[Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
Hi all ! I have ported latest babelz repository to git with full history you can find it here [0] The problem with darcs is that it have less supports than git and in fact is impossible to package software from darcs for openwrt... Can you use git now? I have done the big effort to convert darcs repo to git [0] http://gitorious.org/eigennet/babeld ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
I have tried to do a babelz package form darcs but i obtain unkown source protocol or similar, moreover it seems you are to forced to use a tagged version, if i am doing something wrong please help me to package babelz for openwrt ( not tagged version ) 2011/2/28 Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr: Hi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:49:17PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: The problem with darcs is that it have less supports than git and in fact is impossible to package software from darcs for openwrt... You must be kidding: I added support for darcs repositories to OpenWrt 4 months ago: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/23615 Can you use git now? I have done the big effort to convert darcs repo to git You could have spared your effort and ask first. I maintain an (unofficial) git clone of babeld: http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~kerneis/software/repos/babeld.git Use at your own risk. -- Gabriel ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: I have tried to do a babelz package form darcs but i obtain unkown source protocol or similar, moreover it seems you are to forced to use As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which does not exist). a tagged version, if i am doing something wrong please help me to package babelz for openwrt ( not tagged version ) You cannot retrieve an untagged version (by design). If you really want to build the latest version, apply the attached patch. Best, -- Gabriel diff --git a/include/download.mk b/include/download.mk index d1b3fc8..06aaac4 100644 --- a/include/download.mk +++ b/include/download.mk @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ define DownloadMethod/darcs cd $(TMP_DIR)/dl \ rm -rf $(SUBDIR) \ [ \! -d $(SUBDIR) ] \ - darcs get -t $(VERSION) $(URL) $(SUBDIR) \ + darcs get $(URL) $(SUBDIR) \ find $(SUBDIR) -name _darcs | xargs rm -rf \ echo Packing checkout... \ $(call dl_pack,$(TMP_DIR)/dl/$(FILE),$(SUBDIR)) \ ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which does not exist). yes i was already doing this way as you can see at the latest commit before switching to git http://gitorious.org/eigennet/packages/blobs/f6ab1558a9460efedcdcc93a53a58d107822bc0e/babeld-eigennet/Makefile 2011/2/28 Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: I have tried to do a babelz package form darcs but i obtain unkown source protocol or similar, moreover it seems you are to forced to use As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which does not exist). a tagged version, if i am doing something wrong please help me to package babelz for openwrt ( not tagged version ) You cannot retrieve an untagged version (by design). If you really want to build the latest version, apply the attached patch. Best, -- Gabriel ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which does not exist). yes i was already doing this way as you can see at the latest commit before switching to git http://gitorious.org/eigennet/packages/blobs/f6ab1558a9460efedcdcc93a53a58d107822bc0e/babeld-eigennet/Makefile It looks like you miss PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR, as explained in: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/23615 Add for instance: PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR=$(PACKAGE_NAME)-darcs (Note that, for some reason, you did not forget it when setting up the git package.) Best, -- Gabriel ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git
same error :| here you can find the updated source [0] make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/feeds/packages/ipv6/radvd' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/feeds/eigennet/babeld-eigennet' mkdir -p /home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/dl ERROR: No download method available make[3]: *** [/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/dl/babeld-eigennet-1.1.0.tar.gz] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/feeds/eigennet/babeld-eigennet' make[2]: *** [package/feeds/eigennet/babeld-eigennet/compile] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel' make[1]: *** [/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel/staging_dir/target-mips_uClibc-0.9.30.1/stamp/.package_compile] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gioacchino/Development/backbabel' make: *** [world] Error 2 [0] http://gitorious.org/eigennet/packages/blobs/babel/babeld-eigennet/Makefile 2011/2/28 Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which does not exist). yes i was already doing this way as you can see at the latest commit before switching to git http://gitorious.org/eigennet/packages/blobs/f6ab1558a9460efedcdcc93a53a58d107822bc0e/babeld-eigennet/Makefile It looks like you miss PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR, as explained in: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/23615 Add for instance: PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR=$(PACKAGE_NAME)-darcs (Note that, for some reason, you did not forget it when setting up the git package.) Best, -- Gabriel ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] Last change to edit the Babel draft
I have some ideas for better routing metric and I didn't yet have time to make anything concrete. There's really no reason to put experimental metrics in the RFC. The RFC contains two examples of metrics that are known to work well in practice, and tries to make it clear that further research is needed. (Babelz is an example of such further research.) So I will probably have a discussion there about it and we can then together see and discuss it. Maybe even implement it there and then and test it. That would be great. --Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] Last change to edit the Babel draft
Uh, I am from Slovenia, so this would require some traveling I do not believe by budget allows me. Sadly. I would be glad to visit you. Happily, 404 will be at WBM. --Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
Re: [Babel-users] Babel Multicast routing
And also we like to use multicast for a lot of thing not only for mdns, there is some plan to implement multicast routing on babel in short terms? I've certainly got plans to look at multicast, but not specifically for Babel. If you look closely at the way I'm designing things, you'll notice that I've been very careful to decouple the various pieces of the architecture -- for example, AHCP is completely independent of Babel, and works just fine with OLSR or BATMAN. Which is the way it should be [1]. Same goes for multicast -- I see no reason why multicast routing should be linked to a particular unicast routing protocol, and intend to work on a more general solution. Don't hold your breath, though, my main priority right now is to finish publishing the Babel and Babelz stuff. --Juliusz [1] If you're implementing tunnelling as part of your routing daemon, you've got some explaining to do. ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
