Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

[Jana Iyengar]

That sounds good to me.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Wesley Eddy  wrote:

> In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9
> (or other suitable place).  Since we want to encourage wide
> experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the
> open questions/topics are.
>
>
>
> On 9/29/2016 12:29 PM, Jana Iyengar wrote:
>
> Hi Wes, Roland,
>
> There are two issues in that email:
> 1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for
> evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We
> cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage further
> evaluation and work that can perhaps even lead to a future update to this
> draft. We don't intend to address this point in the draft.
> 2. Consistency of drop_next_. We should be consistent, this was an
> oversight. We'll fix the algorithm to be consistent with the text.
>
> We'll send out a revised draft early next week.
> - jana
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Bless, Roland (TM)  > wrote:
>
>> Hi Wes and all,
>>
>> Am 14.09.2016 um 15:26 schrieb Wesley Eddy:
>> > Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
>> > comments were received, and the authors made an update some time ago.
>> > There hasn't been much follow-up discussion.  I assume this means the
>> > current draft meets people's expectations?  If not, now is a good time
>> > to shout, because I'm working on the shepherd write-up so that it can be
>> > submitted to the IESG soon.
>>
>> No, still some issues that were raised here:
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ENA1VZmcFVXCJWrMIbmey4wAYnw
>>
>> that are not fixed yet.
>> I pointed that out at the mic within the AQM session @IETF96.
>> Andrew said that they need to do the changes and then resubmit.
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Roland
>>
>>
>> ___
>> aqm mailing list
>> aqm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>>
>
>
>
___
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

[aqm] aqm - Not having a session at IETF 97

["IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"]

Wesley Eddy, a chair of the aqm working group, indicated that the aqm working 
group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 97.

This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.


___
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

[Wesley Eddy]

In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9 
(or other suitable place).  Since we want to encourage wide 
experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the 
open questions/topics are.




On 9/29/2016 12:29 PM, Jana Iyengar wrote:

Hi Wes, Roland,

There are two issues in that email:
1. The importance of reentering state. This is clearly a matter for 
evaluation, and further evaluation will surely yield more results. We 
cannot and won't be perfect in this draft, but I encourage further 
evaluation and work that can perhaps even lead to a future update to 
this draft. We don't intend to address this point in the draft.
2. Consistency of drop_next_. We should be consistent, this was an 
oversight. We'll fix the algorithm to be consistent with the text.


We'll send out a revised draft early next week.
- jana

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Bless, Roland (TM) 
> wrote:


Hi Wes and all,

Am 14.09.2016 um 15:26 schrieb Wesley Eddy:
> Hi, for awhile, the CoDel draft was in working group last call. Some
> comments were received, and the authors made an update some time
ago.
> There hasn't been much follow-up discussion.  I assume this
means the
> current draft meets people's expectations?  If not, now is a
good time
> to shout, because I'm working on the shepherd write-up so that
it can be
> submitted to the IESG soon.

No, still some issues that were raised here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/ENA1VZmcFVXCJWrMIbmey4wAYnw


that are not fixed yet.
I pointed that out at the mic within the AQM session @IETF96.
Andrew said that they need to do the changes and then resubmit.

Regards,
 Roland


___
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm





___
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm