nMajority=1.74 -
Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations [3:1]\n1.41 [ label=99,
style=dotted, color=pink ];
Empower the release team to decide about allowing DFSG violations
[3:1]\nMajority=1.27 - Allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations
[3:1]\n1.41 [ label=21, style=dotted, color=pink ];
Empower the release team to decide about allowing DFSG violations
[3:1]\n1.27 [ style=filled , color=pink
Results for Project membership procedures
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Mon Dec 15 13:17:34 2008
Option 1 Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.
Option 2 Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus, leading to
a new proposal.
Option 3 Ask the DAMs to implement the changes.
Option 4 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4
=== === === ===
Option 1 112 195 211
Option 2125 194 209
Option 3 7165 88
Option 4 4749 173
Looking at row 2, column 1, Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or
consensus, leading to a new proposal.
received 125 votes over Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or
consensus.
Looking at row 1, column 2, Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or
consensus.
received 112 votes over Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or
consensus, leading to a new proposal..
Option 1 Reached quorum: 211 47.8591684006314
Option 2 Reached quorum: 209 47.8591684006314
Option 3 Reached quorum: 88 47.8591684006314
Option 1 passes Majority. 4.489 (211/47) = 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 4.265 (209/49) = 1
Dropping Option 3 because of Majority.
(0.5086705202312138728323699421965317919075) 0.509 (88/173) 1
Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 125 - 112) = 13 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 211 - 47) = 164 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 209 - 49) = 160 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus,
leading to a new proposal.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus,
leading to a new proposal.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49 -
Further Discussion [ label=164 ];
Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus, leading to a new
proposal.\n4.27 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=NavyBlue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus, leading to a new
proposal.\n4.27 - Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or
consensus.\n4.49 [ label=13 ];
Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus, leading to a new
proposal.\n4.27 - Further Discussion [ label=160 ];
Ask the DAMs to implement the changes.\n0.51 [ style=filled ,
color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion - Ask the DAMs to implement the changes.\n0.51 [
label=85 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgp8mbac6oYyl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for General Resolution: Altering package upload rules
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Mar 18 03:46:47 2007
Option 1 I support the proposal
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 132
Option 2116
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 116 votes over I support the proposal
Looking at row 1, column 2, I support the proposal
received 132 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 132 48.3037265643138
Option 1 passes Majority. 1.138 (132/116) = 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 132 - 116) = 16 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 I support the proposal
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 I support the proposal
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
I support the proposal\n1.14 [ style=filled , color=powderblue,
shape=egg, fontcolor=Navy Blue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
I support the proposal\n1.14 - Further Discussion [ label=16 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpwBvGTbBfky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Position statement clarifying DFSG
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 15 00:01:14 2006
Option 1 DFSG 2 applies to all programmatic works
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 136
Option 2149
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 149 votes over DFSG 2 applies to all programmatic works
Looking at row 1, column 2, DFSG 2 applies to all programmatic works
received 136 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 136 47.4341649025257
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority. 0.913 (136/149) 1
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
DFSG 2 applies to all programmatic works\n0.91 [ style=filled ,
color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion - DFSG 2 applies to all programmatic works\n0.91 [
label=13 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=Navy Blue, shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpnCfmdS2Bsi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for General Resolution: Re-affirm support to the Debian Project Leader
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 15 00:01:35 2006
Option 1 Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
Option 2 Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other projects
Option 3 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 177 227
Option 2128 226
Option 3 9379
Looking at row 2, column 1, Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other
projects
received 128 votes over Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
Looking at row 1, column 2, Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
received 177 votes over Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other
projects.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 227 47.4341649025257
Option 2 Reached quorum: 226 47.4341649025257
Option 1 passes Majority. 2.441 (227/93) 1
Option 2 passes Majority. 2.861 (226/79) 1
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 177 - 128) = 49 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 227 - 93) = 134 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 226 - 79) = 147 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank\n2.44 [ style=filled ,
color=powderblue, shape=egg, fontcolor=Navy Blue, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank\n2.44 - Re-affirm DPL,
do not endorse nor support his other projects\n2.86 [ label=49 ];
Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank\n2.44 - Further
Discussion [ label=134 ];
Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other projects\n2.86 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his other projects\n2.86 -
Further Discussion [ label=147 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpiKOR4i1bfV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for General Resolution: Recall the project leader
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 15 00:01:49 2006
Option 1 Recall the project leader
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 48
Option 2277
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 277 votes over Recall the project leader
Looking at row 1, column 2, Recall the project leader
received 48 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 48 47.4341649025257
Dropping Option 1 because of Majority. 0.173 (48/277) 1
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 2 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 2 Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Recall the project leader\n0.17 [ style=filled , color=pink,
shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Further Discussion - Recall the project leader\n0.17 [ label=229 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=Navy Blue, shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpBqNH4AuAn6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for General Resolution: Handling source-less firmware in the Linux kernel
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 15 00:02:08 2006
Option 1 Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
Option 2 Special exception to DFSG 2 for firmware as long as required [3:1]
Option 3 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 196 271
Option 2110 199
Option 3 42 111
Looking at row 2, column 1, Special exception to DFSG 2 for firmware as long as
required [3:1]
received 110 votes over Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
Looking at row 1, column 2, Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
received 196 votes over Special exception to DFSG 2 for firmware as long as
required [3:1].
Option 1 Reached quorum: 271 47.4341649025257
Option 2 Reached quorum: 199 47.4341649025257
Option 1 passes Majority. 6.452 (271/42) 1
Dropping Option 2 because of Majority. 1.793 (199/111) 3
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 271 - 42) = 229 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues\n6.45 [ style=filled ,
color=powderblue, shape=egg, fontcolor=Navy Blue, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues\n6.45 - Further Discussion
[ label=229 ];
Special exception to DFSG 2 for firmware as long as required [3:1]\n1.79 [
style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Further Discussion - Special exception to DFSG 2 for firmware as long as
required [3:1]\n1.79 [ label=-88 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpH3bPhIvIcb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Sep 24 00:00:18 2006
Option 1 Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]
Option 2 Further Discussion
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2
=== ===
Option 1 242
Option 2 23
Looking at row 2, column 1, Further Discussion
received 23 votes over Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]
Looking at row 1, column 2, Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]
received 242 votes over Further Discussion.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 242 47.4341649025257
Option 1 passes Majority. 10.522 (242/23) 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 242 - 23) = 219 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]\n10.52 [ style=filled ,
color=powderblue, shape=egg, fontcolor=Navy Blue, fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Amend the constitution [needs 3:1]\n10.52 - Further Discussion [
label=219 ];
Further Discussion [ style=filled , shape=diamond, fontcolor=Red,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
}
pgpHONActKXr4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Results for Debian Project Leader 2006 Election Statistics
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by thesecretary. This is just a
convenience for the impatient. I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Starting results calculation at Sun Apr 9 00:00:16 2006
Option 1 Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Option 2 Ari Pollak
Option 3 Steve McIntyre
Option 4 Anthony Towns
Option 5 Andreas Schuldei
Option 6 Jonathan aka Ted Walther
Option 7 Bill Allombert
Option 8 None of the Above
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
=== === === === === === === ===
Option 1 310 123 144 166 341 228 319
Option 2 40 344645 24648 158
Option 3230 332 184 233 354 278 344
Option 4230 334 190 242 365 281 339
Option 5166 320 124 135 352 240 321
Option 6 2061161616 2173
Option 7119 2756899 117 321 294
Option 8 75 202537175 30187
Looking at row 2, column 1, Ari Pollak
received 40 votes over Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Looking at row 1, column 2, Jeroen van Wolffelaar
received 310 votes over Ari Pollak.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 319 47.0531614240744
Option 2 Reached quorum: 158 47.0531614240744
Option 3 Reached quorum: 344 47.0531614240744
Option 4 Reached quorum: 339 47.0531614240744
Option 5 Reached quorum: 321 47.0531614240744
Option 6 Reached quorum: 73 47.0531614240744
Option 7 Reached quorum: 294 47.0531614240744
Option 1 passes Majority. 4.253 (319/75) 1
Dropping Option 2 because of Majority. 0.782 (158/202) 1
Option 3 passes Majority. 6.491 (344/53) 1
Option 4 passes Majority. 4.775 (339/71) 1
Option 5 passes Majority. 4.280 (321/75) 1
Dropping Option 6 because of Majority. 0.243 (73/301) 1
Option 7 passes Majority. 3.379 (294/87) 1
Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 230 - 123) = 107 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 230 - 144) = 86 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 7 by ( 228 - 119) = 109 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 8 by ( 319 - 75) = 244 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 190 - 184) =6 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 233 - 124) = 109 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 7 by ( 278 - 68) = 210 votes.
Option 3 defeats Option 8 by ( 344 - 53) = 291 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 242 - 135) = 107 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 7 by ( 281 - 99) = 182 votes.
Option 4 defeats Option 8 by ( 339 - 71) = 268 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 7 by ( 240 - 117) = 123 votes.
Option 5 defeats Option 8 by ( 321 - 75) = 246 votes.
Option 7 defeats Option 8 by ( 294 - 87) = 207 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 4 Anthony Towns
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 4 Anthony Towns
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Jeroen van Wolffelaar\n4.25 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica,
fontsize=10 ];
Jeroen van Wolffelaar\n4.25 - Bill Allombert\n3.38 [ label=109 ];
Jeroen van Wolffelaar\n4.25 - None of the Above [ label=244 ];
Ari Pollak\n0.78 [ style=filled , color=pink, shape=octagon,
fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
None of the Above - Ari Pollak\n0.78 [ label=44 ];
Steve McIntyre\n6.49 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Steve McIntyre\n6.49 - Jeroen van Wolffelaar\n4.25 [ label=107 ];
Steve McIntyre\n6.49 - Andreas Schuldei\n4.28 [ label=109 ];
Steve McIntyre\n6.49 - Bill Allombert\n3.38 [ label=210 ];
Steve McIntyre\n6.49 - None of the Above [ label=291 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 [ style=filled , color=powderblue, shape=egg,
fontcolor=Navy Blue, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 - Jeroen van Wolffelaar\n4.25 [ label=86 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 - Steve McIntyre\n6.49 [ label=6 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 - Andreas Schuldei\n4.28 [ label=107 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 - Bill Allombert\n3.38 [ label=182 ];
Anthony Towns\n4.77 - None of the Above [ label=268 ];
Andreas Schuldei\n4.28 [ style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
];
Andreas Schuldei\n4.28 - Bill Allombert\n3.38 [ label=123 ];
Andreas Schuldei\n4.28 - None of the Above [ label=246 ];
Jonathan aka Ted Walther\n0.24 [ style=filled , color=pink,
shape=octagon, fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10
