Re: [CentOS-docs] Application for write permissions to CentOS wiki
On 1 December 2014 at 21:46, Jerry Amundson jamun...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote: On 1 December 2014 at 20:26, Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote: Am 11.10.2014 um 00:04 schrieb Karol Babioch: I hereby would like to ask for write permissions to the CentOS wiki. I've just created a new account. My username is Karol Babioch [1]. Ping. Pong! A home page has been created for you and you should now be able to create translated pages under wiki.centos.org/de/ Perhaps you would first like to experiment on your home page, then make contact with Ekkehard and Michael to plan a course of action for making the translations? I thought usernames *must* be in the FirstnameLastname format...? http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 Correct. The home page was set up using KarolBabioch. Likewise the acl for the German pages. Karol -- If you have created a wiki account with an embedded space between forename and surname please delete it and create a new account, as Jerry has mentioned, above. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1918 CentOS 6 oprofile Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1918
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1918.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0f0c9183544e6f82486346105c34a54afcd715514e13cc2ce28069102d32b057
oprofile-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
3fc7bf59184123d3d58fec29595f06bde27cc8013fa7788da7346a35c36fc612
oprofile-devel-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
e26a9af62cee1cd14bccb46dcc7aff11770f931088f29a442abc51c707e67fdb
oprofile-gui-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
6cc09ce4e5f89e9864bb47d0098100f43d9693f33919237e3f7924c1c6440144
oprofile-jit-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b831f62d7a85743993d2ce5a330fc83c944643667022507185ba0c1f06d3d2d6
oprofile-0.9.9-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
3fc7bf59184123d3d58fec29595f06bde27cc8013fa7788da7346a35c36fc612
oprofile-devel-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
1c47a22ad84b114e788344171305918ee08e64d4d021f1d3179382cc3ac6d198
oprofile-devel-0.9.9-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
507d9e274357fb29b1dfdb91517a7d6430fdd91fa8aa16b338b96ac64cfbc81b
oprofile-gui-0.9.9-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
6cc09ce4e5f89e9864bb47d0098100f43d9693f33919237e3f7924c1c6440144
oprofile-jit-0.9.9-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
70acdcd638b6363e6f2ad044dcc09ee200cfdaf3342058b9fef8cc2edbfd627d
oprofile-jit-0.9.9-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0c12801fcb07266a3bf6c718b3fa5566ec0ea7e59da800effba6a536a8a93cb7
oprofile-0.9.9-6.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1911 Moderate CentOS 6 ruby Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1911 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1911.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
31d5707695b299bd4581acda718ed7b845066ba3c68b3fde46bfa1910b484546
ruby-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
93b81ec1e635b3c33f1a83e899a30ed5ad6a46c460de6b2ff371f965ff24b813
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
7d10fa2773e093898074bb58a168049547da12e0b99405906782ff00136d14a2
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
6954b286ff3c8f183e717b5bf9827683e440bb7702e1d8f956615f6ff6d2f2b2
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
cf2ee4436dab4202ecb4441e6b43ee7b64e53d19e5cea664b23a4e709d84fb58
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
eefe4e31c899d554e0dabecc15cef3ed4d015beff9e05d15f995cfff4cb5bdcf
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
551bc361956144198996fdcab5a7a97610232f962cd5e3bc0dfdd6605156a1d8
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
8958034cac5db419509716d387f1df5a4722c1fba5aa6e1b331d63ea6809cf10
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
32cd9786acbe51cf36bf3b94578cd40055308609879069393e38e1d534a89811
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
909643760630c61085fcbc1a888d532625ce3fdd2e83ab0becbd1d13a8974d32
ruby-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
93b81ec1e635b3c33f1a83e899a30ed5ad6a46c460de6b2ff371f965ff24b813
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
813cdc7b12018f27fd0a8b9317016698f0224eee262f50d51caaf59db4756da2
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
bd94514b57dfe24f7a0b56bdfd00f9d2b966112298c1224d58c15c434118cd16
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
82c7d51431ae43ae88134d7f34c903fcd7286d09fdb71e7946f4bbd7ae26314e
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
cf2ee4436dab4202ecb4441e6b43ee7b64e53d19e5cea664b23a4e709d84fb58
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.i686.rpm
19313fe28cfc5ff4fc0977eb5a4589457d7c7b393ee95cd364a2cf62c2679f8e
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
fc574835d37d437c4c269725f92847a0b04af9940706d6671b9bd4429e7fe7cb
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
8db4efda738f4f6a1e60af15ca8afd137153e55ce81908dfb5e3c47f9ed07f66
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
13c4fc53a8b94ab76f84c8a35d3d230a8a5be9a6fd28771e087e2fdc112a64f4
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
40b23e66b01b108a55eaf5b0f6f623e094becc1455f4ebcef4b9c138e68b96e4
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
53f4584bfb59e584e7848fe11f37d228cdec6ab3509dcbd4b1c9fcdc3533f2e8
ruby-1.8.7.374-3.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1912 Moderate CentOS 7 ruby Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1912 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1912.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
93c6319a06c0545dac0e0a6a1066685f07396c350a745655d27e799f0f41a9f6
ruby-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
86e33edbb18f7d0d8945b6f0c98fa32ccdf2699d6d440b3a00ab71f034fe873e
ruby-devel-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
fd07cccef811c17af83f72f6f3b15739517af811190c8b051837441d02aba0d6
ruby-doc-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
15d0f1940b5c33e0daf36ded54218e063a442b6f38f0f9511a9d299d31d0bb99
rubygem-bigdecimal-1.2.0-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
c060618a05f25ef1eddf2c26e4a7c8f75e458264113613965401c9d0d085667d
rubygem-io-console-0.4.2-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
6192d1d652b260ba142fec6a24d68fb794e1e5d6ddaf15ea5cc9762ed96225cc
rubygem-json-1.7.7-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
84e90436cd96a1f2da988aa83ed31e1d251a72b228457e66e5bebdb612a60a3e
rubygem-minitest-4.3.2-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
55d6d27b11e10c74da42c6942a768bfb955890f824cc0d173a34479868c7fcad
rubygem-psych-2.0.0-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
589d407175e8b50ad83908488e58f95a0b3664de3b3364acd9740f71ec0350db
rubygem-rake-0.9.6-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
91386d554c388ebc53e7a14262b8f685741b90693f588839f7ee2492bad1028d
rubygem-rdoc-4.0.0-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
3028972f561fed8d9c0ce1b5fac5cb790b32e7cfbfbfaf4a4e664259e6edbb24
rubygems-2.0.14-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
a6a26f5c1961ae818b6e13cc2d55bab5dfbc16a4e702ecd27a8d8d286c36ac1b
rubygems-devel-2.0.14-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
f1a13e18dad274233641ce4faec026500f998138e41d9ee54327977183abb58f
ruby-irb-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.noarch.rpm
183504e99b23c5aa3fbba0833cfba1b659cb12db109f28c41f5ed3128784e5ac
ruby-libs-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.i686.rpm
0c047bbd05c23c762ea64d3d8328b662d8092de39bc6f53ca28e65fde63273c8
ruby-libs-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
962126ae9e6dfa0def3e8300978c82377e85c83477c39084811f7d05b75b0d58
ruby-tcltk-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
Source:
70e4e713b67f924b5883a911dd28649c419dc2fccaac1b79ef3fe618b6ecdb26
ruby-2.0.0.353-22.el7_0.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1917 CentOS 7 ibus-hangul FASTTRACK Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1917
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1917.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
4816c8d035c2966aba8812295505e0e87d3f7f86edfa4047aa16f0ddb6971cf7
ibus-hangul-1.4.2-10.el7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
453523f2015d46a26a856b3e0b57282eedf49d74ff65c12881838d4821e3ce72
ibus-hangul-1.4.2-10.el7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] xen-c6 fails to boot
Hi all, Following instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/Xen4 to setup Xen on CentOS 6.4. Unfortunately after installing Xen and modifying the boot line there is a kernel panic during the boot process causing the host to enter a reboot loop. Console log attached. [81575480] panic+0xc4/0x1e1 [81054836] find_new_reaper+0x176/0x180 [81055345] forget_original_parent+0x45/0x2c0 [81107214] ? task_function_call+0x44/0x50 [810555d7] exit_notify+0x17/0x140 [81057053] do_exit+0x1f3/0x450 [81057305] do_group_exit+0x55/0xd0 [81057397] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20 [815806a9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b xen-4.2.2-23.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 title xen root (hd0,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=256M,max:256M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all module /vmlinuz-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_cs-lv_root rd_NO_LUKS KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=uk LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_LVM_LV=vg_cs/lv_root rd_Np module /initramfs-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.img This issue was found in an automated environment that actually uses Dave Scott's Xen 4.4 branch (http://xenbits.xen.org/djs/centos-xen-4-4/) however in trying to diagnose the issue we found that the base xen-c6 combination failed in the same way. Note also that the last successful run (which was a while ago due to a configuration issue) used the same xen and kernel as the now-failing environments. Both the failing and passing environments are using xen-4.4.0-2.el6.x86_64 and kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64. Is the current combination of xen/kernel in xen-c6 working for others at the moment? Are there any thoughts on what might be causing this regression? Bob console.log Description: console.log ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] xen-c6 fails to boot
On 12/01/2014 04:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote: Hi all, Following instructions at http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/Xen4 to setup Xen on CentOS 6.4. Unfortunately after installing Xen and modifying the boot line there is a kernel panic during the boot process causing the host to enter a reboot loop. Console log attached. [81575480] panic+0xc4/0x1e1 [81054836] find_new_reaper+0x176/0x180 [81055345] forget_original_parent+0x45/0x2c0 [81107214] ? task_function_call+0x44/0x50 [810555d7] exit_notify+0x17/0x140 [81057053] do_exit+0x1f3/0x450 [81057305] do_group_exit+0x55/0xd0 [81057397] sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20 [815806a9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b xen-4.2.2-23.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 title xen root (hd0,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=256M,max:256M loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all module /vmlinuz-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_cs-lv_root rd_NO_LUKS KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=uk LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_LVM_LV=vg_cs/lv_root rd_Np module /initramfs-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.img This issue was found in an automated environment that actually uses Dave Scott's Xen 4.4 branch (http://xenbits.xen.org/djs/centos-xen-4-4/) however in trying to diagnose the issue we found that the base xen-c6 combination failed in the same way. Note also that the last successful run (which was a while ago due to a configuration issue) used the same xen and kernel as the now-failing environments. Both the failing and passing environments are using xen-4.4.0-2.el6.x86_64 and kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64. Is the current combination of xen/kernel in xen-c6 working for others at the moment? Are there any thoughts on what might be causing this regression? Bob It works fine for me .. you might consider using CentOS-6.6 and not CentOS-6.4 .. also, we now use a 3.10 kernel and the latest version of xen is 4.2.5 in the /6.6/xen4/ repo. Use this link: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart BUT .. it seems to be a hardware/driver issue. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Error de Relay access denied en Postfix
Hola Jorge: Muchas Graciassi Era eso. ahora voy a probar utilizando el archivo access. Saludos. Cornelio Royer Climent (507) 3991471 (507) 66741218 www.planillapanama.com www.winsof.com Se feliz con lo que tienes, mientras persigues lo que deseas -Original Message- From: Jorge Sanchez Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:57 AM To: centos-es@centos.org ; Cornelio Royer Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Error de Relay access denied en Postfix Para que te podamos ayudar en especificamente, deberias agregar tu configuracion de Postfix. Este tema esta ultra pulido en google, buscalo que seguramente sea mas rapido y eficiente que esperar a que alguien conteste. fijate si en tu configuracion, $mynetworks no esta solo localhost. El día 29 de noviembre de 2014, 13:38, Cornelio Royer cornelioro...@gmail.com escribió: Hola: Tengo Instalado en Postfix en Centos 7. Tengo el siguiente problema 454 4.7.1 cornelioro...@gmail.com: Relay access denied Si envio correo a los usuarios del mismo equipo si funciona. Me podrian asistir como resolver este problema Saludos. Cornelio Royer Climent (507) 3991471 (507) 66741218 www.planillapanama.com www.winsof.com Se feliz con lo que tienes, mientras persigues lo que deseas --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa. http://www.avast.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa. http://www.avast.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl
Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par de lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un numero. El problema comenzo hace un par de dias. El sistema es CentOS 7. Alguien tiene al menos una solucion provisional que no incluya comentar las lineas que hacer saltar este error? Desde ya gracias x su atencion. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl
Te animas a poner el error? asi lo podemos mirar? El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 13:17, William Alexander Brito Vinas wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió: Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par de lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un numero. El problema comenzo hace un par de dias. El sistema es CentOS 7. Alguien tiene al menos una solucion provisional que no incluya comentar las lineas que hacer saltar este error? Desde ya gracias x su atencion. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl
Disculpas...este es el error: Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 646) line 1. Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 1139) line 1. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jorge Sanchezmailto:jsanchezsilv...@gmail.com Sent: 12/1/2014 1:13 PM To: centos-es@centos.orgmailto:centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl Te animas a poner el error? asi lo podemos mirar? El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 13:17, William Alexander Brito Vinas wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió: Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par de lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un numero. El problema comenzo hace un par de dias. El sistema es CentOS 7. Alguien tiene al menos una solucion provisional que no incluya comentar las lineas que hacer saltar este error? Desde ya gracias x su atencion. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl
Parece que es solamente un warning, y es un bug reciente. https://www.marshut.net/ksxqnr/argument-perl-version-isn-t-numeric.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/554537/argument-perl-version-isnt-numeric-in-numeric-ge-at-eval-534-line-1 En esos post, recomiendan simplemente ignorarlo hasta un update. El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 16:16, William Alexander Brito Vinas wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió: Disculpas...este es el error: Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 646) line 1. Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 1139) line 1. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jorge Sanchezmailto:jsanchezsilv...@gmail.com Sent: 12/1/2014 1:13 PM To: centos-es@centos.orgmailto:centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Spam-Assassin y version de Perl Te animas a poner el error? asi lo podemos mirar? El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 13:17, William Alexander Brito Vinas wilian05...@hotmail.com escribió: Tego una avalancha de correos de Crond relacionados con sa-update con un par de lineas advirtiendo que la version version de perl no es un numero. El problema comenzo hace un par de dias. El sistema es CentOS 7. Alguien tiene al menos una solucion provisional que no incluya comentar las lineas que hacer saltar este error? Desde ya gracias x su atencion. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] CONSULTA
Saludos cordiales estimados Especialistas, Mi consulta está dirigida para todos los profesionales que vienen trabajando desde hace rato con el CENTOS como servidor y tienen mucha experiencia. Después de un poco tiempo de pruebas y todo lo demás hemos vendido la idea a la compañía a implementas servidores (Correo, web y LDAP) con CENTOS; todas estas pruebas como un mundo desconocido para mí ya que administro sistemas Windows lo hemos implementado y practicado en CENTOS 6.5 de 32 Bits. CONSULTA, es bueno y recomendable por ustedes implementar sistemas Servidores de producción en las últimas versiones de Linux, CENTOS específicamente?, en este caso la versión 7 que ya está liberado. Por cierto no le entiendo muy bien; hoy el CENTOS 7 solo es de 64 Bits?. Agradezco por sus opiniones y sugerencias. -- *Rhamyro Alcoser A.* *ITIL Systems Development* *Mailto1:* rhamyr...@gmail.com *Mailto2:* rhamyr...@icloud.com rhamyr...@gmail.com *Skype: *rhamyr...@outlook.com ramiro...@hotmail.com *Quito - Ecuador * *¿Qué, pues, diremos a esto? Si Dios es por nosotros, ¿quién contra nosotros?, Rm 8:31* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CONSULTA
CentOS es confiable, por eso es que se usa como servidor, y el soporte es de muchos años. Con soporte me refiero a las actualizaciones y los parches. Ya que nunca administrate, mi recomendacion personal es que uses CentOS 7, por un cambio que se dio hace poco, usar el 6, estarias aprendiendo algunas habilidades que no te servirian con las siguientes versiones de centos. Saludos y mucha suerte. El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 18:28, Rhamyro Alcoser, Ing. rhamyr...@gmail.com escribió: Saludos cordiales estimados Especialistas, Mi consulta está dirigida para todos los profesionales que vienen trabajando desde hace rato con el CENTOS como servidor y tienen mucha experiencia. Después de un poco tiempo de pruebas y todo lo demás hemos vendido la idea a la compañía a implementas servidores (Correo, web y LDAP) con CENTOS; todas estas pruebas como un mundo desconocido para mí ya que administro sistemas Windows lo hemos implementado y practicado en CENTOS 6.5 de 32 Bits. CONSULTA, es bueno y recomendable por ustedes implementar sistemas Servidores de producción en las últimas versiones de Linux, CENTOS específicamente?, en este caso la versión 7 que ya está liberado. Por cierto no le entiendo muy bien; hoy el CENTOS 7 solo es de 64 Bits?. Agradezco por sus opiniones y sugerencias. -- *Rhamyro Alcoser A.* *ITIL Systems Development* *Mailto1:* rhamyr...@gmail.com *Mailto2:* rhamyr...@icloud.com rhamyr...@gmail.com *Skype: *rhamyr...@outlook.com ramiro...@hotmail.com *Quito - Ecuador * *¿Qué, pues, diremos a esto? Si Dios es por nosotros, ¿quién contra nosotros?, Rm 8:31* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] CONSULTA
Por que usar una version de 32 bits? si tu procesador soporta 64bits o no soporta. la recomendacion en tu caso es usar 64bits Y las recomendaciones estan demas por que estas escribiendo a una lista de centos. El 1 de diciembre de 2014, 17:50, Jorge Sanchez jsanchezsilv...@gmail.com escribió: CentOS es confiable, por eso es que se usa como servidor, y el soporte es de muchos años. Con soporte me refiero a las actualizaciones y los parches. Ya que nunca administrate, mi recomendacion personal es que uses CentOS 7, por un cambio que se dio hace poco, usar el 6, estarias aprendiendo algunas habilidades que no te servirian con las siguientes versiones de centos. Saludos y mucha suerte. El día 1 de diciembre de 2014, 18:28, Rhamyro Alcoser, Ing. rhamyr...@gmail.com escribió: Saludos cordiales estimados Especialistas, Mi consulta está dirigida para todos los profesionales que vienen trabajando desde hace rato con el CENTOS como servidor y tienen mucha experiencia. Después de un poco tiempo de pruebas y todo lo demás hemos vendido la idea a la compañía a implementas servidores (Correo, web y LDAP) con CENTOS; todas estas pruebas como un mundo desconocido para mí ya que administro sistemas Windows lo hemos implementado y practicado en CENTOS 6.5 de 32 Bits. CONSULTA, es bueno y recomendable por ustedes implementar sistemas Servidores de producción en las últimas versiones de Linux, CENTOS específicamente?, en este caso la versión 7 que ya está liberado. Por cierto no le entiendo muy bien; hoy el CENTOS 7 solo es de 64 Bits?. Agradezco por sus opiniones y sugerencias. -- *Rhamyro Alcoser A.* *ITIL Systems Development* *Mailto1:* rhamyr...@gmail.com *Mailto2:* rhamyr...@icloud.com rhamyr...@gmail.com *Skype: *rhamyr...@outlook.com ramiro...@hotmail.com *Quito - Ecuador * *¿Qué, pues, diremos a esto? Si Dios es por nosotros, ¿quién contra nosotros?, Rm 8:31* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Clonar VM en kvm
Hola lista Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la puedo apagar es un ambiente productivo. Existe alguna forma que hacer esto, la VM esta montada en un centos 6 y la maquina virtual también es centros Esperó que me puedan apoyar Saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] centos 7 y bind instalación
saludos, ando en busca de un buen manual para instalar bind-chroot en centos 7, hace algún tiempo no obtengo actualizaciones del manual de Joel Barrios que andaba por esta lista y me era muy útil para este tipo de configuraciones, alguna sugerencia. gracias -- Convocatorias abiertas: Nuestro evento internacional de mayor experiencia: *- 21 Conferencia de Química: 3 al 5 de diciembre de 2014 http://ciq.eventos.uo.edu.cu/ -- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Clonar VM en kvm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/01/2014 04:30 PM, jorge saul sanchez molina wrote: Hola lista Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la puedo apagar es un ambiente productivo. Existe alguna forma que hacer esto, la VM esta montada en un centos 6 y la maquina virtual también es centros y el disco de la VM en qué formato está? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUfQy5AAoJEI8SQ0eoZD/XofYP/0ZVUb+ev8ZIcpZn3HWqgwNh C3Zm8f3tZ7v6n5zBGeacEAQTzQQiZpNQ8ZFWgbUdArZYYWG1TIOZeO/W5j56KE/Q gfHuWNCyDQGOm2PwBrRvxpxKGeBFuDqBuLQYSgHhjUy8AAbYDPL0mAEYbX0V/OXw XXL/6p0pazxMJ5x95cAGMvmGsAwnxbgV1BqJQWoJErS6y13xRpssn6qKSaFy60T/ Gt4WydP5/9IGSxSneXXSKh+WTR+SbWywWHf3EHSEIpxmIi1bRN+74OTI8s8Z/Lrd AnelXHeLHUAZjXZtTgxWskN2mFSZCirNsCqIGDfMk7+agjh/cGJgPtD+LB4cfMhC A+N+5Trgt5GoGecHndXlq7q0gUEqVLPX0ZorZKTshPPNCmJcj5FVb3pU7dCMeKvC GdQyfo/AkNTkYeS2VKR3Vryp5uzwhk09Bx1WKCTuYpLgxvGAMkHkiPjqYqgNT8yM b88mHI/o7mOYcUpNpszCOzNGpsH5/ZwnFIeSNnJF3J+G8HifFyyhAhUv83/8CGh5 iH2qjLjQLDujyetpFHqF6M4kaHlzFk3BBCMoAaYyQU+xR6aNzOTQB3L+24gX98yA vxJAiz1AP4CoSdPtZ/jLwxEu4XifPFIvv8qXfDmyC/Njjw47cdCKvoepBTkH1ykG VmM+pIqDflGS+sJFaRzW =S1SX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Email secured by Check Point ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Clonar VM en kvm
Esta en formato qcow2 El dic 1, 2014 6:51 PM, Ernesto Pérez Estévez ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/01/2014 04:30 PM, jorge saul sanchez molina wrote: Hola lista Necesito clonar una máquina virtual en caliente, ya que no la puedo apagar es un ambiente productivo. Existe alguna forma que hacer esto, la VM esta montada en un centos 6 y la maquina virtual también es centros y el disco de la VM en qué formato está? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUfQy5AAoJEI8SQ0eoZD/XofYP/0ZVUb+ev8ZIcpZn3HWqgwNh C3Zm8f3tZ7v6n5zBGeacEAQTzQQiZpNQ8ZFWgbUdArZYYWG1TIOZeO/W5j56KE/Q gfHuWNCyDQGOm2PwBrRvxpxKGeBFuDqBuLQYSgHhjUy8AAbYDPL0mAEYbX0V/OXw XXL/6p0pazxMJ5x95cAGMvmGsAwnxbgV1BqJQWoJErS6y13xRpssn6qKSaFy60T/ Gt4WydP5/9IGSxSneXXSKh+WTR+SbWywWHf3EHSEIpxmIi1bRN+74OTI8s8Z/Lrd AnelXHeLHUAZjXZtTgxWskN2mFSZCirNsCqIGDfMk7+agjh/cGJgPtD+LB4cfMhC A+N+5Trgt5GoGecHndXlq7q0gUEqVLPX0ZorZKTshPPNCmJcj5FVb3pU7dCMeKvC GdQyfo/AkNTkYeS2VKR3Vryp5uzwhk09Bx1WKCTuYpLgxvGAMkHkiPjqYqgNT8yM b88mHI/o7mOYcUpNpszCOzNGpsH5/ZwnFIeSNnJF3J+G8HifFyyhAhUv83/8CGh5 iH2qjLjQLDujyetpFHqF6M4kaHlzFk3BBCMoAaYyQU+xR6aNzOTQB3L+24gX98yA vxJAiz1AP4CoSdPtZ/jLwxEu4XifPFIvv8qXfDmyC/Njjw47cdCKvoepBTkH1ykG VmM+pIqDflGS+sJFaRzW =S1SX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Email secured by Check Point ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] CentOS6 gvfs disk thrashing
On 25/11/2014, isdtor isd...@gmail.com wrote: We recently started upgrading users' workstations to CentOS6. Now we've come across an interesting issue: ~user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata is filling up with tons of files. Once there are around 69270 of them, no more are being created, and the NetApp filer the user's home is on logs: Directory /user/.local/share/gvfs-metadata/ reached the maxdirsize limit. Reduce the number of files or use the vol options command to increase this limit.. Nearly all of the files are exactly 32k in size and they are named .openXX. All of them are being created within the same range of timestamps, with a time that's in the past. I.e. even when deleted, they are being recreated with these timestamps. drwx-- 2 user group 5353472 Nov 15 17:39 ./ drwxr-xr-x 5 user group4096 Oct 29 11:05 ../ -rw-r--r-- 25699 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:11 .open0018OX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open0019OX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open002EPX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open002GPX -rw-r--r-- 25699 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:11 .open002OPX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open0037OX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open003MPX -rw-r--r-- 42962 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:10 .open004NPX -rw-r--r-- 25699 user group 32768 Nov 11 17:11 .open0067OX According to lsof, the only processes operating in this directory are a few instances of nautilus and /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata. There's a whole bunch of gvfs* processes running user 21209 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:00 /usr/libexec/gvfsd user 21549 1 0 Nov11 ?00:03:17 /usr/libexec/gvfsd-trash --spawner :1.2 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/0 user 21788 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:06 /usr/libexec/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor user 21829 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:00 /usr/libexec/gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor user 21849 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:25 /usr/libexec/gvfs-afc-volume-monitor user 22150 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:00 /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata user 22323 1 0 Nov11 ?00:00:00 /usr/libexec/gvfsd-burn --spawner :1.2 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/1 Does anyone have an idea what's going on here? And how to stop it? The more machines we're moving to CentOS6, the more urgent this problems becomes. Is there any suggestion what could be causing this behavior? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] System Hangs At Anaconda Detecting Hardware
Hi, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote: Hey All, I just assembled a new machine. Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 Processor: AMD FX8350 Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB Video: BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT I tried the 6.6 x86_64 netinstall disk. I tried the 6.6 x86_64 install DVD Both fail at the same place: Anaconda installer init version 13.21.229 starting mounting /proc filesystem... done creating /dev filesystem... done starting udev...udev[175]: error setting /sys/class/firmware/timeout: No such file or directory done mounting /dev/pts (unix98 pty) filesystem... done mouning /sys filesystem... done trying to remount root fiesystem read write... done mounting /tmp as tmpfs... done running install... running /sbin/loader detecting hardware... That's all she wrote! The BIOS detects the 500 GB hard drive, the CD/DVD drive, 16 GB of RAM, all eight cores on the CPU, and boots from the CD/DVD. Then it just hangs at detecting hardware. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.6#head-aa1d1d1c4e306596f8ae129e016ef1f95fc7c36e Says: The netinstall isos do not work with UEFI installs, but the minimal or DVD isos do work with UEFI. No versions of CentOS-6.6 will work with Secure Boot turned on. Secure Boot must be disabled to install CentOS-6.6. I see nothing in the MB documentation about Secure Boot enabled or disabled. Also not a word about UEFI. Any suggestions anyone? Please make sure that your BIOS firmware is up to date. Have you checked that? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS6 gvfs disk thrashing
I believe I have found the problem. CentOS version in use here is 6.4, and it seems 6.6 has the updated packages. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637095 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561904 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1499.html I have no access to BZ#902448, but there's some interesting reading in those bug reports ... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps recommend by running sealert,However we are concerned by setroubleshootd crashing and are concered that we may have masked the issue by fixing the entries in the audit.log. abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline:/usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd -f '' executable: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
Thanks Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a newer version released that will fix it. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps recommend by running sealert,However we are concerned by setroubleshootd crashing and are concered that we may have masked the issue by fixing the entries in the audit.log. abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline:/usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd -f '' executable: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the problem goes away. On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: Thanks Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a newer version released that will fix it. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps recommend by running sealert,However we are concerned by setroubleshootd crashing and are concered that we may have masked the issue by fixing the entries in the audit.log. abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline:/usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd -f '' executable: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] A gmane mystery
I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years, but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear. I was able to post to gmane.test, and could read these posts. So I assume there is no problem with my From: or other headers. I take it that the gmane.linux.centos.general is in fact mirroring the mailman mailing list http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Assuming this is so, I don't know whether the problem lies with the list or with the newsgroup? I seem to be properly subscribed to the mailing list, with my current email address. Any enlightenment or advice gratefully received. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [OT] Searching for SNetTerm author
Our firm is constrained by the requirements of an upstream VAN to use a software package called SNetTerm; an MS-Windows based enhanced SSH communications program. SNetTerm is from a corporation called InterSoft International, Inc. This firm's web site was last accessible in June 2014 and is now 'Under Construction' (in much the same way as restaurants are 'Under Renovation' I suspect). I have tried tracking down an email address but everything to do with InterSoft International, Inc. appears out of date. The phone number I have has been disconnected. So, I have little hope of getting any response from the business. However, the author of SNEtTerm is/was Kenneth Robinette. I cannot seem track him down on LinkedIn or FB (the one profile I found that appeared promising has been locked from viewing). So, in desperation, I am asking if anyone has any lead to contacting this person and can either provided it directly to me or contact Mr. Robinette and have him contact me then I would be greatly appreciative. If anyone has any information respecting the fate of InterSoft International, Inc. and their products then I would appreciate if you would sshare that as well. Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be sufficient -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the problem goes away. On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: Thanks Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a newer version released that will fix it. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps recommend by running sealert,However we are concerned by setroubleshootd crashing and are concered that we may have masked the issue by fixing the entries in the audit.log. abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline:/usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd -f '' executable: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
On 12/01/2014 10:39 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be sufficient Ok might not be related. One other suggestion would be to clear the database out. And see if there was something in the database that was causing it problems. Make sure there is no setroubleshootd running and /var/lib/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_database.xml -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the problem goes away. On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: Thanks Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a newer version released that will fix it. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux), with SELinux enabled in permissive mode we receive a large number of entries in the audit.log and setroubleshootd randomly crashes with the following error, We have resolved the selinux alerts by following the troubleshooting steps recommend by running sealert,However we are concerned by setroubleshootd crashing and are concered that we may have masked the issue by fixing the entries in the audit.log. abrt_version: 2.0.8 cmdline:/usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd -f '' executable: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to
Re: [CentOS] OpenJDK 8 on CentOS 7
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Arun Gupta arun.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know the timelines by which it will be included in CentOS 7.0 ? Any place where a binary build can be downloaded ? Two ideas: 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a technology preview for CentOS 6.6, or so this article claims http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml 2. Since Oracle Linux is userland-binary compatible with RHEL and CentOS, I think you will eventually surely get a build by Oracle for OL7 that you can run in your CentOS if you want. Of course #2 is only wishful thinking on my part. Just my $0.02 of course. FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenJDK 8 on CentOS 7
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: Two ideas: 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a technology preview for CentOS 6.6, or so this article claims http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml 2. Since Oracle Linux is userland-binary compatible with RHEL and CentOS, I think you will eventually surely get a build by Oracle for OL7 that you can run in your CentOS if you want. Of course #2 is only wishful thinking on my part. A third one: you can bug Henri Gomez to include CentOS 7 / OL 7 into his OBuildFactory script. https://github.com/hgomez/obuildfactory FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7.0 and reboot failure
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600 On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: I also changed the boot level to 5. Do you mean the runlevel? If so, are you sure that you changed it correctly? Centos 7 doesn't use runlevels set in inittab like previous versions did. I see that fact is actually noted in /etc/inittab, along with the expected way to do it. - Frank, Yes, you are correct, I changed the run level and not boot level to 5 and did so by using the command : ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target /etc/systemd/system/default.target Also, I appreciate everybody's input on this, but I am still at a loss as to how to fix this. Without being able to reboot, it sure makes the set up difficult. Does anyone else have any ideas?? Greg I have tried some additional changes that have not made a difference. I disabled selinux - that made no difference I stopped and disabled firewalld - that made no difference. I can boot this machine after I turn it off and then back on, but when I try to do a shutdown now -r, the system hangs right after picking the OS that is desired CentOS Linux... After the machine is turned off the boot process occurs normally after this choice and I get two penguins in the upper left hand corner, and the boot proceeds. When I do a shutdown now -r, I do not get to the penguins and the machine hangs forever until I either unplug it or press the power button for 5 seconds. Any help would be appreciated!!! Greg --- Everyone, I did not get much of a response on the list so I filed a bug report. I wanted to document the bug report for anyone else that is having a reboot problem. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7949 Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7.0 and reboot failure
On 01/12/14 18:36, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 22:04 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:50:17 -0600 On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:07:47 -0600 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: I also changed the boot level to 5. Do you mean the runlevel? If so, are you sure that you changed it correctly? Centos 7 doesn't use runlevels set in inittab like previous versions did. I see that fact is actually noted in /etc/inittab, along with the expected way to do it. - Frank, Yes, you are correct, I changed the run level and not boot level to 5 and did so by using the command : ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target /etc/systemd/system/default.target Also, I appreciate everybody's input on this, but I am still at a loss as to how to fix this. Without being able to reboot, it sure makes the set up difficult. Does anyone else have any ideas?? Greg I have tried some additional changes that have not made a difference. I disabled selinux - that made no difference I stopped and disabled firewalld - that made no difference. I can boot this machine after I turn it off and then back on, but when I try to do a shutdown now -r, the system hangs right after picking the OS that is desired CentOS Linux... After the machine is turned off the boot process occurs normally after this choice and I get two penguins in the upper left hand corner, and the boot proceeds. When I do a shutdown now -r, I do not get to the penguins and the machine hangs forever until I either unplug it or press the power button for 5 seconds. Any help would be appreciated!!! Greg --- Everyone, I did not get much of a response on the list so I filed a bug report. I wanted to document the bug report for anyone else that is having a reboot problem. https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7949 Greg Ennis Seems little point in filing a bug report when you have no idea what the issue is. Bugs are not a means of troubleshooting nor a support forum. However, you did get my attention so lets see if we can stimulate some further interest in troubleshooting this. So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds like a hardware issue to me. Any clues in /var/log/messages ? Tried updating the BIOS? Any hardware firmwares being loaded? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7.0 and reboot failure
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 + Ned Slider wrote: So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds like a hardware issue to me. I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would reboot about every third time you started it up, otherwise it would hang. Didn't bother me too much since I rarely rebooted it. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7.0 and reboot failure
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:50:42 + Ned Slider wrote: So the system will perform a cold reboot, but not a warm reboot. Sounds like a hardware issue to me. I had a computer that did that a few years ago. It would reboot about every third time you started it up, otherwise it would hang. Didn't bother me too much since I rarely rebooted it. I'd recommend checking to see if there are any firmware updates for the system motherboard. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssh connections not closing when Qt application is opened?
Dave Johansen wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086971 I have been able to reproduce the above issue on my home network and at work, but RedHat is claiming it is not a bug, so can some people on this list give it a try and see if they can reproduce it? If you connect with '-vvv' you can see multiple x11 connections being open: debug3: channel 1: status: The following connections are open: #0 client-session (t4 r0 i0/0 o0/0 fd 4/5 cfd -1) #1 x11 (t4 r2 i3/0 o3/0 fd 7/7 cfd -1) #2 x11 (t4 r3 i0/0 o0/0 fd 8/8 cfd -1) #3 x11 (t4 r4 i0/0 o0/0 fd 9/9 cfd -1) The additional x11 connections are from automatically launched dbus stuff. On exit they don't get closed, therefore the hang. This happens on C6 and C7 with GTK+ 2/3 or Qt4/5 but not with GTK+ 1, Qt3 or legacy apps and it's nothing new. It just never gets fixed. (I think it's a dbus bug.) Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Fix for RHEL BZ#771868 in CentOS?
Hey, We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write side, Red Hat BZ#771868. I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS releases. If you are better at reading release notes than me, could you please help me out and let me know if there's a CentOS release that includes this bugfix? Thanks, Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fix for RHEL BZ#771868 in CentOS?
On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: Hey, We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write side, Red Hat BZ#771868. I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS releases. If you are better at reading release notes than me, could you please help me out and let me know if there's a CentOS release that includes this bugfix? Thanks, Jeff Hi Jeff, It looks like it's fixed in the current kernel. Hint: try grepping the package changelog: $ rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 | grep sendfile - [fs] Fix sendfile write-side file position (Steven Whitehouse) [770023] - [fs] sendfile(): check f_op.splice_write() rather than f_op.sendpage() (Lukas Czerner) [689426] Those entries seem to match the bug description in the errata you list so I'd guess it's fixed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] A gmane mystery
Timothy Murphy wrote: I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years, but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear. To be honest, this was a test post, to see if I could post directly to this newsgroup (rather than sending email to the mailing list). I found that I can indeed post to the centos newsgroup. But for some reason I cannot post directly to the corresponding Fedora newsgroup, gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general, though I can send email the corresponding mailing list, us...@lists.fedoraproject.org . Why can I post to one gmane newsgroup, and not to the other? I am subscribed to both mailing lists, and everything is exactly the same in the two cases. If anyone can cast light on this phenomenon, I should be very grateful. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fix for RHEL BZ#771868 in CentOS?
On 01/12/14 20:48, Ned Slider wrote: On 01/12/14 20:33, Jeff Hammerbacher wrote: Hey, We are blocked on a bug fixed by RHEL in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0362.html. Specifically, the splice code in sendfile() incorrectly updating the offset position on the write side, Red Hat BZ#771868. I have not been able to figure out if this bugfix is included in any CentOS releases. If you are better at reading release notes than me, could you please help me out and let me know if there's a CentOS release that includes this bugfix? Thanks, Jeff Hi Jeff, It looks like it's fixed in the current kernel. Hint: try grepping the package changelog: $ rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 | grep sendfile - [fs] Fix sendfile write-side file position (Steven Whitehouse) [770023] - [fs] sendfile(): check f_op.splice_write() rather than f_op.sendpage() (Lukas Czerner) [689426] Those entries seem to match the bug description in the errata you list so I'd guess it's fixed. Further googling finds that it was fixed in the 6.2 kernel release, as documented in the Technical Notes for 6.2: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.2_Technical_Notes/kernel.html ^^ Search for sendfile and you will find it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] A gmane mystery
Timothy Murphy wrote: I found that I can indeed post to the centos newsgroup. But for some reason I cannot post directly to the corresponding Fedora newsgroup, gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general, though I can send email to the corresponding mailing list, us...@lists.fedoraproject.org . Sorry, that should of course be us...@lists.fedoraproject.org . Why can I post to one gmane newsgroup, and not to the other? I am subscribed to both mailing lists, and everything is exactly the same in the two cases. If anyone can cast light on this phenomenon, I should be very grateful. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] A gmane mystery
On Monday 01 December 2014 16:00:44 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've been collecting redhat.fedora from gmane for several years, but about a week ago I found that while I could read gmane newsgroups I was unable to post to them - that is, my posts did not appear. To be honest, this was a test post, to see if I could post directly to this newsgroup (rather than sending email to the mailing list). I found that I can indeed post to the centos newsgroup. But for some reason I cannot post directly to the corresponding Fedora newsgroup, gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general, though I can send email the corresponding mailing list, us...@lists.fedoraproject.org . Why can I post to one gmane newsgroup, and not to the other? I am subscribed to both mailing lists, and everything is exactly the same in the two cases. If anyone can cast light on this phenomenon, I should be very grateful. This is the CentOS mailing list. You have to subscribe to it, and it's moderated (by someone who currently seems to have a personal issue with me, so I can't post to it). It's not a newsgroup. Evidently you are not familiar with gmane. This is a newsgroup server that mirrors various mailing lists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmane including this mailing list, to which I am subscribed, and which is mirrored in the newsgroup gmane.linux.centos.general. Is the CentOS newsgroup you're talking about a real usenet newsgroup? If so, what's the name, comp.os.centos, or some such? I posted my query to the gmane newsgroup described above, and it thereupon found its way to the CentOS mailing list, where you presumably read it. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That’s the ideal, anyway. What often happens in reality is either: 1. They give us incorrect static IP info, so the box arrives and won’t connect to the Internet, which means we often have to arrange to get someone clueful on-site to fix it. 2. The site is in the middle of some major deployment, a small piece of which is our server, so the LAN isn’t ready, but they demand the box be shipped early anyway for some handwavy business reason. No, we can’t tell you what static IP to use, they say. Just configure it on-site, they say. Sigh. Since these systems have 2+ Ethernet ports and we really only need one in normal operations, we’ve taken to configuring the second one for DHCP, so that they can just move the cable from the primary port to the secondary. This works fine in CentOS 5: DHCP comes up and takes over, giving us the access we need to fix/configure the static IP on the primary port. What happens in CentOS 7 depends on whether you plug in one cable or two: 1. If you plug in only one cable, NetworkManager sees that the static interface is unplugged, so it *helpfully* moves that IP to the secondary NIC, apparently on the assumption that static is always better than DHCP. This is of no use to us, since all it does is move the problem to the other NIC. 2. If you plug both cables in, both interfaces come up configured as you’d expect, but since both configurations provided a gateway address, you still can’t get out to the Internet since the static one came up first, and it’s pointing at an unreachable box. I think all we need to do to fix this is convince NetworkManager not to be clever about moving the static IP to the second NIC. Alas, there is no checkbox in the NM GUI labeled “This is a 4U server, dummy, not a laptop.” Anyone know how to convince NM to obey the MAC binding in the ifcfg-* file, to prevent NM from moving the broken static IP info to the second NIC? Yes, we know we can still disable NetworkManager and edit network-scripts/ifcfg-* directly. We’d just prefer not to fight the OS. Also, unlike EL6, disabling NM on EL7 breaks the network GUI, which we’ve occasionally found helpful, as when we have a semi-clueful tech at the remote site. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That’s the ideal, anyway. Is there anyone who has more than a few boxes at more than one location who _doesn't_ have this issue? I'd like to see a FAQ or something by whoever designed the network configuration system about how they planned for it to work (with and without GUI availability). Likewise for what is supposed to happen when you restore a backup onto different hardware. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
On Dec 1, 2014, at 14:48, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That’s the ideal, anyway. Is there anyone who has more than a few boxes at more than one location who _doesn't_ have this issue? I'd like to see a FAQ or something by whoever designed the network configuration system about how they planned for it to work (with and without GUI availability). Likewise for what is supposed to happen when you restore a backup onto different hardware. Most of the time, I end up nuking HWADDR from orbit on most boxes. It just causes more trouble than it fixes. -- Nate Duehr denverpi...@me.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] System Hangs At Anaconda Detecting Hardware (SOLVED)
On 12/01/14 05:30, Ashish Yadav wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote: Hey All, I just assembled a new machine. Mother Board: Gigabyte 78LMT-USB3 Processor: AMD FX8350 Memory: Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 2x8 GB Video: BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT I tried the 6.6 x86_64 netinstall disk. I tried the 6.6 x86_64 install DVD Both fail at the same place: Anaconda installer init version 13.21.229 starting mounting /proc filesystem... done creating /dev filesystem... done starting udev...udev[175]: error setting /sys/class/firmware/timeout: No such file or directory done mounting /dev/pts (unix98 pty) filesystem... done mouning /sys filesystem... done trying to remount root fiesystem read write... done mounting /tmp as tmpfs... done running install... running /sbin/loader detecting hardware... That's all she wrote! The BIOS detects the 500 GB hard drive, the CD/DVD drive, 16 GB of RAM, all eight cores on the CPU, and boots from the CD/DVD. Then it just hangs at detecting hardware. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.6#head-aa1d1d1c4e306596f8ae129e016ef1f95fc7c36e Says: The netinstall isos do not work with UEFI installs, but the minimal or DVD isos do work with UEFI. No versions of CentOS-6.6 will work with Secure Boot turned on. Secure Boot must be disabled to install CentOS-6.6. I see nothing in the MB documentation about Secure Boot enabled or disabled. Also not a word about UEFI. Any suggestions anyone? Please make sure that your BIOS firmware is up to date. Have you checked that? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I was using my TV on the S-Video Out. It wasn't happy. I connected my monitor to one of the DVI ports and the world became a happy place. I got the install done from the DVD install disk. Now the configuration battle starts. First I have to install the Nvidia drivers so that my Folding At Home application will use the 64 CUDA cores on my video card. Then I have to figure out how to get all the applications I have on my 32 bit CentOS 6.6 system to run on the new 64 bit CentOS 6.6 platform. I know it should be easy but past experience has shown that it probably won't be. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote: We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That’s the ideal, anyway. Is there anyone who has more than a few boxes at more than one location who _doesn't_ have this issue? I'd like to see a FAQ or something by whoever designed the network configuration system about how they planned for it to work (with and without GUI availability). Likewise for what is supposed to happen when you restore a backup onto different hardware. Most of the time, I end up nuking HWADDR from orbit on most boxes. It just causes more trouble than it fixes. Sure, but the interface names will be different in the 'restore backup case' - especially on servers that have several. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager fights with DHCP-only backup NIC
On 12/02/2014 10:35 AM, Warren Young wrote: We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. That’s the ideal, anyway. What often happens in reality is either: 1. They give us incorrect static IP info, so the box arrives and won’t connect to the Internet, which means we often have to arrange to get someone clueful on-site to fix it. 2. The site is in the middle of some major deployment, a small piece of which is our server, so the LAN isn’t ready, but they demand the box be shipped early anyway for some handwavy business reason. No, we can’t tell you what static IP to use, they say. Just configure it on-site, they say. Sigh. Since these systems have 2+ Ethernet ports and we really only need one in normal operations, we’ve taken to configuring the second one for DHCP, so that they can just move the cable from the primary port to the secondary. This works fine in CentOS 5: DHCP comes up and takes over, giving us the access we need to fix/configure the static IP on the primary port. What happens in CentOS 7 depends on whether you plug in one cable or two: 1. If you plug in only one cable, NetworkManager sees that the static interface is unplugged, so it *helpfully* moves that IP to the secondary NIC, apparently on the assumption that static is always better than DHCP. This is of no use to us, since all it does is move the problem to the other NIC. 2. If you plug both cables in, both interfaces come up configured as you’d expect, but since both configurations provided a gateway address, you still can’t get out to the Internet since the static one came up first, and it’s pointing at an unreachable box. I think all we need to do to fix this is convince NetworkManager not to be clever about moving the static IP to the second NIC. Alas, there is no checkbox in the NM GUI labeled “This is a 4U server, dummy, not a laptop.” Anyone know how to convince NM to obey the MAC binding in the ifcfg-* file, to prevent NM from moving the broken static IP info to the second NIC? Have you put NM_CONTROLLED=no in the ifcfg-eth0 script? Yes, we know we can still disable NetworkManager and edit network-scripts/ifcfg-* directly. We’d just prefer not to fight the OS. Also, unlike EL6, disabling NM on EL7 breaks the network GUI, which we’ve occasionally found helpful, as when we have a semi-clueful tech at the remote site. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 6.3
Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3
On 12/02/2014 10:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? It is generally unsafe to run a outdated operating system. Whatever it is. What are your constraints not to upgrade to the latests 6.6? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/14 08:29, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you matrix modeThere is no 6.3/matrix mode .. One thing you have to realize is that there is only CentOS 6, and minor releases that combine security/bugfixes at a certain point in time. So take whatever CentOS 6.x distro, do a yum update on it and it will automatically jump to $actual_version (so 6.6+packages updated post 6.6 release) Of course, one can argue that he can just stick with a particular release (by modifying yum or even not running yum update at all) but then it's another game, as it means no security update[s] at all, with all the possible consequences .. - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlR9a4IACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6TgwCcCQ1RDLGS31pmmySDTtaIIH/J esgAnRPOgfloAuyZfvwGEA2SWylPGk5U =4DQK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3
On 02/12/14 02:29 AM, Hadi Motamedi wrote: Dear All I want to put my stuff on centos 6.3 but some colleagues warned that it is not wise to use it at now for some bugs reported. Can you please confirm if this is true and which vulnerability can be risked for ? Thank you The heartbleed and shellshock bugs are worth upgrading for themselves. In any case, there really is no reason to stay on 6.3, it's quite old now. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
