Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
No DFU capable USB device found Can you please tell me how to transfer the boot loader and the kernel to the NAND? not the slightest clue, what you are talking about :-), but i think you can give the device id (see lsusb), too, to dfu-util. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
No DFU capable USB device found Can you please tell me how to transfer the boot loader and the kernel to the NAND? not the slightest clue, what you are talking about :-), but i think you can give the device id (see lsusb), too, to dfu-util. dfu-util should autodetect all DFU capable devices, so if it doesn't find one it is probably not DFU capable. I noticed this because my usb sound card was brutely reset when I tried to flash the FR ;) grtz, Sander ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
Ok, I prepared the SD card with the boot loader and the kernel, and set the SMDK6410 cfg switches/jumpers to boot it from SD. But nothing shows up on the LCD. Can anyone (possibly Andy) tell me what should I expect when the kernel boots? and how can I see the ash prompt in the Busybox (as declared by andy)? - Tarandeep On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Tarandeep Gill taran.i...@gmail.com wrote: What I guess is, dfu-util does not write to s3c6410 right now, thats why Andy has a small utility that transfers the bootloader and the kernel to a SD card. And I guess right now SMDK6410 (the demo board) can only be booted with the SD card. Am I correct here? - Tarandeep On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Sander van Grieken san...@3v8.net wrote: No DFU capable USB device found Can you please tell me how to transfer the boot loader and the kernel to the NAND? not the slightest clue, what you are talking about :-), but i think you can give the device id (see lsusb), too, to dfu-util. dfu-util should autodetect all DFU capable devices, so if it doesn't find one it is probably not DFU capable. I noticed this because my usb sound card was brutely reset when I tried to flash the FR ;) grtz, Sander ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
Hi, I have a SMDK6410 board. I have successfully compiled dfu-util, Qi, and Openmoko kernel on my Ubuntu machine. The SMDK6410 is just as I got it from the company, I haven't modified its firmware. I have connected it to my computer with a USB cable, that goes into the OTG USB host port on the board (This is how the Windows DNW utility transfers a Win CE image to the board). So, when I use dfu-util to try to burn the Qi image into it, I get the following error: r...@conectech-desktop# ./dfu-util -a u-boot -R -D../qi/image/qi-s3c6410-master_84e38630c7135c1f.udfu dfu-util - (C) 2007-2008 by OpenMoko Inc. This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY No DFU capable USB device found Can you please tell me how to transfer the boot loader and the kernel to the NAND? I also have an Olimex OCD (that connects to the JTAG interface on the board) , if it is needed anyway. Thanks, Tarandeep On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Andy Green a...@openmoko.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0100 | Petr Vanek van...@penguin.cz (PV) wrote: | | On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100 | arne anka openm...@ginguppin.de (AA) | wrote: | | I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might | stick with it for a while i hope. | how does it play with the dead battery issue? | | well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them | around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens. | | | seems like no luck with empty battery, but i hadn't have much time to | test. and, for some reason, i cannot Qi boot my SD located distro. | Results on NAND based distro give me today the same or almost longer | booting times. The original Qi from Andy was definitely faster. | | Someone mentioned sound issue... right, seems to be that way too - no | sound, but i haven't tested it thoroughly now. | | I had been using older qi from Andy and i am not sure, but think that | it didn't suffer these issues... well, let's wait, it's still fresh. The sound thing is a kernel issue I believe. Up in stable-tracking branch of kernel the upstream init of the codec chip is done differently now and I think this is resolved. But stable-tracking has some issues being worked on that stop it replacing stable right now. The empty battery thing on GTA02 A5 anyway is a hardware issue that is happening before the CPU is booted, so Qi can't directly affect it. It can indirectly affect it though, when it does run it enables charging immediately. - -Andy -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkKm5QACgkQOjLpvpq7dMo5YQCeIp88JA+JN/PJypeIQxg/fFU6 agQAnRcAelL2uAg4qRQU7EC7kqrzGlak =uTZ7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might stick with it for a while i hope. how does it play with the dead battery issue? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100 arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AA) wrote: I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might stick with it for a while i hope. how does it play with the dead battery issue? well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens. -- Petr Vaněk http://biodynamika.cz ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0100 Petr Vanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PV) wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100 arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AA) wrote: I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might stick with it for a while i hope. how does it play with the dead battery issue? well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens. seems like no luck with empty battery, but i hadn't have much time to test. and, for some reason, i cannot Qi boot my SD located distro. Results on NAND based distro give me today the same or almost longer booting times. The original Qi from Andy was definitely faster. Someone mentioned sound issue... right, seems to be that way too - no sound, but i haven't tested it thoroughly now. I had been using older qi from Andy and i am not sure, but think that it didn't suffer these issues... well, let's wait, it's still fresh. -- Petr Vaněk http://biodynamika.cz ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
Does Qi have an issue tracker or does an existing issue tracker have a label or a component to track Qi issues? Petr Vanek wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0100 Petr Vanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PV) wrote: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100 arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AA) wrote: I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might stick with it for a while i hope. how does it play with the dead battery issue? well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens. seems like no luck with empty battery, but i hadn't have much time to test. and, for some reason, i cannot Qi boot my SD located distro. Results on NAND based distro give me today the same or almost longer booting times. The original Qi from Andy was definitely faster. Someone mentioned sound issue... right, seems to be that way too - no sound, but i haven't tested it thoroughly now. I had been using older qi from Andy and i am not sure, but think that it didn't suffer these issues... well, let's wait, it's still fresh. -- Petr Vaněk http://biodynamika.cz ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | Does Qi have an issue tracker or does an existing issue tracker have a | label or a component to track Qi issues? For now stick them under the somewhat ambiguous System Software thing with Qi in the title. - -Andy -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkKm1MACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqtLQCfZWSdMpBwbXWKAv3EsWjdb+yB 8QsAoJEXALYjvgXjSge7FgmnE5WqaXwW =FfIn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said: | On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0100 | Petr Vanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PV) wrote: | | On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:00 +0100 | arne anka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AA) | wrote: | | I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might | stick with it for a while i hope. | how does it play with the dead battery issue? | | well, this i cannot answer as i have three batteries and just swap them | around... i can try to run one completely empty and see what happens. | | | seems like no luck with empty battery, but i hadn't have much time to | test. and, for some reason, i cannot Qi boot my SD located distro. | Results on NAND based distro give me today the same or almost longer | booting times. The original Qi from Andy was definitely faster. | | Someone mentioned sound issue... right, seems to be that way too - no | sound, but i haven't tested it thoroughly now. | | I had been using older qi from Andy and i am not sure, but think that | it didn't suffer these issues... well, let's wait, it's still fresh. The sound thing is a kernel issue I believe. Up in stable-tracking branch of kernel the upstream init of the codec chip is done differently now and I think this is resolved. But stable-tracking has some issues being worked on that stop it replacing stable right now. The empty battery thing on GTA02 A5 anyway is a hardware issue that is happening before the CPU is booted, so Qi can't directly affect it. It can indirectly affect it though, when it does run it enables charging immediately. - -Andy -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkKm5QACgkQOjLpvpq7dMo5YQCeIp88JA+JN/PJypeIQxg/fFU6 agQAnRcAelL2uAg4qRQU7EC7kqrzGlak =uTZ7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Has anyone tried Qi?
Has anyone tried the new boot manager? or figured out how to install it? http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
./dfu-util -a u-boot -R -D http://people.openmoko.org/andy/qi-s3c6410-andy_8589b40295653557.udfu haven't tried that build yet.. There has been a thread a while ago. Don't be afraid when your screen stays black for 10seconds or so while booting. Thats normal. It's definitely faster. It will try to boot your kernel from sd-card and if there is none us the one in NAND. Have fun Richard ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
Sorry there, I meant: wget http://people.openmoko.org/andy/qi-s3c6410-andy_8589b40295653557.udfu ./dfu-util -a u-boot -R -D http://people.openmoko.org/andy/qi-s3c6410-andy_8589b40295653557.udfu qi-s3c6410-andy_8589b40295653557.udfu ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:58:34 -0600, Jason Cawood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone tried the new boot manager? or figured out how to install it? http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community Check the thread about 2.6.27 kernel. I've been using qi off and on for a couple weeks. Plus side: Faster. approximately 30% faster, by the stopwatch, than uBoot. Neg side: (note that these are of course fixable) Sound doesn't currently work, period. soundcard device not found. With SHR, FSO, 2008.x, Raster at least. Often doesn't boot the first attempt after restoring power, needs second 'press and hold' Often doesn't want to resume after suspend. of note: Backlight turns on right away, but screen remains blank until kernel load, and kernel does NOT output gobs of text to the screen. Will ALWAYS boot from uSD if first partition is ext2 and contains /boot/uImage.bin, otherwise boots from NAND. No splash screen. (not a problem, just be aware) I altered /etc/init.d/banner to print an ascii openmoko logo, so there'd be something more than 'please wait, booting' onscreen until X starts. In short: Looks extremely promising, and once the soundcard bug is fixed I will probably flash Qi and never look back. Until soundcard and suspend issues are addressed, I'd recommend it ONLY FOR TESTING. j ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Has anyone tried Qi?
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:58:34 -0600 Jason Cawood [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JC) wrote: Has anyone tried the new boot manager? or figured out how to install it? http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi I have tried it and i liked it. It was definitively faster. I might stick with it for a while i hope. -- Petr Vaněk http://biodynamika.cz ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community