Hi, some updates about this?
Thank you
Il Mer 4 Set 2019, 10:46 Marco Marino ha scritto:
> First of all, thank you for your support.
> Andrey: sure, I can reach machines through IPMI.
> Here is a short "log":
>
> #From ld1 trying to contact ld1
> [root@ld
e1-monitor-interval-60s)
Any idea?
How can I reset the state of the cluster without downtime? "pcs resource
cleanup" is enough?
Thank you,
Marco
Il giorno mer 4 set 2019 alle ore 10:29 Jan Pokorný
ha scritto:
> On 03/09/19 20:15 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > 03.09.2019 11:09
Hi, I have a problem with fencing on a two node cluster. It seems that
randomly the cluster cannot complete monitor operation for fence devices.
In log I see:
crmd[8206]: error: Result of monitor operation for fence-node2 on
ld2.mydomain.it: Timed Out
As attachment there is
- /var/log/messages
t; monitor fail, use ocf-tester
>
> 2018-04-13 15:29 GMT+02:00 Marco Marino <marino@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello, I'm trying to configure a simple 2 node cluster with drbd and
>> HALVM (ocf:heartbeat:LVM) but I have a problem that I'm not able to solve,
>> to I de
Hello, I'm trying to configure a simple 2 node cluster with drbd and HALVM
(ocf:heartbeat:LVM) but I have a problem that I'm not able to solve, to I
decided to write this long post. I need to really understand what I'm doing
and where I'm doing wrong.
More precisely, I'm configuring a pacemaker
s bad."
in the function LVM_validate_all()
Anyway, it's only a warning but there is a good reason. I'm not an expert,
I'm studying for a certification and I have a lot of doubts.
Thank you for your help
Marco
2017-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Ferenc Wágner <wf...@niif.hu>:
> Marco Marino &l
b...@suse.com>:
> Hi, Marco
>
> On 01/18/2017 04:45 PM, Marco Marino wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm trying to realize a cluster with 2 nodes that manages a volume
> group.
> Basically I have a san connected to both nodes that exposes 1 lun. So both
> nodes have a disk /dev/sd
Hi, I'm trying to realize a cluster with 2 nodes that manages a volume
group.
Basically I have a san connected to both nodes that exposes 1 lun. So both
nodes have a disk /dev/sdb. From one node I did:
fdisk /dev/sdb <- Create a partition with type = 8e (LVM)
pvcreate /dev/sdb1
vgcreate myvg
reducing rebuild array time is my goal, so I think that
create a virtual drive for each drive group is the right way. Please give
me some advises
Thanks
2015-09-18 13:02 GMT+02:00 Kai Dupke <kdu...@suse.com>:
> On 09/18/2015 09:28 AM, Marco Marino wrote:
> > Can you explain me
k has to be recovered, affecting all 16
volumes."
Can you explain me this? 16 volumes?
Thank you
2015-09-17 15:54 GMT+02:00 Kai Dupke <kdu...@suse.com>:
> On 09/17/2015 09:44 AM, Marco Marino wrote:
> > Hi, I have 2 servers supermicro lsi 2108 with many disks (80TB) and I'm
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo