Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-24 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:54, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 if you wish to not violate a patent.. you simply have to give
 up on implementing the algorithm - or fight his patent in court first.


Very straight and plain...
what would you do in my place?

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-24 Thread Patryk Benderz
Dnia 2010-11-24, śro o godzinie 09:56 +0100, Thibaut Girka pisze:
 Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 à 09:18 +0100, Patryk Benderz a écrit : 
  Well, I do for example. Looking at the title of patent, it seems that
  8pen is French based company. Following google hits I fount French
  patent office:
  http://www.inpi.fr/
  But here after struggling for a while looking for English version, I
  decided to ask If any of you guys know French language and could help to
  find this patent (1058945 ) in patent office?
 
 I'm French, and after a quick search, I couldn't find this patent.
 Furthermore, I doubt INPI would accept this, it's about industrial
 patents, we don't have things like software patents.
I made another attempt to look for this patent at http://www.epo.org/
and http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/index.jsp but failed here also. Any
ideas where to find this patent?
There is one more strangeness, looking at their schematic drawings, it
looks like this patent application is not finished yet. Maybe they have
not applied it yet?
Another fact is that they are decided to distribute their software for
free:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Android-Input-App-8pen-Is-Now-Free-for-Download-166085.shtml
http://www.coveringweb.info/2010/11/android-input-app-8pen-is-now-free-for.html

-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-24 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:57, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 i'd invent a new input method that doesn't violate the patent. take the
 principal and change it so its different enough not to violate. then implement
 that.


They've just released version 1.1 for free (1.0 was 1.50 price). Could
this mean something? :)

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-24 Thread Fernando Martins
Joachim Ott wrote:
 On 24 November 2010 11:15, Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.pl wrote:
   
 Dnia 2010-11-24, śro o godzinie 09:56 +0100, Thibaut Girka pisze:
 
 Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 à 09:18 +0100, Patryk Benderz a écrit :
   
 Well, I do for example. Looking at the title of patent, it seems that
 8pen is French based company. Following google hits I fount French
 patent office:
 http://www.inpi.fr/
 But here after struggling for a while looking for English version, I
 decided to ask If any of you guys know French language and could help to
 find this patent (1058945 ) in patent office?
 
 I'm French, and after a quick search, I couldn't find this patent.
 Furthermore, I doubt INPI would accept this, it's about industrial
 patents, we don't have things like software patents.
   
I made another attempt to look for this patent at http://www.epo.org/
 and http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/index.jsp but failed here also. Any
 ideas where to find this patent?
There is one more strangeness, looking at their schematic drawings, it
 looks like this patent application is not finished yet. Maybe they have
 not applied it yet?
 

 1058945 is, as they stated on their page, an application number, not
 yet a patent number.

 nb: when I was searching for patent claim Dispositif de saisie de
 signes comprenant une zone de base, I found another company
 (swypeinc.com) that has patented an input method.
 ___
   
Patent applications are usually only made public 18 months after date of 
filing, therefore you can't find it on the online databases. Since the, 
apparently international, application is in French, most likely it will 
be searched at the European Patent Office.

Some useful links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_application
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_participation_in_patent_examination

In any case, someone posted in another mail that Quickwriting already 
has a patent pending.

Regards,
Fernando

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Daniele Ricci
Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data
 from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual paper,
 then you have something beginning to be believable.


What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof.
Perlin Quickwriting page:
http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/

We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one
and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor
where to find it :-(

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:14, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 you need documents from him - papers he's submitted, lectures given, anything
 else that proves he had the idea AND when it actually happened (before the
 filing of the patent). the patent filing proves that 8pen's invention happened
 at least when they filed it - you have to prove that their invention came 
 AFTEr
 another and is the same
 ie - prior art. you have to provide 1. it is actually prior, and 2. that it is
 the same thing. for that you will need all the documentation and proof you can
 get. an that means getting perlin's help. if he isn't interested in helping..
 you're pretty much SOL as you need to convince the patent office, not your
 fellow hackers. :)


I sent 2 e-mails to Perlin, still no reply from him. This is
unfortunate... :S i'll try to get all the documents I can get by my
own, but i guess that without Perlin's help i won't get much far...

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Patryk Benderz
Dnia 2010-11-23, wto o godzinie 09:13 +0100, Daniele Ricci pisze:
 Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
 
 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
  themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data
  from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual 
  paper,
  then you have something beginning to be believable.
 
 
 What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof.
 Perlin Quickwriting page:
 http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/
I found something interesting...
If you are interested in licensing this technology for commercial use,
please contact licens...@cat.nyu.edu. Is it possible they have already
patented this?

Regarding contacts with Ken Perlin, he claims he works at:
Games For Learning Institute
New York University
715 Broadway 12th floor
New York, NY 10003, USA
T: (+1) 212.998.2242
F: (+1) 212.995.4122 
so you can try to reach him by phone or by fax.

-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:52, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 it's his idea. it's his job to defend it. he is the one who can. unless.. he's
 involved in 8pen as a founder/investor... then you're pushing poo uphill :)


Contacting him by phone is not something I can do, i don't speak
english very well...
Anyway about the licensing e-mail address in the site, I already tried
that, it's not active... :S

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Al Johnson
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote:
 Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply.
 
 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com 
wrote:
  themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such
  data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on
  actual paper, then you have something beginning to be believable.
 
 What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof.
 Perlin Quickwriting page:
 http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/
 
 We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one
 and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor
 where to find it :-(

Ideally you want something in print with a verifiable publication date. A 
printed copy of UIST '98 - Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM Symposium on 
User Interface Software and Technology [1] might be available through 
university libraries if you can't get it direct from ACM. I don't know whether 
the 'Wired' article [2] made it into the print edition, but that's another one 
to check. 

[1] http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/html/proceedings/1998.html
[2] http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1999/04/19411

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan Petty etie...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is not true. A patent (6031525) was already filed for
 Quickwriting in 1999/2000:
 http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html

 So if this is actually a duplicate patent, all Ken Perlin has to do is
 point out his patent to the patent office to get the 8pen one
 invalidated.


I guess he won't. Can we do something about this? The patent office
will realize it on its own, right?

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread W. B. Kranendonk


--- On Tue, 11/23/10, Daniele Ricci daniele.ath...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan
 Petty etie...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  A patent (6031525) was already filed
 for
  Quickwriting in 1999/2000:
  http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html
 
 The
 patent office
 will realize it on its own, right?

There's sarcasm in that question, isn't there? Usually the patent office 
doesn't know or (bother to?) find out. 

The applicant for a duplicate patent also does not want to know or find out, 
because in that case they can be hold for triple damages in case of a complaint 
from the original patent holder.

For similar reasons there is little incentive for the original inventor to 
raise a flag before the other becomes successful: it takes trouble with 
probably little returns. It is worth much more in damages to complain after the 
(so called) copycat became successful.

Good luck with this quest!

Boudewijn




  

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-23 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 23:53, Bryan Petty etie...@gmail.com wrote:
 If your concern if that you have licensed Ken Perlin's patent, you're
 safe from any lawsuits from 8pen.


Actually my concern is about the implementation of the input method.

I've already pushed to my git repository a working GLP'd
implementation, but without data files (thus just a blank window). I'm
waiting for this issue to be solved to be able to push the rest as
soon as possible. For now I am the only one in the world to use it
outside Android.

Or i could simply push those files and forget about patents. I mean,
it's just an open source implementation, who cares? :)
-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-21 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it wrote:
 Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen
 is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you
 involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact them?

 DaveMDS


I contacted the 8pen company: just one reply and that's it. They're
not responding any more. Probably they think they're in a bad
position.
I also sent a mail to prof. Perlin, the quickwriting creator, no reply.

What about FSF?
-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-21 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:24 +0100, Daniele Ricci wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it wrote:
  Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen
  is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you
  involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact them?
 
  DaveMDS
 
 
 I contacted the 8pen company: just one reply and that's it. They're
 not responding any more. Probably they think they're in a bad
 position.
 I also sent a mail to prof. Perlin, the quickwriting creator, no reply.
 
 What about FSF?
What about SFLC?

Denis.



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-18 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 15:48, Joachim Ott jo.shrde...@googlemail.com wrote:
 I also did some research at the european patant office, I used the
 Application number 1058945 from http://www.the8pen.com/legal.html and
 searched with http://ep.espacenet.com/numberSearch?locale=en_EP -
 there are some hits, but they are all from 2004 or earlier. The one
 from 8pen is not listed there. the8pen or Michael Fester isn't
 found either.


I see... i don't know where else to search... maybe it's not real... i
mean could it be just a fake document for discouraging people willing
to copy it?

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Daniele Ricci
Cross-posting for broadcasting Justus idea.


On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 00:00, Justus Winter
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
 I am also tempted to mail the person(s?) behind 8pen addressing my
 concerns about his attempt to patent the idea, maybe even challenge his
 position stating that I would not recognize his claim. I believe the
 company is based in France (information is a scarce resource on both
 the 8pen and the companies (3qubits) one, I did a whois query). I'd be
 very interested whether such a patent is enforceable within the EU...


I already did a few days ago; just a couple of mails... the interest
part is this:

=== message received from them ===
Dear Daniele,

In fact we did not know about the Quickwriting method that you have
pointed out to us. It strikes us as an incredible coincidence.

We're not interested in engaging into a legal debate, but in the
development of an efficient alternative to conventional keyboards on
small devices. However, intellectual property law does apply, and
copying the 8pen does violate it within the scope set by the patent
previously referred to.

We're not dealing personally with issues that are in conflict with our
patent, or that violate it, but we have instead passed them on to the
lawyers who have filed it.

=== my reply 
 Dear Daniele,
 In fact we did not know about the Quickwriting method that you have
 pointed out to us. It strikes us as an incredible coincidence.
 We're not interested in engaging into a legal debate, but in the development
 of an efficient alternative to conventional keyboards on small devices.

Me neither I am interested in a legal debate, I just wanted to let you
know that your idea is not original, thus it can't be applied for
patenting. Anyway we'll wait for your patent approval.

 However, intellectual property law does apply, and copying the 8pen does
 violate it within the scope set by the patent previously referred to.
 We're not dealing personally with issues that are in conflict with our
 patent, or that violate it, but we have instead passed them on to the
 lawyers who have filed it.

Of course i won't name my program 8pen for Linux.
I guess editing Quickwriting to use 4 zones instead of 9 would violate
your patent too? If Quickwriting was easily configurable to change the
number of zones, how could this be handled?

= end =

 Would anybody care to join me on this one? We could create a message
 or a message template and ask everyone send this message to the person
 behind the 8pen (crowdsourcing seems to be the catchy phrase for this
 approach...).

 Cheers,
 Justus


Sure, i'm with you 110% :-)

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Alfa21-mobile
I think the concept behind quickwriting is unrelated to the numbers of
zones but the way you use them to write.

http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/experiments/quikwriting/
The basic conceit of Quikwriting is that you make a character by
moving your pen first out of, and then back into, a central resting
done. So drawing a character is sort of like drawing a flower petal.
Below is the very first demo I made for it

btw, in this page I read also:
Then several things happened. Microsoft got interested in it and
licensed it from NYU (thereby helping to support our research!)

so, I think it's not free :P


On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Daniele Ricci daniele.ath...@gmail.com wrote:
 Cross-posting for broadcasting Justus idea.


 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 00:00, Justus Winter
 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de wrote:
 I am also tempted to mail the person(s?) behind 8pen addressing my
 concerns about his attempt to patent the idea, maybe even challenge his
 position stating that I would not recognize his claim. I believe the
 company is based in France (information is a scarce resource on both
 the 8pen and the companies (3qubits) one, I did a whois query). I'd be
 very interested whether such a patent is enforceable within the EU...


 I already did a few days ago; just a couple of mails... the interest
 part is this:

 === message received from them ===
 Dear Daniele,

 In fact we did not know about the Quickwriting method that you have
 pointed out to us. It strikes us as an incredible coincidence.

 We're not interested in engaging into a legal debate, but in the
 development of an efficient alternative to conventional keyboards on
 small devices. However, intellectual property law does apply, and
 copying the 8pen does violate it within the scope set by the patent
 previously referred to.

 We're not dealing personally with issues that are in conflict with our
 patent, or that violate it, but we have instead passed them on to the
 lawyers who have filed it.

 === my reply 
 Dear Daniele,
 In fact we did not know about the Quickwriting method that you have
 pointed out to us. It strikes us as an incredible coincidence.
 We're not interested in engaging into a legal debate, but in the development
 of an efficient alternative to conventional keyboards on small devices.

 Me neither I am interested in a legal debate, I just wanted to let you
 know that your idea is not original, thus it can't be applied for
 patenting. Anyway we'll wait for your patent approval.

 However, intellectual property law does apply, and copying the 8pen does
 violate it within the scope set by the patent previously referred to.
 We're not dealing personally with issues that are in conflict with our
 patent, or that violate it, but we have instead passed them on to the
 lawyers who have filed it.

 Of course i won't name my program 8pen for Linux.
 I guess editing Quickwriting to use 4 zones instead of 9 would violate
 your patent too? If Quickwriting was easily configurable to change the
 number of zones, how could this be handled?

 = end =

 Would anybody care to join me on this one? We could create a message
 or a message template and ask everyone send this message to the person
 behind the 8pen (crowdsourcing seems to be the catchy phrase for this
 approach...).

 Cheers,
 Justus


 Sure, i'm with you 110% :-)

 --
 Daniele

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Al Johnson
On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote:
 Cross-posting for broadcasting Justus idea.
[snip...] 
 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 00:00, Justus Winter
  Would anybody care to join me on this one? We could create a message
  or a message template and ask everyone send this message to the person
  behind the 8pen (crowdsourcing seems to be the catchy phrase for this
  approach...).
  
  Cheers,
  Justus
 
 Sure, i'm with you 110% :-)

Has anyone contacted Ken Perlin or NYU about this yet?

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall
btw, in this page I read also:
Then several things happened. Microsoft got interested in it and
licensed it from NYU (thereby helping to support our research!)

so, I think it's not free :P

Not necessarily.  There can be dual licensing, like in MySQP, which
would allow for a not-for-profit or open source licensing.

You really have to contact the copyright holder or their agent, who in
this case seems to be NYU.  And whether an implementation transcends
their patent is an issue for technologists and lawyers.

md



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Daniele Ricci
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:00,  community-requ...@lists.openmoko.org wrote:
 From: Alfa21-mobile freerun...@my.is.it
 To: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org
 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:07:51 +0100
 Subject: Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
 I think the concept behind quickwriting is unrelated to the numbers of
 zones but the way you use them to write.

 http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/experiments/quikwriting/
 The basic conceit of Quikwriting is that you make a character by
 moving your pen first out of, and then back into, a central resting
 done. So drawing a character is sort of like drawing a flower petal.
 Below is the very first demo I made for it

 btw, in this page I read also:
 Then several things happened. Microsoft got interested in it and
 licensed it from NYU (thereby helping to support our research!)

 so, I think it's not free :P


So I guess that QWO implementation is outlaw... :S

REPLY ALL PLEASE!

-- 
Daniele

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-16 Thread Alfa21-mobile
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jon 'maddog' Hall mad...@li.org wrote:
 Not necessarily.  There can be dual licensing, like in MySQP, which
 would allow for a not-for-profit or open source licensing.

you are right, but they are not saying it's for free neither.

I tried to contact that email address for nyu licensing but it's not
an active mailbox :S
(bounced email)

also tried to email perlin but no response.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-09 Thread Jeff Sadowski
8open didn't seem to be that great of improvement over the standard
keypad 2=abc 3=def ... maybe just rearrange the letters on each key so
that the more common ones come first

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Daniele Ricci daniele.ath...@gmail.com wrote:
 Greetings,
 Some weeks ago a new software for Android has come out, the 8pen:
 http://www.the8pen.com/

 the video clearly introduces a modified/simplified version of
 Quickwriting, an open (ie unpatented) input method invented a few
 years ago.

 Now they are trying to put a patent on it, even on variations! This is
 outrageous, since the idea has already been thought. I think we still
 apply against this patent, and move for a request to make it void
 (it's still in pending state).

 Here is the patent request:
 http://www.the8pen.com/legal.html

 Please help the open source community against this ridiculous attempt
 to make money on an already invented thing.
 Thanks,
 --
 Daniele Ricci

 p.s. I already have a working implementation waiting to be pushed, so
 let's not waste time! :-)

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-09 Thread Patryk Benderz
Dnia 2010-11-09, wto o godzinie 08:37 -0700, Jeff Sadowski pisze:
 8open didn't seem to be that great of improvement over the standard
 keypad 2=abc 3=def ... maybe just rearrange the letters on each key so
 that the more common ones come first
anyway, common is relative to used language. If what you is true, than
patent should not be granted.

-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting

2010-11-08 Thread Daniele Ricci
Greetings,
Some weeks ago a new software for Android has come out, the 8pen:
http://www.the8pen.com/

the video clearly introduces a modified/simplified version of
Quickwriting, an open (ie unpatented) input method invented a few
years ago.

Now they are trying to put a patent on it, even on variations! This is
outrageous, since the idea has already been thought. I think we still
apply against this patent, and move for a request to make it void
(it's still in pending state).

Here is the patent request:
http://www.the8pen.com/legal.html

Please help the open source community against this ridiculous attempt
to make money on an already invented thing.
Thanks,
-- 
Daniele Ricci

p.s. I already have a working implementation waiting to be pushed, so
let's not waste time! :-)

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community