On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:58 AM Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2019-01-09 6:54 a.m., Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Hi Juan,
> >
> > are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well,
> > and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:58 AM Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2019-01-09 6:54 a.m., Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Hi Juan,
> >
> > are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well,
> > and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on
Thanks for the review, I've just uploaded it to unstable.
-rt
On 2/12/19 8:13 AM, eamanu15 wrote:
> Oh thanks! I can see now
>
> Take care that the d/changelog entry is on UNRELEASED;
>
> Regards
>
> El mar., 12 de feb. de 2019 a la(s) 09:57, Reinhard Tartler
&
Thanks for the review, I've just uploaded it to unstable.
-rt
On 2/12/19 8:13 AM, eamanu15 wrote:
> Oh thanks! I can see now
>
> Take care that the d/changelog entry is on UNRELEASED;
>
> Regards
>
> El mar., 12 de feb. de 2019 a la(s) 09:57, Reinhard Tartler
&
On 2/12/19 7:17 AM, eamanu15 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The salsa repo is empty.
>
> Something is wrong?
The train station arrived sooner than I could push to salsa. I've just
rectified this, the repository is now populated.
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
On 2/12/19 7:17 AM, eamanu15 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The salsa repo is empty.
>
> Something is wrong?
The train station arrived sooner than I could push to salsa. I've just
rectified this, the repository is now populated.
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
Version : 0.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Kunitz
* URL : https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
Version : 0.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Kunitz
* URL : https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
Version : 0.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Kunitz
* URL : https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-ulikunitz-xz
Version : 0.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Kunitz
* URL : https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz
* License : 3-clause BSD
Programming Lang: Go
Description
I was running into issues with getting the testsuite pass during a package
build. The testsuite does pass when I 'go get' the library and call it
manually with 'go test'. I straced the failing execution and came to the
conclusion that something funny must be going on with interacting with
I was running into issues with getting the testsuite pass during a package
build. The testsuite does pass when I 'go get' the library and call it
manually with 'go test'. I straced the failing execution and came to the
conclusion that something funny must be going on with interacting with
I was running into issues with getting the testsuite pass during a package
build. The testsuite does pass when I 'go get' the library and call it
manually with 'go test'. I straced the failing execution and came to the
conclusion that something funny must be going on with interacting with
The plan is to maintain this package under to go-team umbrella. The
packaging is at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme.
Comments / feedback welcome!
-rt
The plan is to maintain this package under to go-team umbrella. The
packaging is at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme.
Comments / feedback welcome!
-rt
The plan is to maintain this package under to go-team umbrella. The
packaging is at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme.
Comments / feedback welcome!
-rt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme
Version : 0.0~git20170102.b243242-1
Upstream Author : Miloslav Trmač
* URL : https://github.com/mtrmac/gpgme
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme
Version : 0.0~git20170102.b243242-1
Upstream Author : Miloslav Trmač
* URL : https://github.com/mtrmac/gpgme
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme
Version : 0.0~git20170102.b243242-1
Upstream Author : Miloslav Trmač
* URL : https://github.com/mtrmac/gpgme
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-mtrmac-gpgme
Version : 0.0~git20170102.b243242-1
Upstream Author : Miloslav Trmač
* URL : https://github.com/mtrmac/gpgme
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be
much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I
intend to have this package team maintained.
You can find the repository at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be
much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I
intend to have this package team maintained.
You can find the repository at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage
I've pushed my current work to salsa. Feedback and suggestions would be
much appreciated, as I'm still rather new to packaging go libraries. I
intend to have this package team maintained.
You can find the repository at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containers-storage
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-containers-storage
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/containers/storage
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-containers-storage
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/containers/storage
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-containers-storage
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/containers/storage
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-containers-storage
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/containers/storage
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 18:53:40 -0500
Source: restic
Binary: restic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.4+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description:
restic
** Changed in: fs2ram (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: vdradmin (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Nathan, could you please elaborate why you marked this bug as invalid?
What makes you think this was fixed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341307
Title:
fs2ram places /var/cache on
Package: restic
Version: 0.9.4+ds-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
When used for instance in a cron job for backup, I would get emails that have
this content:
/etc/cron.hourly/backup_restic:
open repository
open repository
open repository
This has been reported upstream at:
Package: restic
Version: 0.9.4+ds-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
When used for instance in a cron job for backup, I would get emails that have
this content:
/etc/cron.hourly/backup_restic:
open repository
open repository
open repository
This has been reported upstream at:
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description:
ffjson - faster JSON serialization for Go
golang-github-pquerna-ffjson-dev - faster JSON serialization for Go
Closes: 919278
Changes:
golang-github-pquerna-ffjson (0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1) unstable;
urgency=medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 10:43:49 -0500
Source: slirp4netns
Binary: slirp4netns
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package
> that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved
> from buster 9 months ago).
>
That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out.
> A
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package
> that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved
> from buster 9 months ago).
>
That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out.
> A
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
>
> > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think
> > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping
> > this bug at RC se
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:34 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/01/2019 à 23:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
>
> > Since openjdk-8 is going to be kept in Buster, I don't think
> > we need to keep this bug at RC severity. I'm concerned that keeping
> > this bug at RC se
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional
> cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to
> build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional
> cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to
> build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional
> cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to
> build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and
t apparently we are
just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below.
Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java?
What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster?
Best,
-rt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019
t apparently we are
just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below.
Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java?
What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster?
Best,
-rt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019
t apparently we are
just not quite there yet, please see Petri's message below.
Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java?
What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster?
Best,
-rt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:02 AM Petri Hintukainen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:29 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>
> To make progress on the debian packaging, I see three options:
>
> a) Wait for upstream to make a release (cf.
> https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/pull/200)
> b) upload with an epoc
> c) upload a
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:29 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>
> To make progress on the debian packaging, I see three options:
>
> a) Wait for upstream to make a release (cf.
> https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/pull/200)
> b) upload with an epoc
> c) upload a
Hi Juan,
Thank you for your work on the package. I'm happy to sponsor uploads to
Debian for you as necessary.
Did you see my question in my previous email regarding whether skopeo also
works with the sjoerdsimons fork that we currently have in Debian? If it
would, I think Debian would be better
Hi Juan,
Thank you for your work on the package. I'm happy to sponsor uploads to
Debian for you as necessary.
Did you see my question in my previous email regarding whether skopeo also
works with the sjoerdsimons fork that we currently have in Debian? If it
would, I think Debian would be better
Hi Petri,
I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing
list last march [1].
The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11,
and we as package
maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your
response back then
was that
Hi Petri,
I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing
list last march [1].
The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11,
and we as package
maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your
response back then
was that
Hi Petri,
I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing
list last march [1].
The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11,
and we as package
maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your
response back then
was that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:21:58 -0500
Source: fuse-overlayfs
Binary: fuse-overlayfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description
Seems that additional issues have shown up:
dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2'
dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build
cd _build && go install
-gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"
Seems that additional issues have shown up:
dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2'
dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build
cd _build && go install
-gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"
Seems that additional issues have shown up:
dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1+dfsg2'
dh_auto_build -a -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_build
cd _build && go install
-gcflags=all=\"-trimpath=/<>/cadvisor-0.27.1\+dfsg2/_build/src\"
Go Packaging Team
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Closes: 901745
Description:
golang-github-opencontainers-selinux-dev - common selinux implementation
Changes:
golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (1.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
.
[ Alexandre Viau ]
* Point Vcs
Go Packaging Team
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Closes: 901745
Description:
golang-github-opencontainers-selinux-dev - common selinux implementation
Changes:
golang-github-opencontainers-selinux (1.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
.
[ Alexandre Viau ]
* Point Vcs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson
Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1
Upstream Author : Paul Querna
* URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson
Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1
Upstream Author : Paul Querna
* URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: golang-github-pquerna-ffjson
Version : 0.0~git20181028.e517b90-1
Upstream Author : Paul Querna
* URL : https://github.com/pquerna/ffjson
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:19:58 -0500
Source: fuse-overlayfs
Binary: fuse-overlayfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:05 -0500
Source: keepassx
Binary: keepassx
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Description:
keepassx
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 00:55 Dmitry Smirnov On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 11:04:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > All in all, the package looks good for upload to me. May I ask where we
> are
> > with that?
>
> Wait a sec, did you check the following forwarded bug
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 00:55 Dmitry Smirnov On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 11:04:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > All in all, the package looks good for upload to me. May I ask where we
> are
> > with that?
>
> Wait a sec, did you check the following forwarded bug
Cool, thanks!
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote:
> Hi Reinhard.
>
> Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests:
>
> ```
> === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess
> --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s)
> commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:
Cool, thanks!
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote:
> Hi Reinhard.
>
> Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests:
>
> ```
> === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess
> --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s)
> commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:
Cool, thanks!
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:46 AM Juan Picca wrote:
> Hi Reinhard.
>
> Currently ostree-go, commit d0388bd (master HEAD today) fails some tests:
>
> ```
> === RUN TestCommitTreeSuccess
> --- FAIL: TestCommitTreeSuccess (0.11s)
> commit_test.go:108: failed to tar populated dir:
Hi,
I've looked at packaging skopeo as well, and according to the
dh-make-golang tool, there are apparently 3 dependencies blocking this ITP:
2019/01/09 06:54:27 Build-Dependency "github.com/containers/storage" is not
yet available in Debian, or has not yet been converted to use
Hi,
I've looked at packaging skopeo as well, and according to the
dh-make-golang tool, there are apparently 3 dependencies blocking this ITP:
2019/01/09 06:54:27 Build-Dependency "github.com/containers/storage" is not
yet available in Debian, or has not yet been converted to use
Hi Dmitry,
I wonder where we are with this ITP about packaging oci-image-tools -- OCI
image tooling.
I've cloned salsa:go-team/packages/oci-image-tools and testbuilt it in a
debian/unstable.
Lintian output seems reasonable to me. So does debian/copyright.
All in all, the package looks good for
Hi Dmitry,
I wonder where we are with this ITP about packaging oci-image-tools -- OCI
image tooling.
I've cloned salsa:go-team/packages/oci-image-tools and testbuilt it in a
debian/unstable.
Lintian output seems reasonable to me. So does debian/copyright.
All in all, the package looks good for
Hi Juan,
are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well,
and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on
salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go
This package never got uploaded.
However, I also noticed that
Hi Juan,
are you still working on this ITP? I was looking at skopeo as well,
and stumpled upon this ITP. I noticed that you created a repository on
salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-ostreedev-ostree-go
This package never got uploaded.
However, I also noticed that
No problem at all. Thanks for taking care of the sync for me, Steve!
Reinhard
On January 2, 2019 2:30:50 PM EST, Steve Langasek
wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 04:32:38PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On 12/25/18 11:53 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > Package: aspectc++
&
Hi Steve,
On 12/25/18 11:53 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: aspectc++
> Version: 1:2.2+git20170823-7
> Followup-For: Bug #907632
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch
>
> Hello,
>
> Based on the bug history, I don't think this is a bug in gcc-8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 09:52:59 -0500
Source: slirp4netns
Binary: slirp4netns
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1~git20181119.5e4789b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler
Packaging available at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuse-overlayfs
This program is going to use fuse3, which is not co-installable with fuse2.
cf.
-
http://lists.debian.org/ca+fnjvb3j4h81k+bcxm3d2zjgheenjxhws06c5avicr51jg...@mail.gmail.com
-
Packaging available at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fuse-overlayfs
This program is going to use fuse3, which is not co-installable with fuse2.
cf.
-
http://lists.debian.org/ca+fnjvb3j4h81k+bcxm3d2zjgheenjxhws06c5avicr51jg...@mail.gmail.com
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: fuser-overlayfs
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano
2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi
* URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs
* License : GPLv3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: fuser-overlayfs
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano
2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi
* URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs
* License : GPLv3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: fuser-overlayfs
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Scrivano
2001-2007 Miklos Szeredi
* URL : https://github.com/containers/fuse-overlayfs
* License : GPLv3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
Package name: slirp4netns
Version : git HEAD
Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda
URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns
License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : User
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
Package name: slirp4netns
Version : git HEAD
Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda
URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns
License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : User
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
Package name: slirp4netns
Version : git HEAD
Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda
URL : https://github.com/rootless-containers/slirp4netns
License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:08:17 -0400
Source: aspectc++
Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.2+git20181008-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 10:05:31 -0400
Source: aspectc++
Binary: aspectc++ libpuma-dev libpuma-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.2+git20181008-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler
Changed-By: Reinhard
Control: found -1 0.0.20140505.a+dfsg-4+deb8u1
On 09/27/2018 01:28 AM, Matthias Faulstich wrote:
> Dear Reinhard,
>
> the bug should be fixed in the repository
> https://non-gnu.uvt.nl/
> as reported here
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903948
>
> The fixed Package there is
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
I think the issue is that the file got dropped from the package, yet the
default package is still referencing it. I took the liberty of taking the
image from the jessie package and propose a change at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dokuwiki/merge_requests/1.
Tanguy,
Package: gcc-8
Version: 8.2.0-4
Affects: aspectc++
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Relevant part from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0
In file included from
Package: gcc-8
Version: 8.2.0-4
Affects: aspectc++
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Relevant part from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0
In file included from
Package: gcc-8
Version: 8.2.0-4
Affects: aspectc++
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Relevant part from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aspectc%2B%2B=ppc64el=1%3A2.2%2Bgit20170823-8=1535500793=0
In file included from
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable.
Let's proceed with the RM bug.
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable.
Let's proceed with the RM bug.
I agree that it's time to have the package npapi-vlc removed from unstable.
Let's proceed with the RM bug.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: retitle -1 Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1
Well, I just checked, even the latest trunk does not support LLVM 6.0.1.
Or rather, it builds (with some minor, obvious modifications), but
doesn't work. I haven't tested LLVM 6.0.0, it may or may not work.
This needs to be looked into more.
Control: retitle -1 Needs porting to LLVM 6.0.1
Well, I just checked, even the latest trunk does not support LLVM 6.0.1.
Or rather, it builds (with some minor, obvious modifications), but
doesn't work. I haven't tested LLVM 6.0.0, it may or may not work.
This needs to be looked into more.
On 08/29/2018 08:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> AspectC++ upstream code already seems to support LLVM 6 (untested).
That's contradictory to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906972#10
This needs to be looked into more.
Also, why do you need to have this bug at severity serious?
On 08/29/2018 08:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> AspectC++ upstream code already seems to support LLVM 6 (untested).
That's contradictory to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906972#10
This needs to be looked into more.
Also, why do you need to have this bug at severity serious?
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your bug maintenance work, much appreciated!
On 08/28/2018 08:27 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reopen 902220
> Bug #902220 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [aspectc++]
>
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your bug maintenance work, much appreciated!
On 08/28/2018 08:27 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reopen 902220
> Bug #902220 {Done: Reinhard Tartler } [aspectc++]
>
901 - 1000 of 13013 matches
Mail list logo