[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:24:48 +0100
Source: flatpak
Binary: flatpak flatpak-builder flatpak-tests gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 libflatpak-dev 
libflatpak-doc libflatpak0
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team 

Changed-By: Simon McVittie 
Description:
 flatpak- Application deployment framework for desktop apps
 flatpak-builder - Flatpak application building helper
 flatpak-tests - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (tests)
 gir1.2-flatpak-1.0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps 
(introspection)
 libflatpak-dev - Application deployment framework for desktop apps 
(development)
 libflatpak-doc - Application deployment framework for desktop apps 
(documentation)
 libflatpak0 - Application deployment framework for desktop apps (library)
Closes: 825191
Changes:
 flatpak (0.6.2-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
 - d/p/Treat-members-of-sudo-group-as-privileged.patch: drop,
   superseded by new --with-privileged-group option
 - d/p/Skip-tests-that-make-a-repository-if-var-tmp-lacks-user-x.patch:
   drop, merged upstream
   * Use new --with-privileged-group option to make "sudo" group privileged
 - d/p/Correctly-handle-with-privileged-group.patch: add post-release
   patch from upstream to make it work
 - drop hack to make admin group privileged on Ubuntu, they started to
   phase out that group in 2012
   * Build-depend on libdw-dev from src:elfutils instead of libdwarf-dev.
 Both provide dwarf.h, which is all we really need; libdw-dev is
 the one that is used in various important packages, including systemd.
 We also require src:elfutils anyway, for libelf-dev. (Closes: #825191)
   * debian/upstream/signing-key.asc: add
   * debian/gbp.conf: automatically merge upstream tag into imported source
Checksums-Sha1:
 003d901438b551551062444f351d45ed2b5bf48a 2795 flatpak_0.6.2-1.dsc
 ce754fc82f35dff95a5e8a414378ad06ac781b9e 554568 flatpak_0.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 7f7c29cc0d74734ff0da3937f9639efc6ee81042 10820 flatpak_0.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 fd586d38ca36685c5384f07735d094ba2cf7cc0703b2060bf3edddbb5ca124e4 2795 
flatpak_0.6.2-1.dsc
 69cc156ef1479e9c259717b9c6041dbb45dcd1054b0cee97bb1bf0705053628a 554568 
flatpak_0.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 d907f01093441a0d7a126173f35200672920cd474defda54da6c565d71a2456d 10820 
flatpak_0.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 5a20ba881a7a59bd3ed5393bfcbd22c7 2795 admin optional flatpak_0.6.2-1.dsc
 ce066e97d44d13b4d4634651a104fb0c 554568 admin optional 
flatpak_0.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 874a149863036430a08e0518726c6636 10820 admin optional 
flatpak_0.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=uypg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processing of flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

flatpak_0.6.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  flatpak_0.6.2-1.dsc
  flatpak_0.6.2.orig.tar.xz
  flatpak_0.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Пpивeтcтвую

[Ткач1929]

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Joaquim Rocha]

Great! Thank you!

Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon McVittie  wrote:

> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
> > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only
> the
> > dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.
>
> ... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably
> build-depend
> on whichever is more popular :-)
>
> In unstable, only hhvm build-depends on libdwarf-dev, whereas lots of
> stuff (linux, rpm, systemd, ...) build-depends on libdw-dev, so libdw-dev
> wins the popularity contest and should probably be used.
>
> Also, libdw-dev comes from src:elfutils, which we already build-depend on
> for libelf-dev.
>
> Fixed in git, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> S
>
___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Joaquim Rocha]

BTW, Alex has released 0.6.2. Will you have packages soon? (so I hold on
the Endless's ones for a little while)

Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Joaquim Rocha  wrote:

> Great! Thank you!
>
> Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon McVittie  wrote:
>
>> Control: tags -1 pending
>>
>> On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>> > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses
>> only the
>> > dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.
>>
>> ... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably
>> build-depend
>> on whichever is more popular :-)
>>
>> In unstable, only hhvm build-depends on libdwarf-dev, whereas lots of
>> stuff (linux, rpm, systemd, ...) build-depends on libdw-dev, so libdw-dev
>> wins the popularity contest and should probably be used.
>>
>> Also, libdw-dev comes from src:elfutils, which we already build-depend on
>> for libelf-dev.
>>
>> Fixed in git, thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> S
>>
>
>
___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Simon McVittie]

Control: tags -1 pending

On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
> Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only the
> dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.

... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably build-depend
on whichever is more popular :-)

In unstable, only hhvm build-depends on libdwarf-dev, whereas lots of
stuff (linux, rpm, systemd, ...) build-depends on libdw-dev, so libdw-dev
wins the popularity contest and should probably be used.

Also, libdw-dev comes from src:elfutils, which we already build-depend on
for libelf-dev.

Fixed in git, thanks.

Regards,
S

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Processed: Re: Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 pending
Bug #825191 [flatpak] Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
825191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers

[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Joaquim Rocha]

Package: flatpak
Version: 0.6.1

Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only
the dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.

This bug serves to clarify which of the libraries should be used. Is there
an advantage of using one over the other? libdw on jessie seems to be more
recent than libdwarf but both have recent releases in sid.
___
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers