No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 5/178 (x86_64), 40/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210329.n.0):
ID: 837005 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837005
ID: 837031
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210329.0):
ID: 836923 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210329.0):
ID: 836946 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/836946
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7
On 3/29/21 10:01 AM, David wrote:
In my install of Rawhide, gdm has a flat black background,
but in Fedora 34 Beta, it is a blue background that is different shades
of blue across the screen, sort of fading from one spot to another.
Just curious if this is intentional.
Most likely. There is
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dear all,
Following up on a broken update that got pushed:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d42d8643e4
(I'm not naming the package here, as my goal with this discussion is
not to assign blame but to figure out if we can prevent similar issues
from reoccuring)
Event timeline:
OLD: Fedora-34-20210329.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210330.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 21
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.88 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Lukas Ruzicka composed on 2021-03-30 13:22 (UTC+0200):
> *On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output) the
> system must be able to display the video content on each connected device.
Above to me is rather ambiguous.
Laptops generally have one external output only.
Hi My Name is Alisina Bolourchi,
I am an Outreachy applicant. I am a Code Your Future graduate I have
Experience In JavaScript and React I am willing to contribute to the
Fedora QA project.
I am a bit lost I have already done the following:
- Subscribe to the test
Hi Lukas,
*On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output), as
> well as with multiple video cards*
>
In regard to the above, I think what you intend to say is: "On computers
with video-out capability, as well as with multiple video cards...", or
something like that. As it
Hello everyone,
I'm very happy to join the team! I've wanted to contribute to open source
for a while and I'm glad I can now.
My name is Linda Okorie. I live in Lagos, Nigeria. I have experience with
JavaScript and React. I'm studying a lot more on JavaScript internals and
Java as well. I'm
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 AM David wrote:
>
> Does anything exciting happen during that time ?
>
Hello,
Ben has already answered the organisational stuff, but if you have asked
because you wanted to know
how safe it is to use the Beta version, my reply would be that it is
generally safe
Thanks for your view.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:45 PM Richard Ryniker wrote:
>
> desktops to work with multiple displays on erery architecture. It is
> desirable, yes, but this sounds like a QA attempt to control development.
>
No, this is not a QA attempt to control development. This is a
Should multiple displays be a release-blocking criterion? I can imagine
a desire to ship a new release on-schedule because of significant,
content that works fine, but with multiple display support deferred for
an update because upstream problems are likely to take a while to fix. I
am
Hi Manisha,
thanks for showing interest in our project, I already saw your pull request
and contacted Frantisek regarding the API changes.
L.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Manisha Kanyal
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm Manisha Kanyal, a Computer Science & Engineering student and an
>
Hello friends of Fedora,
I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested
on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you
think about it and perhaps suggest improvements.
Target:
*Preferably Beta*
*Proposal 1 (conservative criterion)*
*On
Hi Everyone,
I'm Manisha Kanyal, a Computer Science & Engineering student and an Outreachy
2021 applicant. I'm looking to contribute to the project "Improve Fedora QA
Dashboard".
I've forked the repo, cloned, and started making changes locally to get an
understanding of how things are going
18 matches
Mail list logo