Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO

2009-05-07 Thread DJDAS
Paul Fertser ha scritto:
 DJDAS dj...@djdas.net writes:
   
 Franky Van Liedekerke ha scritto:
 
 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.
 
 
 hmm ... I thought end-users were people actually using the phone, not
 unix-hackers ... 
   
 That's why I wrote it ;)
 

 It's very nice you work on it. Too bad you use a dead-born deprecated
 distro ;)
   
Well, to be honest I'm a maintainer of a distro called FDTF based on 
Om2008.9+FDOM(September version) I customized for the Italian community 
at http://forum.telefoninux.org. I still use it because it's quite 
stable, telephony works (little qtopia bugs but it's daily usable) and 
with the community suggestions I added various customizations in the 
startup scripts, keyboards, themes and so on. I'm stuck with it because 
I have no much time to re-test everything in FSO-based distros and I 
don't like their telephony-PIM (qtopia IMHO still rocks hard).
So this is my development environment with pros  cons obviously, but I 
think it's better to have a daily quite stable phone rather than 
something updated but quite unusable, I'll wait for real stable releases 
with no one who wants to recreate the wheel from scratch after something 
goes wrong at the end of the job ;)

 As Franky already mentioned, bluez3 and bluez4 interfaces are
 completely different, so porting won't be that easy :-/
   

No probs ;) It's just a matter of code

 One of the reasons FSO integrates functionality of powering and
 resetting devices is exactly that. Higher level app devs shouldn't be
 bothered with kernel changes, FSO quickly adopts to it and you receive
 all updates free. In fact, you might like the idea of FSO, take a look
 at specs ;)
   

Oh, I know and appreciate FSO way but I need something really stable and 
working, not something randomly working after an update :P
Seriously: as I said above I'll make BlueMoko compatible with FSO but 
for my daily use I'll stick with my FDTF until a real stable working 
out-of-the-box distro will be released ;)
Thanks you, bye!


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO

2009-05-06 Thread DJDAS
Paul Fertser ha scritto:
 Franky Van Liedekerke liede...@telenet.be writes:
   
 And BTW, FSO-based distros should now support bluetooth headsets out
 of the box, one needs to follow instructions from [1].

 [1] 
 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Manually_using_Bluetooth#Once_Again.2C_Bluetooth_Headset_on_Freerunner
   
 I beg to differ, but if those instructions mean out of the box, then
 all commandline things are out of the box as well. Commandline
 instructions are very nice, but when you're in a car and try to pair
 with the car bluetooth, this is not practical at all. You need a gui
 there...
 

 You Qtopia guys seem to have a quite unusual (for a unix hackers) POV
 ;)

 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.

   
The fact stable telephony is still missing since 2 years doesn't seem 
lack of interest :P
Seriously: BlueMoko is intended mainly as GUI for Bluetooth because 
every 20€ phone has its own... I started as proof-of-concept with those 
dependencies as they are the most stable to my daily use distro and 
working properly for my experiments, but consider it uses only DBUS 
calls to Bluez so if APIs don't change too much (I have to verify) it 
should work with Bluez4 too and for FSO I plan to integrate 
compatibility with it to let it work with every distro (except qtopia 
based obviously, but they should still have their BT GUI). Furthermore I 
didn't read of A2DP support in FSO and BlueMoko started with it in mind ;)
If FSO team agrees too, they can integrate my future plans (file 
exchange, AVRCP, networking...) and we can work together to provide full 
BT support, provided I'd like to customize GUI handling to achieve 
compatibility with different toolkits (GTK, Elementary, console, etc..)
Bye!




___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO (was: Re: [Om2008.x] Announcing BlueMoko 1.0b1)

2009-05-06 Thread Franky Van Liedekerke
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Paul Fertser fercer...@gmail.com wrote:
 Franky Van Liedekerke liede...@telenet.be writes:
 And BTW, FSO-based distros should now support bluetooth headsets out
 of the box, one needs to follow instructions from [1].

 [1] 
 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Manually_using_Bluetooth#Once_Again.2C_Bluetooth_Headset_on_Freerunner

 I beg to differ, but if those instructions mean out of the box, then
 all commandline things are out of the box as well. Commandline
 instructions are very nice, but when you're in a car and try to pair
 with the car bluetooth, this is not practical at all. You need a gui
 there...

 You Qtopia guys seem to have a quite unusual (for a unix hackers) POV
 ;)

then you try to enter your commands on your FR in your car ... I think
I just as well can put my phone aside, drive to my destination, tell
them to wait half an hour, go back and start typing :-)

 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.

hmm ... I thought end-users were people actually using the phone, not
unix-hackers ... but I saw the announcement of a bluetooth gui for
Om2008, aboeit for bluez3. Oh wait, that's what qtopia does as well
:-) But since the newer kernels are there: no bluez3, thus no qtopia
bluetooth ... hopefully for Om2009 final that'll change.

 Also, the person that wrote that wiki says However, I couldn't get an
 actual voice over it, just crackling. If this is no longer true,
 somebody should change it.

 Somebody should finally try to use this support and report the
 findings. Of course, Jan, who wrote the code, tried it and it worked
 for him. And BTW please take into account it seems that not all
 headsets are compatible with BT chip we use (at least it was the case
 some time ago, i guess i need to try again with my not-working headset
 and latest bluez and bluetooth-testing kernel branch).

heh, trying to get your non-working headset to work, are you? :-)

Franky

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO

2009-05-06 Thread DJDAS
Franky Van Liedekerke ha scritto:
 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.
 
 hmm ... I thought end-users were people actually using the phone, not
 unix-hackers ... 

That's why I wrote it ;)

 but I saw the announcement of a bluetooth gui for
 Om2008, aboeit for bluez3. 
Well those are minimum requirements as I couldn't test other distros
but, as I wrote in the last post, I use only DBUS calls to Bluez so
maybe it should work on other distros (probably in FSO to given I don't
use FSO calls yet...). The only userspace dependency is PyGTK but I
think almost every distro has it installed.
I think the only real issue could be the power and reset /sys files
which change between different kernel versions... I accept suggestions
and patches too :P

Thank you, bye!




___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO

2009-05-06 Thread Franky Van Liedekerke
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:11 PM, DJDAS dj...@djdas.net wrote:
 Franky Van Liedekerke ha scritto:
 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.

 hmm ... I thought end-users were people actually using the phone, not
 unix-hackers ...

 That's why I wrote it ;)

 but I saw the announcement of a bluetooth gui for
 Om2008, aboeit for bluez3.
 Well those are minimum requirements as I couldn't test other distros
 but, as I wrote in the last post, I use only DBUS calls to Bluez so
 maybe it should work on other distros (probably in FSO to given I don't
 use FSO calls yet...). The only userspace dependency is PyGTK but I
 think almost every distro has it installed.
 I think the only real issue could be the power and reset /sys files
 which change between different kernel versions... I accept suggestions
 and patches too :P

sure you do :-)
DBUS calls have changed quite a lot between bluez3 and bluez4. I face
the same problem for QtEi, but I don't feel like doing all that work
on my own there (it's quite a big code change). So for now QtEi has no
bluetooth in newer kernels (if they don't provide the bluez3 package
anymore).

Franky

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Bluetooth headsets in FSO

2009-05-06 Thread Paul Fertser
DJDAS dj...@djdas.net writes:
 Franky Van Liedekerke ha scritto:
 Framework already supports BT headsets. The fact GUI is missing shows
 the lack of interest from end-users, well, i think it'll change soon.
 
 hmm ... I thought end-users were people actually using the phone, not
 unix-hackers ... 

 That's why I wrote it ;)

It's very nice you work on it. Too bad you use a dead-born deprecated
distro ;)

 but I saw the announcement of a bluetooth gui for
 Om2008, aboeit for bluez3. 
 Well those are minimum requirements as I couldn't test other distros
 but, as I wrote in the last post, I use only DBUS calls to Bluez so
 maybe it should work on other distros (probably in FSO to given I don't
 use FSO calls yet...). 

As Franky already mentioned, bluez3 and bluez4 interfaces are
completely different, so porting won't be that easy :-/

 The only userspace dependency is PyGTK but I think almost every
 distro has it installed.  

Yep, no problems with that.

 I think the only real issue could be the power and reset /sys files
 which change between different kernel versions... I accept
 suggestions and patches too :P

One of the reasons FSO integrates functionality of powering and
resetting devices is exactly that. Higher level app devs shouldn't be
bothered with kernel changes, FSO quickly adopts to it and you receive
all updates free. In fact, you might like the idea of FSO, take a look
at specs ;)

-- 
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:fercer...@gmail.com

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community