On 06/06/2016 03:04 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
...
> 5) promote service on nodeB - replace config and internally reload/restart
> 6) start VIP on nodeB
>
> 1-2 and 5-6 pairs may need to be reversed if you bind service to a
> specific VIP (instead of listening on INADDR_ANY).
Yeah, that could
07.06.2016 02:20, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 03:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Adam Spiers wrote:
>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> > > Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> > >> My main
On 06/06/2016 03:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> 06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
On 06/06/2016 05:45 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> My main question is how useful would it
Adam Spiers wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > >> My main question is how useful would it actually be in the proposed use
> > >> cases.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> >> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >> A recent thread discussed a proposed new feature, a new environment
> >> variable that would be passed to resource agents,
On 05/20/2016 06:20 AM, Felix Zachlod (Lists) wrote:
> version 1.1.13-10.el7_2.2-44eb2dd
>
> Hello!
>
> I am currently developing a master/slave resource agent. So far it is working
> just fine, but this resource agent implements reload() and this does not work
> as expected when running as
06.06.2016 23:28, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 05/30/2016 01:14 PM, DacioMF wrote:
Hi,
I had 4 nodes with Ubuntu 14.04LTS in my cluster and all of then worked well. I
need upgrade all my cluster nodes to Ubuntu 16.04LTS without stop my resources.
Two nodes have been updated to 16.04 and the two
On 05/30/2016 08:13 AM, Les Green wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a two-node cluster with no-quorum-policy=ignore and an external
> ping responder to try to determine if a node has its network down (it's
> the dead one), or if the other node is really dead..
>
> The ping helps to determine who the
06.06.2016 22:43, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 05/30/2016 01:14 PM, DacioMF wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had 4 nodes with Ubuntu 14.04LTS in my cluster and all of then worked well.
> I need upgrade all my cluster nodes to Ubuntu 16.04LTS without stop my
> resources. Two nodes have been updated to 16.04 and the two others remains
> with 14.04. The
On 06/06/2016 12:25 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot
>>> wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016
On 06/06/16 01:13 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm currently establishing a two node cluster. I have a FC SAN and two hosts.
> My services are integrated into virtual machines (kvm). The vm's should
> reside on the SAN.
> The hosts are connected to the SAN via FC HBA. Inside the hosts i
06.06.2016 19:39, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
A recent thread
Hi,
i'm currently establishing a two node cluster. I have a FC SAN and two hosts.
My services are integrated into virtual machines (kvm). The vm's should reside
on the SAN.
The hosts are connected to the SAN via FC HBA. Inside the hosts i see already
the volume from the SAN. I'd like to store
On 06/05/2016 07:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 08:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
A recent thread discussed a proposed new
Thanks, really appreciate your help.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> But C1 is *guaranteed *to deliver *before *m(k)? No case where C1 is
>>
>
> Yes
>
> delivered after m(k)?
>>
>
> Nope.
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Satish
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:10
But C1 is *guaranteed *to deliver *before *m(k)? No case where C1 is
Yes
delivered after m(k)?
Nope.
Regards,
Satish
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Jan Friesse wrote:
satish kumar napsal(a):
Hello honza, thanks for the response !
With state sync, I simply
But C1 is *guaranteed *to deliver *before *m(k)? No case where C1 is
delivered after m(k)?
Regards,
Satish
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> satish kumar napsal(a):
>
> Hello honza, thanks for the response !
>>
>> With state sync, I simply mean that
Hi All,
When a node joined while start of the resource takes time, start of the
resource is carried out twice.
Step 1) Put sleep in start of the Dummy
resource.(/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/Dummy)
(snip)
dummy_start() {
sleep 60
dummy_monitor
if [ $? = $OCF_SUCCESS ]; then
(snip)
Hi All, When a node joined while start of the resource takes time, start of the
resource is carried out twice. Step 1) Put sleep in start of the Dummy
resource.(/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/Dummy) (snip)
dummy_start() { sleep 60 dummy_monitor if [ $? = $OCF_SUCCESS ]; then
(snip) Step 2)
Hello honza, thanks for the response !
With state sync, I simply mean that 'k-1' messages were delivered to N1, N2
and N3 and they have applied these messages to change their program state.
N1.state = apply(m(k-1);
N2.state = apply(m(k-1);
N3.state = apply(m(k-1);
The document you shared cleared
05.06.2016 22:22, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 06/04/2016 01:02 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
I'd modify RA to support master/slave concept.
I'm assuming you use a shared mail store on your imapd cluster? I want
No, I use cyrus internal replication.
to host the storage on the same cluster
Hi,
Hello,
Virtual Synchrony Property - messages are delivered in agreed order and
configuration changes are delivered in agreed order relative to message.
What happen to this property when network is partitioned the cluster into
two. Consider following scenario (which I took from one of the
Hi,
Would like to understand how secure is the corosync authkey.
As the authkey is a binary file, how is the private key saved inside the
authkey?
Corosync uses symmetric encryption, so there is no public certificate.
authkey = private key
What safeguard mechanisms are in place if the
Hi,
Would like to understand how secure is the corosync authkey.
As the authkey is a binary file, how is the private key saved inside the
authkey?
What safeguard mechanisms are in place if the private key is compromised?
For e.g I don't think it uses any temporary session key which refreshes
30 matches
Mail list logo