Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-12 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:32:19 +0100 (CET)
Alexander Lehner leh...@edv-buero-lehner.de wrote:

 
 
 On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, elf Pavlik wrote:
 
  Someone have just showed me yesterday this one:
  http://wetab.mobi/en/
 
  It says 'Open Software, Open Hardware' but don't seam to me like
  open source hardware... Still it runs version of MeeGo as you can
  see on this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOBUdiPZ1hA
 
 Ha, I applied to this company a few years ago, when the product was
 still in the pre-alpha phase. I guess it was shortly after the Neo
 came out and I was interested in opensource development.
 I didn't take the job for other personal reasons.
 But there already the whole sofware and hardware stack seemed not
 open at all.
 
 So if you take all disadvantages of the NEO and the 
 iPad, you will get this 'weTab'. (Sorry weTab-guys for the hard
 criticism). Similair to FIC/OpenMoko, their business plan seems not
 to work out. And I guess there is no community around the weTab at
 all.
 
 Maybe also have a look at the new 1-Laptop-per-Child XO/3 tablet
 (german news site):
 http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OLPC-Gruender-will-Tablets-mit-dem-Hubschrauber-verteilen-1374592.html
 (Hardware is still a mock-up, of course...)
 
 I still prefer the 'wooden-case' version after all these
 discussions ;)


WeTab is quite awesome, WeTab OS... not so much :)

I'm running Fedora 16 with GNOME and Enlightenment on my weTab. Running
Enlightenment is almost like a Moko tablet :)

Much better support than most arm devices all around with Free Software
drivers.

Rui

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-11 Thread Al Johnson
On Thursday 10 November 2011, SZENTE Balint wrote:
 On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:44:00 +
 
 Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk wrote:
  That's about all you can expect with the current state of openness on
  embedded GPUs. If you want acceleration you get a binary blob if
  you're lucky. Mostly you're just SOL. There are hints that things are
  moving slowly towards more openness, but that's about it. It's not
  much better with embedded DSPs, though Ti seem to have a reasonably
  open interface.
  
  Do you know of a better alternative?
 
 To be honest, I was not aware about this. I thought, the lack of
 specifications of Glamo chip is only a special case of the available
 embedded GPUs.

Quite the reverse - it's a special case that Openmoko managed to get docs that 
can be released to community devs for an open driver at all, even if they do 
have to sign an NDA. As a result it's got some of the best open support out 
there for a mobile GPU. That it doesn't work very well with a 640x480 screen 
is another matter entirely ;-)

 However, a possible (but more complex) alternative would be to avoid
 completely the existing proprietary GPU/DSP chips and make an FPGA
 based phone instead. Then we could use various open source hardware IP
 cores for CPU, GPU and whatever else is needed, similar to Milkymist,
 Open Graphics Project or Project VGA. That would be really cool.

Cool, but relatively expensive and power hungry. Any idea how many you need to 
be making before getting the design burned into silicon becomes cost 
effective?

 From my point of view a GPU is completely useless without drivers /
 specifications, thus practically it is not better at all from a basic
 VGA 2D accelerator IP core. At least an FPGA based open source IP core
 design *could be* improved in time without changing the PCB. Just think
 the possibilities. On the other hand, a closed unsupported GPU is dead
 from the start.

If you want a fast and efficient cpu with a good set of interfaces for making 
a phone or tablet they tend to have a gpu in them too, even if we can't use 
the acceleration at the moment. It's like things with an iPod dock - it's a 
useless feature for me, but something with one may still be better than 
something without for entirely separate reasons. 

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-10 Thread SZENTE Balint
Hello!

On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:19:23 +0530
RANJAN infi...@gmail.com wrote:

 25$ Linux computer at the size of a USB Flash stick
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pcb1.jpg

I am worried about the openness of this hardware. They say the
following on their wiki[1]:

* GPU core: [...] Raspberry Pi team are looking at how they can make
some of the proprietary features available to application programmers
 * DSP core: There is a DSP, but there isn't currently a public API

So it is not quite a fully open platform. Sounds similar to the
Freerunner's Glamo chip features.

[1] http://elinux.org/RaspberryPiBoard#Components

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-10 Thread Al Johnson
On Thursday 10 November 2011, SZENTE Balint wrote:
 Hello!
 
 On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:19:23 +0530
 
 RANJAN infi...@gmail.com wrote:
  25$ Linux computer at the size of a USB Flash stick
  http://www.raspberrypi.org/
  http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pcb1.jpg
 
 I am worried about the openness of this hardware. They say the
 following on their wiki[1]:
 
 * GPU core: [...] Raspberry Pi team are looking at how they can make
 some of the proprietary features available to application programmers
  * DSP core: There is a DSP, but there isn't currently a public API
 
 So it is not quite a fully open platform. Sounds similar to the
 Freerunner's Glamo chip features.
 
 [1] http://elinux.org/RaspberryPiBoard#Components

That's about all you can expect with the current state of openness on embedded 
GPUs. If you want acceleration you get a binary blob if you're lucky. Mostly 
you're just SOL. There are hints that things are moving slowly towards more 
openness, but that's about it. It's not much better with embedded DSPs, though 
Ti seem to have a reasonably open interface.

Do you know of a better alternative?

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-10 Thread SZENTE Balint
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:44:00 +
Al Johnson openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.uk wrote:

 That's about all you can expect with the current state of openness on
 embedded GPUs. If you want acceleration you get a binary blob if
 you're lucky. Mostly you're just SOL. There are hints that things are
 moving slowly towards more openness, but that's about it. It's not
 much better with embedded DSPs, though Ti seem to have a reasonably
 open interface.
 
 Do you know of a better alternative?

To be honest, I was not aware about this. I thought, the lack of
specifications of Glamo chip is only a special case of the available
embedded GPUs.

However, a possible (but more complex) alternative would be to avoid
completely the existing proprietary GPU/DSP chips and make an FPGA
based phone instead. Then we could use various open source hardware IP
cores for CPU, GPU and whatever else is needed, similar to Milkymist,
Open Graphics Project or Project VGA. That would be really cool.

From my point of view a GPU is completely useless without drivers /
specifications, thus practically it is not better at all from a basic
VGA 2D accelerator IP core. At least an FPGA based open source IP core
design *could be* improved in time without changing the PCB. Just think
the possibilities. On the other hand, a closed unsupported GPU is dead
from the start.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-09 Thread RANJAN
Hello All,

Just got an Idea. I think we can make a Moko Tab (an open source tablet
phone/PC) from the existing opensource hardware and the ones related to
GSM,Wifi,bluetooth from OpenMoko FR.

Take a look at the parts that you can find.
http://imgur.com/NCkp9

References:
Modular sensors for the Moko Tab
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10724
Tiny GPS with module and antenna
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10890
25$ Linux computer at the size of a USB Flash stick
http://www.raspberrypi.org/
http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pcb1.jpg

The rest of the hardware can be taken from the previous moko. I think the
idea of the first truly open source tablet PC should be realized.

Sincerely
Sriranjan
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-09 Thread elf Pavlik
Excerpts from RANJAN's message of 2011-11-09 19:49:23 +:
 Hello All,
 
 Just got an Idea. I think we can make a Moko Tab (an open source tablet
 phone/PC) from the existing opensource hardware and the ones related to
 GSM,Wifi,bluetooth from OpenMoko FR.
 
 Take a look at the parts that you can find.
 http://imgur.com/NCkp9
 
 References:
 Modular sensors for the Moko Tab
 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10724
 Tiny GPS with module and antenna
 http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10890
 25$ Linux computer at the size of a USB Flash stick
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/
 http://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/pcb1.jpg
 
 The rest of the hardware can be taken from the previous moko. I think the
 idea of the first truly open source tablet PC should be realized.
 
 Sincerely
 Sriranjan

Hi,

Someone have just showed me yesterday this one:
http://wetab.mobi/en/

It says 'Open Software, Open Hardware' but don't seam to me like open source 
hardware...
Still it runs version of MeeGo as you can see on this video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOBUdiPZ1hA

Cheers!
~ elf Pavlik ~

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-09 Thread Alexander Lehner



On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, elf Pavlik wrote:


Someone have just showed me yesterday this one:
http://wetab.mobi/en/

It says 'Open Software, Open Hardware' but don't seam to me like open source 
hardware...
Still it runs version of MeeGo as you can see on this video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOBUdiPZ1hA


Ha, I applied to this company a few years ago, when the product was still 
in the pre-alpha phase. I guess it was shortly after the Neo came out and 
I was interested in opensource development.

I didn't take the job for other personal reasons.
But there already the whole sofware and hardware stack seemed not open at 
all.


So if you take all disadvantages of the NEO and the 
iPad, you will get this 'weTab'. (Sorry weTab-guys for the hard criticism).

Similair to FIC/OpenMoko, their business plan seems not to work out.
And I guess there is no community around the weTab at all.

Maybe also have a look at the new 1-Laptop-per-Child XO/3 tablet
(german news site):
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OLPC-Gruender-will-Tablets-mit-dem-Hubschrauber-verteilen-1374592.html
(Hardware is still a mock-up, of course...)

I still prefer the 'wooden-case' version after all these discussions ;)

A.


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: The idea of making the MOKO tab

2011-11-09 Thread Thomas HOCEDEZ

Le 09/11/2011 21:32, Alexander Lehner a écrit :



On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, elf Pavlik wrote:


Someone have just showed me yesterday this one:
http://wetab.mobi/en/

It says 'Open Software, Open Hardware' but don't seam to me like open 
source hardware...
Still it runs version of MeeGo as you can see on this video 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOBUdiPZ1hA


Ha, I applied to this company a few years ago, when the product was 
still in the pre-alpha phase. I guess it was shortly after the Neo 
came out and I was interested in opensource development.

I didn't take the job for other personal reasons.
But there already the whole sofware and hardware stack seemed not open 
at all.


So if you take all disadvantages of the NEO and the iPad, you will get 
this 'weTab'. (Sorry weTab-guys for the hard criticism).

Similair to FIC/OpenMoko, their business plan seems not to work out.
And I guess there is no community around the weTab at all.

Maybe also have a look at the new 1-Laptop-per-Child XO/3 tablet
(german news site):
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/OLPC-Gruender-will-Tablets-mit-dem-Hubschrauber-verteilen-1374592.html 


(Hardware is still a mock-up, of course...)

I still prefer the 'wooden-case' version after all these discussions ;)

A.




Hi all,

The idea is great, and (I thiunk) not so much hard to do.

The project could be based on the GTA04 hardware, (because it can be 
used with a larger screen, with higher resloution), thoug the GTA02 
won't ba able to.


So it is only a problem of finding a new touchscreen, and a case (as 
usual ,-) ).


It could be a good idea to ask to Dr Nocholaus Scheller for the screen.

Thomas

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community