[Bug 119437] Re: apport_python_hook.py sys.argv check broken for embedded Python interpreter
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- apport_python_hook.py sys.argv check broken for embedded Python interpreter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] apport-collect data
Architecture: i386 CurrentDmesg: [ 30.624287] agpgart-via :00:00.0: AGP 2.0 bridge [ 30.624309] agpgart-via :00:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode [ 30.624352] nvidia :01:00.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode [ 37.280058] eth0: no IPv6 routers present DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8367-8233 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 PccardctlIdent: PccardctlStatus: ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=efe2eb86-9283-451c-90ee-7d0c8b741247 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3 libdrm2 2.4.12+git20090801.45078630-0ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090825.fc74e119-0ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare Xrandr: Error: command ['xrandr', '--verbose'] failed with exit code 1: Can't open display dmi.bios.date: 11/26/2002 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00 PG dmi.board.name: VT8367-8233 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PG:bd11/26/2002:svnVIATechnologies,Inc.:pnVT8367-8233:pvr:rvn:rnVT8367-8233:rvr:cvn:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: VT8367-8233 dmi.sys.vendor: VIA Technologies, Inc. fglrx: Not loaded glxinfo: Error: command ['glxinfo'] failed with exit code 255: Error: unable to open display setxkbmap: Error: command ['setxkbmap', '-print'] failed with exit code 255: Cannot open display default display system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: i686kernel: 2.6.31-9-generic xdpyinfo: Error: command ['xdpyinfo'] failed with exit code 1: xdpyinfo: unable to open display . -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305904/Dependencies.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305903/BootDmesg.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] Lspci.txt
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305905/Lspci.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] PciDisplay.txt
** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305906/PciDisplay.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] ProcCpuinfo.txt
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305908/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] ProcInterrupts.txt
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305909/ProcInterrupts.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] ProcModules.txt
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305910/ProcModules.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] UdevDb.txt
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305911/UdevDb.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] UdevLog.txt
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305912/UdevLog.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] XorgConf.txt
** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305913/XorgConf.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] XorgLog.txt
** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305914/XorgLog.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] XorgLogOld.txt
** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305915/XorgLogOld.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413399] xkbcomp.txt
** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31305917/xkbcomp.txt -- [i945] Screen flickers after jaunty update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414194] Re: Apport assumes dmesg output is ordered - not always true
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Apport assumes dmesg output is ordered - not always true https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242085] Re: Apport fails to launch
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Apport fails to launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311764] Re: E: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- E: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311764 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293283] Re: apport could help the user search for already existing bugs with a link
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- apport could help the user search for already existing bugs with a link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293283] Re: apport could help the user search for already existing bugs with a link
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: apport Status: New = Confirmed -- apport could help the user search for already existing bugs with a link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228898] Re: apport-cli wrong options in spanish translation
It's fixed in Karmic. *** ¿De qué tipo de problema desea informar? Opciones: 1: External or internal storage devices (e. g. USB sticks) 2: Other problem C: Cancelar Por favor elija (1/2/C): ** Changed in: language-pack-es (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- apport-cli wrong options in spanish translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 394411] Re: attach_hardware() should hide disk labels for privacy
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Confirmed ** Tags removed: kerneloops -- attach_hardware() should hide disk labels for privacy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394411 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401973] Re: ubuntu-bug's quoting prevents .crash files from being reported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 422881 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422881 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 422881 ubuntu-bug argument issue with complete path to .crash file -- ubuntu-bug's quoting prevents .crash files from being reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398599] Re: ubuntu-bug reports Could not import module, is a package upgrade in progress? Error: No module named launchpadlib.errors
These two commands worked without problem in my Karmic. -- ubuntu-bug reports Could not import module, is a package upgrade in progress? Error: No module named launchpadlib.errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398599 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417850] Re: apport-collect crashes line 106
Hi! Could you test if this happen in Karmic? I've tested it in my Karmic and I can't reproduce it. Thanks ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- apport-collect crashes line 106 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417850 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413805] Re: Message has no sense
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Marco Rodrigues (gothicx) -- Message has no sense https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413805] Re: Message has no sense
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: Marco Rodrigues (gothicx) = (unassigned) -- Message has no sense https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413805] Re: Message has no sense
** Tags added: bitesize -- Message has no sense https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413805] Re: Message has no sense
** Branch linked: lp:~gothicx/apport/fix_sentence_resume -- Message has no sense https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208592] Re: Synchronize maatkit version with upstream
** Changed in: maatkit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Synchronize maatkit version with upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 363458] Re: Freeze completly computer as soon as I start to view a flash video in Opera or Firefox
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92207 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92207 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92207 konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation -- Freeze completly computer as soon as I start to view a flash video in Opera or Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 92207] Re: konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation
I also have this problem with Karmic with latest updates. -- konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 401333] Re: init rc main process stopped and continued in loop on system reboot/shutdown
I still have this problem.. and the after shutdown it asks me to run 'fsck'. Really strange. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid = Fix Released ** Package changed: ubuntu = upstart (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- init rc main process stopped and continued in loop on system reboot/shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401333] Re: init rc main process stopped and continued in loop on system reboot/shutdown
Maybe it could be a kernel problem. Bug 418560 -- init rc main process stopped and continued in loop on system reboot/shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418509] Re: [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7
It now works, but I still have problems after the shutdown. It asks me for root password and to run fsck manually. -- [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208592] Re: Synchronize maatkit version with upstream
** Changed in: maatkit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Synchronize maatkit version with upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363458] Re: Freeze completly computer as soon as I start to view a flash video in Opera or Firefox
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92207 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92207 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92207 konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation -- Freeze completly computer as soon as I start to view a flash video in Opera or Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92207] Re: konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation
I also have this problem with Karmic with latest updates. -- konqueror and firefox freeze when closing a tab with a flash animation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hi from Portugal!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi folks! I'm Marco Rodrigues and I live in Portugal. I subscribed to be a member of Debian-Ruby, because I want to participate more in Debian Ruby to have more packages in good shape and try to collaborate with the team to update them. First of all, I need to learn about Debian Ruby packaging. I'm not an Ruby hardcore programmer. I just have done some Ruby on Rails little website and some small Ruby hacking in Debian QA (hi lucas :-p), nothing special :) Let's hope we can improve Ruby on Debian and it's derivatives distributions. Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKlYuNAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzIYcQAMBW4t10/HQCMmTzhBHmqNc7 967CJ2tat6+yWcyBrOMLKzx4z9Xy2eybtU36ARbDW3PpRqH19jiNYOhdHxhnvyMf sbAK2YrDqYdOYRIgHE2zAMmS975TghtzNhQzef3NSYegOTvcf6BUcoCy3cvHtneQ RWwuSgryvuW/d8zimULPip8FR1aiyS/H/HkUp70sfxOslKzgt4c8qFm+GSvb94P2 3ui8j8WnvhdzR/AqQHeY2akTH5+pugHP60iElz9P/EoI2Q7g/u/V6uy+VYLKiFa4 9meqtfIrCf4Q/CSuLHBjwAtSZwrey+CF3z7WBAKd4nwQbbAyyG8wcNKe0xiRkwm8 l7/X034SHLmsyO6olXQDiKtcYI9XFXpZxiV8K3ChuLwRy4MqVe2SwJ3M0r124Syl g9K0Elldgz4DfhdE7i5eAIqEK4iy9GqybgxpasO8+e0gJ2nKZWV10e3/PAYYo+px Afh3LK56xQdepHdKZ75yYm5hFhxrwXhYnCArPq9HFRgWBMSR54HVuYE+qMlWRsSl /yegqOZn+J7QZHlfhOEK5sIwiRw3QfNCEBA28HpED5XehQpz7t2UBJLDtAAfqcKn sGlsNb40oFX5LiRHdZat3HxcL+p5dtqQxObAaSKqOKiP7tPlbNz67mz2n71Rn2O1 F64JNrq+DMfJUBu9Bggw =Zghc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#506647: This package is not part of Debian archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reopen 506647 thanks Ups.. looks like it's part of the coming freeruner packages. I'm reopening it. http://wiki.debian.org/pkg-fso - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKklzLAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzuhcP/0NVGvoWfUP4U6QSyM+C+AkJ aIsNJNV6TxsbCo3vbVszvEOK/WiPzG/5edCHAszDBKLjmJ/WSI1fR5X49W+S17fr vMKC9WClTzTWg8eyBzkh199tUn1TC4VAeZV8Cbs46nxykO3X3OGYJzgDSi5FiKYd HsG2/xGT7WfdWYg8Zt1hTOSvFFTEHlhPFfjhchzpJJHgXBfn4jrv5eO4cTuWEwDf 3nxPiB1UXXrQnikB6NX3zjxvrViN/W/nNwtqnhAK4xrbBt+BIFJcJFmJEQVFUyKr FGUc+/+Wag8uNHLODlDJJALPfmKvRUEsKzgk9Txira5+qXKqHH1EAcZMwxNxw7Qr 8qJ0uib77+DB/871N+XnxkwTl5sM3YUgKy32dIo9yBwPT74R3v6zAJpIB6IaeNLg 9A9wWaBO+gLyjLFCLpXxrcmC3vXEhLN2+for5d8ZWDSMngjKo7BoMc0aILBG7Yzx rKhhBaW04tzv1j39Dreb4VGgoQj04+mzdQZ4+y0PsbuQqGkA+VLWFFRRfh6IWe5t LgHWxqwlO27ELf/9V6iSK3zJyLRn/Un+8gaR//+aNnmTpxYhJQ0FCijgflkwgvuA BdnovS6jk/Iz1oan1FEmUorIk/tL47mVcr1U5CfG3l6HElKVgIM+bvSXdHTqmoE8 chvRrLDgdWcpFlmj995s =ncfc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#506648: This package is not part of Debian archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reopen 506648 thanks Ups.. looks like it's part of the coming freeruner packages. I'm reopening it. http://wiki.debian.org/pkg-fso - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKkl0fAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzyzQQAJpc82Fqdh4OaZX/RwGeFnx3 a1sggVAINPk9Hm+9BvBLPvAofqoEFOC/hswJJY72jGiomjavJGVDjjKA5ahBO1DP 1ESUHvhVAostWonOUGvbgM7NJGvZWdSrx6kqrHyTSutMIyUP+OwPx7+atXYwqSxO vTk2Zb2lwEnxVb5yldtU8TwlqcmOidfCOBBY8VbWhEXF2hUXaofW9UKrkOs5df7V 4avFMxLSPVcDzuK5A+MyDCyiFL3eQ8KKJlkE9dfqXFbXVbDCSDBhfoylAJMLbmpJ lCUN0wOmnDHmLxjeMYLrxpMxUBW7PnoGyYylzt7Rolvkxvg6ZTQzwqUhH5dtYSiS cE3I8ZVN5KkVCj3H31RBo54DCSxPlzzlC7YKW0ir+EIEbd4ylkZOret6kKUpXGEW WHp0knVn2YWjCZIdNP+Eeh5qGXLzC1tAblJ47Ix1Fk8GxJW8IkGNHyCj7Ta4pf5m 5FFk4AYSJCD27nXrHCWKBzNjl8egpYxaHhDtEgbwXVUsn6az8sMRD2iUlvuDSTuV xm1OkDvthOdAcstkq2ohSoQ4bVRV4hSRq2gVT7UpqqLRv4CvR7fDngb3wVRfSPeA x6/AAj7wQWCv9NFIxv689B9EAmrSdz0zVCQ7W1lQe1/huSLsRM/OsI+y1hwjYF4b ugWSeLFRLjZNiXTHygRm =ZUYU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#506648: This package is not part of Debian archive
reopen 506648 thanks -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#62859: Bug#210450: marked as done (Please provide template for removed non-free documentation)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 24.08.09 Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org) wrote: Hi Marco, To: 210450-d...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Package tetex-doc has been removed from Debian Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:00:55 +0100 Message-Id: 1251108055.954266.4263.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5+rm You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/210450 in Debian BTS against the package tetex-doc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/472810. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Are you sure the bug is fixed in TL? I guess many bugs applying to the old teTeX packages still apply to TL. We just didn't find the time to close the outdated bugs and reassign these whiche still apply. So please stop closing the bugs just b/c the package has been removed. Hi! I'm closing them versioned in unstable, so they will remain open for older Debian distributions, such oldstable, old and stable, so anyone in the team can handle them and do whatever they want, they just don't disappear. Most of the maintainers forget to move their bugs to new packages or to close them, so Debian QA needs to clean them out of BTS and if someone don't agree, just feel free to reopen the bug and reassign it to the correct package. I've reassigned this tetex-doc bug to texlive-base, so someone on the team can handle it better than me. Each Debian Developer has his own ideas, and some of them don't want old packages bugs in the new ones, so there is no policy to follow about this procedure :( Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKkuNjAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzc9gQALu6/fmOSTOEQ/za35gEQoC8 pnHY7wK69HhVY6wDvAOkezqF1EZM9967AluAWTHs8HABi3OX+859+ZF+sjuGf6u/ zGFlPsup3+CJ1An5qcjTLOABDOYftHfB6ZiibVk9zj4J0JMhxG0+9kQWkCrblrwa NtopqDguo2ghPRqjSBvS3AcNO/ZE2He1go0a9esNJYPnvHYartSgzzHYGDDmlVjh oFvdJ61NK9rHmD8Rb1V4ZBqNqnKKeRcf0HRAJ+hq7Ib9rijksJKgTuP6sjknmkBB bKfQR+fKRpfmWpFy8jIP0mFOAYv+YO9Vfd3AcfiU5Wk5eY4JwhY1eOtbZMIsj/+I 7kv5UD7FEd8xCL1ou0+UJUO+RV5vngz/CFcOdCrcJsciuyNakoG9e/ucoZGTaDv1 ujzlSdY0evYn/gv2+j0+n2VEqpfavh6MXvawrLv5c/DOtGrsXd1+vKEp8xcAHBAI qKYtEHYWt9WOVIPEF9YIkbHqeW5NpcXsD0GU8iRQ74YqVIRbUWoq9tREmGD6UCVm N2cMoVZeAer8qCqw/BDN8K6CPIRWCdGlI6+vvk8RKmdbAlAUSJ4CzDMbkujUgFtK TtipKnhhX6dEyms9zGx0kHrLhSo43rOmN5nbRqzRsdO4a1Kkb2QWHegyBqu4f8vs 1npTaAomE6D1HkDtJs7Q =+TDW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Debconf QA BOF summary / handling of orphaned packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sandro Tosi wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:08, Lucas Nussbaumlu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: I don't think that our current workflow for QA uploads is suboptimal, but I have not done many QA uploads. Maybe the best thing to do would be to ask people who do a lot of QA uploads, and see if using a VCS would help them? I did some qa uploads (so if that doesn't qualify as 'a lot', simply ignore this email). I don't think importing all (or a part) orphaned packages in a (public) VCS is anything near helpful. Which one to choose, for example? one may like A and dislike B, while another may love C, quite like B and dislike A, and another one prefers B over anything else; or any other possible combinations. I think that the best workflow for a QA upload is: take the canonical source package (hence from the debian archive), do the needed changes, upload. Simple, fast, no additional layers not strictly needed (that could scare potential contributors): as it should be for a *temporary* maintainership of a package. In the upload part, I just use mentors for that. I don't need to VCS for nothing in these cases. I think to import debian/ to VCS is only a time and server wasting. - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKjwf7AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzM98P/jksg1pUq+7RjwsfLmDlK/Th r252UZzdfgVRXo9AVN0aLSSYyQA/SYWFjxOuYGKzEXdrm7LYbUSsJ48qQps3RBzf 43PmCCz/qn70bWm7MABLjcdlsRXInexJRrMHliaqlEs3EgnmdsjfX+ZqD1xdEk91 HOqlfYg9tjo2YunHcgJuv7IengrlOerKjBZFPeJ4enZaTJZgSnwRiycGwI6Csrql lJ2Ru1onuCduTBa6llBv4tdxtnJnBdaOsvEi2xlf9jft3ZVTwmNEhYPtcF+CclfA b72/XXD0rAhJ+wcmhVeYcPk31V9JQsFnw+OEQxiN2Lk1Oy0X6sqmegYM+riEQTcr NSuxvJge1AkTklCWxVOZNDOcyc1BIxbKp6FVpzVXT1FPHftRK51fkx+rnJtt3e/I If0jdl2n4e3wqqGqnmORunDjsIQJnE20ZP7aN6mSWiyV0urRExVAipllHaW4G5xv VmSvDOlzPqt9m5QXsl1ixdbgkBL0u6Hw8LnjhGf7wMC31ktZZYLLZ0eh5zq+36Fd 1TSgJ3NgySsmvwE0q863vCLievEQSN8kf0P2+E4st5sn5rx3rqZf91EoHRgdHvnp Twvwg94YuWhQcS7G6tpR5R7u6bvhd5xwSlifKq4Dq0x2driszWTOQL7VqlWNNLAl WM9pWBWNYS5AWz6RBppH =2tk5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
About tomcat5.5 package bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi again! Can I reassign all bugs in 'tomcat5.5' package to 'tomcat6' ? http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tomcat5.5.html Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKix8lAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzxUYQAJlQ5sHiUDGg9HPxrJB91UDk GSpbf0v4O4kMjeEb1BEDD8qbeu7LjBU554x2v+qBDWFcTqQYHNAQ+F7/OR/Tc0UL EgGdWsRQvnUi3+00wVfwsyEwwJV64bJB9HSCRwq7S4bhHu8CIS0E2WkX8/2UtR3A 3bypK+K7P7Jk8y55MjAewOK7SxHM//vNDGEA2LvqOsC65JGHPKHE6YUsirinXAp7 zmkYYuNu5twDmQZjeXEpOyedr48r3nUmGWOoP+lkcP/Ub5IcTFbPNcI8V9MfSetA 1pocpNupiSzThRJ48UTx7suYmKScehmT522vzIxy6jHTE6iZtHtWPSTyPVUj8nlr x70tt2GbvtnAtnN+rTTlWFkbbUbgyqb/a4b6QTXt1zqzyWLOoPEwqep751Or2LdV ocnBAK3IvfqDfFXOtnWPg4ZeO/gpuFHFP7b/yASxeNCLRc4Et1+Qg97/kEFpQsYM 270F18TMVvU+78beJVcP4XVTnddJHQ8dRWd4UO2gWIWEfw5GMl4DP9WCsv9n1CAL dzx8Wns31PTUVe4R6l3acDgtQkhx/gKYVq5GIwg6YaJE113x+Mykp6xSYrmXnMAt px24HJpKKdpyooWRfrn4fFROs+J6MuFd6g81I1dqsnME2kJppaI4kBR/IvIHeQ4d gfE/2h4ArdyQsyajNAah =ywrs -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#349631: Reassigning bugs from tomcat5-admin to tomcat6-admin
reassign 349631 tomcat6-admin thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The tomcat5-admin package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the tomcat6-admin package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to tomcat6-admin anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#341777: Reassigning bugs from tomcat5 to tomcat6
reassign 320848 tomcat6 reassign 388130 tomcat6 reassign 294741 tomcat6 reassign 341777 tomcat6 thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The tomcat5 package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the tomcat6 package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to tomcat6 anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#493932: Reassigning bugs from libtomcat5-java to libtomcat6-java
reassign 493932 libtomcat6-java thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The libtomcat5-java package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the libtomcat6-java package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to libtomcat6-java anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#349631: Reassigning bugs from tomcat5-admin to tomcat6-admin
reassign 349631 tomcat6-admin thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The tomcat5-admin package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the tomcat6-admin package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to tomcat6-admin anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#341777: Reassigning bugs from tomcat5 to tomcat6
reassign 320848 tomcat6 reassign 388130 tomcat6 reassign 294741 tomcat6 reassign 341777 tomcat6 thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The tomcat5 package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the tomcat6 package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to tomcat6 anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#493932: Reassigning bugs from libtomcat5-java to libtomcat6-java
reassign 493932 libtomcat6-java thanks Version: 5.0.30-12+rm The libtomcat5-java package has been removed from Debian. We are reassigning its bugs to the libtomcat6-java package. Please have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to libtomcat6-java anymore. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Some KDE bugs that I found in bugs to remove from missing old packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! I found some bugs from KDE 3 that needs to be assigned to the new package in KDE 4 or just closed. http://bugs.debian.org/360980 http://bugs.debian.org/408320 http://bugs.debian.org/456189 http://bugs.debian.org/514784 http://bugs.debian.org/530807 http://bugs.debian.org/531193 http://bugs.debian.org/412072 http://bugs.debian.org/412750 http://bugs.debian.org/414997 http://bugs.debian.org/415409 http://bugs.debian.org/420652 They need some love. Ana :-) Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKhI11AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzdl4P/il17Fe5RwuqhFWmi3RpwDW9 5FzAk8vnNQHzFBYpdBT0xFrgHMitZkVwiNAwsIa/fIx+xXHRSzKexIWR5MrEsH7Z tD5cb+iR+FC6n3K8GSIodO5tVyi9rrT9z8NyNO0CBxkJz6lMdwcdyZC9n6KTQM/G Aj4PAekTn0Qsra/Zeg4oZJWNpTt2LrdcGM+Uc3YSJ7oT85vs/X9dP5VgLEqVEw2p N0lqDCqwKlv+0iLo1UPYSxLI7YrEsXRVDc5b/pBcG7FJ+wqaM1q6Msptu12KydUL 18i5Q5kZuOgOWi8PdpcA00F3+Q68Sh3tPskNYH5nAAYg19vng6V/2vOCC6J2GCyB LDLWcdZz2+uJ9b1RkDucWzYEp23OWRIX1xZsvq0alER5vaYJQ0tnHhW4g5QAFj7S XN2ATfm4tjhWXPHg1FycmF0zAQM/XoiYcsQ0Kpi8BnQ6KD2Kf1LENH2acWFGUjv1 SgItTLC4c6ySaluqpvNnDQj7Hs9n8NPd7PaVPwPHH9ykfXe7MnCGZo3Nhp/3sdge 5Pn16/4S3pncr+MrioJ9Lt6xq57tEVM9GLwEsl79Qzls0x7akcBmCOA3G8zdcmn1 GENQprbPXrj+di0WzBgYBMxYFZNMxhrzXdgbJB4QqrIx3o6xidDI8TwwnPLfs1Iu F0NPSowFh4B1BL+aHHlw =cVT5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Collab-qa-commits] r1554 - in bapase: . rm_pkgs
Author: gothicx-guest
Date: 2009-08-09 20:01:36 + (Sun, 09 Aug 2009)
New Revision: 1554
Modified:
bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.rb
bapase/rm_pkgs/mass-close-pkg
Log:
Add debian-policy to pseudo packages
Modified: bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.rb
===
--- bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.rb 2009-08-08 19:52:54 UTC (rev 1553)
+++ bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.rb 2009-08-09 20:01:36 UTC (rev 1554)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
'general', 'listarchives', 'nm.debian.org', 'qa.debian.org',
'ftp.debian.org', 'www.debian.org', 'bugs.debian.org', 'lists.debian.org',
'wnpp', 'cdimage.debian.org', 'tech-ctte', 'mirrors', 'security.debian.org',
-'installation-reports', 'upgrade-reports', 'release-notes', 'wiki.debian.org',
'security-tracker', 'release.debian.org', 'debian-i18n', 'buildd.emdebian.org',
'buildd.debian.org' ]
+'installation-reports', 'upgrade-reports', 'release-notes', 'wiki.debian.org',
'security-tracker', 'release.debian.org', 'debian-policy', 'debian-i18n',
'buildd.emdebian.org', 'buildd.debian.org' ]
EXCLUDED = [
/^(linux|kernel)-(image|source)-/, # we don't care about those bugs for now
Modified: bapase/rm_pkgs/mass-close-pkg
===
--- bapase/rm_pkgs/mass-close-pkg 2009-08-08 19:52:54 UTC (rev 1553)
+++ bapase/rm_pkgs/mass-close-pkg 2009-08-09 20:01:36 UTC (rev 1554)
@@ -12,15 +12,20 @@
bts = SOAP::RPC::Driver::new('http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/soap.cgi',
'/Debbugs/SOAP')
bts.add_method('get_status', 'bugs')
bts.add_method('get_bugs', 'params')
-bts.add_method('get_bug_log', 'params')
-bts.add_method('get_usertag', 'email', 'tag')
-bts.add_method('newest_bugs', 'num')
+#bts.add_method('get_bug_log', 'params')
+#bts.add_method('get_usertag', 'email', 'tag')
+#bts.add_method('newest_bugs', 'num')
+bts.add_method('get_versions', 'params')
PKG=ARGV[0]
VER=ARGV[1]
RMBUG=ARGV[2]
SENDMAIL=true
+#dist = bts.get_versions(['package' = PKG, 'dist' = 'experimental', 'arch'
= 'i386'])
+#puts dist
+#exit(1)
+
puts Bugs for #{PKG}
bugs = bts.get_bugs(['src', PKG])
status = bts.get_status(bugs)
___
Collab-qa-commits mailing list
Collab-qa-commits@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/collab-qa-commits
[Bug 379077] Re: Notification when synaptic is running
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 363934 computer-janitor gives unhelpful error when synaptic is running -- Notification when synaptic is running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410042] [NEW] Better error message when option isn't correct
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: computer-janitor $ sudo computer-janitor cleanup all /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/computerjanitorapp/app.py:152: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if not self.apt_cache[name].candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:101: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if pkg.installedDownloadable or pkg.candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:101: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if pkg.installedDownloadable or pkg.candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:79: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedDependencies, please see the Version class for alternatives. for dep in pkg.installedDependencies: CRITICAL: The correct way is: $ sudo computer-janitor cleanup --all The strange thing is.. $ sudo computer-janitor all cleanup gives an empty ERROR: and... $ sudo computer-janitor --all cleanup just works. I think it should only accept [option] before the command (e.g: cleanup) and not before and after. Thanks ** Affects: computer-janitor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Better error message when option isn't correct https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: About tomcat5 package bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Marco, On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Marco Rodriguesgoth...@sapo.pt wrote: Can I close all bugs in 'tomcat5' package ? only if they are specific to the old version. If they are affecting tomcat6 too - you should reassign them to the newer package. I don't know anything about java or tomcat :( I was hoping the java team could help to assign bugs that still apply to tomcat6 and left the ones that doesn't, so I can massively close them. Thanks - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdUSvAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzUVkP/ixeJhjYR4TadV9/+W/q0z9r NP15T+G23Kes8yquNsfvfSt0vdL4eUrwzETRf6TxYhOQUyN+S8ql9aKvToSv0d/e e8Sy0a8dnUVPDG0nyPfmVoDQM+5mU0BfOZCo2Oqj2zmvc+K/GeItiBBmEWmFMyny 6xNah9NTMLRNb0yEwAisO+ocWTmiREP1dA3kYaAooS7VdZHlQ3bEpF7TfyHMxIDy P0gcBJJunU5We9yWKxUOI2CxYDpwdPUV9/vWHc/ImtnSQp0SbU+Q9iJS/lmgtCAC vnx8YW3ygekYoqRFaefi+/JJqCZVuwqOWpoo7mLNv/feYTngjKQK3J6nTYvR1m8u JSEYHznK2iQx8tK+Ax5hZe/jxsUGmp1F3tXGgwWiZMxGA7JJXUqS3dZBQTul3gQj +NtCP6ujyj/46WHYBpZph0AziWFORKJGR05aRuTZEmgA1xZP/UHypvkh20KE6x4W tsFLshBkfrQHEKbF8BfFhf3h5RIECDf1vu6nOeJeUeKAMkz61Smmb8xemrlcD1kw Zrz1ErOWdHEdrrxRVMV8s4/kAz6OuguqD1DeXysh+xsAw+FjnEune1HqbHND26kE CNbqRasCCtlgdSFpi6i2rdEjWe9Pj9l/39ORLyYbMvC7Yk3NBTeLxC902YWGl7Xv /4i8Qz0aU+X0WOU2AbAT =iE2e -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#518478: Still vulnerable according to Debian CVE tracker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Looks like it still has problems in etch. http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2009-0756 Bug reassigned to libpoppler4. - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdV34AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzG2cP/0XsBU+WooVWHHTiqfFbkYFS m2hVxgSxKJl58qaMm4IzV26zCP/9izWrCzYrTD5dXFocF3V6tEHopC2xDMHJ6VmE cA5eQajZSl3NQFm0EQLYjMPzvyixG788zbboIJmzwKIgCCyB8imS9Egz/pyCFWf7 2B8aLbhj66ciX9IP1Bg0IppCPtPeG1FRgnHJ5kQdEgLhmREcyR3ZmvfZwBQ1egc3 mz3wOaEwGFb04LAueoGPxOVdlzynTBNRpxGL7zjdw4ljN1c3pL8sHqvOEInEe+eO xhiPmqx59/D7MN6bFtHBXrO06YDpN5CJtvUdeeJajPeKWu7mQ9KyynaPuLz9Q5qP 5/VlmiHqapBVfXG8WKTbfi1l9cyMl80U8TaEZtbtLAZP6AXzXsHwMcbzK90GaY/a 1G68M/c9UlUTvGiiPxO8dHdXsRFlqFiEeunCobLOKuplGQaFNiNVE1giv4Nam7j6 Awfw2YEMZygD9TkQGHH+BnhhLQV/lhsD3y1qFMwyceHl7CPHtzayJOeR8eAwYKm0 Jxu+nNkk6+FkAqliA9BZ0WOCIf6AzGm7qAylG4FCcHFc/jXx35gvgSvFKqvTZxPK uTYuyi+WOd/UaMwgV4KVZHr9pH00opyB7QK7cXm1DPsQTiOi+HMk/AaIcHiltCdk WrbG1SAfpxTeZohLNV5g =Vaat -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
About tomcat5 package bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Can I close all bugs in 'tomcat5' package ? http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tomcat5.html Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdMILAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzGIYQAIzf9IG1zU+3t/5Q7AVKYa4l YVDOtEHRmc2udWbcfOv7B249ZirPa7osV/H7iOPYRoKJaelnHcNAG8D6xt8dDkeT n/O16klBFp0Pwa8JdcLXwu+dtO4k+/0OnvE811ZzOJruvQiQj2a5kI9eLqRtFx4f NjryftwQP9OXlAeFBnID86rnaaS8HGSAp3j8fEXwjIsPr1kPFAGgodG2BDr4ICTx 0/hsbJMnbPypAglfHylZUEY1h05xAqjI98tUGbDLPT+i/d5j7fUT8R/x00QPNdsi Z+7ze/rTawCBDeUgJYTyZryrAJyYn32gj6Kt8wYxpJbaR/e8F46NaEDPidKK5Ih5 kd854DaRmrCWdr77X7IMcd2WkkwdPinz0b/DCbSrYy70RFV/olvLczV1DEoPPQhC x4lo6xHjr67IEGjEj73gTxSv5kIFQrw0ZCqBVGTyhB8X2FLx6RO4hMlJ51Bo1IkZ uL6Rt5mzjadfgMSLzG0wVFItcYcSVuDNkGb2pM/7Gt1BqYEYyYtKBkJvFUQRqZmV Rv0PNhx81bT6QmDTCO3QHHFZTonuXyqcjNl6AtWAYM7UtyaK2m0kSkHJ871q7mnk o+zt2Y6E1/pOeK0MFdM5JCrXHMOKEt13IoXE0+iV/qj99Dlze4WMkjbHnWX95Lr1 0jkMszEkSD6OujGaNtAy =d8mc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
About apache package bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Can I close all bugs in 'apache' package ? http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apache.html Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdKl0AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzkUUQAKJvXCg3el2S+Sok8i0jMdUa W7FPlnWMDdz7maG4anZmK2tb733FuVZ/Vpy2d181r61wQHV3FozzJAWgKJI1h0Kr rBr1t9OP38nKD6MwTseDFRRtH3PBA85d8DaZ9Q65D4IJKMIXT6lbJ5kT+Ykx5sXo hcOpUa8VXT6FvZgfPOoaKbYw2mVrG/hxJf576OQ3yN43swl/PpDrGvgWYSoDQlHI oTNxn3cVahGiQC6swMuZInQ6fbs+ym3CoyQDULohwg9oUAEeqmzNQFLFNseNggQm lmRzTKRCRHkgt17I0QLf8Oo5bcJUis2Kh3AXGeJg2QPAny1SYlZhREeFFoQTwXri 3gUBwgB4o4C3RwPDF+CQRIevKhjASuvgg2wlwr9VIfhp8xWf4IFyx1171miMQAgC I2jkn2qJ2r0W+Pa9ObbMxCPACepTwrZzo0OPWmqdgpn1OBL3i1viNKIKhrvigqab thBTO9N4mCfeCBAyQd3d7rTxYBGZiBpnz1JKrivR4zRnqm+3N2PLiekFJJKZHyzK +cq9P0cQW2L88QrGTFOYjziOxZ+R59zd79amVwygK0YD1fHUjnWnOtRB8AdkM9cE tkozG/rCKn9nSXQG7Iy2zfkb0HQUQp58vQqdK/dPvm8jGsgRv8KZgu0Ev8UVQPSa dTEWwp4wAgCUQWBMkycj =BmDi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
About unison2.9.1 package bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Can I close all bugs in 'unison2.9.1' package ? http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/unison2.9.1.html Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdMOcAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzo2gP/Rzbm+OYutweC+Gaq9Y9j8h/ DNgl6pUBs7lTcGgCEh7aDw+a13whRokNXlFtj5DjeYT8hwQX9tBWvB6RsAjj/T5q JNE7DA/6qmOYWsuZJBaH/Ob1AYAg3RdVIY46BfRNZcgIMur6YFPtRYppmEkjSeHa 1Nxv29PZrGIUFE0y5OJpccLkqksrh4zHVvxs+ygEsYzeXET5F8d5RH4hg5baEybV CqQ9/q/hIuABBZ3oxrVta4FHBtDdil6qp82+XvQcGsdnrbOD2DR2C7KVqcFcDYXa ZXZKYKOP/iqM0qZstn9YnNfvy2g9Nc2cIgQyu7/04jmXEyoeHH8Mldhrii376gFf NmIIsYJQ4GuCWpJ/8DYWXuevJdZl5yGoio2OwOOGkvaQ4Mgk5Hvc67bKnKDVOgjN sWaxFC0DttTKkicqOLHyXKbviXPBr8gDMsX5ZF3NT3/+mMpKYDBIA249132ZyzBE EVLjoNwcxZWURbTcI95IszNU8v34WFGOXVNyK5xDFQh69hNMm7VaJhSS4QU+aXzc PWC7bmaUQz+IrMMqvB9T/CJ8Z71+eo+uXgSxzxjk51aabs3IPk0IjuOdvhL1Huue KaFJZYAcoQNnlLuvJenMAGPlUTxsl4Q2t3PQLhuk6JIo33ES/gBj8oY/H7Q2wkvc PxeM1U7TjqUeNoBkJwVO =lYQd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#539383: New upstream version 5.00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: nmap Severity: wishlist Hi! Please update nmap to version 5.00. Top 5 improvements: http://nmap.org/5/#5changes Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKcsD8AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzSj4QALY0/xp4Wzf5IAGCnsCwQqcg 8xD/T5uvMlgztxNL7inx36xtqDUIXB40TCUg38f7lzukGPpx80k3xZwL4+J1qntL vlf+Pp7A/aSuG5U/wURjQqer/crvBo3N0xV6tqD9zWAZgAtDfSPEH3LJCyu63kKD iOY1PgzPBbGn85bSYnijENqe6KAX99S7bcr0u8LGUON0mYAqcvJyrEXIM7Qwsa8Q L3a1uC9KbbOz5xGUalxzt43eh14qBu0EGz098tFfyuFLHs9j/ivDyYelcp/yiOcu jRmd083ALRn4AlfjoPWQXVjHYj98x/3nab6vFT+os7X+3kc53OkjOb+UOOYbddfN 4BQZW5jQJioMNYvsZPsdTi0clfsTFtBukicMpEx3afOJwIOpqjo36/zL9PQWSuEr 7Tc5vGWsTgSIKot0B3jvR08rbiqcSeF2iZUxGlyahNlnwLzud30vM6E00A8bXU/+ OnA+LmK3k2PSpYUOD3pcKYhILrqLOYajSBF81k0ucjCYTjeQ537Tac+etuuNGh74 Qqips4tsT0V1J31ZIcEyCi1FIo/3y3k/oTeZ81FFaL2wY8nHyIhoRzO6PxqrB0DN zW4fVInRHNalPCf5EdXkjziktRDgoeUAXZ/cJuSYSPsxJ0b8Ytnh+DfKgK7SurzX DiYjV5/ly7RGofyKFRvx =lcFB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug 398655] Re: mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade
I got the same problem. Preparing to replace mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 (using .../mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin. update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin. dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... prerm called with argument `failed-upgrade' dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 postinst called with argument `abort-upgrade' dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Changed in: gnash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 398526] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0. 8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul sc ript pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la i eșire 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398655 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398655 mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 403807] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 400036] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 398655] Re: mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 398526] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0. 8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul sc ript pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la i eșire 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 398655 mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
[Bug 398655] Re: mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade
I got the same problem. Preparing to replace mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 (using .../mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb) ... update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin. update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin. dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... prerm called with argument `failed-upgrade' dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 postinst called with argument `abort-upgrade' dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-plugin-gnash_0.8.5-0ubuntu2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Changed in: gnash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398526] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0. 8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul sc ript pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la i eșire 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398655 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398655 mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 403807] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 400036] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398655] Re: mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398526] Re: package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0. 8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul sc ript pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la i eșire 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398213 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398213 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 398655 mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu2 failed to upgrade ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398213 package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- package mozilla-plugin-gnash 0.8.5-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script pre-removal nou returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390292] Re: undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2)
From jaunty to karmic alpha 3: Setting up console-setup (1.34ubuntu1) ... dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please use '--print-architecture' instead. WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 150 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 153 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 160 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 161 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 162 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 164 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 170 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 174 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 176 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 178 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 222 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 223 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 227 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 229 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 230 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 231 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 232 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 233 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 234 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 235 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 236 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 237 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 244 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 246 * Saving console font and keymap for next boot... WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 150 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 153 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 160 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 161 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 162 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 164 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 170 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 174 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 176 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 178 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 222 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 223 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 227 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 229 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 230 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 231 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 232 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 233 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 234 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 235 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 236 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 237 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 244 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 246 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 150 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 153 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 160 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 161 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 162 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 164 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 170 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 174 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 176 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 178 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 222 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 223 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 227 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 229 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 230 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 231 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 232 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 233 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 234 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 235 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 236 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 237 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 244 WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 246 [ OK ] update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) -- undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407127] [NEW] Python 2.6 DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: computer-janitor $ sudo computer-janitor cleanup --all /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/computerjanitorapp/app.py:152: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if not self.apt_cache[name].candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:101: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if pkg.installedDownloadable or pkg.candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:101: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable, please see the Version class for alternatives. if pkg.installedDownloadable or pkg.candidateDownloadable: /usr/share/computerjanitor/plugins/unsupported_plugin.py:79: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedDependencies, please see the Version class for alternatives. ** Affects: computer-janitor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: python2.6 ** Tags added: python2.6 -- Python 2.6 DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.candidateDownloadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407157] [NEW] Python 2.6 DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedVersion
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdebi I was using pbuilder with -gdebi and it shows me this warning. /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/GDebi/DebPackage.py:78: DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedVersion, please see the Version class for alternatives. ** Affects: gdebi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: python2.6 ** Tags added: python2.6 -- Python 2.6 DeprecationWarning: Accessed deprecated property Package.installedVersion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Debconf QA BOF summary / handling of orphaned packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, Here is some notes (from memory) about the QA BOF, and the actions that we are likely to take during the next weeks/months. I saw the discussion from home and it was very interesting. Thank you As usual, the most (only?) discussed topic was the handling of orphaned packages. Several ideas were discussed. Removal of orphaned packages The audience clearly want orphaned packages to be removed. I'm not quite sure it's reasonable to do that. However, clearly, there's no opposition to this idea. When snapshots.debian.org will be fully fonctional, a web interface will allow users to fetch and install removed packages. TODO: - wait for snapshots.d.o to be fully functional (weeks, not months) - add a note on the PTS explaining how to install packages from snapshots.d.o - remove packages Move of orphaned packages to another place == Another possible solution would be to move orphaned packages to another section/archive area (i.e something sitting next to unstable or experimental), or just to experimental. This would provide a intermediate solution between keep the package in testing/unstable and remove the package. However, it doesn't sound easy to create another release, so the easy solution is to just use experimental for that. While it is technically possible for ftpmaster to move packages between suites, it is better to do source-ful QA uploads to experimental, and to file RM requests from unstable at the same time, so that process is documented in the changelog and the RM bug report. TODO: - add a note on the PTS for experimental-only packages to explain how to install them. - move packages to experimental I vote for this option. If a package doesn't have an active maintainer, it should belong to experimental suite and add some note at PTS explaning what to do in this case. When someone adopt the package, he upload the package to unstable and the dak semi-automatically script remove it from experimental, and all the process begins again. if ($maintainer==QA) show_link_with_howto_to_install_experimental_packages Another thing, is provide by default in apt package the experimental suite, without the need of manual user configuration, so he can do $ apt-get -t experimental install package easily. I think the policy about removing packages from QA need to be changed too, so we know when we should ask for a package removal, else the archive will be full of garbage. Raise the awareness about orphaned packages === For developers: --- The idea of a cron script in devscripts was proposed again, and didn't receive much opposition. Of course it adds to the daily batch of mails that admins have to read, so we have to make sure that it is written in a useful way. TODO: - write the script (heavily based on wnpp-alert), and integrate it in devscripts For users: -- liw worked on Computer Janitor[1,2], which seems to be a GUI for debfoster/deborphan. It could be an interesting addition to add support for listing orphaned packages in such a tool. [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/computer-janitor [2] http://beginlinux.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/ubuntu-9-04-cleanup-with-computer-janitor/ It is important to note that Joerg Jaspert read and ACKed this with his ftpmaster hat. Nice. - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKcC9GAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzYGkQAI+LKFst4O9fcbjeu1s+7qtd /GbXL++9hMdsmWLDtqIxaYOf0l8omfG3eZ1bbVdvvLWs2/YiOJqSAOQNnl0k5wlb s+EXN70YnycQeBJ+EJU2PdMSgm0pJni3ax9HlQCE2DKunnydCizPDuUcXG5qtTv6 u8vP19NMbd+8LJi9g2AZeE15fWn+WkUjVbiosGN0Gzo9U+oM//tqVIRFfBoeCgc3 X0mPjKlbTOOf3+s5jYpSrky6KgPlpYutf7RozQI9mC8enxWJ0wLwdI1Ed56/E8I+ OrTsmeUJcpk5wvMS9COq1PJ5KL1Y2aEtcHRU7qpV6UHHefa7Y4d43ya4wvTzIdQK PLwzfTLe6kQgAKxay6uLgLKHoKPuh9t2Jgt4Ni/NoCYtHsd/3GHW9IIiRXaOqh8q 8VMGLoNX6UArg/WAk9MPkGXB0dh24cYJyS00TUzS4MHyIbGzxpoAZMfQGH75+IL7 mathr9zj1JY2XLZdNTlIbQV6V/oEqmzjbA/XJvIaa0v+lzFjvGOnhoOl4s82kEmm LF3Z40jBjDfvItn4Ce6vAS36Jg60tfkHeT/bQ1VSkJTS972iZRFgTFKn448WYNJw YWBxnfYpf2c/TBXe5PFg6N0JKgYp8bzm06GubrBLLfknwk4FYjg6qLu+8mVvtsGY emUWWEXj2YdmLYSRbXXc =R/JM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#474524: Package removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reassign 474524 ftp.debian.org retitle 474524 RM: ggtl -- RoQA; orphaned, inactive upstream, very low popcon thanks Hi! Please see the following reasons for the removal request: * Package is orphaned. * Inactive upstream (no much changes since 2006). * Few users - a popcon of 6 users only. Reverse Depends: libggtl2-dev Thank you! - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKa2SzAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzUiAQAIjPbXrnBlItpKJ+UJTHiUU1 k4SWy3DggdOssRBjF7pLaEwCrCdS5rovoGTWoW6WziRYAHYZ6d8u2rbsnq9zy60m AxrGUG9WJGSIbcWSwChjviB8YAJt7uWQCoTMh0RAc4p0fhKIPQawpDuIU7vn8vlU voNuKAP79tTmXQwqwQ4guBp0LdpUbtHV6K0vHXOb8XhuNppr8DbYWKACtlEQCkm3 p3P/OxaImT6vceBBVjQ81NddCGE2MLq9+gAgFI4KGp5UEsdXdvqEOczC7/p3Dpo4 lII4X+rKy0Llyma4MUMpNbkrJn/X0kT0tzmQi2Dt+exyPExilwPpMFxg1ry8WvPc hSFbprWI19P01ZOkBTadz05VHXUAlNCOZxhHQ0kKkyFj2VW6B8YMwQbefZg1J0ti vaiRQnyKKcFioxMnYDznTVszhdW3eHzAYHTK6TSR3rXwsaa2vfZ6ZCUpbjryUh/r fjxMWPKx20dagR5fhWyEArEdPVy20xw00GiSw2hXIxkqA9eWar+uLEMoOph2akGS MzQbme0UV6XnyeO89QIjQ4NFVllfK++VleyNnhbJHkdpQGZI40QgcYY+x3g5i0hz PIPFHAt2ujrF6V3DP4PrienOnvaIFzhXfCDF+CFUZdyzXjiwG5YdGXWlaTFDwflp 4ubeJuvPkW5lJ4yBQQ8F =Ggyt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#474524: Package removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reassign 474524 ftp.debian.org retitle 474524 RM: ggtl -- RoQA; orphaned, inactive upstream, very low popcon thanks Hi! Please see the following reasons for the removal request: * Package is orphaned. * Inactive upstream (no much changes since 2006). * Few users - a popcon of 6 users only. Reverse Depends: libggtl2-dev Thank you! - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKa2SzAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzUiAQAIjPbXrnBlItpKJ+UJTHiUU1 k4SWy3DggdOssRBjF7pLaEwCrCdS5rovoGTWoW6WziRYAHYZ6d8u2rbsnq9zy60m AxrGUG9WJGSIbcWSwChjviB8YAJt7uWQCoTMh0RAc4p0fhKIPQawpDuIU7vn8vlU voNuKAP79tTmXQwqwQ4guBp0LdpUbtHV6K0vHXOb8XhuNppr8DbYWKACtlEQCkm3 p3P/OxaImT6vceBBVjQ81NddCGE2MLq9+gAgFI4KGp5UEsdXdvqEOczC7/p3Dpo4 lII4X+rKy0Llyma4MUMpNbkrJn/X0kT0tzmQi2Dt+exyPExilwPpMFxg1ry8WvPc hSFbprWI19P01ZOkBTadz05VHXUAlNCOZxhHQ0kKkyFj2VW6B8YMwQbefZg1J0ti vaiRQnyKKcFioxMnYDznTVszhdW3eHzAYHTK6TSR3rXwsaa2vfZ6ZCUpbjryUh/r fjxMWPKx20dagR5fhWyEArEdPVy20xw00GiSw2hXIxkqA9eWar+uLEMoOph2akGS MzQbme0UV6XnyeO89QIjQ4NFVllfK++VleyNnhbJHkdpQGZI40QgcYY+x3g5i0hz PIPFHAt2ujrF6V3DP4PrienOnvaIFzhXfCDF+CFUZdyzXjiwG5YdGXWlaTFDwflp 4ubeJuvPkW5lJ4yBQQ8F =Ggyt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug 144685] Re: udev fails to install in a vserver due to /lib/udev/devices/ppp - operation not permitted
Hi! Yes.. but it should also be fixed in Hardy, because it's an LTS. -- udev fails to install in a vserver due to /lib/udev/devices/ppp - operation not permitted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144685] Re: udev fails to install in a vserver due to /lib/udev/devices/ppp - operation not permitted
I'm upgrading from feisty to hardy in vserver and it has the same problem. Setting up udev (117-8ubuntu0.2) ... /etc/iftab does not exist to convert Removing any system startup links for /etc/init.d/finish ... mknod: `/lib/udev/devices/ppp': Operation not permitted dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- udev fails to install in a vserver due to /lib/udev/devices/ppp - operation not permitted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug#487966: marked as done (Should create a system user/group)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Huh, did you read what I wrote on the other mail? This is *still* in the archive, don't close the bugs as the package hasn't been completely removed! Hi! Sorry.. I didn't saw the experimental one :( I need to add some verification in the script to check if the package is still at experimental. Thank you - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKWcx3AAoJENDqNB6bSPIzUGsP/39wQOHgstbZcNBxxD+/uVEM 9IjgkDNe91B3wZGo5Y23banaqfFgYt5JAC1/Wxbask4/94suP1JYxnqW9N+VAHtW O1b/iP3cAMTkhtxHdEmLiC6M8yzYbsyr0dIrtz4inqcgVzm3gQ3EQ1qYVdID7dWW Hn6CA0IDDvt/x+Hj/61hjxdU9KZSDEByZUds+yf1Q3BKNsr4njh5jDjpi3XornVP F6HJkqkIHIbsUe0idTfX51A7xpEi5e3hf7i+ksdXIpRZOz0hlUw+7t1PeFtj+aLC gSxSqJWuCxgk1t65TuRNKuZ0bUKv8PtgYYFMNwa8I+s6f8naCdT3lkjY3hRH7aBv YGkpfAvBaium3aCPkj8SkGEvtkGGyjZDnbFfGHPrHbqXbvcB7cv3J9g9Wqau5LUZ U/PllKJBNeg6hgUNn5gQYtmQy9oHMqbAoie7tQIlC/5zzI8k1uPP8z/kBCHcAcwZ q/1pgpEIQ3UaiduWW7qViegs8FxXkYESM1JDjDgceM4YzR/Oo/czYZTbpPkyF1ue JuzYJot8tpH9hl3zMArVS0icurKdJ0ioZ0g7yzM94MiPZXL6wW1A7BTudhEHflVn jRdcOETfsxAs/zEDN9lxGkh4/dHFvHtoR/JLUI4QqYXGYFjD7apE4IqyZkP5rNY/ U71mCHckIcAZAy0kvB/I =xSrc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Accepted startupmanager 1.9.13-2 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:32:16 +0100 Source: startupmanager Binary: startupmanager Architecture: source all Version: 1.9.13-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt Description: startupmanager - Grub and Splash screen configuration Changes: startupmanager (1.9.13-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Re-add patches directory. Missing in the last upload. * debian/patches: + Correct patch to add su-to-root to desktop file. * debian/copyright: + Bump copyright years for translation files. + Point package license to GPL-2 to make lintian happy. Checksums-Sha1: b1c62c9556ab6f478e855787c201620e405e6396 1446 startupmanager_1.9.13-2.dsc 1e4430fc66d2a47de3507245cc2a3f3c39f1b9d7 3998 startupmanager_1.9.13-2.diff.gz 9ed2c2448cb28c37ebe6187b04d51c8e664cb4cc 118480 startupmanager_1.9.13-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: e1427d989093a45f9e4fe1a3af5e97aba7c81c714e5ae99e2049a3c004ded1b6 1446 startupmanager_1.9.13-2.dsc cd144ac6aa7c52479e85def8bedebd9e64a4e161b71d9a349bfcc20b70dac07e 3998 startupmanager_1.9.13-2.diff.gz 63317215a4786a90f20d22801dcf8144289bebf79ec93244598ec8fb5c6012eb 118480 startupmanager_1.9.13-2_all.deb Files: 6c01e71575787482ce1545fa6085a4dd 1446 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-2.dsc 5ee8f12db9e537ffde94507e195c15c7 3998 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-2.diff.gz a944c72b3027d0fd9a5ed813112c009f 118480 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpXkY4ACgkQB01zfu119ZlZHACZAeBCQiKeZQ1v4rgBK9vWL5On qE0An37OASlN1XOgFvArHAt7b+rWMqd8 =Q2gW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: startupmanager_1.9.13-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-2.diff.gz startupmanager_1.9.13-2.dsc to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-2.dsc startupmanager_1.9.13-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-2_all.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#452834: Reassigning bugs from openldap2.3 to openldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Helge Kreutzmann wrote: I just checked the template and it still contains the old phrase. Is there something controversial with my suggested improvement? Since I've provided an alternative, I denote it on the bug status as well. Hi! Sorry, but I'm not the maintainer of OpenLDAP2.3. You should try a member of Debian OpenLDAP Maintainers. Thanks - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKVjlLAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzHcQQAMELWXEl+qAJgoSJJ+uhTw33 qNYIiMtFLxpcFT+BbXf6RLymJ63xCv3ZnN0tDoIeFCpAERI3HsK63AkB/ZE/7jID KcKXyCqaCUiOzc5JknKW9NWExyHTE2bGi7wSdlOmOKrqn97h32vpSrhLe3/4wj4+ qPtOBMHwgJuEf+BTcSl8Ekc1Prm7GVJXy43G7lzA7h9XEhdklvFvazbG6QCgSXJn S8b3Q1mqZ2UkgoYu8/dLGcQdhtgfmajJ8f7n1Q2BsXzOI7pdnQhRAe9DIs74/FEp +J91/7nhOPdulhpL3VXHKb3t2JFwD/2wv/xSDcopc1pad1cliFEHJBu1Lq0KzNAs MF1HQKXzn7PRap+LQu3V/XKGDlWBVkcq7BuRYhD3k1VCIwdmeQAXiSaSN07q+5l5 30kX3m4u5S3ph8LtunPvKqGGctivM/kh66aIrgboH+OQoXMIDCwkHSftPDJxblPq CHvUC82InuQgKwyhaSrQqyUIyqUvOKaP9Wan/7WxTDNSLprhOpkqVrUUI+RCZkVy 7xSBQGo7AsRc4SHVrvpoaYRvcVDh8n3iJEuS4Nboqwu8XQ6OLQ78qEx3/ENrX5za X+UrIXPj05jgORmN9Ga941mjhbZivJpvM2UIExg8kyh/N11aZGK1TZmaw83dlRJI hlegGW0xrSxFZPzrDMr8 =lPLa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Accepted startupmanager 1.9.13-1 (source all)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:56:06 +0100 Source: startupmanager Binary: startupmanager Architecture: source all Version: 1.9.13-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Python Applications Packaging Team python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt Description: startupmanager - Grub and Splash screen configuration Changes: startupmanager (1.9.13-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Add preinst to remove pycentral files. * debian/control: + Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.2 (no changes). + Migrate from pycentral to pysupport. + Add x11-xserver-utils (provides xrandr) to Depends. * debian/rules: + Migrate from pycentral to pysupport. * debian/watch: + Fix upstream package name to check latest version. * debian/copyright: + Bump copyright years. Checksums-Sha1: d8c650bce9e8b132a98658e84d098cacea6591e1 1446 startupmanager_1.9.13-1.dsc b82a65ac6ec488ca7fe16fd3ea277cd15a3627c6 94671 startupmanager_1.9.13.orig.tar.gz 95e171b7b436e56cbc9f9058809bd57bb95f68d7 3726 startupmanager_1.9.13-1.diff.gz ff6e6b9073da1bd370ead3820a2f5d1acb37a94b 118346 startupmanager_1.9.13-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 0f3b9b345ff4af160f80666884993059e2a7ac0826aed805a448ea108dcbc286 1446 startupmanager_1.9.13-1.dsc f51f8a64080759e3d3af58cfbae1769b8e3db8c65a2d9bd2ba80a7e6e7489a2d 94671 startupmanager_1.9.13.orig.tar.gz da467a82723dfe4ab283db480cdea9c768bc6443881c2a51116a43cd38e22fc5 3726 startupmanager_1.9.13-1.diff.gz b5bab8d7886c90969fc5e99894479e1ae9b4572caa30ceda24ee1e8eaebd1dff 118346 startupmanager_1.9.13-1_all.deb Files: e06e3516efc7364fe449e9624f8df55b 1446 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-1.dsc 76ad91b77359f134161ccf2fd5618585 94671 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13.orig.tar.gz 13c32bac467b3097fe0633225791719c 3726 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-1.diff.gz d3ffeae5af13d0c64cf28fb5cd695e3e 118346 utils optional startupmanager_1.9.13-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpTs+QACgkQB01zfu119ZkDHgCglyZdgVDw9kFs/73SZop6ALJd GLIAnRzCMSQoIwJaLulqZUycrQD1f3iO =e903 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: startupmanager_1.9.13-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-1.diff.gz startupmanager_1.9.13-1.dsc to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-1.dsc startupmanager_1.9.13-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13-1_all.deb startupmanager_1.9.13.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/startupmanager/startupmanager_1.9.13.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Bug 293220] Re: kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup
I got the same problem in some ubuntu hardy vserver. It's a problem related to klogd. It says there for 5 minutes and after fails. I've added 'set -x' to klogd init script and it showed me this. + echo * Starting kernel log daemon... * Starting kernel log daemon... + COL= + mkdir -p /var/run/klogd + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd + mkfifo -m 700 /var/run/klogd/kmsg + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /var/run/klogd/kmsgpipe.pid --exec /bin/dd -b -m -- bs=1 if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --chuid klog --exec /sbin/klogd -- -P /var/run/klogd/kmsg It stops here... -- kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293220] Re: kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup
$ uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.22.18-vs2.2.0.6-ocelot #2 SMP Mon Feb 25 00:53:29 WET 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 Codename: hardy -- kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293220] Re: kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup
FULL LOG: + echo * Starting kernel log daemon... * Starting kernel log daemon... + COL= + mkdir -p /var/run/klogd + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd + mkfifo -m 700 /var/run/klogd/kmsg + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /var/run/klogd/kmsgpipe.pid --exec /bin/dd -b -m -- bs=1 if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --chuid klog --exec /sbin/klogd -- -P /var/run/klogd/kmsg + log_end_msg 1 + [ -z 1 ] + log_use_usplash + [ n = y ] + type usplash_write + log_to_console log_end_msg 1 + [ n != y ] + [ no != yes ] + readlink /proc/self/fd/0 + stdin=/dev/pts/2 + [ /dev/pts/2 != /dev/pts/2 ] + return 0 + [ ] + [ 1 -eq 0 ] + echo...fail! ...fail! + return 1 + exit 0 ** Package changed: usplash (Ubuntu) = sysklogd (Ubuntu) -- kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230342] Re: Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly)
I can also confirm this bug. ** Changed in: update-manager-core (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230342] Re: Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly)
FULL LOG: + echo * Starting kernel log daemon... * Starting kernel log daemon... + COL= + mkdir -p /var/run/klogd + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd + mkfifo -m 700 /var/run/klogd/kmsg + chown klog:klog /var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /var/run/klogd/kmsgpipe.pid --exec /bin/dd -b -m -- bs=1 if=/proc/kmsg of=/var/run/klogd/kmsg + start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --chuid klog --exec /sbin/klogd -- -P /var/run/klogd/kmsg + log_end_msg 1 + [ -z 1 ] + log_use_usplash + [ n = y ] + type usplash_write + log_to_console log_end_msg 1 + [ n != y ] + [ no != yes ] + readlink /proc/self/fd/0 + stdin=/dev/pts/2 + [ /dev/pts/2 != /dev/pts/2 ] + return 0 + [ ] + [ 1 -eq 0 ] + echo ...fail! ...fail! + return 1 + exit 0 $ uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.22.18-vs2.2.0.6-ocelot #2 SMP Mon Feb 25 00:53:29 WET 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release: 8.04 Codename: hardy -- Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230342] Re: Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly)
** Package changed: update-manager-core (Ubuntu) = sysklogd (Ubuntu) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #437213 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437213 ** Also affects: sysklogd (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437213 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Upgrading Dapper - Hardy fails (due to klogd not being restarted properly) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390292] Re: undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2)
My upgrade from jaunty to karmic fails to boot because of this problem. It hangs at console font and keymap when booting. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390292] Re: undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2)
I've 2.6.30-10-generic version. -- undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390292] Re: undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #531292 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531292 ** Also affects: console-setup (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531292 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = console-setup (Ubuntu) -- undefined kernel key code ( in karmic a2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 132432] Re: [nvidia-glx-legacy] glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV
For me it works fine again with jaunty, but I didn't install the version from PPA. http://pastebin.com/f104e549 -- [nvidia-glx-legacy] glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Bug 132432] Re: [nvidia-glx-legacy] glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV
For me it works fine again with jaunty, but I didn't install the version from PPA. http://pastebin.com/f104e549 -- [nvidia-glx-legacy] glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Bug#414532: Package removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reassign 414532 ftp.debian.org retitle 414532 RM: emifreq-applet -- RoQA; orphaned, upstream dead, better alternatives, buggy thanks Hi! Please see the following reasons for the removal request: * Package is orphaned. * Upstream is inactive/dead (no updates since 2005). * Better alternatives (e.g: awn-extras-applets + computertemp). * 100% CPU Load. Buggy, Memory leaks There are no reverse depends. Thank you! - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKPmcUAAoJENDqNB6bSPIz22kP/3jiY6mMG4nscUcQV17F6v4H VDEwD7CQzwLJSAR2yjkSro+HhghJ3kkHkDjjSzlaGPso1qKsoJJhOgTIaY6qtlcC UzbKe6t52S/LPFaZBbiVl26LTcqop1Ij90r95HNY1NZKdvxWuLQONm9A3UQ41y7D 8FKsICi66tO5TKEVq8BqG04iZYnEQoDGMtMKgi9RRk/z3RZWKvwHNayrZdNavOs7 kX+9IpVnYCdIPuO8BmfH+usCnxW43IpJF/K1afs4m7AOdQidR/cu2FBB5OS2qeiP gjFNw5O6q6TgWgF6Hjv6c0bNsOgwTCC2d+/domt5PHGZjJd+dnscKs4/6boayFkK vw3ojclOXVQqcwKscTJLVgmhZ5aay3Rcb8a0vMoJX6nzozUsy7uHn2wmVrJCF4kx LQO2ZewJeIjFpN7MZXAIUPSzEIZZRuarn1s0Qb5RwZNg4vlTnAxsdHGIVqtOQFay jP+zWCXT0CXeUIgYqgPC66iHeoRweQWH2XM2UQylX99+3XRzCC9rL/cxo0uwwqVr wtn/XHhv+NWepxdpVIhxDrftOVCo2mf+K/8FdAoiWEdhq8+XoGDjwFhZi6kHN0g4 E2Zn0bGf1Ax7K0LHmWtlBmonDrAwz2FnqFo/YsmVWDljUTFTUa6MR+oghRhGcLEo 3MoD8iGY6LQQIRrC8a8k =kb3C -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#391574: Still persist ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! Could you please try with latest version in unstable to see if this bug still occurs ? I should be fixed. Thanks - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKPrnMAAoJENDqNB6bSPIzgDUQAIo80QRBLryP4DMC/xp9+8Fc gWH3qUP8ak/C7AYJoSAhIHte9FefIv/016q4q+2iZGKwXVcK09D73cdaP4U84Ywx Mvgwa6DgrLcGn1y9QDbhw5UYU35EG5JFZPUrBkE032/aRpl4W9wG0I0TNICYbwg9 l3GYuW4hkhpsO/0t1Lm68x5q4jE3hsfJADed78GD5g/q7lS6k5Ua96KvnlaAJGes YtcYf8Ov3LEUb4hwDCQgl8pAXNVtywdAN944ZN13yB2Tqg839XcCn8tV9tZJ9xWx GT+cdjFZ/wZOli/z4h6oGwcelQjLgspwJRoXvaZpAkPN2Pq72MtO6Wprc6XJsYVn nBZTTXUXQTsGCbAOYBvck2i9DCfvJzeJ4TFiqHHsnwxvCbahqdlXXSbqRzf5CO79 uSG67Pu0RXqkVoSSNa0ZUNr5Y8z7HkNgtdk+FD/2FcnvYgDzHLfnrRzDU3A3QX4C xG9OfkC7La+O8vqYyqfsG0kWcsvqB6Vucw+Ythz1YYNmDjWWtJHCZK/OLzmzF941 v7LhgI/OlORTnVA7tvlOl6+qzG2ounXM+Mrz/Ps1ByD+hVA2CM5dOmfrBXGVBZi4 zYimb1zxSvR4Z1uOugMsbHbmDZsilBLKxnyVYzR7nceoL/+IJQOQUhTPseKNMC4e mFawf7dTKHsfxrlxhbTU =bVo6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#502889: Deprecated build dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I think it's time to remove it. http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinBugs/DependencyOnOrphanedPythonXML#prev Status: you can use a recent version of python and the builtin xml libs (e.g. 2.5.2) and it should work. for older pythons (2.3, 2.4), you need pyxml. - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKPrisAAoJENDqNB6bSPIznykQAJsj7jPOC0bgbmQML5j0ohix VZ8p10YE2PUOd5cfF5uc24ZT1I+dx/By7BZmAPgd5YiksMXb7aQW1fkhTFSGX68s xL9t1G4M0tUwbOjQkjmcgEy2QeUCVUsNmM+vhdDnJ0zzEqC+zDZxx+8D0+CkwH6K BtJ5aSVUlbAJuMT8i6DynXQPyU1kudR4IQ6jlZ8EwJt1VjA0mAion/V5FiaxJuT5 5gOg2MCFWDkNAglaPsU7isD7fu+sXjC4ifZcrusLR4TepcMx6+hmmOm5T93lB6n7 K3ct/hHzks8GxXFoSwnVosiJDIOEvPW+bPSqg1sfwzGfqZaQUsMBcyZErDNqHD2d cg3vzrQ8zNWSfvyQ9hEZJFraomnssQLvXTJg5/T5+KnF9Jq4+CxMMi4E5yHuCHzC VqlgYVD8z/1EZNJxc+0m1yMUEIz7P8QcHEidjNam5BWlecxMV1a+YhZK70oF3mK8 MVUSKfUKY2kcNhEfwvMPisTqGz2Cs6RBvtcCFC3wVEpMRo1LwekChsqnEUrK0mHk 4p12NjOCxTx44EyfRmXoPVNF2ZJGmGFVrBuefVzWSm2LzpRvwJjRe0yB3NaciF4K qMOPnuoOBUwgI2THCPpBjMpQt8WTSnx2DWysSNNoUgF8NLBmjLn1aGUpOzV4dmAZ 75N9fF8IoODZmA6YMw/E =8twM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#414532: Package removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 reassign 414532 ftp.debian.org retitle 414532 RM: emifreq-applet -- RoQA; orphaned, upstream dead, better alternatives, buggy thanks Hi! Please see the following reasons for the removal request: * Package is orphaned. * Upstream is inactive/dead (no updates since 2005). * Better alternatives (e.g: awn-extras-applets + computertemp). * 100% CPU Load. Buggy, Memory leaks There are no reverse depends. Thank you! - -- Marco Rodrigues http://Marco.Tondela.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKPmcUAAoJENDqNB6bSPIz22kP/3jiY6mMG4nscUcQV17F6v4H VDEwD7CQzwLJSAR2yjkSro+HhghJ3kkHkDjjSzlaGPso1qKsoJJhOgTIaY6qtlcC UzbKe6t52S/LPFaZBbiVl26LTcqop1Ij90r95HNY1NZKdvxWuLQONm9A3UQ41y7D 8FKsICi66tO5TKEVq8BqG04iZYnEQoDGMtMKgi9RRk/z3RZWKvwHNayrZdNavOs7 kX+9IpVnYCdIPuO8BmfH+usCnxW43IpJF/K1afs4m7AOdQidR/cu2FBB5OS2qeiP gjFNw5O6q6TgWgF6Hjv6c0bNsOgwTCC2d+/domt5PHGZjJd+dnscKs4/6boayFkK vw3ojclOXVQqcwKscTJLVgmhZ5aay3Rcb8a0vMoJX6nzozUsy7uHn2wmVrJCF4kx LQO2ZewJeIjFpN7MZXAIUPSzEIZZRuarn1s0Qb5RwZNg4vlTnAxsdHGIVqtOQFay jP+zWCXT0CXeUIgYqgPC66iHeoRweQWH2XM2UQylX99+3XRzCC9rL/cxo0uwwqVr wtn/XHhv+NWepxdpVIhxDrftOVCo2mf+K/8FdAoiWEdhq8+XoGDjwFhZi6kHN0g4 E2Zn0bGf1Ax7K0LHmWtlBmonDrAwz2FnqFo/YsmVWDljUTFTUa6MR+oghRhGcLEo 3MoD8iGY6LQQIRrC8a8k =kb3C -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
