The United States is currently awash in Zionist journals posing as conservative
journals. One of the more dangerous is American Thinker. It is extremely
dangerous precisely because it is so competently done. American Thinker, as
anyone who peruses it quickly discovers, is a fanatically pro-Israel journal.
It is at great pains, not merely to blame the Arabs, but to discredit
paleo-conservative anti-semitism. Thus, there is an article dated January 10,
2009 by a Mr. Bruce Walker entitled Jews and Bolshevism; Falsely Accused. The
article is rather intelligent. It admits a great many verifiable facts, while
attempting to minimize or misinterpret them. Thus, Mr. Walker does not deny
that a not inconsiderable number of the early Soviet commissars were Jewish but
employs the usual technique of claiming that these renegades were traitors to
the Jewish religion. That claim is more than dubious, given the number of
Jewish Communists, such as Kadmi-Cohen and Alfred Nossig, who claimed that the
socialism of the Prophets and the socialism of Marx were one and the same. Mr.
Walker then claims that Stalin purged the Jewish Communists by the late 1930s.
That is false. As Yuri Slezkine shows in The Jewish Century the percentage of
Jews purged in the 1930s was actually far less than the percentage of other
groups purged, such as Ukrainians, Poles and Russians. Also omitted from Mr.
Walkers discussion is the fact that the post-WW2 satrapies installed in
Eastern Europe were all heavily dominated by Jewish commissars. Walker charges,
correctly, that the Communist Party took the side of the Arabs during the 1929
Wailing Wall riots., describing the Arabs as victims of Jewish aggression. What
he omits is that during the 1936-1937 Arab rebellion in Palestine that the
Party changed its line somewhat. The Party argued that the Arabs and the Jews
should stop fighting and collaborate against the real enemy, the capitalist
British. Why did the Party change its line? Many Communist Jews who were also
Zionists had been deeply offended by the Partys pro-Arab position. To avoid
alienating them, the Party tried to reconcile them without abandoning the
Arabs. Thus, Mr. Walkers attempt to equate pro-Arabism with pro-Communism is
sleight-of-historical hand. He also mocks Adolf Hitler for claiming that there
was a Jewish international of finance capitalism collaborating with Jewish
Communism. Walker ignores that Jewish historians like Norman Cantor have said
exactly the same thing.
Another revealing American Thinker article, dated May 14, 2008 is entitled:
Triple Cross: How Britain Created The Arab-Israeli Conflict by Rachel
Neuwirth. The article begins with a long attack on the British describing,
accurately enough the innumerable crimes and oppressions committed by the
English in building their empire. Then Miss Neuwirth cleverly proclaims that
these same double-dealing English stabbed the Zionists in-the-back by
abandoning the Balfour Declaration with their 1939 White Paper, which renounced
any intention of creating a Jewish state in Palestine. In other words, Miss
Neuwirth is attempting to argue, in effect, that the British betrayed the Jews
in Palestine the same way that the British betrayed the American isolationists
into World War Two. Thus, the Jews instead of being the bad guys named by
Charles Lindberg as being responsible for American entry into the war become
instead common victims of the British, just like the Americans. That is truly
inspired Talmudic twist think history, with a transparent political agenda in
mind. American Thinker also has articles arguing that the Arab expulsion into
the desert in 1948 was: (1)a myth or (2)the fault of the British. Still other
articles discuss the Jewish Section of the Soviet Communist Party, the
Evsektsia. Thus, American Thinker claims, accurately, that the Section aimed
to integrate the Jews into the Communist Party, that it suppressed the Jewish
religion, the Hebrew language and Zionism but that it promoted Yiddish theatre
and Yiddish Communism. But American Thinker still insists that Jews had no
particular affinity for communism and that the Jewish-Bolshevik charge is a
myth.
Another excellent indication of the Zionist agenda hiding behind American
Thinkers kosher conservatism is the people it attacks. Senator Joseph
McCarthy is condemned just like Anne Coulter. Both are counter-productive.
Both are a discredit to true conservatism. Both are pseudo-intellectual. It is
easy to see why American Thinker does not like McCarthy and Coulter, just as
it has reservations about Patrick Buchanan. All three of the individuals
described are well aware of the Jewish angle. Most of the Communists exposed
by McCarthy were Jews. Miss Coulter, although she plays the Islamo-Fascist
card to get published, is a friend with Joseph Sobran, the former National
Review editor who is a Holocaust Denier. Patrick