Re: [Chicken-users] Port of racket/math to Chicken egg

2019-07-10 Thread kooda
Diego  wrote:
> I'd like to add this to the egg repository, as long as it's ok that it's 
> technically not 'complete' at this point. I'm also wondering wether a more 
> descriptive name than simply 'math' would be better (e.g. racket-math?) so as 
> to avoid ambiguity or confusion.

Done! Thanks for the contribution, this looks cool!

If you want to change the name, that can be done later without problem. :)

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


Re: [Chicken-users] Port of racket/math to Chicken egg

2019-06-27 Thread Sungjin Chun
Wow, this is great!
On Jun 27, 2019, 15:31 +0900, Diego , wrote:
> I've begun to port https://docs.racket-lang.org/math/index.html to a Chicken 
> Scheme egg here:
>
> https://github.com/dieggsy/chicken-math
>
> math.number-theory (equivalent to math/number-theory in racket) is finished 
> with tests passing, so at least that should be usable. Development on the 
> rest has stalled a bit as I haven't quite figured out how to port all the 
> special syntax in some modules.
>
> I'd like to add this to the egg repository, as long as it's ok that it's 
> technically not 'complete' at this point. I'm also wondering wether a more 
> descriptive name than simply 'math' would be better (e.g. racket-math?) so as 
> to avoid ambiguity or confusion.
>
> - Diego
>
>
>
> ___
> Chicken-users mailing list
> Chicken-users@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users


[Chicken-users] Port of racket/math to Chicken egg

2019-06-27 Thread Diego
I've begun to port https://docs.racket-lang.org/math/index.html to a Chicken 
Scheme egg here:

https://github.com/dieggsy/chicken-math

math.number-theory (equivalent to math/number-theory in racket) is finished 
with tests passing, so at least that should be usable. Development on the rest 
has stalled a bit as I haven't quite figured out how to port all the special 
syntax in some modules.

I'd like to add this to the egg repository, as long as it's ok that it's 
technically not 'complete' at this point. I'm also wondering wether a more 
descriptive name than simply 'math' would be better (e.g. racket-math?) so as 
to avoid ambiguity or confusion.

- Diego



___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users