301
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
i16 %arg to i8
+ %i2 = trunc i16 %arg to i14
+ %i3 = lshr i14 %i2, 8
+ store i8 %i, ptr %arg1, align 1
+ %i4 = getelementptr i8, ptr %arg1, i64 1
+ %i5 = trunc i14 %i3 to i8
+ store i8 %i5, ptr %i4, align 1
+ ret void
+}
___
llvm-branch-commits mai
return SDValue();
_______
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
.*}} map_clauses(from)
capture(ByRef) bounds(%{{[0-9]+}}) -> {{.*}} {name = "u%b(1_8)%a(1)"}
+subroutine foo2()
+ implicit none
+
+ type t0
+ integer :: a(10)
+ end type
+
+ type t1
+type(t0) :: b(10)
+ end type
+
+ type(t1) :: t, u
+
+!$omp target map(to: t%b(1)%a(1)) map(from: u%b(1)%a(1))
+ t%b(1)%a(1) = u%b(1)%a(1)
+!$omp end target
+
+end
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94495
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tring::npos ||
+ S.find("__TEXT,__swift") != std::string::npos)
return true;
break;
}
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
uses(to)
capture(ByRef) bounds(%{{[0-9]+}}) -> {{.*}} {name = "t%b(1_8)%a(1)"}
+! CHECK-DAG: omp.map.info var_ptr(%{{[0-9]+}} : {{.*}} map_clauses(from)
capture(ByRef) bounds(%{{[0-9]+}}) -> {{.*}} {name = "u%b(1_8)%a(1)"}
+subroutine foo2()
+ implicit none
+
+ type
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94494
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
h status" not in console_output:
+console_output += self.collect_console(1.0)
+n_reads += 1
# Verify the exit status message is printed.
self.assertIn(
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94494
___
lldb-co
# Verify the exit status message is printed.
self.assertIn(
_______
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
r openssl, ffmpeg and the second half of the table.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
that some known sanitizer incompatibilities are blocked
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kzhuravl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1,
gfx12-generic, gfx1200, gfx1201{{$}}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple r600--- -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix R600
// R600: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shiltian approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vgvassilev wrote:
Oh, we need to adjust
https://github.com/root-project/root/blob/be5d34934de883270683030b3af2cd1195d17ea8/cmake/modules/RootMacros.cmake#L272
to skip in case of C++...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94471
___
cfe-commits
@@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum class CudaArch {
GFX1151,
GFX1200,
GFX1201,
+ GFX9_GENERIC,
kzhuravl wrote:
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
x1012, gfx1013,
gfx10-3-generic, gfx1030, gfx1031, gfx1032, gfx1033, gfx1034, gfx1035, gfx1036,
gfx11-generic, gfx1100, gfx1101, gfx1102, gfx1103, gfx1150, gfx1151,
gfx12-generic, gfx1200, gfx1201{{$}}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple r600--- -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix R600
// R600: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wxz2020 wrote:
Any more comments? Otherwise, we will move forward. Thanks,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91022
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AtariDreams wrote:
@jroelofs on a slight tangent, when do we get to add information on the M4 chip?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
``sizeof(expr)``
+ where the expression is a pointer. Default is `false`.
PiotrZSL wrote:
expression type is a pointer
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
ot; or even
"suspicious use of 'sizeof()' on a pointer type resulting from an expression"
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
+- LGTM, except nits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
``sizeof(expr)``
+ where the expression is a pointer. Default is `false`.
PiotrZSL wrote:
You could mention here that CWE.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
r()).c_str());
JDevlieghere wrote:
Yup
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94420
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
iag::err_attribute_arm_sm_incompat_builtin)
<< TheCall->getSourceRange() << "streaming";
else
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93802
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
i32 1, -2147483648) i32
@llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x()
+; RANGE_20: call range(i32 1, 65536) i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x()
; CHECK: ret;
%x = call i32 @llvm.nvvm.read.ptx.sreg.nctaid.x()
ret i32 %x
@@ -327,14 +327,3 @@ declare void @llvm.nvvm.bar.sync(i32 %i)
!0 = !{i32 0, i32 19}
; RANGE-DAG: ![[ALREADY]] = !{i32 0, i32 19}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[BLK_IDX_XY]] = !{i32 0, i32 1024}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[BLK_IDX_XY]] = !{i32 0, i32 1024}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[BLK_IDX_Z]] = !{i32 0, i32 64}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[BLK_SIZE_XY]] = !{i32 1, i32 1025}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[BLK_SIZE_Z]] = !{i32 1, i32 65}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[LANEID]] = !{i32 0, i32 32}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[WARPSIZE]] = !{i32 32, i32 33}
-; RANGE_30-DAG: ![[GRID_IDX_X]] = !{i32 0, i32 2147483647}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[GRID_IDX_YZ]] = !{i32 0, i32 65535}
-; RANGE_30-DAG: ![[GRID_SIZE_X]] = !{i32 1, i32 -2147483648}
-; RANGE-DAG: ![[GRID_SIZE_YZ]] = !{i32 1, i32 65536}
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsed
> > >struct Mutext *mu_;
> > > }
> > > ```
> >
> >
> > Adopted `LateAttrParseExperimentalExt`. Let me know if that looks okay.
>
> Thanks! Could you please also add a test taking advantage of late parsing?
Done!
https://github.com/ll
read-safety-parsing.cpp
@@ -1516,11 +1516,7 @@ class Foo {
mutable Mutex mu;
int a GUARDED_BY(mu);
- static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
-//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
-#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
- // expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static dat
hub.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nishithshah2211 wrote:
Here is the revert PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94488
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93753
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
std::optional> {
@@ -112,7 +111,7 @@ TEST_F(PPDependencyDirectivesTest, MacroGuard) {
StringRef Input = (*FileMgr.getBufferForFile(File))->getBuffer();
bool Err = scanSourceForDependencyDirectives(
Input, DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Tokens,
-DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives, LangOpts);
+DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives);
EXPECT_FALSE(Err);
return llvm::ArrayRef(DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives);
};
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92600
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
- LangOptions LangOpts;
auto getDependencyDirectives = [&](FileEntryRef File)
-> std::optional> {
@@ -112,7 +111,7 @@ TEST_F(PPDependencyDirectivesTest, MacroGuard) {
StringRef Input = (*FileMgr.getBufferForFile(File))->getBuffer();
bool Err = scanSourceForDependencyDirectives(
Input, DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Tokens,
-DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives, LangOpts);
+DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives);
EXPECT_FALSE(Err);
return llvm::ArrayRef(DepDirectivesObjects.back()->Directives);
};
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arseExperimentalExt`. Let me know if that looks okay.
Thanks! Could you please also add a test taking advantage of late parsing?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1516,7 @@ class Foo {
mutable Mutex mu;
int a GUARDED_BY(mu);
- static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
-//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
-#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
- // expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data member 'mu'}}
-#endif
+ static int si GUARDED_BY(mu); // expected-error {{invalid use of non-static
data member 'mu'}}
static void foo() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu);
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
processing phase.
Yes, splitting this into two PRs would be great.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93753
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ersion falls
into one category if necessary. I'm not sure if we have this kind of use case,
but it is common for the other targets. Ignore this if we don't.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
a `-cc1` command line and does not specify
`-target-feature +neon`, as the driver would for the same triple. So the test
is maybe not actually representative of what would be done if going through the
driver, but the changes here look correct given that nothing asks for `+neon`.
`+simd` now implies
, return a concatenated list of the corresponding
// backend features (which might contain duplicates).
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
to existing
code in [D137617](https://reviews.llvm.org/D137617) but no details. If this has
been used for e.g. intrinsics definitions, I am surprised there are not more
test failures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94279
___
cfe-commits mailing list
neric, gfx12-generic{{$}}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple r600--- -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix R600
// R600: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
eric,
gfx11-generic, gfx12-generic{{$}}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple r600--- -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix R600
// R600: error: unknown target CPU 'not-a-cpu'
``
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94483
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
fx1032, gfx1033,
gfx1034, gfx1035, gfx1036, gfx1100, gfx1101, gfx1102, gfx1103, gfx1150,
gfx1151, gfx1200, gfx1201, gfx9-generic, gfx10-1-generic, gfx10-3-generic,
gfx11-generic, gfx12-generic{{$}}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple r600--- -target-cpu not-a-cpu -fsyntax-only %s
2>&1 | File
6_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c510)
#5 0x7f5baf2a816
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94471
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NagyDonat wrote:
@EugeneZelenko Thanks for inviting some additional reviewers. I'll add an entry
in the release notes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fopenacc -verify
+
+template
+void TemplUses() {
+#pragma acc loop device_type(I)
+ for(;;);
+#pragma acc loop dtype(*)
+ for(;;);
+#pragma acc loop device_type(class)
+ for(;;);
+#pragma acc loop device_type(private)
+ for(;;);
+#pragma acc loop device_type(bool)
+ for(;;);
+#pragma acc kernels dtype(true) device_type(false)
+ for(;;);
+ // expected-error@+2{{expected ','}}
+ // expected-error@+1{{expected identifier}}
+#pragma acc loop device_type(T::value)
+ for(;;);
+}
+
+void Inst() {
+ TemplUses(); // #INST
+}
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94471
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
type-lists
-Unknown
+Clang 19
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2693.html;>2693
@@ -16435,7 +16435,7 @@ C++ defect report implementation
status
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2771.html;>2771
DR
Transformation for unqualified-ids in address operator
-
e:
I added a default member initializer for everything
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tin wrote:
Nope, Any cast would make it a different shape than `(::bar)`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
om/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86402
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid
P SIGNATURE-
# gpg: Signature made Wed 05 Jun 2024 02:01:10 AM PDT
# gpg: using RSA key F13338574B662389866C7682BFFBD25F78C7AE83
# gpg:issuer "pbonz...@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "Paolo Bonzini " [full]
# gpg: ak
pdherbemont wrote:
Pushed an additional change on the documentation: the doc was incorrectly
stating that ACQUIRED_{AFTER,BEFORE} were not implemented but they are.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
nEvaluationContext::PotentiallyEvaluated,
nullptr,
+ ExpressionKind::EK_BoundsAttrArgument);
pdherbemont wrote:
Renamed!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
gt; problem as `guarded_by`: https://godbolt.org/z/hWTMxzrns
>
> Oh yes – maybe it makes sense to fix them in this commit. Let me try to look
> into that quickly.
Seems like it's an easy change for `acquired_after` and `acquired_before`!
Added support & a test.
https://github.co
nalysis.rst
index dcde0c706c704..6eefa306e3c89 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.rst
@@ -764,12 +764,6 @@ doesn't know that munl.mu == mutex. The SCOPED_CAPABILITY
attribute handles
aliasing for MutexLocker, but does so only for that particular pattern.
-ACQUIRED_BEFORE(...) and ACQUIRED_AFTER(...) are currently unimplemented.
--
-
-To be fixed in a future update.
-
-
.. _mutexheader:
mutex.h
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mutable Mutex mu;
int a GUARDED_BY(mu);
- static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
-//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
-#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
- // expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data member 'mu'}}
-#endif
+ static int si GUARDED_BY(mu); // expected-error {{invalid use of non-static
data member 'mu'}}
static void foo() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu);
//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
gnment);
// The copy expression is defined in terms of an OpaqueValueExpr.
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
TIFitis wrote:
@jdoerfert Kind reminder for review. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80343
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dkrupp closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Malloc(){
+ size_t size = 0;
+ scanf("%zu", ); // expected-note {{Taint originated here}}
+ // expected-note@-1 {{Taint propagated to the 2nd
argument}}
+ int *p = malloc(size);// expected-warning{{malloc is called with a tainted
(potentially attacker controlled) value}}
+// expected-note@-1{{malloc is called with a tainted
(potentially attacker controlled) value}}
+ free(p);
+}
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AlexVlx edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pe::getUnqual`, so if
we rename this we'd probably have to rename that as well, no?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94388
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nst CXXMethodDecl *candidate = dyn_cast(overload);
EugeneZelenko wrote:
```suggestion
const auto *candidate = dyn_cast(overload);
```
Type is explicitly stated in same statement.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94362
___
cfe-comm
:
```suggestion
const auto *Call = MemberParents[0].get();
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ere usable in IR, without
the target exposing a flat/generic AS, letting the target figure out the
legality of e.g. this or that ascast.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
s – maybe it makes sense to fix them in this commit. Let me try to look
into that quickly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-commits/jenkinsci/jenkins/push/
.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
___________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
lvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll commented:
`Sema.h` changes look good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hes or not, the stores have to produce valid in-memory
representation (according to the target ABI), which in the general case means
writing **all the** bits of the in-memory representation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
_______
cfe-commi
ins-infra-...@users.noreply.github.com>
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" grou
ins-infra-...@users.noreply.github.com>
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" grou
ins-infra-...@users.noreply.github.com>
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" grou
ins-infra-...@users.noreply.github.com>
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" grou
ins-infra-...@users.noreply.github.com>
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" grou
-project/pull/94216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
,
+Form);
+return;
pdherbemont wrote:
Done!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
o `EK_AttrArgument` and fixed the style (using the clang-format)
thank you for the feedback!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
d-safety-parsing.cpp
@@ -1516,11 +1516,7 @@ class Foo {
mutable Mutex mu;
int a GUARDED_BY(mu);
- static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
-//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
-#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
- // expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data m
:get(CGM.Int64Ty,
I * SingleVecTy->getMinNumElements());
}
Is it possible to add a test for this change too?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94267
_______
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jenkinsci-commits+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web vi
ails, change your notification settings at
https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins-infra/settings/notifications
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Commits" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
oo {
mutable Mutex mu;
int a GUARDED_BY(mu);
- static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
-//FIXME: Bug 32066 - Error should be emitted irrespective of C++ dialect
-#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
- // expected-error@-3 {{invalid use of non-static data member 'mu'}}
-#endif
+ static int si GUARDED_BY(mu);
, I);
+
+assert(V != nullptr);
+
+if (tag == Store) {
+ Builder.CreateStore(V, Dst);
+}
+
+if (tag == Memcpy) {
+ Builder.CreateMemCpy(Dst, {}, V, {}, bytes);
+}
+ }
+}
+ };
+};
+
+bool ExpandVariadics::runOnModule(Module ) {
+ bool Ch
taLayout &,
+VAEndInst *Inst) {
+ assert(ABI->vaEndIsNop());
+ Inst->eraseFromParent();
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool ExpandVariadics::expandVAIntrinsicCall(IRBuilder<> ,
+const DataLayout ,
+
continue;
+
+// Now need to track down indirect calls. Can't find those
+// by walking uses of variadic functions, need to crawl the instruction
+// stream. Fortunately this is only necessary for the ABI rewrite case.
+for (BasicBlock : F) {
+ for (Instruction : llvm::make_early_inc_range(BB)) {
Pierre-vh wrote:
```suggestion
for (Instruction : make_early_inc_range(BB)) {
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93362
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ariadic ... parameter, rearranged to allow indexing through a
+// va_list iterator
+enum { N = 4 };
+SmallVector FieldTypes;
+enum Tag { Store, Memcpy, Padding };
Pierre-vh wrote:
```suggestion
enum Tag { Store, Memcpy, Padding };
```
(tiny optional nit) I don't li
901 - 1000 of 1863382 matches
Mail list logo
