Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

My hunch might have been correct, the fresh upload did build successfully on buildds. yay! On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:12 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the > package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? > &

[pkg-go] Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

My hunch might have been correct, the fresh upload did build successfully on buildds. yay! On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:12 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the > package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? > &

Bug#1011875: marked as pending in golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1011875 in golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Please find the buildlog of my attempt attached to this email As far as I can tell, the tests are executing in the same way as in your logs, but I may be missing something. golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools_0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1_amd64-2022-06-05T02:02:05Z.build Description:

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? I wonder whether I need to add 'ca-certificates' to "Build-Depends". What do you think? On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:10 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: >

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Please find the buildlog of my attempt attached to this email As far as I can tell, the tests are executing in the same way as in your logs, but I may be missing something. golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools_0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1_amd64-2022-06-05T02:02:05Z.build Description:

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? I wonder whether I need to add 'ca-certificates' to "Build-Depends". What do you think? On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:10 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: >

[pkg-go] Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? I wonder whether I need to add 'ca-certificates' to "Build-Depends". What do you think? On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:10 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: >

[pkg-go] Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Please find the buildlog of my attempt attached to this email As far as I can tell, the tests are executing in the same way as in your logs, but I may be missing something. golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools_0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1_amd64-2022-06-05T02:02:05Z.build Description:

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible Hi Lucas, Thank you for reaching out. I've been looking into this report and am a bit confused. I'm trying to reproduce it on my laptop, but it builds just fine for me. Can you please help me understand why it would fail on your end? -- regards,

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible Hi Lucas, Thank you for reaching out. I've been looking into this report and am a bit confused. I'm trying to reproduce it on my laptop, but it builds just fine for me. Can you please help me understand why it would fail on your end? -- regards,

[pkg-go] Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible Hi Lucas, Thank you for reaching out. I've been looking into this report and am a bit confused. I'm trying to reproduce it on my laptop, but it builds just fine for me. Can you please help me understand why it would fail on your end? -- regards,

Bug#1012030: (no subject)

I wonder whether this may be related to upstream report at https://github.com/containers/common/issues/631 It seems that in debian/bullseye, podman is only able to work in crun, since the version of runc we have in stable seems to have issues with seccomp. Can you please try the following for me

[pkg-go] Bug#1012030: (no subject)

I wonder whether this may be related to upstream report at https://github.com/containers/common/issues/631 It seems that in debian/bullseye, podman is only able to work in crun, since the version of runc we have in stable seems to have issues with seccomp. Can you please try the following for me

[Bug 1943049] Re: Docker ubuntu:impish: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'rm -f /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb /var/cache/apt/*.bin || true'

@wide0s: what is the exact version of podman you were testing in the comment above? Please provide the output of: type -p podman dpkg -s podman podman --version podman system info -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

a hand with this netavark package? On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:00 PM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: netavark > Version : 1.0.2 > Upstream Author : github.com/containers > * URL or Web page : https://github.co

Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

a hand with this netavark package? On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:00 PM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: netavark > Version : 1.0.2 > Upstream Author : github.com/containers > * URL or Web page : https://github.co

Re: Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

a hand with this netavark package? On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:00 PM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: netavark > Version : 1.0.2 > Upstream Author : github.com/containers > * URL or Web page : https://github.co

Bug#1011275: ITP: golang-github-gorilla-schema -- Package gorilla/schema fills a struct with form values.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-gorilla-schema Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Gorilla Web Toolkit * URL : https://github.com/gorilla/schema * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Go

Bug#1011275: ITP: golang-github-gorilla-schema -- Package gorilla/schema fills a struct with form values.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-gorilla-schema Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Gorilla Web Toolkit * URL : https://github.com/gorilla/schema * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Go

Bug#1011275: ITP: golang-github-gorilla-schema -- Package gorilla/schema fills a struct with form values.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-gorilla-schema Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Gorilla Web Toolkit * URL : https://github.com/gorilla/schema * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Go

Bug#1011275: ITP: golang-github-gorilla-schema -- Package gorilla/schema fills a struct with form values.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-gorilla-schema Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Gorilla Web Toolkit * URL : https://github.com/gorilla/schema * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Go

Bug#1011043: golang-ginkgo: Please update to upstream version 2.1.4

Package: ginkgo Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Reinhard Tartler I've had to disable various tests from github.com/containers/common that depend on ginkgo/v2 interfaces -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50

Bug#1011017: ITP: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri -- (cd .Temporary) Golang pkcs11 URI library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri Version : 0.0~git20201008.78d3cae-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/go-pkcs11uri * License : Apache-2.0

Bug#1011017: ITP: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri -- (cd .Temporary) Golang pkcs11 URI library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri Version : 0.0~git20201008.78d3cae-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/go-pkcs11uri * License : Apache-2.0

Bug#1011017: ITP: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri -- (cd .Temporary) Golang pkcs11 URI library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri Version : 0.0~git20201008.78d3cae-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/go-pkcs11uri * License : Apache-2.0

Bug#1011017: ITP: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri -- (cd .Temporary) Golang pkcs11 URI library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-stefanberger-go-pkcs11uri Version : 0.0~git20201008.78d3cae-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/go-pkcs11uri * License : Apache-2.0

[Bug 1971034] Re: Several security issues in libpod 3.4.x

@mdeslaur the issue is not addressed with a simple debdiff, several packages need to be updated in the right order. I've done all this work in debian testing, and all those packages could be synced over. I'm asking for help with coordinating these uploads. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1971034] Re: Several security issues in libpod 3.4.x

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-1227 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-27191 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2022-27649 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1971034] [NEW] Several security issues in libpod 3.4.x

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Ubuntu 20.04 ships currently with podman 3.4.4. Current upstream is at version 3.4.7 and ships with a number of security updates: 3.4.7 * This release addresses CVE-2022-1227, where running podman top on a container

Bug#1010000: marked as pending in libpod

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #101 in libpod reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1010063: ITP: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go -- Test Anything Protocol for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go Version : 0.0~git20171203.629fa40-1 Upstream Author : Michael Hendricks * URL : https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go * License : Public Domain Programming Lang

Bug#1010063: ITP: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go -- Test Anything Protocol for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go Version : 0.0~git20171203.629fa40-1 Upstream Author : Michael Hendricks * URL : https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go * License : Public Domain Programming Lang

Bug#1010063: ITP: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go -- Test Anything Protocol for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go Version : 0.0~git20171203.629fa40-1 Upstream Author : Michael Hendricks * URL : https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go * License : Public Domain Programming Lang

Bug#1010063: ITP: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go -- Test Anything Protocol for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reinhard Tartler * Package name: golang-github-mndrix-tap-go Version : 0.0~git20171203.629fa40-1 Upstream Author : Michael Hendricks * URL : https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go * License : Public Domain Programming Lang

Re: RFS: golang-github-canonical-go-dqlite

Thanks, uploaded On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 3:36 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for my updates to the package golang- > github-canonical-go-dqlite, which can be viewed on salsa at [1]. This > is a dependency for my LXD packaging work; I've updated the package to > the

[pkg-go] Bug#1009776: podman: Packages uidmap and slirp4netns should be full dependencies

Control: tag -1 upstream Control: severity -1 minor On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:09 AM Giuseppe wrote: > Package: podman > Version: 3.0.1+dfsg1-3+deb11u1 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: peppecal+debianb...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > I really think packages uidmap and slirp4netns

Bug#1009776: podman: Packages uidmap and slirp4netns should be full dependencies

Control: tag -1 upstream Control: severity -1 minor On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:09 AM Giuseppe wrote: > Package: podman > Version: 3.0.1+dfsg1-3+deb11u1 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: peppecal+debianb...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > I really think packages uidmap and slirp4netns

Bug#1009376: running foreign architecture containers hits the network every time and confuses future `podman run` invocations

Control: tag -1 upstream Hi Antonio, Can you please file a report upstream here: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues -- upstream is really friendly with reports from other Distros, in particular from Debian. I'm not sure what value I can bring as a package maintainer here. Thanks.

[pkg-go] Bug#1009376: running foreign architecture containers hits the network every time and confuses future `podman run` invocations

Control: tag -1 upstream Hi Antonio, Can you please file a report upstream here: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues -- upstream is really friendly with reports from other Distros, in particular from Debian. I'm not sure what value I can bring as a package maintainer here. Thanks.

Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: netavark Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : github.com/containers * URL or Web page : https://github.com/containers/netavark * License : MIT Description : A container network stack Podman 4.0 recommends this and its

Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: netavark Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : github.com/containers * URL or Web page : https://github.com/containers/netavark * License : MIT Description : A container network stack Podman 4.0 recommends this and its

Bug#1009713: RFP: netavark -- A container network stack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: netavark Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : github.com/containers * URL or Web page : https://github.com/containers/netavark * License : MIT Description : A container network stack Podman 4.0 recommends this and its

[Bug 1964288] Re: Upgrade podman packages to v3.23 or above

Ubuntu Jammy ships with podman 3.4 ** Changed in: libpod (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libpod (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Reinhard Tartler (siretart) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

Bug#1009374: marked as pending in libpod

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1009374 in libpod reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1005147: marked as pending in golang-github-sylabs-sif

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1005147 in golang-github-sylabs-sif reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1008396: marked as pending in consul

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1008396 in consul reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

[Bug 1952103] Re: buildah run fails with permission denied

I've created test packages in my ppa at https://launchpad.net/~siretart/+archive/ubuntu/podman/+packages ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Buildah, a specialized tool for building container images and an + alternative to docker, fails to fulfill it's primary use-case: building + container

[Bug 1952103] Re: buildah run fails with permission denied

) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: golang-github-containers-buildah (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Reinhard Tartler (siretart) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

Bug#889714: marked as pending in etcd

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #889714 in etcd reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1005839: undefined reference to `reflect.unsafe_New' #21

Package: golang-github-modern-go-concurrent-dev Version: 1.0.3-1.1_all Affects: golang-github-containers-buildah The package golang-github-containers-buildah 1.24.1+ds1-1 fails to build in experimental with undefined references. This appears to affect all architectures that use gccgo instead fo

[pkg-go] Bug#1005839: undefined reference to `reflect.unsafe_New' #21

Package: golang-github-modern-go-concurrent-dev Version: 1.0.3-1.1_all Affects: golang-github-containers-buildah The package golang-github-containers-buildah 1.24.1+ds1-1 fails to build in experimental with undefined references. This appears to affect all architectures that use gccgo instead fo

[pkg-go] Bug#1004289: libpod package stops buld at override_dh_auto_build

Can you reproduce this in a sid chroot? May I ask you why you marked this issue as 'important'? -- Unfortunately I do not have the capacity to support builds for backports. Best regards, -rt On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:33 AM Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Source: libpod > Version: 3.4.4=ds1 >

Bug#1004289: libpod package stops buld at override_dh_auto_build

Can you reproduce this in a sid chroot? May I ask you why you marked this issue as 'important'? -- Unfortunately I do not have the capacity to support builds for backports. Best regards, -rt On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:33 AM Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Source: libpod > Version: 3.4.4=ds1 >

Bug#1005051: golang-github-sylabs-sif: Please update to upstream version 2.3.1

Source: golang-github-sylabs-sif Version: 1.0.9-2.1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: siret...@tauware.de A newer version 2.3.1 has been released upstream. This version is required for building newer versions of github:containers/image, which is required for podman 4.0 -- System Information:

Bug#1000521: libpod: please provide podman-remote binary

Hi Antonio, thanks for reaching out, On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:45 AM Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Source: libpod > Version: 3.4.1+ds1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > Recent podman upstream releases provide a new podman-remote binary, but > the Debian package does not even build

[pkg-go] Bug#1000521: libpod: please provide podman-remote binary

Hi Antonio, thanks for reaching out, On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:45 AM Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Source: libpod > Version: 3.4.1+ds1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > Recent podman upstream releases provide a new podman-remote binary, but > the Debian package does not even build

Bug#1004533: bullseye-pu: package golang-github-opencontainers-specs/1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1

(1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Backport seccomp patches from upstream to allow execution of newer +syscalls, Closes: #994451 + + -- Reinhard Tartler Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:12:47 -0400 + golang-github-opencontainers-specs (1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1) unstable; urgency

Bug#1004533: bullseye-pu: package golang-github-opencontainers-specs/1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1

(1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Backport seccomp patches from upstream to allow execution of newer +syscalls, Closes: #994451 + + -- Reinhard Tartler Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:12:47 -0400 + golang-github-opencontainers-specs (1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1) unstable; urgency

Bug#1004406: ffmpeg: symbol lookup error undefined symbol drmModeGetFB2

Can you please run the command "ldd /usr/bin/ffmpeg" and share the output with us? Also, are you sure you are executing /usr/bin/ffmpeg and not accidentally /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg? Thanks, -rt

Bug#1004406: ffmpeg: symbol lookup error undefined symbol drmModeGetFB2

Can you please run the command "ldd /usr/bin/ffmpeg" and share the output with us? Also, are you sure you are executing /usr/bin/ffmpeg and not accidentally /usr/local/bin/ffmpeg? Thanks, -rt

Bug#994451: marked as pending in golang-github-opencontainers-specs

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #994451 in golang-github-opencontainers-specs reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#1003663: marked as done (golang-github-containers-image: FTBFS: tests fail with 'key has been revoked')

> > > Hi Andreas, thank you for your report, > > I've tried rebuilding the package on my laptop in a clean sid chroot, > and for some reason, it works just fine. > > Can you please have a look at my build log and help me understand why > the build is failing for you but not for me? > > I looked a

Bug#1003663: marked as done (golang-github-containers-image: FTBFS: tests fail with 'key has been revoked')

> > > Hi Andreas, thank you for your report, > > I've tried rebuilding the package on my laptop in a clean sid chroot, > and for some reason, it works just fine. > > Can you please have a look at my build log and help me understand why > the build is failing for you but not for me? > > I looked a

Bug#1002997: podman: Please provide a default /etc/containers/storage.conf

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:15 AM Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > > > @Giuseppe Scrivano what do you think? > > please keep in mind that unprivileged overlay mounts cannot use > metacopy. You still need root access on the host (CAP_SYS_ADMIN in > the initial user namespace) in order to use

Bug#1003486: Fwd: [containers/podman] Pre-release v4.0.0-rc1 - v4.0.0-RC1

Package: libpod Severity: wishlist -- Forwarded message - From: Matthew Heon Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:50 PM Subject: [containers/podman] Pre-release v4.0.0-rc1 - v4.0.0-RC1 To: containers/podman Cc: Subscribed v4.0.0-RC1

[pkg-go] Bug#1003486: Fwd: [containers/podman] Pre-release v4.0.0-rc1 - v4.0.0-RC1

Package: libpod Severity: wishlist -- Forwarded message - From: Matthew Heon Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:50 PM Subject: [containers/podman] Pre-release v4.0.0-rc1 - v4.0.0-RC1 To: containers/podman Cc: Subscribed v4.0.0-RC1

[pkg-go] Bug#1002997: podman: Please provide a default /etc/containers/storage.conf

Control: reassign -1 storage-common Control: affects -1 podman Hi Philip, Thank you for your bug report. The Debian equivalent to Fedora's package 'containers-common' has the same name in debian, and does ship a 'storage.conf' file in /usr/share/containers/storage.conf. This is so that the

Bug#1002997: podman: Please provide a default /etc/containers/storage.conf

Control: reassign -1 storage-common Control: affects -1 podman Hi Philip, Thank you for your bug report. The Debian equivalent to Fedora's package 'containers-common' has the same name in debian, and does ship a 'storage.conf' file in /usr/share/containers/storage.conf. This is so that the

Bug#817078: ITA: boxbackup

I looked at the bug report which says that boxbackup fails to compile with gcc 11. I did not see any update from you or any proposed patch. I'm not familiar with mentors, but I'm happy to sponsor you from time to time (sorry, I cannot promise timely reactions) if I'm able to see and review your

Bug#817078: ITA: boxbackup

I looked at the bug report which says that boxbackup fails to compile with gcc 11. I did not see any update from you or any proposed patch. I'm not familiar with mentors, but I'm happy to sponsor you from time to time (sorry, I cannot promise timely reactions) if I'm able to see and review your

Bug#817078: ITA: boxbackup

Awesome, please let me know if you have any questions or if I can assist you with the package. Best -rt On January 4, 2022 12:41:39 PM EST, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: >I intend to adopt the orphaned package boxbackup. > >Ileana Dumitrescu > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please

Bug#817078: ITA: boxbackup

Awesome, please let me know if you have any questions or if I can assist you with the package. Best -rt On January 4, 2022 12:41:39 PM EST, Ileana Dumitrescu wrote: >I intend to adopt the orphaned package boxbackup. > >Ileana Dumitrescu > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please

Bug#1001321: Fwd: [containers/podman] Release v3.4.3 - v3.4.3

Package: libpod -- Forwarded message - From: Matthew Heon Date: Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:09 AM Subject: [containers/podman] Release v3.4.3 - v3.4.3 To: containers/podman Cc: Subscribed v3.4.3 Repository:

[pkg-go] Bug#1001321: Fwd: [containers/podman] Release v3.4.3 - v3.4.3

Package: libpod -- Forwarded message - From: Matthew Heon Date: Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 10:09 AM Subject: [containers/podman] Release v3.4.3 - v3.4.3 To: containers/podman Cc: Subscribed v3.4.3 Repository:

Bug#1000318: docker.io: FTBFS on mipsen: FAIL: profiles/seccomp TestUnmarshalDefaultProfile

On 11/21/21 8:14 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Source: docker.io > Version: 20.10.5+dfsg1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS - prevents depending packages from migrating > > the docker.io package FTBFS on mipsen in the same way: > > - > https://buildd.

Bug#1000318: docker.io: FTBFS on mipsen: FAIL: profiles/seccomp TestUnmarshalDefaultProfile

On 11/21/21 8:14 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Source: docker.io > Version: 20.10.5+dfsg1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS - prevents depending packages from migrating > > the docker.io package FTBFS on mipsen in the same way: > > - > https://buildd.

Bug#1000318: docker.io: FTBFS on mipsen: FAIL: profiles/seccomp TestUnmarshalDefaultProfile

Source: docker.io Version: 20.10.5+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS - prevents depending packages from migrating the docker.io package FTBFS on mipsen in the same way: - https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=docker.io=mips64el=20.10.10%2Bdfsg1-1=1636015943=0 -

Bug#1000318: docker.io: FTBFS on mipsen: FAIL: profiles/seccomp TestUnmarshalDefaultProfile

Source: docker.io Version: 20.10.5+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS - prevents depending packages from migrating the docker.io package FTBFS on mipsen in the same way: - https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=docker.io=mips64el=20.10.10%2Bdfsg1-1=1636015943=0 -

Bug#998055: Problem actually in conmon, not podman

Control: reassign -1 common 2.0.25+ds1-1.1 Control: affects -1 podman According to the referenced redhat bug entry, this is actually an issue in the conmon package. Reassigning accordingly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952698 -- regards, Reinhard

[pkg-go] Bug#998055: Problem actually in conmon, not podman

Control: reassign -1 common 2.0.25+ds1-1.1 Control: affects -1 podman According to the referenced redhat bug entry, this is actually an issue in the conmon package. Reassigning accordingly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952698 -- regards, Reinhard

Bug#999846: golang-dbus: Please update to upstream version 5.0.6 or later to pickup SessionBusPrivateNoAutoStartup function

Source: golang-dbus Version: 5.0.3-2 Severity: normal Podman 3.4.2 started using a function that was introduced in this commit: https://github.com/godbus/dbus/commit/2ece603a3b742642e388ba947c276189fae90b73 Please upgrade to package 5.0.6 or later which would allow me to update the podman

[pkg-go] Bug#999846: golang-dbus: Please update to upstream version 5.0.6 or later to pickup SessionBusPrivateNoAutoStartup function

Source: golang-dbus Version: 5.0.3-2 Severity: normal Podman 3.4.2 started using a function that was introduced in this commit: https://github.com/godbus/dbus/commit/2ece603a3b742642e388ba947c276189fae90b73 Please upgrade to package 5.0.6 or later which would allow me to update the podman

Bug#999589: ITP: catatonit -- Lightweight init implementation for containers

Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler Severity: wishlist * Package name: catatonit Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Author : 2018 SUSE LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/openSUSE/catatonit * License : GPLv3 Description : Lightweight init implementation

Bug#999589: ITP: catatonit -- Lightweight init implementation for containers

Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler Severity: wishlist * Package name: catatonit Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Author : 2018 SUSE LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/openSUSE/catatonit * License : GPLv3 Description : Lightweight init implementation

Bug#999589: ITP: catatonit -- Lightweight init implementation for containers

Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler Severity: wishlist * Package name: catatonit Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Author : 2018 SUSE LLC * URL or Web page : https://github.com/openSUSE/catatonit * License : GPLv3 Description : Lightweight init implementation

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

Control: tag -1 patch On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > Cloud you backport following commit? > > > > > > > https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b > > > > > This patch updates libocispec/Makefile.am, which is needed to

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

Control: tag -1 patch On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > Cloud you backport following commit? > > > > > > > https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b > > > > > This patch updates libocispec/Makefile.am, which is needed to

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

s that have actually been tested. I don't think it is a good use of Debian's developers' time to play this game of catching up. On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:27 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > That's not sufficient. > > the commit you point out does two things: > > - update the submo

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

s that have actually been tested. I don't think it is a good use of Debian's developers' time to play this game of catching up. On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:27 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > That's not sufficient. > > the commit you point out does two things: > > - update the submo

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

you backport following commit? > > https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b > > > (Sent on my mobile phone) > > Reinhard Tartler 于 2021年11月10日周三 07:05写道： > >> I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts: >> >>

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

you backport following commit? > > https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b > > > (Sent on my mobile phone) > > Reinhard Tartler 于 2021年11月10日周三 07:05写道： > >> I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts: >> >>

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts: - the build error is a failure to link some test binaries. excluding them from the build might be possible with some patching. - I've upgraded the package to the latest upstream 1.3, and was seeing exactly the same build failure - the build

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts: - the build error is a failure to link some test binaries. excluding them from the build might be possible with some patching. - I've upgraded the package to the latest upstream 1.3, and was seeing exactly the same build failure - the build

[Bug 1940152] Re: TLS related test failure with go1.16

are you sure that the autopkgtests ever worked? As far as I can tell from https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/consul/unstable/amd64/ it seems to have been broken for quite a while (if they ever worked, that is) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1940152] Re: TLS related test failure with go1.16

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #997133 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997133 ** Also affects: consul (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997133 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

Bug#997133: More information in the ubuntu bugtracker

the ubuntu tracker claims this is golang 1.16 related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/consul/+bug/1940152 not sure how to proceed here, though... -- regards, Reinhard

Bug#997133: More information in the ubuntu bugtracker

the ubuntu tracker claims this is golang 1.16 related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/consul/+bug/1940152 not sure how to proceed here, though... -- regards, Reinhard

[pkg-go] Bug#997133: More information in the ubuntu bugtracker

the ubuntu tracker claims this is golang 1.16 related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/consul/+bug/1940152 not sure how to proceed here, though... -- regards, Reinhard ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Bug#997133: Relevant part of the consul log

Here is the actual relevant part of the build log: === RUN TestDynamicTLSConfig tls_test.go:263: Error Trace: tls_test.go:263 tls_test.go:339 Error: Not equal: expected:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >