[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1826 Moderate CentOS 6 libvncserver Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1826 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1826.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0716f57168140f6062b8cdb0efc7c601ffa3fe81855f759d3e2733d5b7d7a355
libvncserver-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.i686.rpm
266355a2ec31bea7285f3a530991345604875e1662bcbcfd200be9d8876f4e7d
libvncserver-devel-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
0716f57168140f6062b8cdb0efc7c601ffa3fe81855f759d3e2733d5b7d7a355
libvncserver-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.i686.rpm
2c8f243f3b7de8151b420b84178764b8f19bd64c510dec6f6d95c8f7b8838086
libvncserver-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.x86_64.rpm
266355a2ec31bea7285f3a530991345604875e1662bcbcfd200be9d8876f4e7d
libvncserver-devel-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.i686.rpm
5134ca78f7182719b16a45f8a33b576d108dee4f4b4de10ddc92e10e8e73cafe
libvncserver-devel-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7d83f556540cd4df5e71bc1be7f4106483c604c95da62af25f4dc0c3894d060a
libvncserver-0.9.7-7.el6_6.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1843 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1843 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1843.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
e64a630855f472f4807e3f372ac5e3db50cb0364eee72d50588b351f0a3dd711
kernel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
59a69f69fbc12acacb743ac045b539a0f1c73c00ce16d605d513601d70268fa6
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
f319f1a7b0900df550a32cb3464c5b1f195052ccdc4cd33588292e02d1e83789
kernel-debug-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
622fb747d10b9e5a19e2d2a427a92583aa0d4a06a7821bc6d3179c96e61e1ff4
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
60f4c49b5a42d7f6d282764952349dd0c7fbeee95a886b66b2a6cf76eff26b1f
kernel-devel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
efaf4a0803a7bfd29abe3e8ab751b25242f356bf2054d924bf6c00ee46439eb8
kernel-doc-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
e1fa08c31f3982e895945e703c2bd5211911a4a60f2b2c632090bf9e7d7d2cb0
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
69590e12f6aec5ee924caa81a240555bb0a7f071d36770e4d91cd39cdda35282
kernel-headers-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
7ef7d0ab42e941779e75b24e7fabc2884fd336e644fd467c047e9b8c12ff3ad1
perf-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
4e8dabde67439cad326be23e988aca91ebfdd320f8794e9b4fb69cc6ecc7b508
python-perf-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
e3401c36143dedd71d9f5a0b4c743b20705efbf21358749212a2df94d423057a
kernel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
59a69f69fbc12acacb743ac045b539a0f1c73c00ce16d605d513601d70268fa6
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
3b62c8cc13fb670ed63e8686ea9dd84eda5a916cbbbf8089639c215f67d8f6ed
kernel-debug-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
04ed371ff25e86dabbd6ade04eea43ade8605594e4f75efc1ea192484073d019
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
9e8f28789d9c102fa8643eb4277006d7cfd87f7bc0d531fc080a9eed14ded64c
kernel-devel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
efaf4a0803a7bfd29abe3e8ab751b25242f356bf2054d924bf6c00ee46439eb8
kernel-doc-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
e1fa08c31f3982e895945e703c2bd5211911a4a60f2b2c632090bf9e7d7d2cb0
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.noarch.rpm
922bd34bb3f7b01b0ed762ca809af950861ed8b78ada25c59bb09f5b1db7b280
kernel-headers-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
f2c0b198f82458d102efabc159cb0deb33250edd99500ec91923272cfdf20133
perf-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
b190d2f4b5f398f2e4f4e13971f4ec002c4637442abf55a4f0dd0d9f6673089c
python-perf-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
54731d970e5a18144faa02bb7ab2d5512b789501551ce19b95f1cc48c9e3faa8
kernel-2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1828 CentOS 7 ipa BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1828
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1828.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
48fb8185766b8ad8c46123dc8d0e91c73bb1fd1e7d1fa15c7218d2863a8a3439
ipa-admintools-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.x86_64.rpm
1cf2e2ed639ce436be331771abf4ae6fc31c3ff0af22df2025c3d56c336841bb
ipa-client-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.x86_64.rpm
918cc3fc9d1d782bd79f9f67e1a3001878bb7f099759d7d28f7dde4cb440b86d
ipa-python-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.x86_64.rpm
3984d4845aeccc6a91d75c28ce68b2183012002986d9d004ebadd450c0c8d59a
ipa-server-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.x86_64.rpm
52de4977b1ef5acaa4faf23423c3e5a75227f776373a3e78941f5b0f5515e31c
ipa-server-trust-ad-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8aaf46c4b60d6227d6cc4a6325c7742a8d5c5e5546651500abd17bafbc594536
ipa-3.3.3-28.el7_0.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] Xen Project Test Day for 4.5 RC2 on Thursday, Nov 13
Since the folks on this list work with integrating Xen Project on CentOS, we'd like you to be aware of the upcoming Xen Project 4.5 RC2 Test Day. This Thursday, November 13, is our second Test Day for the 4.5 release cycle. Release Candidate 2 is now available for assessment. Information about testing this release can be found here: http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_4.5_RC2_test_instructions To learn more about Test Days, check out: http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Test_Days Russ Pavlicek Xen Project Evangelist, Citrix Systems Home Office: +1-301-829-5327 Mobile: +1-240-397-0199 UK VoIP: +44 1223 852 894 ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] squirrelmail
buenos dias a todos me pueden apoyar ya que estoy tratando de instalar squirrelmail , mi servidor tiene centos 6.5 pero me marca esto al tratar de instalar [root@mail /]# yum install squirrelmail Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Install Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.host-engine.com * extras: mirror.thelinuxfix.com * updates: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com No package squirrelmail available. Error: Nothing to do ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] squirrelmail
Hola debes agregar el repo de epel ahí esta el squirremail -- Saludos Cordiales |César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM |Tel: (593-2)554-271 2221-386 | Ext 4501 |Celular: 0999374317 |Skype servicomecuador |Web www.servicomecuador.com Síguenos en: |Twitter: @servicomecuador |Facebook: servicomec |Zona Clientes: www.servicomecuador.com/billing |Blog: http://servicomecuador.com/blog |Dir. Av. 10 de Agosto N29-140 Entre |Acuña y Cuero y Caicedo |Quito - Ecuador - Sudamérica On 11/11/14 11:47, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: buenos dias a todos me pueden apoyar ya que estoy tratando de instalar squirrelmail , mi servidor tiene centos 6.5 pero me marca esto al tratar de instalar [root@mail /]# yum install squirrelmail Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Install Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.host-engine.com * extras: mirror.thelinuxfix.com * updates: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com No package squirrelmail available. Error: Nothing to do ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] squirrelmail
Eso te dice que el paquete squirremail no existe en el repo. Mi consejo es usar el paquete oficial de la web, es un tar.gz al final squirremail es una web que puedes configurar facilmente sin necesidad de instalar nada. Saludos, David El día 11 de noviembre de 2014, 13:50, César Martinez cmarti...@servicomecuador.com escribió: Hola debes agregar el repo de epel ahí esta el squirremail -- Saludos Cordiales |César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM |Tel: (593-2)554-271 2221-386 | Ext 4501 |Celular: 0999374317 |Skype servicomecuador |Web www.servicomecuador.com Síguenos en: |Twitter: @servicomecuador |Facebook: servicomec |Zona Clientes: www.servicomecuador.com/billing |Blog: http://servicomecuador.com/blog |Dir. Av. 10 de Agosto N29-140 Entre |Acuña y Cuero y Caicedo |Quito - Ecuador - Sudamérica On 11/11/14 11:47, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: buenos dias a todos me pueden apoyar ya que estoy tratando de instalar squirrelmail , mi servidor tiene centos 6.5 pero me marca esto al tratar de instalar [root@mail /]# yum install squirrelmail Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Setting up Install Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.host-engine.com * extras: mirror.thelinuxfix.com * updates: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com No package squirrelmail available. Error: Nothing to do ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Medios para CENTOS.
Estimada Lista: Estoy en la busqueda de los medios o instaladores en cd/dvd de las versiones de CENTOS 5-6-7 para32/64 bits. Alguien sabe, donde puedo conseguir en mi pais BOLIVIA? Mejor si es en la ciudad de Santa Cruz de la Sierra. Disculpen, pero el ancho de banda que manejo me limita. Finalmente, si no es posible en fisico links de repositorios mas cercanos a mi pais. Agradezco su ayuda, saludos. -- *Mario Mendez Navarro | Ingeniero Informatico | Infrastructure Operations**U.A.G.R.M.* * | Av. Virgen de Lujan, Urb. DAMAR, calle 7 NRO 5, Santa Cruz, BOLIVIA**+591 3 3601000 | Cell +591 721-44989* *mende...@gmail.com mende...@gmail.com* *En cuanto a mí respecta, muy poco me preocupa ser juzgado por ustedes o por algún tribunal humano. Ni siquiera yo mismo me juzgo. . . . Pues el que me juzga es el Señor (1 Corintios 4:3-4, vp).* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Medios para CENTOS.
Disculpen, pero el ancho de banda que manejo me limita. Finalmente, si no es posible en fisico links de repositorios mas cercanos a mi pais. No bajes las imagenes ISO, baja los archivos torrents y descargas con transmission o cualquier cliente de torrents, la ventaja de bajar los torrents es que puedes pausar y reiniciar la descarga cuantas veces sea necesario por lo que no tienes que bajar todo en una sola sesión. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Medios para CENTOS.
wget -c http://link/image.iso Con la opcion -c tambien puedo pausar cuando quiera o cuando mi conexion se corte y no tendré que re-empezar la descarga de cero. Saludos, David El día 11 de noviembre de 2014, 17:07, William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com escribió: Disculpen, pero el ancho de banda que manejo me limita. Finalmente, si no es posible en fisico links de repositorios mas cercanos a mi pais. No bajes las imagenes ISO, baja los archivos torrents y descargas con transmission o cualquier cliente de torrents, la ventaja de bajar los torrents es que puedes pausar y reiniciar la descarga cuantas veces sea necesario por lo que no tienes que bajar todo en una sola sesión. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Medios para CENTOS.
Aquí está la lista de todos los mirrors checa el mas cercano http://www.centos.org/download/mirrors/ On Nov 11, 2014 1:54 PM, Mario Mendez Navarro mende...@gmail.com wrote: Estimada Lista: Estoy en la busqueda de los medios o instaladores en cd/dvd de las versiones de CENTOS 5-6-7 para32/64 bits. Alguien sabe, donde puedo conseguir en mi pais BOLIVIA? Mejor si es en la ciudad de Santa Cruz de la Sierra. Disculpen, pero el ancho de banda que manejo me limita. Finalmente, si no es posible en fisico links de repositorios mas cercanos a mi pais. Agradezco su ayuda, saludos. -- *Mario Mendez Navarro | Ingeniero Informatico | Infrastructure Operations**U.A.G.R.M.* * | Av. Virgen de Lujan, Urb. DAMAR, calle 7 NRO 5, Santa Cruz, BOLIVIA**+591 3 3601000 | Cell +591 721-44989* *mende...@gmail.com mende...@gmail.com* *En cuanto a mí respecta, muy poco me preocupa ser juzgado por ustedes o por algún tribunal humano. Ni siquiera yo mismo me juzgo. . . . Pues el que me juzga es el Señor (1 Corintios 4:3-4, vp).* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] squirrelmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/11/2014 11:50 AM, César Martinez wrote: Hola debes agregar el repo de epel ahí esta el squirremail haces: yum install epel-release luego yum install squirrelmail saludos epe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYoi7AAoJEI8SQ0eoZD/X160P/0wYN88f48aCbhwq5P3tRZpr M2MvBuc/4e1f0pDxQi4gBMZGiSHRQ9fnsjBOv9qt/Gjw140gIaJDyjWkIro8Ravi YcqHEUzI4AC40GDzrj+21QtvtHWl2yhKqgS+pEnTNoRcJZ0MPCjXVF5noITxgqlq gN8wJ5vTcX6KorC6Phx6NaStlaAK+v3JgXQNVViHyfQBFieBpvK+Ctb+9IYtznhs n8CU53ntJdbUpe8zBniVXWSScb8WXWCcCLx/neYEv7TBes5ckgKjRWDmWgt3tR+6 9WMfAb2EQX3vEiIQmTCJskCOM6MA93H0jvGYDBPRksTHSSnd638j+moOsG/SkDxh /fpyL4q+bsa86Ws/my2j3yELWbMJWqxBb4YZ8P2sPhOjfOCE8rhzN567VycY9n4P VdtR/6aowpAhNMmfemEVFZHKqdx+jE9vmZKcMWVi2QUlYWuVuddh9Pzv3VHN6KH2 QM0M5l/8rrS6n4znzCeRDCsNai6UmtjT+aX1/dnIW+EMzj+HywwCkw9Jh9nbrlvI 85Ags1cd9RN8+3QTxUAbEWorFvUS+BG6xFwQYm2Zxs0iva8CuKMIl6Lh5Picezp4 +GEl5bhRWjnCVtKzCDsjRjq61d4A5W/edVx/joL2QwpK7bJXPAuHBdFFn3i2XX6F HxFrI49FeOKiX6ODvJnQ =+C7M -END PGP SIGNATURE- Email secured by Check Point ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] squirrelmail
Saludos, Un webmail con muchas mas funcionalidades: EgroupWare (Comunity Edition) http://www.egroupware.org/en/products-and-prices/egroupware-community-edition.html El 11 de noviembre de 2014, 17:07, Ernesto Pérez Estévez ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/11/2014 11:50 AM, César Martinez wrote: Hola debes agregar el repo de epel ahí esta el squirremail haces: yum install epel-release luego yum install squirrelmail saludos epe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYoi7AAoJEI8SQ0eoZD/X160P/0wYN88f48aCbhwq5P3tRZpr M2MvBuc/4e1f0pDxQi4gBMZGiSHRQ9fnsjBOv9qt/Gjw140gIaJDyjWkIro8Ravi YcqHEUzI4AC40GDzrj+21QtvtHWl2yhKqgS+pEnTNoRcJZ0MPCjXVF5noITxgqlq gN8wJ5vTcX6KorC6Phx6NaStlaAK+v3JgXQNVViHyfQBFieBpvK+Ctb+9IYtznhs n8CU53ntJdbUpe8zBniVXWSScb8WXWCcCLx/neYEv7TBes5ckgKjRWDmWgt3tR+6 9WMfAb2EQX3vEiIQmTCJskCOM6MA93H0jvGYDBPRksTHSSnd638j+moOsG/SkDxh /fpyL4q+bsa86Ws/my2j3yELWbMJWqxBb4YZ8P2sPhOjfOCE8rhzN567VycY9n4P VdtR/6aowpAhNMmfemEVFZHKqdx+jE9vmZKcMWVi2QUlYWuVuddh9Pzv3VHN6KH2 QM0M5l/8rrS6n4znzCeRDCsNai6UmtjT+aX1/dnIW+EMzj+HywwCkw9Jh9nbrlvI 85Ags1cd9RN8+3QTxUAbEWorFvUS+BG6xFwQYm2Zxs0iva8CuKMIl6Lh5Picezp4 +GEl5bhRWjnCVtKzCDsjRjq61d4A5W/edVx/joL2QwpK7bJXPAuHBdFFn3i2XX6F HxFrI49FeOKiX6ODvJnQ =+C7M -END PGP SIGNATURE- Email secured by Check Point ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- John Jairo Toro A. NewRoute Inc. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] squirrelmail
GMail, acostumbro al publico a otra cosa, los clientes web de correo que vienen desde antes, es como dar un paso atras. En el lugar donde trabajo, me miraron con cara de ogete cuando les mostre roundcube, y me pidieron GMail, me enoje, pero la verdad es que tienen razon, volver a esos es dar un paso atras. Esto fue lo que encontre, te recomiendo que pruebes el demo, y veas la usabilidad, tus usuarios te van a querer mas. Mailpile: https://www.mailpile.is/ 2014-11-12 3:50 GMT-02:00 New Route Inc newro...@gmail.com: Saludos, Un webmail con muchas mas funcionalidades: EgroupWare (Comunity Edition) http://www.egroupware.org/en/products-and-prices/egroupware-community-edition.html El 11 de noviembre de 2014, 17:07, Ernesto Pérez Estévez ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/11/2014 11:50 AM, César Martinez wrote: Hola debes agregar el repo de epel ahí esta el squirremail haces: yum install epel-release luego yum install squirrelmail saludos epe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYoi7AAoJEI8SQ0eoZD/X160P/0wYN88f48aCbhwq5P3tRZpr M2MvBuc/4e1f0pDxQi4gBMZGiSHRQ9fnsjBOv9qt/Gjw140gIaJDyjWkIro8Ravi YcqHEUzI4AC40GDzrj+21QtvtHWl2yhKqgS+pEnTNoRcJZ0MPCjXVF5noITxgqlq gN8wJ5vTcX6KorC6Phx6NaStlaAK+v3JgXQNVViHyfQBFieBpvK+Ctb+9IYtznhs n8CU53ntJdbUpe8zBniVXWSScb8WXWCcCLx/neYEv7TBes5ckgKjRWDmWgt3tR+6 9WMfAb2EQX3vEiIQmTCJskCOM6MA93H0jvGYDBPRksTHSSnd638j+moOsG/SkDxh /fpyL4q+bsa86Ws/my2j3yELWbMJWqxBb4YZ8P2sPhOjfOCE8rhzN567VycY9n4P VdtR/6aowpAhNMmfemEVFZHKqdx+jE9vmZKcMWVi2QUlYWuVuddh9Pzv3VHN6KH2 QM0M5l/8rrS6n4znzCeRDCsNai6UmtjT+aX1/dnIW+EMzj+HywwCkw9Jh9nbrlvI 85Ags1cd9RN8+3QTxUAbEWorFvUS+BG6xFwQYm2Zxs0iva8CuKMIl6Lh5Picezp4 +GEl5bhRWjnCVtKzCDsjRjq61d4A5W/edVx/joL2QwpK7bJXPAuHBdFFn3i2XX6F HxFrI49FeOKiX6ODvJnQ =+C7M -END PGP SIGNATURE- Email secured by Check Point ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- John Jairo Toro A. NewRoute Inc. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Kickstart IPv6 Gateway
Hi. I'm installing CentOS 7 with Kickstart on a machine that has IPv6. The problem is that while it has an IPv6 address after installation it does not have the IPv6 gateway. I'm using NetworkManager and my network configuration is completely static, no autoconf or dhcpv6. My Kickstart configuration uses the following network configuration (actual values replaced but with the same format): network --device enp1s0 --bootproto=static --gateway=123.123.123.1 --ip=123.123.123.123 --nameserver=123.123.123.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123 --ipv6gateway=2001:123:abc::1 --activate network --hostname=test.example.org The Red Hat installation guide suggests that --ipv6gateway should be used but it looks like it's not picked up. Does anyone know why this doesn't work? John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation
Hi guys, I'm yet to use 10 Gbps with CentOS, hence my question. I'm looking for a cheap (doh) adapter that won't cause me problems with CentOS. Any recommendations? Cheers Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
Hi, I have been trying to build a docker image to run unit tests for the B2G project [1]. However when I try to install Xorg I get this error [2]. I have been searching on web but is still not clear for me if this is an issue or if I should proceed like this link [3] says. Any idea? Cheers, Wander. [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G [2] https://pastebin.mozilla.org/7243239 [3] jperrin.github.io/centos/2014/09/25/centos-docker-and-systemd/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation
Am 11.11.14 um 10:22 schrieb Nux!: Hi guys, I'm yet to use 10 Gbps with CentOS, hence my question. I'm looking for a cheap (doh) adapter that won't cause me problems with CentOS. Any recommendations? I'd say, depends on what you wanna do with it; e.g. iscsi trafic too, how mayn ports, copper or sfp+? We have intel and emulex (including hardware iscsi) cards in use and no trouble so far. Depending on the intended purpose. /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation
Thanks Gotz, I'll definitely do some storage on them, Gluster/DRBD/ISCSI, but also general traffic; I just want to replace 1 Gbps as much as possible, budgets allows. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 11:28:15 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation Am 11.11.14 um 10:22 schrieb Nux!: Hi guys, I'm yet to use 10 Gbps with CentOS, hence my question. I'm looking for a cheap (doh) adapter that won't cause me problems with CentOS. Any recommendations? I'd say, depends on what you wanna do with it; e.g. iscsi trafic too, how mayn ports, copper or sfp+? We have intel and emulex (including hardware iscsi) cards in use and no trouble so far. Depending on the intended purpose. /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On 11/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: On 11/10/2014 2:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote: I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I want to connect to. However, the outside ssh connection works only if the computer's gateway assignment matches the router that I'm connecting to. I suspect that I have to set up some sort of routing assignment to tell the computer to reply to the gateway that the ssh connection request came in on if it doesn't match the current gateway assignment, but I have no idea how to do that. I also have two ISPs at home. I have a Peplink to manage this now, but before that I some commands in rc.local. I had two networks and two NICs on my workstation. This used to work on CentOS 6. ## # symetric routing # ## NIC1=eth0 IP1=192.168.1.6 GW1=192.168.1.1 NET1=192.168.1.0/24 NIC2=eth1 IP2=192.168.2.6 GW2=192.168.2.1 NET2=192.168.2.0/24 DEFGW=$GW2 cat EOF /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep # symetric routing 101 T1 102 T2 EOF # routing and default gateway for each interface ip route add $NET1 dev $NIC1 src $IP1 table T1 ip route add default via $GW1 table T1 ip route add $NET2 dev $NIC2 src $IP2 table T2 ip route add default via $GW2 table T2 # regular routes ip route add $NET1 dev $NIC1 src $IP1 ip route add $NET2 dev $NIC2 src $IP2 # preference for default route route delete default ip route add default via $DEFGW # rules ip rule add from $IP1 table T1 ip rule add from $IP2 table T2 # enable routing echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward Good luck, Jack I can verify the above works just fine if all you want to be able to do is reach your system from outside over either isp.. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
On 11/07/2014 09:05 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello all, As far as which VMWare tools to use - the ones from VM Ware or the open-vm-tools available through the EPEL - is there any consensus on what is better? I know that for CentOS 7 you are told to use open-vm-tools but what is the situation with CentOS 6? I use this: https://www.vmware.com/support/packages ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
I would use the open-vm-tools from EPEL in EL6 as well. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Friday, 7 November, 2014 18:05:54 Subject: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6 Hello all, As far as which VMWare tools to use - the ones from VM Ware or the open-vm-tools available through the EPEL - is there any consensus on what is better? I know that for CentOS 7 you are told to use open-vm-tools but what is the situation with CentOS 6? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list
On Mon, November 10, 2014 13:56, Les Mikesell wrote: Well, yeah...If I wanted to keep secrets, I wouldn't be sending them over the internet at all. You don't really trust your software or other third parties that much, do you? Read my signature. The point is that it is not what I trust. It is what my correspondents do with their mail irrespective of trust. And that is totally out of my control. Nonetheless, we must take whatever steps we can to protect whatever residual confidentiality there is. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
Why? VMWare's rpm repo is well maintained until EL6. Am 11.11.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Nux!: I would use the open-vm-tools from EPEL in EL6 as well. VG Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Non-Gnome desktop
On Mon, November 10, 2014 14:57, Frank Cox wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:35:05 -0500 James B. Byrne wrote: Does this Desktop work for anyone else without gnome3 installed? What am I leaving out? Am I suppose run some sort of X configuration program? I've done this a few times now, and it's worked every time: Install the Centos 7 Live CD. Install epel-release Install Mate Desktop That matches my experience. I can install from the LiveCD with a graphical interface and get KDE and Mate. But I suspect that is because the LiveCD is providing Gnome3. If I use the Minimal install DVD instead then I simply cannot get Mate or KDE to run as desktops without having first installed Gnome3. Neither alternative desktop will work without and both always work with Gnome3 present. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation
We use the Supermicro X9 and X10 motherboards with built in X540 10gbe intel. Centos 6.X and on just work :) We have optimized the nics a bit per this https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2009/ols2009-pages-169-184.pdf The mobo is like $550 to $600 with built in nics :0) - the nics alone run $450 For high end applications we use SolarFlare SFN7122 but those are still around $900 each for 2 port. -Joe -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux! Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 06:52 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation Thanks Gotz, I'll definitely do some storage on them, Gluster/DRBD/ISCSI, but also general traffic; I just want to replace 1 Gbps as much as possible, budgets allows. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 11:28:15 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation Am 11.11.14 um 10:22 schrieb Nux!: Hi guys, I'm yet to use 10 Gbps with CentOS, hence my question. I'm looking for a cheap (doh) adapter that won't cause me problems with CentOS. Any recommendations? I'd say, depends on what you wanna do with it; e.g. iscsi trafic too, how mayn ports, copper or sfp+? We have intel and emulex (including hardware iscsi) cards in use and no trouble so far. Depending on the intended purpose. /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
Why not? I already have EPEL on 99% of my systems, don't have to bother with Vmware's repo. Open-vm-tools is good enough to be included in Base in EL7, it's good enough for me on EL6. Disclaimer: I do not use VMware :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rainer Traut tr...@gmx.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 14:22:52 Subject: Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6 Why? VMWare's rpm repo is well maintained until EL6. Am 11.11.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Nux!: I would use the open-vm-tools from EPEL in EL6 as well. VG Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] backup incrementals on mysql
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I usally make backups of databases mysql. I make buckups of all datbase for example: mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db backups.sql also I make backups just its schema for example mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db --no-data backups.sql Hola, If size's a concern, just export your DBs gziped : mysqldump -u user database | gzip backup_database.sql Also if you are concerned about time to compress, you can enable multithreaded parallel gzip compress with pigz (available in EPEL) : mysqldump -u user database | pigz backup_database.sql TBH, 500 MB databases aren't big enough to seek a more complex approach (unless you have more ambitious RTO/RPO requirements) HTH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation
Check this also - http://dak1n1.com/blog/7-performance-tuning-intel-10gbe sadly, almost always not done when we get there -Joe -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nux! Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 06:52 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation Thanks Gotz, I'll definitely do some storage on them, Gluster/DRBD/ISCSI, but also general traffic; I just want to replace 1 Gbps as much as possible, budgets allows. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 11:28:15 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 10 Gbps adapter recommendation Am 11.11.14 um 10:22 schrieb Nux!: Hi guys, I'm yet to use 10 Gbps with CentOS, hence my question. I'm looking for a cheap (doh) adapter that won't cause me problems with CentOS. Any recommendations? I'd say, depends on what you wanna do with it; e.g. iscsi trafic too, how mayn ports, copper or sfp+? We have intel and emulex (including hardware iscsi) cards in use and no trouble so far. Depending on the intended purpose. /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Non-Gnome desktop
On Mon, November 10, 2014 15:00, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2014-11-10, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: So, 1. I installed a minimal CentOS-7. 2. I then installed epel-release. 3. I then installed etckeeper from epel. 4. I then ran yum update -y. 5. I then rebooted (kernel update). 6. I then ran yum groups install X Window System 7. I then ran yum groups MATE Desktop 8. I then ran startx. Can you confirm line 7 above? It might be a typo. Typos on lines 6 and 7. Mate was installed successfully along with the X Windo System. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network menu doesn't appear on system menu on CentOS 6.6
On Mon, November 10, 2014 16:44, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Frank Cox wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:08:53 -0600 (CST) Gilbert Sebenste wrote: I am not seeing the Network Connections menu option (to configure the network) on one of my CentOS 6.6 machines, even on user root, in Gnome under System - Administration. It's not anywhere else, either. Can anyone point me in the direction of having that added? yum install nm-connection-editor On Mate it shows up under System-Preferences-System-Network Connections Yeah, I'm having a tough day, THAT is where it should be found, but isn't, under Gnome, on this one machine. Typing what you did above gave me an error of no such package. I then tried yum install *connection* and yum install *editor* and nothing came up that matches what I need. Gilbert The Gnome developers probably decided that users did not need to see that. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
It was brought to my attention that the EPEL package is maintained by Vmware as well, so there you go.. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=545136 -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 15:06:58 Subject: Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6 Why not? I already have EPEL on 99% of my systems, don't have to bother with Vmware's repo. Open-vm-tools is good enough to be included in Base in EL7, it's good enough for me on EL6. Disclaimer: I do not use VMware :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Rainer Traut tr...@gmx.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 11 November, 2014 14:22:52 Subject: Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6 Why? VMWare's rpm repo is well maintained until EL6. Am 11.11.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Nux!: I would use the open-vm-tools from EPEL in EL6 as well. VG Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] open-vm-tools on CentOS 6
I know that open-vm-tools is maintained by vmware. I meant the Vmware repo is alway matching latest vSphere release. But: - doesn't contain newer pv drivers - isn't on par with vSphere releases For example: 9.4.6 Dyno Hongjun Fu h...@vmware.com Release matching the vSphere 5.5p02 release. 9.4.0 Dmitry Torokhov d...@vmware.com Release matching the vSphere 5.5 release. There is no 9.4.6 rpm for C7 but we are running vSphere 5.5p02 VG Rainer Am 11.11.2014 um 16:17 schrieb Reindl Harald: the ones from EPEL too guess who maintains the packages Wed Jul 16 2014 Ravindra Kumar ravindraku...@vmware.com - 9.4.6-1 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15954 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=545136 Am 11.11.2014 um 15:22 schrieb Rainer Traut: Why? VMWare's rpm repo is well maintained until EL6. Am 11.11.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Nux!: I would use the open-vm-tools from EPEL in EL6 as well ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote: On 11/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: On 11/10/2014 2:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote: I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I want to connect to. However, the outside ssh connection works only if the computer's gateway assignment matches the router that I'm connecting to. I suspect that I have to set up some sort of routing assignment to tell the computer to reply to the gateway that the ssh connection request came in on if it doesn't match the current gateway assignment, but I have no idea how to do that. I also have two ISPs at home. I have a Peplink to manage this now, but before that I some commands in rc.local. I had two networks and two NICs on my workstation. This used to work on CentOS 6. ## # symetric routing # ## NIC1=eth0 IP1=192.168.1.6 GW1=192.168.1.1 NET1=192.168.1.0/24 NIC2=eth1 IP2=192.168.2.6 GW2=192.168.2.1 NET2=192.168.2.0/24 DEFGW=$GW2 cat EOF /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep # symetric routing 101 T1 102 T2 EOF # routing and default gateway for each interface ip route add $NET1 dev $NIC1 src $IP1 table T1 ip route add default via $GW1 table T1 ip route add $NET2 dev $NIC2 src $IP2 table T2 ip route add default via $GW2 table T2 # regular routes ip route add $NET1 dev $NIC1 src $IP1 ip route add $NET2 dev $NIC2 src $IP2 # preference for default route route delete default ip route add default via $DEFGW # rules ip rule add from $IP1 table T1 ip rule add from $IP2 table T2 # enable routing echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward Good luck, Jack I can verify the above works just fine if all you want to be able to do is reach your system from outside over either isp.. I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] backup incrementals on mysql
On Tue, November 11, 2014 9:10 am, Fran Garcia wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I usally make backups of databases mysql. I make buckups of all datbase for example: mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db backups.sql also I make backups just its schema for example mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db --no-data backups.sql Hola, If size's a concern, just export your DBs gziped : mysqldump -u user database | gzip backup_database.sql I would stay away from compression. Compression results in binary file. Even though compressed result is smaller, when you will try to keep several versions back, you will have multiple compressed file versions hitting your backup storage. The original poster's intent is better: to keep diff of ASCII dump files. If one commits dumps into some version control system, even though its files may be treated as binary, you will need only one latest version on backup (as it contains all versions of database). Just my $0.02. Valeri Also if you are concerned about time to compress, you can enable multithreaded parallel gzip compress with pigz (available in EPEL) : mysqldump -u user database | pigz backup_database.sql TBH, 500 MB databases aren't big enough to seek a more complex approach (unless you have more ambitious RTO/RPO requirements) Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] To James B. Byrne
Dear James, everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you. Please finally fix your MX records or whatever is needed. No offence Greetings from Germany Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
Dear James, I for one would suggest: just ignore what gmail people are saying about your MX records. No offense intended. Just moral support meant. Valeri On Tue, November 11, 2014 10:16 am, Alexander Farber wrote: Dear James, everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you. Please finally fix your MX records or whatever is needed. No offence Greetings from Germany Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kickstart IPv6 Gateway
Did you probably forget to provide the network prefix, when specifiying the ipv6 address? --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123/network-prefix suomi On 11/11/2014 09:44 AM, John Tall wrote: Hi. I'm installing CentOS 7 with Kickstart on a machine that has IPv6. The problem is that while it has an IPv6 address after installation it does not have the IPv6 gateway. I'm using NetworkManager and my network configuration is completely static, no autoconf or dhcpv6. My Kickstart configuration uses the following network configuration (actual values replaced but with the same format): network --device enp1s0 --bootproto=static --gateway=123.123.123.1 --ip=123.123.123.123 --nameserver=123.123.123.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123 --ipv6gateway=2001:123:abc::1 --activate network --hostname=test.example.org The Red Hat installation guide suggests that --ipv6gateway should be used but it looks like it's not picked up. Does anyone know why this doesn't work? John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:18 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: On Mon, November 10, 2014 13:56, Les Mikesell wrote: Well, yeah...If I wanted to keep secrets, I wouldn't be sending them over the internet at all. You don't really trust your software or other third parties that much, do you? Read my signature. Hmmm, gmail conveniently collapses previously-seen content into an ellipse so that didn't jump out out me before. The point is that it is not what I trust. It is what my correspondents do with their mail irrespective of trust. And that is totally out of my control. Nonetheless, we must take whatever steps we can to protect whatever residual confidentiality there is. I don't get your point about gmail then. If you don't expect internet email to be secure in any case then you won't send secrets over it and it won't matter who archives, forwards, or searches it. This is all pretty obvious for public mail lists anyway and there's not that much point in trying to mix them with even business-level security. I prefer to have a completely separate account for list use although some companies might be so restrictive as to not let you use even web access to it from work machines. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
On 11/11/2014 04:51 AM, Wander Costa wrote: Hi, I have been trying to build a docker image to run unit tests for the B2G project [1]. However when I try to install Xorg I get this error [2]. I have been searching on web but is still not clear for me if this is an issue or if I should proceed like this link [3] says. Any idea? Yes, one of the packages you're attempting to install requires systemd as a dependency and so you would need to follow the instructions in that blog. You might still run into some issues even then, if you're trying to display X from the container on the host. If you'd like, I have a centos-systemd container already built (following that blog post) that you could try. a 'docker pull centos/c7-systemd' should get you what you need: reference url: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/centos/c7-systemd/ -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] /etc/locale.conf is ignored
It seems that /etc/locale.conf is ignored in Centos 7. As a traditionalist who prefers things sorted lexicographically rather than indiscriminately with case ignored and dates to be displayed in the form Sep 11 2008, I have always added lines to this file: $ cat /etc/locale.conf LANG=en_US.UTF-8 # Fix collating sequence for sort and ls export LC_COLLATE=C # Fix time format in ls -l to Sep 11 2008 export LC_TIME=C and it's always worked - in UNIX, all Fedora's, Centos 6 (I think). Now, in a fresh installation of Centos 7 (virtual, kvm) these exported environment variables are nowhere to be seen. If I manually type export LC_COLLATE=C in an xterm, sorting works properly again. Why is /etc/locale.conf ignored in Centos 7 - and not in Fedora 20? While it shouldn't matter, I'll mention that I'm running Xfce4 with mostly xterm windows - where the LC_COLLATE and LC_TIME variables are absent from `env`. However, if I revert to a non-X console (CTL-ALT-F2), these variables are present. So, /etc/locale.conf isn't totally ignored. Perhaps xterm, or Xfce4, or that whatever it is awful undocumented GUI thing that starts X, has simply forgotten the concept of export. -- David A. De GraafDATIX, Inc.Hendersonville, NC d...@datix.us www.datix.us The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so. - Ronald Reagan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kickstart IPv6 Gateway
On 11.11.2014 17:44, anax wrote: Did you probably forget to provide the network prefix, when specifiying the ipv6 address? --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123/network-prefix doesn't it default to /64 ? suomi On 11/11/2014 09:44 AM, John Tall wrote: Hi. I'm installing CentOS 7 with Kickstart on a machine that has IPv6. The problem is that while it has an IPv6 address after installation it does not have the IPv6 gateway. I'm using NetworkManager and my network configuration is completely static, no autoconf or dhcpv6. My Kickstart configuration uses the following network configuration (actual values replaced but with the same format): network --device enp1s0 --bootproto=static --gateway=123.123.123.1 --ip=123.123.123.123 --nameserver=123.123.123.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123 --ipv6gateway=2001:123:abc::1 --activate network --hostname=test.example.org The Red Hat installation guide suggests that --ipv6gateway should be used but it looks like it's not picked up. Does anyone know why this doesn't work? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [offtopic] Groupon to use the Gnome name for proprietary software
It's just out of this world http://www.gnome.org/groupon/ I'm making efforts to maintain civility for the list's sake. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC Yes. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Non-Gnome desktop
On Mon, November 10, 2014 15:00, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2014-11-10, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: Try including the session manager in the startx invocation, e.g., startx /usr/bin/mate-session (Or whaterever the MATE session manager is called. I'm guessing the above by analogy with gnome-session.) Yes! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Now, to test this I removed Gnome3 rather than start over with a fresh install. So it is possible that installing Gnome Desktop makes some configuration change of which I am unaware that permits Mate to work thereafter. However, using startx /usr/bin/mate-session does indeed bring up the Mate desktop without Gnome3 installed. This whole exercise in frustration was due to the fact that I am singularly unimpressed with the Gnome3 experience. Others have made all the arguments and comments respecting its opaqueness and inflexibility that I can think of; and quite a few more besides. So, suffice to say, it will not be installed here. What I cannot understand is why an Enterprise Distro is packaging an evidently tablet based GUI to begin with. Where do they think RHEL gets installed; cell phones? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC Yes. Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know better and breaks it with their default settings: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031 However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response sent to the default one?And if so, can you traceroute to the address where the connection attempt is originating? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [offtopic] Groupon to use the Gnome name for proprietary software
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: It's just out of this world http://www.gnome.org/groupon/ I'm making efforts to maintain civility for the list's sake. Lucian Unless it needs 3D support to work and has other unnecessary bloat, I fail to see the resemblance. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [offtopic] Groupon to use the Gnome name for proprietary software
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:49:09 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: Unless it needs 3D support to work and has other unnecessary bloat, I fail to see the resemblance. It appears to be a clear-cut case of market confusion, which is exactly what trademark law is intended to prevent. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
And ignore the Chrome people getting the certificate warning at https://harte-lyne.ca too ;-) On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote: Dear James, I for one would suggest: just ignore what gmail people are saying about your MX records. No offense intended. Just moral support meant. Valeri On Tue, November 11, 2014 10:16 am, Alexander Farber wrote: Dear James, everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you. Please finally fix your MX records or whatever is needed. No offence Greetings from Germany Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Non-Gnome desktop
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:34 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: Try including the session manager in the startx invocation, e.g., startx /usr/bin/mate-session (Or whaterever the MATE session manager is called. I'm guessing the above by analogy with gnome-session.) Yes! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Now, to test this I removed Gnome3 rather than start over with a fresh install. So it is possible that installing Gnome Desktop makes some configuration change of which I am unaware that permits Mate to work thereafter. However, using startx /usr/bin/mate-session does indeed bring up the Mate desktop without Gnome3 installed. This whole exercise in frustration was due to the fact that I am singularly unimpressed with the Gnome3 experience. Others have made all the arguments and comments respecting its opaqueness and inflexibility that I can think of; and quite a few more besides. So, suffice to say, it will not be installed here. What I cannot understand is why an Enterprise Distro is packaging an evidently tablet based GUI to begin with. Where do they think RHEL gets installed; cell phones? I've always heard that managing software developers is like herding cats - so the direction goes more or less toward what someone wants to write instead of what would be most useful.I mostly run remote sessions under x2go, where gnome3 won't work at all so I'm using MATE on CentOS 7. But I don't really object to having the gnome desktop installed if it brings along settings and maybe some applications to help things work. Disk space is cheap. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] login fail on crypted /home
I have a fesh install of CentOS release 6.6 on my laptop. I want to use a more secure config with /home crypted. But when this partition is mounted I cannot login anymore on my laptop. Only root can login. This occur at level 5 (graphic login) or 3 (text login). The message is Cannot enter home directory. Using /. Logged as root I can create a new user (with useradd) and his home is created on this crypted partition. Logged as root I can issue a su - anotheruser in a terminal and access the home of this user on the crypted partition. The problem looks strange for me and google has not helped This how I build the crypted partition (following a tutorial, just changing ext4 with xfs): lvcreate -L 30G -n lv_home vg_portable badblocks -s -w -t random -v /dev/vg_portable/lv_home cryptsetup luksFormat /dev/vg_portable/lv_home cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/vg_portable/lv_home c_home mkfs -t xfs -L /home /dev/mapper/c_home The blkid command shows: /dev/mapper/c_home: LABEL=/home UUID=1118317e-cc5a-4183-a498-21418f82e982 TYPE=xfs In /etc/fstab I add: UUID=1118317e-cc5a-4183-a498-21418f82e982 /home xfs defaults 1 2 In /etc/crypttab I add: c_home /dev/vg_portable/lv_home none luks Thanks for your advices. Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] login fail on crypted /home
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:43:21PM +0100, Patrick Bégou wrote: I have a fesh install of CentOS release 6.6 on my laptop. I want to use a more secure config with /home crypted. But when this partition is mounted I cannot login anymore on my laptop. Only root can login. This occur at level 5 (graphic login) or 3 (text login). The message is Cannot enter home directory. Using /. Does the new /home have the SELinux context home_root_t? Does your new home directory have the context user_home_dir_t? Does running '/sbin/restorecon -r -v /home' fix the issue? -- Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
Of couse I could explain my Gmail mailbox not move messages by James - but I assumed the person sending 3-4 messages daily to this mailing list might be asked to consider to fix his own settings (MX and http certificate). The Chrome warning for harte-lyne.ca looks dreadful by the way. Regards Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [offtopic] Groupon to use the Gnome name for proprietary software
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 17:30 +, Nux! wrote: It's just out of this world http://www.gnome.org/groupon/ Groupon's Trade mark request for 'Gnome' for computer software etc. etc. Don't know about the USA but within the EU, Groupon do not have a hope of ever obtaining 'G-NOME' for computer systems, computer software, computer applications and similar. Mad but typical big (USA) business arrogance mentality. Regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list
On Tue, November 11, 2014 11:10 am, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:18 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: On Mon, November 10, 2014 13:56, Les Mikesell wrote: Well, yeah...If I wanted to keep secrets, I wouldn't be sending them over the internet at all. You don't really trust your software or other third parties that much, do you? Read my signature. Hmmm, gmail conveniently collapses previously-seen content into an ellipse so that didn't jump out out me before. The point is that it is not what I trust. It is what my correspondents do with their mail irrespective of trust. And that is totally out of my control. Nonetheless, we must take whatever steps we can to protect whatever residual confidentiality there is. I don't get your point about gmail then. If you don't expect internet email to be secure in any case then you won't send secrets over it and it won't matter who archives, forwards, or searches it. This is all pretty obvious for public mail lists anyway and there's not that much point in trying to mix them with even business-level security. I prefer to have a completely separate account for list use although some companies might be so restrictive as to not let you use even web access to it from work machines. Indeed, e-mail is not a secure channel of communication (as everyone of us repeats for decades). That is because there are _bad_guys_ doing bad thing (sniffing packets)... Now we come to the point that some company collects information. In general doing virtually the same thing. And we should feel no disrespect to that company, right? I feel it is unfair to the first category of guys (the bad ones sniffing network traffic). Do you not have any problem with that? Because I do ;-( But alas, it is the majority that rules (sort of democracy as opposed to constitutional republic). Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
Reindl, you should relax a bit. I didn't mean exactly MX, just meant a heads up to take a look at own configs. I like how you defend using a broken http cert. Regards Alex On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 11.11.2014 um 19:34 schrieb Alexander Farber: Of couse I could explain my Gmail mailbox not move messages by James - but I assumed the person sending 3-4 messages daily to this mailing list might be asked to consider to fix his own settings (MX and http certificate) you could also stop talking about things you don't have any clue - the MX has nothing to do with outgoing mail and SPF is as explained also not the reason it's the *list software* mangle DKIM signed messages The Chrome warning for harte-lyne.ca looks dreadful by the way WTF - whatever certificate is used on a website has no business in context of mail and any software crying in context of mail because a self signed website certificate is broken complain at Chrome! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
On 11/11/2014 12:11 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: On 11/11/2014 04:51 AM, Wander Costa wrote: Hi, I have been trying to build a docker image to run unit tests for the B2G project [1]. However when I try to install Xorg I get this error [2]. I have been searching on web but is still not clear for me if this is an issue or if I should proceed like this link [3] says. Any idea? Yes, one of the packages you're attempting to install requires systemd as a dependency and so you would need to follow the instructions in that blog. You might still run into some issues even then, if you're trying to display X from the container on the host. If you'd like, I have a centos-systemd container already built (following that blog post) that you could try. a 'docker pull centos/c7-systemd' should get you what you need: reference url: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/centos/c7-systemd/ We need to get systemd-container into the default centos image. We are working on this for RHEL7 also. That way these problems can be prevented and we can make it easier for people to run systemd within a container. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
On Tue, November 11, 2014 12:34 pm, Alexander Farber wrote: Of couse I could explain my Gmail mailbox not move messages by James - but I assumed the person sending 3-4 messages daily to this mailing list might be asked to consider to fix his own settings (MX and http certificate). The Chrome warning for harte-lyne.ca looks dreadful by the way. And out of my childishness again (to contradict anything ;-)... I have no bad feelings about domain that decided no to pay CA for signed Certificate. As somebody mentioned, to keep internet in harmony, these should not be in hands of commercial Certification Authorities, but DNS authorities instead should be involved here in establishing the chain of trust and identity of domain instance. Just my $0.01 (plus $0.01 borrowed from somebody else ;-) Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC Yes. Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know better and breaks it with their default settings: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031 However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response sent to the default one?And if so, can you traceroute to the address where the connection attempt is originating? Natting is obviously involved on this end and if the incoming ssh session is originating thru a nat then if the response packet doesn't have as a source what the original destination was the nat on the ssh end won't be able to figure where the packet should go. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com wrote: Of couse I could explain my Gmail mailbox not move messages by James - but I assumed the person sending 3-4 messages daily to this mailing list might be asked to consider to fix his own settings (MX and http certificate). The Chrome warning for harte-lyne.ca looks dreadful by the way. That's something different - and I think that the emails as originated by James are probably correct. It is just the versions forwarded by the mailing list that fail gmail's DMARC test. And in any case, only the site admin can fix these things. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] login fail on crypted /home
Thanks for this very good suggestion Jonathan. I've disabled selinux and it works now. When I install desktops with kickstart, I always disable selinux on our internal network and I do not thought about this. This laptop was installed from DVD support! May be on a laptop that can be connected everywhere I'll have to understand this selinux application for a more secured system. Thanks again. Patrick Jonathan Billings a écrit : On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:43:21PM +0100, Patrick Bégou wrote: I have a fesh install of CentOS release 6.6 on my laptop. I want to use a more secure config with /home crypted. But when this partition is mounted I cannot login anymore on my laptop. Only root can login. This occur at level 5 (graphic login) or 3 (text login). The message is Cannot enter home directory. Using /. Does the new /home have the SELinux context home_root_t? Does your new home directory have the context user_home_dir_t? Does running '/sbin/restorecon -r -v /home' fix the issue? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] /etc/locale.conf is ignored
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:27:13PM -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote: It seems that /etc/locale.conf is ignored in Centos 7. So, /etc/locale.conf isn't totally ignored. Perhaps xterm, or Xfce4, or that whatever it is awful undocumented GUI thing that starts X, has simply forgotten the concept of export. Well, I have isolated the problem to that awful undocumented GUI thing that starts X - namely, gdm! I first switched to multi-user.target, which provides the old familiar UNIXy login: and ran 'startxfce4'. The `env` contained both LC_COLLATE=C and LC_TIME=C. Then I switched back to graphical.target, but also did yum install lightdm, systemctl disable gdm, systemctl enable lightdm, and after rebooting with a graphical login, found that my two environment variables were present in the enviroment. So gdm, once again, demonstrates a flagrant disregard of longstanding standards and conventions. Ugh! -- David A. De GraafDATIX, Inc.Hendersonville, NC d...@datix.us www.datix.us That state which separates its warriors from its scholars will have its thinking done by cowards and fighting done by fools -- Thucydides - The Pelopenisia ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote: On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC Yes. Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know better and breaks it with their default settings: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031 However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response sent to the default one?And if so, can you traceroute to the address where the connection attempt is originating? Natting is obviously involved on this end and if the incoming ssh session is originating thru a nat then if the response packet doesn't have as a source what the original destination was the nat on the ssh end won't be able to figure where the packet should go. That makes sense. The original target of the connection would be the public side of the non-default gateway and it would reach the target via port-forwarding, keeping the public source address. The response would go to the default router which would forward it on, but NAT to its own public address. Then when the response packet gets back to the originating system it won't be associated with the originating socket since it's source IP won't match the initial target. Or maybe the other router drops it because the connection isn't established and the response packet won't have a SYN. I can't think of a handy fix for this without extra public addresses. If you know a fixed IP address or range that would only be used for this connection (e.g. to connect in and flip the default gateway if the other one is down), you could add a static route for it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
On 11/11/2014 12:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: We need to get systemd-container into the default centos image. We are working on this for RHEL7 also. That way these problems can be prevented and we can make it easier for people to run systemd within a container. If the source for it is public, I would happily do this, as the current systemd/fakesystemd issue causes a fair amount of breakage. Where can I pull systemd-container source/spec? -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On 11/11/2014 02:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote: On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600 Les Mikesell wrote: I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one NIC Yes. Can you tell where the packets are getting lost? Asymmetric routing is supposed to work per the IP design, but Red Hat thinks they know better and breaks it with their default settings: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53031 However, I thought that only applied to multiple NICs. Can you tell if packets are coming in from the non-default router and the response sent to the default one?And if so, can you traceroute to the address where the connection attempt is originating? Natting is obviously involved on this end and if the incoming ssh session is originating thru a nat then if the response packet doesn't have as a source what the original destination was the nat on the ssh end won't be able to figure where the packet should go. That makes sense. The original target of the connection would be the public side of the non-default gateway and it would reach the target via port-forwarding, keeping the public source address. The response would go to the default router which would forward it on, but NAT to its own public address. Then when the response packet gets back to the originating system it won't be associated with the originating socket since it's source IP won't match the initial target. Or maybe the other router drops it because the connection isn't established and the response packet won't have a SYN. I can't think of a handy fix for this without extra public addresses. If you know a fixed IP address or range that would only be used for this connection (e.g. to connect in and flip the default gateway if the other one is down), you could add a static route for it. Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] /etc/locale.conf is ignored
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:08:01 -0500 David A. De Graaf d...@datix.us wrote: So gdm, once again, demonstrates a flagrant disregard of longstanding standards and conventions. Ugh! Groupon, please take the GNOME development team too :-) BR, Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote: Indeed, e-mail is not a secure channel of communication (as everyone of us repeats for decades). That is because there are _bad_guys_ doing bad thing (sniffing packets)... Now we come to the point that some company collects information. In general doing virtually the same thing. And we should feel no disrespect to that company, right? I feel it is unfair to the first category of guys (the bad ones sniffing network traffic). Do you not have any problem with that? Because I do ;-( I don't - for a couple of reasons. First, google doesn't charge for the service so I'll use it for what it is: a good place to collaborate, and ignore the fact that it might be a bad place to keep secrets. And public mailing lists are pretty clearly about open collaboration. Second, your, and the recipient's ISPs are going to be as bad or worse about allowing government spying. They don't really have any choice about that if they want to exist so I don't have a real problem with that either, except that they charge us all extra for the capability. But alas, it is the majority that rules (sort of democracy as opposed to constitutional republic). Ummm, at this point is it much more a matter of corporate ownership than anything else. If you don't like the government, you have to buy a better one. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] backup incrementals on mysql
On Nov 10, 2014 9:25 PM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I usally make backups of databases mysql. I make buckups of all datbase for example: mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db backups.sql also I make backups just its schema for example mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db --no-data backups.sql but now I need a backups incrementals, because the size of DB is very big (500 mb) How to make this? Rodrigo, If your storage engine is InnoDB I would advise to use Percona Innobackupex tool. Take a look here: [1] http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-xtrabackup/2.1/innobackupex/incremental_backups_innobackupex.html [2] http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/kastauyra/bitmap-33283809 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list
On Tue, November 11, 2014 1:30 pm, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote: Indeed, e-mail is not a secure channel of communication (as everyone of us repeats for decades). That is because there are _bad_guys_ doing bad thing (sniffing packets)... Now we come to the point that some company collects information. In general doing virtually the same thing. And we should feel no disrespect to that company, right? I feel it is unfair to the first category of guys (the bad ones sniffing network traffic). Do you not have any problem with that? Because I do ;-( I don't - for a couple of reasons. First, google doesn't charge for the service so I'll use it for what it is: a good place to collaborate, and ignore the fact that it might be a bad place to keep secrets. And public mailing lists are pretty clearly about open collaboration. Second, your, and the recipient's ISPs are going to be as bad or worse about allowing government spying. They don't really have any choice about that if they want to exist so I don't have a real problem with that either, except that they charge us all extra for the capability. But alas, it is the majority that rules (sort of democracy as opposed to constitutional republic). No, I meant it with respect to google, metaforically speaking, not meaning actual government of one sort of another. So, you are in the majority as far as google or other free services are concerned, I figure, and I'm not - in our internet democracy that is. Valeri Ummm, at this point is it much more a matter of corporate ownership than anything else. If you don't like the government, you have to buy a better one. Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
On 11/11/2014 02:17 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: On 11/11/2014 12:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: We need to get systemd-container into the default centos image. We are working on this for RHEL7 also. That way these problems can be prevented and we can make it easier for people to run systemd within a container. If the source for it is public, I would happily do this, as the current systemd/fakesystemd issue causes a fair amount of breakage. Where can I pull systemd-container source/spec? Jim work with Vaclav on this. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker
- Mensagem original - De: Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org Para: centos@centos.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 11 de novembro de 2014 15:11:33 Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Xorg installation broken under docker On 11/11/2014 04:51 AM, Wander Costa wrote: Hi, I have been trying to build a docker image to run unit tests for the B2G project [1]. However when I try to install Xorg I get this error [2]. I have been searching on web but is still not clear for me if this is an issue or if I should proceed like this link [3] says. Any idea? Yes, one of the packages you're attempting to install requires systemd as a dependency and so you would need to follow the instructions in that blog. You might still run into some issues even then, if you're trying to display X from the container on the host. If you'd like, I have a centos-systemd container already built (following that blog post) that you could try. a 'docker pull centos/c7-systemd' should get you what you need: reference url: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/centos/c7-systemd/ Thanks, I will try that. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On 11/11/2014 2:27 PM, Steve Clark wrote: Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work. I'm outside my area of expertise here, but is there a reason you couldn't fake a second network card by assigning two IP addresses to the one interface? I recall that the OP had two routers on opposite ends of the same subnet. If each router used its own subnet and everything was connected by a hub instead of a switch, then wouldn't the server know which way the packets needed to go out? Or a switch that knows VLANs, but that might be needlessly complex. I realize that means installing a hub instead of a second network card, so I'm just asking for my own edification. -- -Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] outside ssh connection from two different ISP's
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chris Beattie cbeat...@geninfo.com wrote: On 11/11/2014 2:27 PM, Steve Clark wrote: Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work. I'm outside my area of expertise here, but is there a reason you couldn't fake a second network card by assigning two IP addresses to the one interface? I recall that the OP had two routers on opposite ends of the same subnet. If each router used its own subnet and everything was connected by a hub instead of a switch, then wouldn't the server know which way the packets needed to go out? Or a switch that knows VLANs, but that might be needlessly complex. I realize that means installing a hub instead of a second network card, so I'm just asking for my own edification. There's no difference between a hub and switch with respect to routing. It might be possible to do something with a 2nd ip address in the same subnet used as the target of the port-forwarding from the other router along with policy based routing to make packets with that source ip take the other route. But that would introduce complications for normal outbound traffic. It may depend on the point of having the 2nd connection. Normally cable is so much faster than dls that you would always prefer it unless it was down. If the dsl is just for emergency inbound use you might run a VM configured with the other gateway as the default - maybe even set up openvpn there for fairly transparent access to the rest of the LAN. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] To James B. Byrne
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Farber wrote: Dear James, everyday I look into my Gmail SPAM folder and your mails (sent to Centos list) are there. Noone else is there but you. Please finally fix your MX records or whatever is needed. No offence I bit a tired of this too. James, be the Man and fix your mail server. Or what else. Greetings from Germany Alex Greetins from Ukraine (Donetsk). -- Igor Zubkov http://hi.im/ice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
