Re: "New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-04 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:34, singpol...@singpolyma.net said: > headers. Such implementations' ouput can be read by gpg, but there's > currently no way to convince gpg to talk to them :) I just checked the RFC and it says: If interoperability [with PGP 2] is not an issue, the new packet form

Re: "New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-04 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote: On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output? No. I was hoping that with al

Re: "New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-04 Thread David Shaw
On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote: >> On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber >> wrote: >>> tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output? >> >> No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for

Re: "New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-04 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output? No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for those packets that can be described that way Hmm, ok. I was hoping t

Re: "New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-03 Thread David Shaw
On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Is there a set of switches to tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length > headers for output? Specifically > . No. GPG automatically uses the old packet headers for those packets

"New" packet headers and gpg

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Is there a set of switches to tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output? Specifically . -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph _