Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-04-06 Thread Lothar Behrens
Besides all the discussion. Is this here really yet patented?

http://www.brainshell.de/patentmarkt_ikt.php
http://www.brainshell.de/upload/Openmoko_de01b9e8b4.pdf

If a patent would disable an emergeny functionality like automating  
the alert
in case of 'changing behaviour' (accels), or it makes the device a bit  
more
expensive, because it helps save live, I must say patents are the  
wrong way.

I think, such an important issue should not be patented, because it is  
a feature
all phones should become and not only these whose manufacturer are  
willing
to pay the patent licenses.

Also, in my view, the amount of invention is not quite high to  
eligible for a patent.

What do you think?

Is there prior art?
http://www.steiger-stiftung.de/GPS-Ortung-So-funktioniert-s.67.0.html

An interactive location is established and is provided by many  
services, does an automation
of them by a change in accelorometer behavior not be always the  
conclusion to be the best?

Wouldn't that idea in someones head earlyer?

Lothar

Am 19.03.2009 um 01:18 schrieb Rask Ingemann Lambertsen:

 On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:58:10PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Harald Welte wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:

 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no  
 matter if
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.

 that depends on what the network operator does.

 Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the
 significance of 112.
 I don't have any quote yet, but as far as I understood it is even
 required to by the GSM standards. But that might be wrong.

   A D112 AT command is mentioned in the 3GPP TS 07.07 specification  
 which you
 can get from here:
 http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/0707.htm
 Quoting section 8.3  Enter PIN +CPIN:

   NOTE:   Commands which interact with ME that are accepted when ME is
   pending SIM PIN, SIM PUK, or PH‑SIM are: +CGMI, +CGMM,
   +CGMR, +CGSN, D112; (emergency call), +CPAS, +CFUN, +CPIN,
   +CDIS (read and test command only), and +CIND (read and test
   command only).

   I don't know where the D112 command is documented. I also haven't  
 looked
 through the commands to see if there is a loophole such that you can  
 dial
 112 without making an emergency call.

   Btw, a few days ago danish media had a news story about unintended
 emergency calls. It appears that the answering machine offered by many
 telcos is partly to blame. What happens is that you press and hold  
 1 to
 speed dial your answering machine, press 1 to listen to a message  
 and
 press 2 to delete a message. Doing so leaves the number 112 on the
 display...

 -- 
 Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
 Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for  
 a year

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

-- | Rapid Prototyping | XSLT Codegeneration | http://www.lollisoft.de
Lothar Behrens
Heinrich-Scheufelen-Platz 2
73252 Lenningen









___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-04-06 Thread Pander
Perhaps you can also merge the functionality with
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Anti-Theft_Mode and avoid the patent thing.

Lothar Behrens wrote:
 Besides all the discussion. Is this here really yet patented?
 
 http://www.brainshell.de/patentmarkt_ikt.php
 http://www.brainshell.de/upload/Openmoko_de01b9e8b4.pdf
 
 If a patent would disable an emergeny functionality like automating  
 the alert
 in case of 'changing behaviour' (accels), or it makes the device a bit  
 more
 expensive, because it helps save live, I must say patents are the  
 wrong way.
 
 I think, such an important issue should not be patented, because it is  
 a feature
 all phones should become and not only these whose manufacturer are  
 willing
 to pay the patent licenses.
 
 Also, in my view, the amount of invention is not quite high to  
 eligible for a patent.
 
 What do you think?
 
 Is there prior art?
 http://www.steiger-stiftung.de/GPS-Ortung-So-funktioniert-s.67.0.html
 
 An interactive location is established and is provided by many  
 services, does an automation
 of them by a change in accelorometer behavior not be always the  
 conclusion to be the best?
 
 Wouldn't that idea in someones head earlyer?
 
 Lothar
 
 Am 19.03.2009 um 01:18 schrieb Rask Ingemann Lambertsen:
 
 On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:58:10PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Harald Welte wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no  
 matter if
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.
 that depends on what the network operator does.
 Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the
 significance of 112.
 I don't have any quote yet, but as far as I understood it is even
 required to by the GSM standards. But that might be wrong.
   A D112 AT command is mentioned in the 3GPP TS 07.07 specification  
 which you
 can get from here:
 http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/0707.htm
 Quoting section 8.3 Enter PIN +CPIN:

  NOTE:   Commands which interact with ME that are accepted when ME is
  pending SIM PIN, SIM PUK, or PH‑SIM are: +CGMI, +CGMM,
  +CGMR, +CGSN, D112; (emergency call), +CPAS, +CFUN, +CPIN,
  +CDIS (read and test command only), and +CIND (read and test
  command only).

   I don't know where the D112 command is documented. I also haven't  
 looked
 through the commands to see if there is a loophole such that you can  
 dial
 112 without making an emergency call.

   Btw, a few days ago danish media had a news story about unintended
 emergency calls. It appears that the answering machine offered by many
 telcos is partly to blame. What happens is that you press and hold  
 1 to
 speed dial your answering machine, press 1 to listen to a message  
 and
 press 2 to delete a message. Doing so leaves the number 112 on the
 display...

 -- 
 Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
 Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for  
 a year

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
 
 -- | Rapid Prototyping | XSLT Codegeneration | http://www.lollisoft.de
 Lothar Behrens
 Heinrich-Scheufelen-Platz 2
 73252 Lenningen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-18 Thread Chris Samuel
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, arne anka wrote:

 well, it fits the wet dreams of germany's current top terrorists hunter  
 (register everyone who buys a sim card) -- and there are no numbers  
 mentioned of abuse.

In 2003 our local telco monopoly released numbers show about 70% of emergency 
calls were not real - so about 7 million false calls to 000 (the Australian 
emergency number) in *Melbourne* each year.  That's getting on for 2 per head 
of population.

That includes hoaxes, mistakes, fax machines (yes, really), unlocked
mobiles pocket-dialing 000, school kids, people calling 000 to report a car 
blocking their drive because their local police station went to an answer 
phone, etc..

-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-18 Thread Steve 'dillo Okay

On Mar 18, 2009, at 04:28 , Chris Samuel wrote:

 On Wednesday 18 March 2009, arne anka wrote:

 well, it fits the wet dreams of germany's current top terrorists  
 hunter
 (register everyone who buys a sim card) -- and there are no numbers
 mentioned of abuse.

 In 2003 our local telco monopoly released numbers show about 70% of  
 emergency
 calls were not real - so about 7 million false calls to 000 (the  
 Australian
 emergency number) in *Melbourne* each year.  That's getting on for  
 2 per head
 of population.

 That includes hoaxes, mistakes, fax machines (yes, really), unlocked
 mobiles pocket-dialing 000, school kids, people calling 000 to  
 report a car
 blocking their drive because their local police station went to an  
 answer
 phone, etc.

Hmmm...I wonder how much of that could be avoided by choosing  
something like
911 or 909 or (as stated on the TV show IT Crowd)  0118 999  
881 999 119 7253  :)
instead of 3 consecutive presses of the most exposed digit on the  
phone keypad.

It's a lot harder to keypad mash those than just 000.


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-18 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:58:10PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Harald Welte wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 
  PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter if  
  the number is a emergency number in tie state.
  
  that depends on what the network operator does.
 
 Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the 
 significance of 112.
 I don't have any quote yet, but as far as I understood it is even 
 required to by the GSM standards. But that might be wrong.

   A D112 AT command is mentioned in the 3GPP TS 07.07 specification which you
can get from here:
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/0707.htm
Quoting section 8.3Enter PIN +CPIN:

NOTE:   Commands which interact with ME that are accepted when ME is
pending SIM PIN, SIM PUK, or PH‑SIM are: +CGMI, +CGMM,
+CGMR, +CGSN, D112; (emergency call), +CPAS, +CFUN, +CPIN,
+CDIS (read and test command only), and +CIND (read and test
command only).

   I don't know where the D112 command is documented. I also haven't looked
through the commands to see if there is a loophole such that you can dial
112 without making an emergency call.

   Btw, a few days ago danish media had a news story about unintended
emergency calls. It appears that the answering machine offered by many
telcos is partly to blame. What happens is that you press and hold 1 to
speed dial your answering machine, press 1 to listen to a message and
press 2 to delete a message. Doing so leaves the number 112 on the
display...

-- 
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency  
 services for location.
 I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de  
 (European, websites in other languages should be available)
 
   A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the  
 GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
 I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.
 
 Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.
 
 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter if  
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.

that depends on what the network operator does.  The SIM card has a list of
emergency numbers.  If you call one of those numbers, or make an emergency
call without a SIM card inserted, the phone will do itts request for a physical
channel indicating its a EMERGENCY call, and then use EMERGENCY SETUP instead
of SETUP, so the network can decide to rather kill somebody elses call and free
resources for your emergency call in case the cell is otherwise full.

that's at least the theory from the protocol side.

the practical implementation can look quite different.  The German government
e.g. now legally mandates that an operator will refuse to take emergency
calls from phones with no SIM card inserted.

regards,
-- 
- Harald Welte lafo...@openmoko.org   http://openmoko.org/

Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread Tilman Baumann
Harald Welte wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency  
 services for location.
 I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de  
 (European, websites in other languages should be available)

I have asked them. They are basically not prepared to share any 
information on details.
It is somehow a service they provide, but how it is implemented is unknown.

Reply to my question if I might have some information to make my phone 
use their service, the answer was 'there are many phones which support 
us...'
Yes, and I want to become one of them. But this is to much to ask from 
them. Stupid fuckers.
I'm sure they did not even understand what I was asking. :-/

eCall seems to be a more open system, but still no real informations to 
find. And it as a slightly different focus too.

   A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the  
 GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
 I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.

 Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.

 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter if  
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.
 
 that depends on what the network operator does.

Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the 
significance of 112.
I don't have any quote yet, but as far as I understood it is even 
required to by the GSM standards. But that might be wrong.

 The SIM card has a list of
 emergency numbers.  If you call one of those numbers, or make an emergency
 call without a SIM card inserted, the phone will do itts request for a 
 physical
 channel indicating its a EMERGENCY call, and then use EMERGENCY SETUP instead
 of SETUP, so the network can decide to rather kill somebody elses call and 
 free
 resources for your emergency call in case the cell is otherwise full.

That would be a great thing to have indeed. This needs to be included in 
the (FSO) dialer/contacts framework. Including the other special numbers 
the sim has, like ones own.



-- 
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
  Albert Einstein

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread arne anka
 Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the
 significance of 112.

at least in all states of the eu 112 has to work -- the last member to  
implement it only recently was bulgaria (see  
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Eine-Notrufnummer-fuer-alle-27-EU-Laender--/meldung/132427).

though, in germany in future emergency calls are possible only _with_ a  
sim card inserted  
(http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kein-Notruf-ohne-SIM-Karte--/meldung/132539).
inhowfar that is a way to remedy the alleged misuses of emergency numbers  
seems rather questionable -- will probably kill more people than it saves.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread Pander
arne anka wrote:
 Yep, but there seems to be some international agreement on the
 significance of 112.
 
 at least in all states of the eu 112 has to work -- the last member to  
 implement it only recently was bulgaria (see  
 http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Eine-Notrufnummer-fuer-alle-27-EU-Laender--/meldung/132427).
 
 though, in germany in future emergency calls are possible only _with_ a  
 sim card inserted  
 (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kein-Notruf-ohne-SIM-Karte--/meldung/132539).
 inhowfar that is a way to remedy the alleged misuses of emergency numbers  
 seems rather questionable -- will probably kill more people than it saves.

Well it can go either way. Many costs are made when reacting to false
calls and less resources are available for serious calls. Also, who is
using a phone without a SIM card anyway?

 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread arne anka
 Well it can go either way. Many costs are made when reacting to false
 calls and less resources are available for serious calls.

well, it fits the wet dreams of germany's current top terrorists hunter  
(register everyone who buys a sim card) -- and there are no numbers  
mentioned of abuse.

 Also, who is
 using a phone without a SIM card anyway?

a lot of people have got one in the car or elsewhere exactly to make  
emergency calls w/o having to pay for a sim.

but that's off topic.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread Steve 'dillo Okay

On Mar 17, 2009, at 07:57 , arne anka wrote:

 Well it can go either way. Many costs are made when reacting to false
 calls and less resources are available for serious calls.

 well, it fits the wet dreams of germany's current top terrorists  
 hunter
 (register everyone who buys a sim card) -- and there are no numbers
 mentioned of abuse.

That would explain why I had such problems getting a SIM card during  
my recent trip to
Europe. I knew it was some sort of overreaction like that.
  *sigh*.
Your government learns too well from ours :)
The one good thing that came out of the whole mess was that it  
pointed out that the majority of
my SIM problems during the trip were political/bureaucratic and not  
due to an intrinsic problem with the FR.

-Steve

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-03-17 Thread Joerg Reisenweber
Am Do  12. März 2009 schrieb Harald Welte:
 the practical implementation can look quite different.  The German 
government
 e.g. now legally mandates that an operator will refuse to take emergency
 calls from phones with no SIM card inserted.
WTF, those braindead i
/j


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


GPS emergency call standards

2009-02-24 Thread Tilman Baumann
Hi,

I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency  
services for location.
I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de  
(European, websites in other languages should be available)

  A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the  
GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.

Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.

PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter if  
the number is a emergency number in tie state.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-02-24 Thread Helge Hafting
Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency  
 services for location.
 I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de  
 (European, websites in other languages should be available)
 
   A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the  
 GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
 I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.
 
 Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.
 
 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter if  
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.

If you have the gps coordinates, just tell them over the phone as you 
make the call. They will use it if they have gps eqipment, which is 
likely. Automating this seems dangerous in that your SMS to the 
emergency service is delayed by a few minutes as the phone struggle to 
get the first fix. When you talk, you can fall back on other 
descriptions of the place (addresses, road names) if coordinates aren't 
available.

Helge Hafting

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-02-24 Thread Tilman Baumann

Am 24.02.2009 um 12:38 schrieb Helge Hafting:

 Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency
 services for location.
 I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de
 (European, websites in other languages should be available)

  A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the
 GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
 I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.

 Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.

 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter  
 if
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.

 If you have the gps coordinates, just tell them over the phone as you
 make the call. They will use it if they have gps eqipment, which is
 likely.

As log as you are able to do so.
I'm more thinking about something like a machine readable side channel  
paralel to a regular emergency call.

BTW. the German ADAC is completely helpless if you provide them GPS  
coordinates.

 Automating this seems dangerous in that your SMS to the
 emergency service is delayed by a few minutes as the phone struggle to
 get the first fix. When you talk, you can fall back on other
 descriptions of the place (addresses, road names) if coordinates  
 aren't
 available.

Depends, when a GPS fix is made it will be much more precise and  
quicker.

And there seems to be a standard for cars to make automatic emergency  
calls on accidents.
It is called eCall and no technical information is to be found... :)

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-02-24 Thread Pander
Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Am 24.02.2009 um 12:38 schrieb Helge Hafting:
 
 Tilman Baumann wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency
 services for location.
 I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de
 (European, websites in other languages should be available)

  A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the
 GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
 I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.

 Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.

 PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter  
 if
 the number is a emergency number in tie state.
 If you have the gps coordinates, just tell them over the phone as you
 make the call. They will use it if they have gps eqipment, which is
 likely.
 
 As log as you are able to do so.
 I'm more thinking about something like a machine readable side channel  
 paralel to a regular emergency call.
 
 BTW. the German ADAC is completely helpless if you provide them GPS  
 coordinates.
 
 Automating this seems dangerous in that your SMS to the
 emergency service is delayed by a few minutes as the phone struggle to
 get the first fix. When you talk, you can fall back on other
 descriptions of the place (addresses, road names) if coordinates  
 aren't
 available.
 
 Depends, when a GPS fix is made it will be much more precise and  
 quicker.
 
 And there seems to be a standard for cars to make automatic emergency  
 calls on accidents.
 It is called eCall and no technical information is to be found... :)
 

The notification part sending data can be reused with/from
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Anti-Theft_Mode

Uploading GSM cell info, GPS coordinates, USB IDs, voice recordings, etc.

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS emergency call standards

2009-02-24 Thread Lothar Behrens
Even if the GPS location is not actually got, the phone software in  
that case
could activate GPS automatically. When GPS has a fix the app could  
assist in

taking another call or, if no reaction of the user do it automatically.

Navit could be used to locate the city and street near the location  
and this could be

spd-say'ed.

The human in danger then only has to accept to do the followup call,  
nothing more.

In case all is fine he/she could dismiss.

Doing all the combination of locating and navit, will help in the  
typical situation
one isn't really in the position to 'think' about what to tell to the  
operator.


There are several articles and at least one I have read or have seen  
about doing

emergency calls in carcrash for sample with the car - GPS application.

Would that help ?

Lothar

Am 24.02.2009 um 15:30 schrieb Pander:


Tilman Baumann wrote:

Am 24.02.2009 um 12:38 schrieb Helge Hafting:


Tilman Baumann wrote:

Hi,

I'm just wondering if there are any open standards for emergency
services for location.
I'm thinking about services like http://www.steiger-stiftung.de
(European, websites in other languages should be available)

A SMS to the respective emergency (112, 911) number containing the
GPS position could be a start, but then someone has to read it.
I would guess there is a standard for a computer readable format.

Building a emergency call app would be a nice thing to have.

PS: According to Wikipedia, 112 works on all GSM networks no matter
if
the number is a emergency number in tie state.
If you have the gps coordinates, just tell them over the phone as  
you

make the call. They will use it if they have gps eqipment, which is
likely.


As log as you are able to do so.
I'm more thinking about something like a machine readable side  
channel

paralel to a regular emergency call.

BTW. the German ADAC is completely helpless if you provide them GPS
coordinates.


Automating this seems dangerous in that your SMS to the
emergency service is delayed by a few minutes as the phone  
struggle to

get the first fix. When you talk, you can fall back on other
descriptions of the place (addresses, road names) if coordinates
aren't
available.


Depends, when a GPS fix is made it will be much more precise and
quicker.

And there seems to be a standard for cars to make automatic emergency
calls on accidents.
It is called eCall and no technical information is to be found... :)



The notification part sending data can be reused with/from
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Anti-Theft_Mode

Uploading GSM cell info, GPS coordinates, USB IDs, voice recordings,  
etc.



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



-- | Rapid Prototyping | XSLT Codegeneration | http://www.lollisoft.de
Lothar Behrens
Heinrich-Scheufelen-Platz 2
73252 Lenningen








___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community