** Changed in: u-boot-nezha (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068600
Title:
Rebuild with current OpenSBI
To manage notifications
Uploaded with a few minor changes as agreed in #ubuntu-devel:
Dropped versioned B-D as this is unnecessary.
Adjusted changelog to add bullet '*' and note that the reason for the
B-D change is to fix an FTBFS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
@Nathaniel
Thank you for the merge proposal! Asking here in the bug since I think
my question is more general.
Please could you explain your use case? In reviewing your merge proposal
I'm missing that context which makes it difficult for me to verify the
correctness of your code.
os-prober is
Hello lahari, or anyone else affected,
Accepted horizon into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/4:24.0.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Hua, or anyone else affected,
Accepted horizon into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/4:24.0.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: sysstat (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066117
Title:
sysstat.service is enabled by default on 24.04
This seems fine, but I don't see any mention of inverse tests in the
test plan. Are we sure that password changes will continue to fail in
scenarios where it is expected to fail, such as in admin password
incorrect and user not authorized cases? If there are already automated
tests that exercise
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libfilezilla has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator has completed successfully and the package is now being
released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates
Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug
report. In
The verification of the Stable Release Update for crash has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Thank you for the analysis. I've triggered a retest against migration-
reference/0 then. That should reset the baseline and remove the flag.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847
The binary is accepted now. But if we're not going to use apt to try
installing from proposed, I suppose I should wait for a britney run to
ensure that there are no installability issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libvpoll-eventfd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
I pinged in #ubuntu-release for an AA review for the binary.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061182
Title:
mstflint-dkms no longer exists in mantic
To manage notifications about
Looks like we rely solely on autopkgtests for verification, so a formal
verification report isn't needed? If so it might be worth explicitly
mentioning this in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bind9Updates and the SRU
template used.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The verification of the Stable Release Update for bind9 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for boinc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ngspice has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for python-qrencode has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for motion has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for hexchat has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Further to discussion in #ubuntu-devel just now[1], we'll aim for a
4.7.3 release that will eliminate the need for the distro patches and
with Steve's other comments above addressed. For now then I'll reject
the current uploads from the queue.
[1]:
Size-based benefit analysis here:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2024-May/043006.html
** Summary changed:
- Packages file contains extra uinnecessary hashes
+ Packages file contains extra unnecessary hashes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Packages files (eg.
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-
amd64/Packages.xz) contain hashes using MD5sum, SHA1, SHA256 and SHA512,
but if we deprecate the older ones and leave only SHA512 (for example),
then we get a 30% or so size saving, reducing the
The verification of the Stable Release Update for far2l has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted easyeffects into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easyeffects/7.1.6-1ubuntu0.24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately this doesn't address my concerns
though. Please address paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 from my comment 7 above.
Depending on your answer, it may be the case that I end up rejecting the
SRU because the impact is not sufficient to justify one (see:
Thank you for the discussion. My reaction was the same as Andreas', but
with the alternatives having been considered, if you still want to make
this change then I guess it's fine to defer to you to make the call as
you're driving this and the various options all seem reasonable to me.
The change
I spoke to Andreas and Renan about this bug just now. I'm told that 32.2
in proposed passes all verification tests against the exceptional test
plan except for this bug. But we also need this bug fixed and don't want
to have to wait for the additional time a full test rerun would take
along with a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
It isn't obvious to me what Ubuntu might be "doing wrong", if anything,
that is causing this issue. Xen in Ubuntu is in our universe component
and community-supported only. Therefore I don't expect this bug to
** Description changed:
- I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update-
- notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive
- unless I subscribe to Pro.
+ I understand that, when informing me about updates, update-notifier will
+ tell me about Pro-only updates
Steve asked for this to be Critical and assigned to Simon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065863
Title:
needrestart causes kernel upgrade messages in motd
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
On Noble, I see this in my motd:
*** System restart required ***
Pending kernel upgrade!
Running kernel version:
6.8.0-22-generic
Diagnostics:
The currently running kernel version is not the expected kernel version
6.8.0-31-generic.
I found this code in needrestart:
This doesn't seem like a duplicate to me?
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2051115
ubuntu pro integration interferes with dist-upgrade prompting
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
OK, thanks. I guess we can review the Jammy upload for now then on the
assumption that the Mantic upload won't have substantial changes until
it arrives in the queue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This should be Fix Released for the development release, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061324
Title:
Error when re-building package from source
To manage notifications
> * run update-maintainer script
FWIW, it's not necessary to mention this directly. It is correct to do
it, but convention is to skip mentioning it in the changelog because
otherwise we'd have to unnecessarily mention it on nearly every Ubuntu
upload.
--
You received this bug notification
I wondered if ucf is expected to handle dpkg-divert -ed files in the
first place, since that seemed odd to me. It does seem like that's a
feature the code was intended to support, although it's unclear to me if
it ever worked, and it's not really documented anywhere I can find
except that is
Debian is behind and the server team is upstream, so there is no work to
do on this package.
There is a delta introduced in Ubuntu, but no need to merge it upstream
right now as there wouldn't be any user-facing benefit to that. We can
catch up when there is user-facing benefit work to do.
**
There is currently no newer Debian version.
** Changed in: mosh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064428
Title:
Merge mosh from Debian
Currently the version of adsys in Mantic is 0.13.1ubuntu0.1, which is
lower than the version in Jammy Unapproved. What's your plan for Mantic
and/or users upgrading to Mantic please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.27.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Hector, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
I'm concerned that my questions at
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2024-March/005937.html
have not been fully answered. Please could you participate in that
discussion?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for usbguard has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
Thank you for the detailed explanation of your testing!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855189
Title:
usbguard stops responding when recvmsg receives ENOBUFS
To manage notifications
The verification of the Stable Release Update for sagemath has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
~ubuntu-release: could we treat this as a blocker for enabling upgrades,
please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064349
Title:
ubuntu-kernel-accessories does not get installed on
Public bug reported:
Upgrading from Jammy to Noble, we need the kernel metapackage to switch
from the Jammy HWE one to linux-generic or similar. linux-generic
Recommends ubuntu-kernel-accessories. It should get pulled in on
upgrade. It's important to ensure that this works so it is the same as
in
I've removed this from the queue as requested. Thank you for all your
work on this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485
Title:
Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected
To
Hello Paride, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Mauricio identified that there are many symbols added in libvirt-daemon-
driver-qemu.so, due to the inclusion of the RPC archives, associated
with gcc/ld export-dynamic in the build (which includes all symbols, not
just actually used). On consultation with both Mauricio and Sergio, we
concluded
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/unhide/+git/unhide/+merge/464618
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062269
Title:
incorrect parsing of long
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssh has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
It's not clear to me if a simple "ssh -Snone localhost" is covered by
the autopkgtests, so I did that manually, testing without -proposed
first, and ensuring to run "sudo systemctl restart ssh" after upgrading
to -proposed to ensure that I'm definitely hitting the daemon from
-proposed.
Success
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747499
Title:
98-reboot-required and Interaction with livepatch
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998947
Title:
restore reboot notification so that users are notified after
unattended-upgrades
To manage
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036213
Title:
Duplicate reboot prompt is displayed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017401
Title:
Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel
upgrade when Livepatch enabled
To
> would like this avenue to be investigated
To be clear, I mean the general avenue of workarounds in mkvterm, not
necessarily my specific idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485
I consulted with other SRU team members today.
We agree that the bug is valid and that the current behaviour is wrong.
However, if we were to change behaviour, the concern is that existing
users might be regressed in a way that will be difficult for them to
track down. The trade-off we must make
> still if adding hwclock command back has no conflict, it will be great
helpful for customers.
Unfortunately hwclock is in universe so we cannot easily ship it
automatically any more. We'd have to promote it back to main first. So
it isn't so easy.
If you wish to undertake "Guest Customization"
Here's some more background:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-
devel/2011-May/002526.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039206
Title:
open-vm-tools "hwclock" needed
The reason hwclock isn't shipped any more is that Ubuntu now uses
systemd's functionality to perform the same task instead. To configure
RTC translation between UTC and local time, the primary supported method
is now "sudo timedatectl set-local-rtc 0" or "sudo timedatectl set-
local-rtc 1". See
Hello Jamie, or anyone else affected,
Accepted usbguard into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbguard/0.7.6+ds-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Accepting, but in the Test Plan, please could you elaborate on how long
you need to typically wait to see the reproducer, so that a third party
will be able to verify if they are not affected? Eg. 1 minute, 1 hour, 1
day or 1 week? Then, during SRU verification, if we wait (say) double
that time,
Hello Roland, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pure-ftpd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure-
ftpd/1.0.49-4ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Arrigo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-qrencode into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
qrencode/1.2-5ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Denys, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ngspice into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ngspice/36+ds-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Interleaving Frank's and jldolan's comments here:
> I just assumed socat was not a very popular package.
My experience is the opposite! I understand it to be used in all kinds
of corners - particularly in user scripts that don't appear in the
archive.
> I've learned (and I generally agree with
Ah sorry, I think I know what this is. Let me look again.
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification becau
steps to reproduce or have a correction to make to my analysis,
please do that in a comment and then change the status back to New.
Thanks!
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigne
SRU review
> +-version_attributes = set(["lio_version", "version"])
> +-discovery_auth_attributes = set(["discovery_auth"])
These might be accessed by an API caller somewhere, and so would
represent a regression. I spent some time digging around and didn't find
a direct example, so I was going
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059857
Title:
logcheck report flooded with cron session li
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776
Title:
After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is
assigned does not become active in
@dgadomski looks like you signed the uploads. Please could you take a
look and re-upload with the correct versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988942
Title:
Failed to set image
SRU review
Please could you explain why "minor-corrections-in-makefile-and-test-
sh.patch" is required - in particular the change to Makefile.in, but
also the test change? If only parts are required, can the patch be made
more minimal?
> [ Where problems could occur ]
I accept that this is a
> [Rationale]
> - The package bpfcc is required in Ubuntu main as a runtime dependency of
> bpftrace.
Correction: this is true, but we'd also like bpfcc-tools in its own
right since these tools are recommended by experts for direct use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The main user story being implemented here is the one specified by
Brendan Gregg in his literature, including his book "Systems
Performance, 2nd Edition". In that book he specifies "Linux crisis tool
packages" [Table 4.1], which specifies bpfcc-tools and a bunch of
binaries provided by that.
This is in the Noble release pocket now.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055432
Title:
[needs-packaging] Metapackage
** Tags added: needs-upstream-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051288
Title:
byobu should revert to dmidecode if bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo are set
to zero
To manage
This sounds like exactly the behaviour that I explained in 2013 here:
https://askubuntu.com/a/332421/7808
ifconfig still exists but is deprecated and no longer shipped by
default. Users should use its replacement "ip" instead.
However it is true that ifconfig does not display the additional
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: server-todo
** Tags added: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Noble)
** Also affects: numptyphysics (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936449
Title:
numptyphysics segfault on startup on XUb 21.04
What's the status of this bug in Mantic and Noble please? Were 8.2 and
8.3 ever affected, and if so, in which versions were they fixed? I
couldn't figure this out within a few minutes - sorry!
> [ Test Plan ]
> Run the upstream tests included within this fix. To do so, an upstream
> [Test plan]
> Needs to be finalized...
Is this finalized yet please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442
Title:
Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error:
This bug was fixed in the package python-qrencode - 1.2-7
Sponsored for Sudip Mukherjee (sudipmuk)
---
python-qrencode (1.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
* fix crash in Python 3.10 (Closes: #1032287)
- redo the fix from 1.2-5.1 which was lost with the update to
Thank you for working on this!
> Can I suggest ubuntu adds the debian delta as well as the ubuntu delta
patch as part of this sync & merge
Sorry, I don't follow. It looks like lp-2037569-skip-
bd_part_get_disk_spec.patch is part of the Ubuntu delta uploaded in
ubuntu1. A sync would drop this,
Thank you for the fix! I haven't reviewed this in detail, but normally
I'd expect there to be a commit or bug report upstream but I cannot find
one. Is this fixed upstream yet please, and if not, have you sent it
there for review? Looks like that would be here:
Uploaded.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565
Title:
[FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and
It sounds like this is/was a valid regression report. It's something
that was considered:
> e.g. 4.2 may be selected instead of 4.0 used previously. This could
have an impact on workloads if there are any regressions in switching to
4.2 from 4.0 etc.
...but on balance we chose to proceed anyway.
Hello Kai-Heng, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
1 - 100 of 12260 matches
Mail list logo
