[Cooker] irssi-gc obsoletes irssi
Hi, All is in the subject, my irssi got replaced by urpmi --auto-select... Btw, is there a way to share the src.rpm between both ?
Re: [Cooker] Re: kronolith or php-pear RPM in 9.2 Contribs missing php-pear Date module
Oden Eriksson wrote: I admit I know nothing about pear. I have checked how PLD is doing it, and their list is about 180 php-pear-* packages. Is this the way to do it? I started a php script some time ago (last chrismas ?)to build a mandrake rpm from a pear package name (quite simple as a package is well described, with dependencies, test files, ...). That would generate a lot of packages so they couldn't be tested manually, so the script would have to automaticallay run the test programs. This could be done quite easily as pear has a command run-tests to run the regression tests. I didn't finish because not many people looked interested. The point is to decide if this is usefull as pear already has commands to install/update packages.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi download file twice
Olivier Thauvin wrote: When you urpmi from two mirror, files are download twice: [EMAIL PROTECTED] olivier]# rpm -q urpmi urpmi-4.4-42mdk [EMAIL PROTECTED] olivier]$ urpmi kdebase-common --clean Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être installés (127 Mo): kdebase-common-3.1.93-14mdk.i586 libkdebase4-3.1.93-14mdk.i586 Est-ce correct ? (O/n) o ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-common-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libkdebase4-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-common-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libkdebase4-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm L'installation a échoué, il manque des fichiers : rsync://ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-common-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm rsync://ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libkdebase4-3.1.93-14mdk.i586.rpm Vous devriez mettre à jour votre base de données urpmi I guess it tries on the first one, fails, tries on the second one, only tells it failed on the last one.
Re: [Cooker] Re: No more fpons
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Brad Felmey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What a typical macho opinion. I rather prefer the nice girls who can write good code. IIRC for GC it would be handsome guys delivering refreshments between bouts of perfect coding. :) How rumours can spread.. May I forward his mail to some Swiss people I'm thinking about ? :-)
Re: [Cooker] Re: No more fpons
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As of now, there is no room for hiring or paying more. What else would make Mandrake a more attractive workplace for you? I don't understand. Maybe he plans to provide you with nice girls bringing coffee or tea to your desk :-)
Re: [Cooker] Re: No more fpons
Götz Waschk wrote: Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2003, 16:47:28 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal Terjan: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What else would make Mandrake a more attractive workplace for you? I don't understand. Maybe he plans to provide you with nice girls bringing coffee or tea to your desk :-) What a typical macho opinion. I rather prefer the nice girls who can write good code. I would prefer too, but it's really more difficult to find :-)
Re: [Cooker] Re: No more fpons
Götz Waschk wrote: Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2003, 17:14:42 Uhr MET, schrieb Pascal Terjan: Götz Waschk wrote: What a typical macho opinion. I rather prefer the nice girls who can write good code. I would prefer too, but it's really more difficult to find :-) Depends on where you're looking. When I was a CS student, there were almost no females, but this has changed a bit. In my Processor Architecture class there is 1/3 female students, so there might be a new generation of coding girls. Impressive ! Here that didn't change :/
Re: [Cooker] Danger: Magazine with 9.2 with problematic kernel
Francisco Alcaraz wrote: I just have bought a linux magazine (Todo Linux) that comes with the two first Mandrake 9.2 and, of course, with the old kernel. Nothing in the magazine warn about the possible problem with LG cdrom drivers. It could be problematic have lot of people having their LG cdrom-drivers broken. At least a note about the danger should be put. :-( Mandrake should be more carefull with this, shouldn't it? I'm pretty sure the magazine didn't even bother to tell Mandrakesoft they'll distibute the 9.2...
Re: [Cooker] Mozilla crash because of libgaleon-xpcom.so ??
Frederic Crozat wrote: On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:56:08 +0100, Pascal Terjan wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ mozilla -mail /usr/lib/mozilla-1.4/mozilla-bin: relocation error: /usr/lib/galeon/components/libgaleon-xpcom.so: undefined symbol: eel_gconf_get_string [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ I don't understand why does mozilla use something from galeon... I remember I already saw something about this but just found http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2599 (maybe I just remembered reading this bug). Could you reopen this bug and add ALL info from your system on it ? Arrrg. Seeing no answer and needing to read my mails, I just did urpme mozilla 5 minutes ago (and reinstalled every previously installed stuff depending on it : galeon-1.3.8-2mdk.i586 mozilla-dom-inspector-1.4-13mdk.i586 mozilla-enigmail-1.4-13mdk.i586 mozilla-enigmime-1.4-13mdk.i586 mozilla-js-debugger-1.4-13mdk.i586 mozilla-livehttpheaders-0.6-1.20030627.5mdk.noarch mozilla-mail-1.4-13mdk.i586 mozilla-spellchecker-1.4-13mdk.i586 ) Now no problem anymore, sorry.
[Cooker] Mozilla crash because of libgaleon-xpcom.so ??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ mozilla -mail /usr/lib/mozilla-1.4/mozilla-bin: relocation error: /usr/lib/galeon/components/libgaleon-xpcom.so: undefined symbol: eel_gconf_get_string [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ I don't understand why does mozilla use something from galeon... I remember I already saw something about this but just found http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2599 (maybe I just remembered reading this bug). It started crashing tonight, when I try to display one newsgroup message (I can display other ones) or after a few minutes doing nothing. I only updated kernel today so I can't see where this issue can come from.
Re: [Cooker] Is rpm2cpio usable?
Quel Qun wrote: Hi, I can't seem to get it to work. Example given, rpm2cpio libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm | cpio -ivd usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.la does not create any file locally. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ rpm2cpio /var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm | cpio -i --list ./usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu.h ./usr/X11R6/include/GL/glu_mangle.h ./usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.la ./usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.la ./usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so ./usr/share/doc/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1 ./usr/share/doc/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1/COPYING ./usr/share/doc/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1/COPYRIGHT ./usr/share/doc/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1/README ./usr/share/doc/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1/README.X11 176 blocks [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ rpm2cpio /var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libMesaGLU1-devel-5.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm | cpio -idv ./usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.la ./usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.la 176 blocks The file got created
[Cooker] urpmi basesystem
I just tryied urpmi --root /tmp/mdk basesytem, it worked really nicer than the first time I did it months ago. Only got 2 errors (except for kernel but that's not a problem) : 8:glibc ## /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.27792: line 24: rm: command not found This one is easy to fix but has no impact... 55:rpm-helper ## /usr/share/rpm-helper/add-group: line 23: /dev/null: No such file or directory This one may turn something wrong but I didn't look into it more.
Re: [Cooker] TWiki Style
Greg Meyer wrote: On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:53 am, Buchan Milne wrote: All gecko-based browsers show this (Mozilla, Firebird, Galeon, Epiphany). IE is fine, so is Konqueror. It works in Opera too. The offending bit is I think this p / tag (looking at the html source of the page as it is displayed): table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 bgcolor=#00 tr td table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=2 cellpadding=10 p / tr bgcolor=#ff td colspan=2 h1a name=Mandrake_Linux Mandrake Linux /a/h1 Yes. I have confirmed that if I take that tag out of the code it renders correctly in Mozilla. Perhaps this is a bug in Mozilla/Gecko. Is this normal to have a p tag outside a td ? If not, the bug is in the html code. If yes I guess it considers that you omitted the trtd and creates a td (with black backround as asked). The height of the td is one character as a paragraph ends with a newline so you get a line of text with no character.
Re: [Cooker] Mandrake uses Photoshop... What a pity!
Mike wrote: If you have ever tried to use gimp for serious work - you will realise how cumbersome and not up to the job it is sorry to say that, but it is true... even the user interface in gimp takes a while to get used to, its layers are a nightmare to use compared to potatoshop Maybe you're right for people that start with photoshop... I started image manipulation with paint shop pro, each time I tryied to use photoshop I lost hours trying to do simple stuff. Then I switched to Linux and since the first time I ran GIMP I achieved what I wanted quite easily. I really prefer it's user interface. For the layers, could you explain the problem ? There is one major thing missing in GIMP : you keep only the result of filters and cannot modify parameters of the ones applied before. Except for that, I have no blame for GIMP.
Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives
ef2 wrote: I am afraid it also concerns the CRD-8322B : http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Splatt_Forumfile=viewtopictopic=12989forum=10 Someone on IRC also just reported for CRD-8322B :/
Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DMA is not supported on the CRD-8400B, it is in the kernel nodma blacklist
(drive_list_entry drive_blacklist).
Reading the list I see stuff like :
{ Compaq CRD-8241B, ALL },
{ CRD-8400B , ALL },
{ CRD-8480B, ALL },
{ CRD-8480C, ALL },
{ CRD-8482B, ALL },
{ CRD-84 , ALL },
Does it work when this appears as substring ?
I guess not, else CRD-84 would be enough...
Re: [Cooker] [IMPORTANT] 9.2 install potentially frying some LG cdrom drives
Pascal Terjan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DMA is not supported on the CRD-8400B, it is in the kernel nodma
blacklist (drive_list_entry drive_blacklist).
Reading the list I see stuff like :
{ Compaq CRD-8241B, ALL },
{ CRD-8400B , ALL },
{ CRD-8480B, ALL },
{ CRD-8480C, ALL },
{ CRD-8482B, ALL },
{ CRD-84 , ALL },
Does it work when this appears as substring ?
I guess not, else CRD-84 would be enough...
for ( ; drive_table-id_model ; drive_table++)
if ((!strcmp(drive_table-id_model, id-model))
I think I have my answer...
Re: [Cooker] Mozilla Thunderbird not on cooker
Buchan Milne wrote: We first need a thunderbird package that actually displays a window. Just tryied with your spec. Running with -g shows me [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 9702)] 0x4004ab40 in js_AllocStack () from /usr/lib/mozilla-thunderbird-0.3/libmozjs.so Looks like it's catched and thunderbird exits normally when it occurs.
Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.2 update policy
Jos Hulzink wrote: Jabber is no option for all the new guys that come over from Redmond OS, for they don't want a huge manual how to set up a gateway, they want working IM. If you don't care about those guys, you don't care about Mandrake. What do you mean by setup a gateway ? You just need to chose a server to connect to...
Re: [Cooker] Plastik Theme
Laurent Montel wrote: When cooker will open... Maybe we could provide a flamethrower to warly to help him unfreezing main :)
Re: [Cooker] http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ is ...
jokerman64 wrote: ... anti-aliased. well kinda. read on. Ok after wgetting http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ and taking a closer look at it. It quickly became clear that changind a few lines o css wasn't gonna solve any problems w/ fonts on the site (as i was previously led to believe). Boo hoo. Well since I've (naively) been asking/begging/whining for the fonts to be changed i decided to do something about it. It looked like _someone_ had started changing the fonts already so i decided to help him along. the whole english site w/ the exception of the docs directory has been mirrored at http://www.i-kubed.org/en/ Nice, now it's exactly the same when I stop forcing fonts in Galeon :-)
Re: [Cooker] And next ?
Buchan Milne wrote: But, before doing that, ensure you have working spam filters :-/ It became subscribers only recently. I got rejected few days ago because I don't post with the right address.
[Cooker] xchat 2.0.5
For those interested I put packages on http://cmoi.fasmz.org:8080/misc/
Re: [Cooker] 9.2 download CD size
Leon Brooks wrote: But I think 650 (at least for CD1) should be used to be as compatible as possible. It's not always good to cater for the majority, some minorities have a big influence (stupid journalist reviewers...) I agree with this: 650MB for CD1, 700MB for the rest, buys us an extra 100MB without completely cutting off older equipment. Looks a nice compromise to get sure install work everywhere. I vote for this one.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] openssh-3.6.1p2-7mdk
Tibor Pittich wrote: On 16. September 2003 at 20:00, Vincent Danen wrote: Version : 3.6.1p2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft -=-=-=- Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.6.1p2-7mdk - security fix hm,. vincent, are you only backported patch? is cooker freeze reason why you don't upload 3.7 version? There are some changes in 3.7 (for several protocols) and we have less than one week to test before scheduled final for 9.2 so I really prefer him not upgrading.
Re: [Cooker] BitTorrent suggestion
Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: Hello, For the final Mandrake release could you not split the torrents (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/torrent/ ) up by CD (and md5sum)? Instead package them as one. That's what had been done for rc2
Re: [Cooker] 9.2 download CD size
Buchan Milne wrote: Warly wrote: A poll on club shows that (now) most of the users prefers 700 MB discs over 650 MB ones. WDYT? Most users have =128MB ram, but I don't see us adding features to the installer to take advantage of the extra ram. Remember your minimum requirements. Machines which only just make those requirements are likely to have an older CD-ROM drive, thus we are likely to find users who have problems if we use 700MB. What is the difference between having 700MB CDs, and having 3 650MB CDs and a fourth 150MB CD? It's the same space on the mirror, and it costs the user only an extra $0.50 (well, that's what CD-Rs cost here). Buying a new CD-ROM drive for all the PII machines would cost significantly more ... The oldest CDROM drive I got, a cheap 4X from Mitsumi can read 700MB CD. I bought it while I still had a 486 DX4 100...
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] sgrotum-1.2.6-1mdk
Thierry Vignaud wrote: Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -- __ Men often believe -- or pretend -- that the Law .,-;-;-,. /'_\ is something sacred, or at least a science -- an _/_/_/_|_\_\) / unfounded assumption very convenient to '-=/\ governments. jgs `/_//_/-'\_\ is this really needed in package description ? I agree, putting a sample is nice, but a neutral one for most people would be better.
Re: [Cooker] Enlarge your bash completion experience
Guillaume Rousse wrote: COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '-a -p -P -y -s -q -v -h --help \ - --update --media --excludemedia --sortmedia \ - --synthesis --auto --auto-select --fuzzy --src \ - --install-src --clean --noclean --force \ - --allow-nodeps --allow-force --parallel --wget --curl \ - --limit-rate --proxy --proxy-user --bug --env \ - --X --best-output --verify-rpm --test --excludepath' \ - -- $cur ) ) + --update --media --excludemedia --sortmedia --synthesis \ + --auto --auto-select --no-uninstall --keep --split-level \ + --split-length --fuzzy --src --install-src --clean \ + --noclean --force --allow-nodeps --allow-force --parallel \ + --wget --curl --limit-rate --proxy --proxy-user --bug \ + --env --X --best-output --verify-rpm --test --excludepath \ + --excludedocs ' -- $cur ) ) please add --no-verify-rpm which is quite handy for contribs :)
[Cooker] Galeon crashes quite often
Galeon crashes several times a day, always after closing a tab. I can't reproduce it as I may occur or not on the same page... Browsing gnome bugzilla I found nothing related...
Re: [Cooker] MD5SUM 9.2 RC2 CD1
Olivier Villin wrote: Hello, i just download RC2 CD1 from two differents mirrors (ftp.ciril.fr and ftp.surfnet.nl) and i got this md5sum : 9725a5942d84390c691d78f95084b5ee MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD1.i586.iso instead of the one written in 9.2rc2.md5sums 0354883ff172fa31f2b4759f4929ffeb MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD1.i586.iso Which one is correct ? And in case of my file beeing corrupted where did you find a valid mirror for CD1 ? Thanks in advance Olivier. Here are the right ones : 9725a5942d84390c691d78f95084b5ee MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD1.i586.iso 78374f7ff4335f5b46b3cd7d8e2f3e94 MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD2.i586.iso 70de3baa4a1e3f3c0229bed38b237d8a MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD3.i586.iso
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3540] [ati.2] On Ati Mobility M1 with XFree 4.3, no xv video output, only xshm
[jkeller] wrote:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3540
I guess it's, one more time, too late to have ati.2 build in XFree86
package with the ati.2 name to allow choice depending on the card :/
And the package has still the same problems :
- you need a XFree buildtree in %{_topdir}/BUILD/XFree86-4.3/ in order
to build it
- when XFree is updated you need to reinstall ati.2 package...
For the second point, which is the one really annoying, someone
suggested using a trigger but it looks like nobody looked into it.
[Cooker] warning during scli update
installation de //var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/scli-0.2.12-2mdk.i586.rpm Préparation... ## 166:scli ## install-info: warning: no info dir entry in `/usr/share/info/scli.info.bz2'
[Cooker] urpmi problem during auto-select
installation de //var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm Préparation... ## L'installation a échoué: file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheader from install of bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk conflicts with file from package initscripts-7.06-20mdk installation de //var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/initscripts-7.06-23mdk.i586.rpm L'installation a échoué: bootloader-utils 1.4-1mdk is needed by initscripts-7.06-23mdk
Re: [Cooker] urpmi problem during auto-select
Pascal Terjan wrote: installation de //var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm Préparation... ## L'installation a échoué: file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheader from install of bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk conflicts with file from package initscripts-7.06-20mdk installation de //var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/initscripts-7.06-23mdk.i586.rpm L'installation a échoué: bootloader-utils 1.4-1mdk is needed by initscripts-7.06-23mdk A conflict between bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk and initscripts = 7.06-23mdk would solve that.
Re: [Cooker] XFce 4
Marcel Pol wrote: On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:10:40 +0200 jp4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it planned to replace 3.XX versions (XFCE4-rc3 is out) No, 9.2 main is in version freeze now, so I don't think it will happen for 9.2. Sorry. Maybe someone could introduce XFce4 as a separate package in contribs ?
[Cooker] Logging out Gnome
Hi, When I click on the logout icon in the panel I used to have a dialog box asking me if I wanted to reboot, shutdown or logout and I could cancel at this step. Now I get logued out immediatly with everything killed if I miss another icon (lock for example) and click on this one. Is this a bug or a decided change of behaviour ? If it is a bug, wher should I look (gdm, my conf (create another panel ?)...) Any suggestion welcome.
Re: [Cooker] Logging out Gnome
Frederic Crozat wrote: On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:13:30 +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: Run gnome-session-properties, you can configure that.. Right, It just got changed by the update. Thanks.
Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] option to tell urpmi skip signature check
Olivier Blin wrote: On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 14:23:02 + FACORAT Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there a way to tell urpmi or rpm to skip signature check ? when installing package from main, no pb, but when coming to contrib you have to say yes each time. This is time consuming Hi From urpmi --help : --verify-rpm - verify rpm signature before installation (--no-verify-rpm disable it, default is enabled) I guess --no-verify-rpm is what you want :) Should be in the list like other options (and in bash_completion), currently you don't find it if you don't know it exists.
[Cooker] Problem using smbmount since I updated my cooker
Hi, when mounting a shared directory I get : 3443: session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) SMB connection failed I'm sure the password is right and it used to work until yesterday evening, when I updated my cooker. Any idea what could I do to find out the problem ?
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] icewm-1.2.9-2mdk
Frederic Crozat wrote: Many web servers do a redirection when first case doesn't apply and 'bar' directory exist.. But it is BAD :) I agree but vim spec mode doesn't :-)
Re: [Cooker] conflict between ucd-snmp and net-snmp
Guillaume Rousse wrote: ucd-snmp is the old version, it should get removed. Current direct dependencies on ucd-snmp : bronc fwbuilder libfwbuilder4 libfwbuilder5 ucd-snmp-utils Indirect (all stuff that will get broken) : bronc fwbuilder gkrellm-plugins-snmp hpoj libfwbuilder4 libfwbuilder4-devel libfwbuilder5 libfwbuilder5-devel libfwbuilder-data libptal0 libptal0-devel libsane-hpoj0 libsnmp0 libsnmp0-devel ucd-snmp ucd-snmp-utils xojpanel
[Cooker] problem with urpmq -d ?
Hi, it looks like there is problem with urpmq -d : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ urpmq glasnost glasnost [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ urpmq -d glasnost [EMAIL PROTECTED] pascal]$ rpm -qp --requires /var/mirror/cooker/contrib/i586/glasnost-0.6.1-2mdk.noarch.rpm apache = 2.0.0 mod_python.so python python-imaging libxml2 libxslt1 python-TAL docbook-dtd412-xml docbook-style-xsl gnupg python-base = 2.2 rpm-helper /bin/sh /bin/sh rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 python-base = 2.2
Re: [Cooker] An interesting comment
Eric Fernandez wrote: Actually that would be a good move if Paris was doing the same than Munich... switching from MS to SuSE ? :-)
Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts
Buchan Milne wrote: Hmmm, hack would be to add manual provides perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) etc in the spec file ... OK, that was my first idea but wondered if there was something cleaner :-) Let's do that.
Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts
Luca Berra wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 08:06:05AM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: Buchan Milne wrote: Hmmm, hack would be to add manual provides perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) etc in the spec file ... OK, that was my first idea but wondered if there was something cleaner :-) Let's do that. i'd put those in %_requires_exceptions, it is cleaner than providing those, since no package other than w3m would require them and they are installed in /usr/share/w3m/ which is not in the perl searchpath. Agreed :) Uploaded like that.
[Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts
[Already sent this 7 hours ago but it still not appear so I guess it's lost] I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for scripts : # rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk perl(w3mhelp-funcname.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk But this scripts are in the w3m rpm $ rpm -qlp /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep .pl$ /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcdesc.ja.pl /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcname.pl What are your suggestions ?
Re: [Cooker] problem with requires/provides on perl scripts
Buchan Milne wrote: quote who=Pascal Terjan [Already sent this 7 hours ago but it still not appear so I guess it's lost] I just rebuilt w3m with ipv6 enabled but It has some requires for scripts : # rpm -Uvh /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk perl(w3mhelp-funcname.pl) is needed by w3m-0.4.1-2mdk But this scripts are in the w3m rpm $ rpm -qlp /tmp/w3m-0.4.1-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep .pl$ /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcdesc.en.pl /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcdesc.ja.pl /usr/share/w3m/w3mhelp-funcname.pl What are your suggestions ? grep 'use w3mhelp' `rpm -qlp w3m` This will likely show that some non-perl statement file tells you to use the mentioned perl scripts, which find-requires mis-interprets as a perl use statement. There is /usr/lib/w3m/w3mhelp.cgi that use the required .pl And this is really some perl :) So, either work around it by some ignore-requires statement (see the thread where Oden had the same problem with perl(the) on MySQL IIRC), or we need to fix find-requires with a better regex/algo. Like, maybe it should only check files that have a perl she-bang on the first line, or maybe it should grep for something more like ^use \w*(::\w*)*; Here the .pl is really needed, the problem is it doesn't know it's there.
Re: [Cooker] utf8 in PHP
Luis Ortega wrote: The following script, ? echo tf8_encode(test); ? produces the following error when browsed, Fatal error: Call to undefined function: tf8_encode() in /var/www/html/test.php on line 2 I am running this in mdk-cooker. Any suggestions as to how to solve this? add a 'u' before tf8 ?
[Cooker] /tmp/.resolv.conf.XXXX after dhcp
I have 182 files like .resolv.conf.p8fpLb in /tmp, 0 sized and owned by root. Creation time looks like each time I received an address from DHCP. And I just tryied to run dhclient by hand and one was created. I'm using dhcp-client-3.0-2pl2.5mdk Should I report this upstream or is the problem coming from other scripts ?
[Cooker] php-pspell broken ?
Whatever disctionary I try to use (en, fr, ...), I get : Warning: PSPELL couldn't open the dictionary. reason: I'm sorry I can't find any suitable word lists for the language-tag fr. ?php pspell_new(fr, , , , (PSPELL_NORMAL)); ? pspell-0.12.2-7mdk aspell-0.50.3-1mdk aspell-en-0.50.2-3mdk aspell-fr-0.50.3-5mdk
Re: [Cooker] problems with orinoco_ps on 9.1
Bernard Varaine wrote: Also when removing the car dthe Notebok lockup completely. had to pcmcia stop first to avoid this problem. Same problem here. I was told last version fix this but didn't compile it yet to try.
Re: [Cooker] xchat 2.0.1 segfaults
Pascal Terjan wrote: New xchat as a big problem. Tabs get detached into windows without any reason and when reattaching, xchat segfault little time after. I guess following strace and gdb backtrace won't help :( Figured out for the detaching. When you slightly move your mouse while clicking on a tab it interprets that as a drag and detach the tab... The main problem is the segfault occuring quite always after reattaching
[Cooker] xchat 2.0.1 segfaults
New xchat as a big problem. Tabs get detached into windows without any reason and when reattaching, xchat segfault little time after. I guess following strace and gdb backtrace won't help :( recv(10, :bfinch|[EMAIL PROTECTED]..., 2048, 0) = 248 time(NULL) = 1049491280 time(NULL) = 1049491280 write(11, avr 04 23:21:20 , 16) = 16 write(11, bfinch|away\twell the headlists..., 185) = 185 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 2850)] 0x08076629 in gtk_widget_grab_focus () (gdb) bt #0 0x08076629 in gtk_widget_grab_focus () #1 0x0827cae8 in ?? () #2 0x425c in ?? ()
Re: [Cooker] Bug with G++ and 9.0
Josh Seidel wrote: I have a source file that compiles, but there is a syntax error in the file. I also compiled with an older version of g++ (I think it was 2.1 or 1.2, some obsolete version that is on a SunOS machine I don't have access to). In .NET (I do not own it, it is my professors computer) it throws a Syntax error on line 156, that there is not a return statement. When I fix then add the return statement on line 156 in .NET it then compiles and gives the same output as g++ in mandrake 9.0 which does not throw the syntax error. When you ask for warnings( what you should always do), last one is : project1.cpp: In member function `bool RoundRobinBlockedList::isEmpty() const': project1.cpp:157: warning: control reaches end of non-void function That means a return is missing. That's not an error so I guess there is a default value (maybe 0 or it is undefined, I don't know the norm) when return is missing.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] bittorrent-3.1-1mdk
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Frederic Lepied : Description : BitTorrent is a tool for copying files from one machine to another. FTP punishes sites for being popular. Since all uploading is done from one place, a popular site needs big iron and big bandwidth. With BitTorrent, clients automatically mirror files they download, making the publisher's burden almost nothing. Isn't this some kind of p2p ? This is. But this can be discussed as it is dedicated to distributed mirroring. (Currently on their home page a big link We have Mandrake 9.1 ISOs.).
Re: [Cooker] WHEREIS DESKTOP
Luis Vicente Castillo Corbella wrote: Whereis is in mandrake 9.1 the file desktop, not in traditional location etc/sysconfig, or other maner to change mdkkdm for kdm regards $ cat /etc/sysconfig/desktop DISPLAYMANAGER=gdm DESKTOP=GNOME But you can also change it using mandrake control center
Re: [Cooker] Is 9.1 finished?
John Allen wrote: First modifications on Cooker seem to come to a halt, indicating that 9.1 is finished; then it appears that an RC3 has been released, and now my overnight rsync has produced an updates/9.1 directory. What is the official position? Read the mail sent one week ago called 9.1 final ...
Re: [Cooker] where is xev gone?
Bernd Niederberger wrote: Hi everybody, I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev. Has anybody an idea where it is? Looks like X11R6-contrib is not on CDs. You can get it from a cooker mirror.
Re: [Cooker] Some Ideas for the future
Chad wrote: 2)Next I'd propose the development of an app called some thing like bugdrake. It would be a Wizard/Gui client side front end for Bugzilla. Something like drakbug ?
Re: [Cooker] Bla, bla, but no 9.1 date
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote: Could anyone of the Mandrake team give us a clue? I'm not from Mandrake team but I pretty sure : March 2003 :-)
Re: [Cooker] Bla, bla, but no 9.1 date
Hoyt Duff wrote: On Wednesday 19 March 2003 12:51 pm, Texstar wrote: Deno responded:Nope. He wants to have as many people as possible using the distro as fast as possible, in order to get more users, and make more money that way. By making it only available to Club members at first (2-3 weeks) woudl increase Club membership. Unless they are now giving that away, how could that _not_ make them money? How is giving away iso's making any money? This is free software. If someone from club get it, he can put it on any public mirror... I don't see what they would earn by doing so except a bad image and the closing of my club account.
Re: [Cooker] Post 9.1 - GATOS
Spencer wrote: Hi all, With the generous help of Austin, I was able to get rough forms of avview and ati.2 into contribs. Both of these packages need a lot of work to get them to behave smoothly. In the case of avview, as soon as cooker gets a tcl/tk update, I will package a much newer version and with ffmpeg support. I'm working towards as much video capturing as is available from the GATOS project. Future ati.2 packages will have DRI support for Rage 128 and Radeon cards IF they are working according to gatos-devel. The km package, the drm-kernel package and the ati-remote package will all be available also. For any one wanting more information, check out; http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ My question, how much interest is there in the gatos project and would RPMs help more people. Spence Best thing would be their integratio in XFree86 package and a choice by XFdrake depending on your card (or maybe a choice do you prefer 3D games or DVD/DivX ? :) ).
Re: [Cooker] Will there be a 9.1RC3 ??
Tulear wrote: Do you know if there will be a RC3 before MDK9.1 final ?? I understood that there won't be. How does Mandrake decide that a version is stable enough, remaings bugs no so important to freeze the final version (for example now there still 1415 bugs with state UNCONFIRMED/NEW/NEEDINFO/ASSIGNED/REOPENED...) Counting the major bugs. A lot of the bugs you count are minor or not reproductible so won't be fixed before the release (would need a lot of work and only one or 2 users would see the difference).
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
François Pons wrote: Possible features of urpmi for next release : * virtual medium (no need to update explicitely, only with synthesis ?). * delay before accepting using a package from a medium (cooker) I'm not sure that's usefull. Or maybe for some important packages, but I everyone delays testing, that will delay fixing... * always ask confirmation if fuzzy search is used (even for 1 package) [+] * on the fly sorting of media (according to regex like file,rsync,ftp,http) * urpm centralized tools, as well as perl-URPM managing media. [+] new format of urpmi.cfg is already a good thing but seeing how easy it is tu handle sources information with perl-URPM, that should be complicated to have tools :-) * p2p urpmi database (export database as magic synthesis) Would be fun :-) * -h by default for urpmi.addmedia [+] * do install of package by groups which are shorter as possible (apt-get like) Would be nice. Good luck for an optimized algorithm :) * allow file conflicts error to be handled by recovering errors and try again. Would be very nice * conflicts, provides and requires tag added for global rpm behaviour in order to allow broken dependencies to be not resolved or to avoid removing important package (generalize basesystem) Any other idea are wellcome. - Explicit priority for sources (Or at least document that currently it's based on the order :) - Acces to information like package description from hdlist with urpmq
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
Eric Fernandez wrote: Having urpmi.setup integrated, which would do the same than http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon. It's here : http://www.urpmi.org/en/urpmi.setup/index.html It is integrated in main already. Would be nice to make a standard tool of it. And I don't think it would be a problem of legality with PLF since they would not be configured in advance, would they ? The only problem is where to take the list of mirror.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
François Pons wrote: Le lun 17/03/2003 à 18:37, Eric Fernandez a écrit : * possibility to use only one or several media, but less restricted. There is an actual option to use only one source, --media, but what I would like FYI you can use more than one source in fact, separated by comma (,). François. In fact the best improvment for urpmi would be documentation anad advertising :-)
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
François Pons wrote: * conflicts, provides and requires tag added for global rpm behaviour in order to allow broken dependencies to be not resolved or to avoid removing important package (generalize basesystem) I'm going to working on a an automatic rebuild capability (somewhat Gentoo-ish)... I've been thinking of doing this for a while, and the time for action draws near... ;o) This features is more an rpm features than a urpmi one. I think it can already be done currently by asking urpmi to get the src.rpm and calling rpm to rebuild all the downloaded packages.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
Eric Fernandez wrote: You mean it would be illegal to even put the mirrors list of PLF in the distro ? Not illegal but I think Mandrakesoft does not want to know that PLF exists and does not want to have any link with it. (And I can understand that).
Re: [Cooker] urpmi features
Eric Fernandez wrote: Exact, 100% agreed. I wrote a doc about urpmi in Hardware.fr forum, it is in French, but I have also an english translation. A lot of newbies gave me good feedback. It is here : If you want, you can use it to include it in the documentation, I shall put it under FDL if necessary. It is here : http://forum.hardware.fr/forum2.php3?post=20457cat=11config=interface=ca che=cachesondage=owntopic=p=1trash=subcat= Looks fine. I think it could at least be on urpmi.org (which is an independant website which goal is to gather documentation about urpmi so it can be more advertized).
Re: [Cooker] Major evolution of gnomeicu to include in mdk 9.1
Pierre BETOUIN wrote: Hi, It would be very great to include the last version of gnomeicu in latest mdk... Too late...
Re: [Cooker] Whats in a name
Zdenek Mazanec wrote: 9.1 Bamboo Just for information, where did you get it ?
Re: [Cooker] where can I read something about zeroconf ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zeroconf is a new feature anounced for MDK 9.1 but where can I find some infos about this ? If you want general information about ZeroConf, a good starting point is http://www.zeroconf.org/ (and http://www.multicastdns.org/ but I think it is linked from the previous one). You also have this article : http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/wireless/2002/12/20/zeroconf.html
Re: [Cooker] 9.1rc2 upgrade
Pierre Jarillon wrote: I wish to upgrade Mdk9.1rc2 to continue the tests in order to confirm or to close the bugs I have reported. How can I do with urpmi or rpmdrake ? You add ftp or http or rsync Cooker sources. This can be easily using urpmi.setup or the instructions on http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon/. Then you run urpmi --auto-select.
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 100000] [XFree86] there is no way to run several XFree servers in parallel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10 What is this bug number and why isn't the standard reply-to on this email ? Did you make the email by hand ? I was trying to get multiple local X servers/users ( see http://startx.times.lv/ ) but the mandrake X server simply doesn't want to run in parallel. :( Work fine here using startx -- :1 while one is already there, as it has always worked.
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 100000] [XFree86] there is no way to run several XFree servers in parallel
Pascal Terjan wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was trying to get multiple local X servers/users ( see http://startx.times.lv/ ) but the mandrake X server simply doesn't want to run in parallel. :( Sorry I had'nt read the page and what you want to do is special...
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 3193] [drakxtools] draktv fails on setting xawtvconfiguration
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 00:10 --- Can people please quit inflating the severity ratings?! This is by NO stretch of the imagination a critical bug... Maybe this is one for the Mandrake 9.1 TV edition :)
Re: [Cooker] Re: War
Buchan Milne wrote: And are they going to start boycotting British products now too? Really, mixing politics and business is not a good idea ... When I read things like the following URL, I can't see what they expect from us (except making us laugh). http://www.gopbi.com/partners/pbpost/news/0311french.html
[Cooker] wireless-tools ?
I just noticed wireless-tools are no longer in Cooker. Anyone knows why they disappeared ?
Re: [Cooker] wireless-tools ?
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: seems like a mirror problem for you, it's here on the devel server. Right, I checked on mirrors it's there, but it doesn't appear in hdlist.cz
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] ati.2-4.3.20030307-1mdk
Charles A Edwards wrote: Using auto-select just updated both XFree and ati.2 The question is which driver will I be using and how do I verify. rpm --verify ati.2 If files were changed you have XFree one :-)
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] ati.2-4.3.20030307-1mdk
Pascal Terjan wrote: rpm --verify ati.2 If files were changed you have XFree one :-) More seriously, just did the update. ati.2 was updated before XFree86 so ati.2 files disapeared. I did urpme ati.2 the urpmi ati.2 to get it again. urpme ati.2 removed the XFree86 drivers... I don't know what would be the best solution to avoid those problemes.
Re: [Cooker] Could we have more votes on Bugzilla ?
Eric Fernandez wrote: I would like to know how to obtain more votes on Bugzilla. Only 1 vote is not enough. I can confirm at least 3 bugs I have spotted in the RC2, but they are still in unconfirmed state since I have already used my vote. You can vote for only one bug ? didn't know that. Before a solution is found, could you give the list of bug so that we can confim them for you ?
Re: [Cooker] ATI Users
Austin wrote: Also, can ATI users try out the gatos drivers (package called ati.2). Obviously they are beta software, but if they really screw up your system, I'll have to remove them. Thanks a lot, Xv works :)
Re: [Cooker] ATI Users
Pascal Terjan wrote: Thanks a lot, Xv works :) Forgot : ATI Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x
[Cooker] avview dependency on ati.2
After someone reported on irc installing avview broke is X by installing ati.2 while is card is not an ATI, I looked on the website and did not found such a dependency : Requirements: TV input capable card with Xv support, Tcl/Tk 8.4.x or later. libzvbi from http://zapping.sf.net/ ffmpeg-0.4.6 from http://ffmpeg.sf.net/ So the ati.2 is only needed if you have an ATI which has no Xv without it. I don't know what is the best solution but keeping non ATI drivers would limit the impact of useless ati.2 installation.
Re: [Cooker] avview dependency on ati.2
Spencer Anderson wrote: On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:38:36 +0100 Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tcl/tk 8.4.x is only needed on avview newer than 10.8. Ati.2 was packaged so that if it did not help or give Xv support, it could be uninstalled and go back to the previous drivers. If someone installed ati.2 that didn't have an ATI video card, it would definitely not help. Putting a dependency on avview for ati.2 may not be the right solution but if too many problems occur, the dependency can be removed. Btw, ffmpeg is only needed for video capture and I have no intention of enabling it in avview before 9.1 final. I didn't ask to add the dependencies, just noticed it can work with other video cards, so it shouldn't remove their drivers :-) The fix should be in ati.2 so that it only touches ati drivers.
Re: [Cooker] ati.2
Frederic Lepied wrote: Sorry for the delay. I have integrated the gatos changes but unfortunately they broke 3D acceleration so I will not put it in 9.1. I will try to get them working after 9.1. Could we have the driver available with another name (like ati.2 ...) so that we just have to chose it in XF86Config-4 to have Xv on Mach64 or may this still break something ?
Re: [Cooker] gatos
Spencer Anderson wrote: On 02 Mar 2003 11:45:17 -0500 Austin Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the update to XFree 4.3, I was hoping avview would start working again, but we're still seeing bug reports about it. Can XFree 4.3 please be patched with the latest drivers from the GATOS project? Otherwise nobody can use their ATI TV tuners. Austin -- I have written before to try and get a statement from Frederic, as to whether XFree86 will include the new ati.2 drivers. Still no luck. Avview works for most boards IF the latest ati.2 from gatos is installed. If they are not included for 9.1 final, I will try and build them in RPM format. I answered ati.2 mail with CC to flepied and previously confirmed the opened bug and before that I sent a mail to cooker when the diappeared but no answer at all :( Making an unofficial rpm is a problem because files have to be replaced so you have to make a full XFree rpm and that takes time.
Re: [Cooker] Update urpmi database
Trevor Rhodes wrote: When trying to update from cooker I am being told: 'You may want to update your urpmi database' I was advised to run: 'urpmi.update my_cooker_source' But this didn't change anything. Can someone give me a hand here? Wait for your mirror to get fully synced and try again or change mirror
Re: [Cooker] Trying to compile a gnome applet in 9.1
James Sparenberg wrote: http://developer.gnome.or.kr/doc/API/panel-applet/applet-porting.html Uh I'm getting a server not found is the URL right or is my DNS hosed? Hum this was right when I sent it but doesn't work anymore. This is the first result I found on google since I never find what I'm looking for on gnome site. The simple way to get this page is installing libpanel-applet-2_0-devel-2.2.0.1-3mdk you'll then get it as /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/panel-applet/applet-porting.html
Re: [Cooker] ati.2
Spencer Anderson wrote: I have checked the last two versions of XFree86 and have noticed that Patch 205, the gatos ati.2 drivers have not been updated. These drivers are needed to correct Bug#1429,#1466 and others. I have built the last two versions of XFree86 with gatos CVS and find the drivers, at least for my Mach 64 system, extremely stable and functionable. My question is whether this patch is going to be updated before 9.1 final. I will understand if it's felt that they would break other things but it would be nice to know. TIA Spence I would also like an answer. Even if it is not the default, I would really appreciate to be able to watch movies with a Mandrake install without having to built it :/
Re: [Cooker] ati.2
Pascal Terjan wrote: Spencer Anderson wrote: I have checked the last two versions of XFree86 and have noticed that Patch 205, the gatos ati.2 drivers have not been updated. These drivers are needed to correct Bug#1429,#1466 and others. I have built the last two versions of XFree86 with gatos CVS and find the drivers, at least for my Mach 64 system, extremely stable and functionable. My question is whether this patch is going to be updated before 9.1 final. I will understand if it's felt that they would break other things but it would be nice to know. TIA Spence I would also like an answer. Even if it is not the default, I would really appreciate to be able to watch movies with a Mandrake install without having to built it :/ Just tested getting the binaries from gatos website and putting them in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers. And now I have a working Xv. Does the XFree version have anything more than this one that would make it more interesting for some users to not put this in ?
Re: [Cooker] nfs install
berazafi wrote: can anyone confirm the probs im having with the nfs install see 1784 pls help im sick of buring iso or coping it all to my hd did not look into your bug yet, but I can tell tou that ftp install worked fine 3 times last week :-)
Re: [Cooker] Trying to compile a gnome applet in 9.1
James Sparenberg wrote: And it says I need applet-widget.h Can't find this as part of any package in the cooker... According to this from gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-devel-list/2002-September/msg9.html applet-widget.h should be part of libpanel or gnome-panel... both of which I have. Yet neither one has the .h file... (I've installed the devel versions as well.) Any thoughts? the applet I'm trying to build is gcardscheme for switching network profiles in Linux without a reboot James The applet you are trying to run is for gnome 1.x New ones don't use this file but panel-applet.h. See http://developer.gnome.or.kr/doc/API/panel-applet/applet-porting.html
Re: [Cooker] urpmi.listmedia (or the equivalent)
Jon Gabrielson wrote:
Is there an option in urpmi to list the installed media.
urpmi.removemedia without any options lists the tags,
but i haven't found anything that would list what url each tag
is pulling from short of just looking at the files in /etc/urpmi
If there is not such an option, it would probably be a useful
option to add. Besides returning the tag and url, It could also
possibly return a last updated field.
Here is a simple one based on urpmi.removemedia
#!/usr/bin/perl
#- Copyright (C) 2000 MandrakeSoft ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
#-
#- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
#- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
#- the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
#- any later version.
#-
#- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
#- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
#- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
#- GNU General Public License for more details.
#-
#- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
#- along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
#- Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
#- this program is based upon old urpmi.addmedia
#use strict qw(subs vars refs);
use urpm;
#- get I18N translation method.
import urpm _;
sub main {
my (@toremoves, %options);
$options{noclean} = 1;
foreach (@_) {
/^--?a/ and $options{all} = 1, next;
/^-/ and die _(usage: urpmi.removemedia [-a] name ...
where name is a medium name to remove.
) . _( --help - print this help message.
) . _( -a - select all media.
) . (/^--?h(?:elp)$/ ? _(\nunknown options '%s'\n, $_) : '');
push @toremoves, $_;
}
my $urpm = new urpm; $urpm-read_config;
my @entries = map { $_-{name} } @{$urpm-{media}};
if ($options{all}) {
@toremoves = @entries;
@toremoves == 0 and die _(no medium present (use urpmi.addmedia to add
media)\n);
}
@toremoves == 0 and die _(the entry to list is missing\n(one of %s)\n, join(,
, @entries));
foreach(@entries){
$name = $_;
$url = $urpm-{media}[$name]-{url};
print $name\t\t$url\n;
}
}
main(@ARGV);
Re: [Cooker] urpmi.listmedia (or the equivalent)
Pascal Terjan wrote:
Here is a simple one based on urpmi.removemedia
Showing all by default is even better :)
#!/usr/bin/perl
#- Copyright (C) 2000 MandrakeSoft ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
#-
#- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
#- it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
#- the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
#- any later version.
#-
#- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
#- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
#- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
#- GNU General Public License for more details.
#-
#- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
#- along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
#- Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
#- this program is based upon old urpmi.addmedia
#use strict qw(subs vars refs);
use urpm;
#- get I18N translation method.
import urpm _;
sub main {
my (@toremoves, %options);
$options{noclean} = 1;
foreach (@_) {
/^-/ and die _(usage: urpmi.removemedia [-a] name ...
where name is a medium name to remove.
) . _( --help - print this help message.
) . (/^--?h(?:elp)$/ ? _(\nunknown options '%s'\n, $_) : '');
push @toremoves, $_;
}
my $urpm = new urpm; $urpm-read_config;
my @entries = map { $_-{name} } @{$urpm-{media}};
if (@toremoves == 0 ) {
@toremoves = @entries;
@toremoves == 0 and die _(no medium present (use urpmi.addmedia to add
media)\n);
}
foreach(@entries){
$name = $_;
$url = $urpm-{media}[$name]-{url};
print $name\t\t$url\n;
}
}
main(@ARGV);
[Cooker] galaxy-gnome
I just tryied it and I really like it except one thing : The metacity window border are really large. I think that borders are mainly wasted room, we just need the cursor to change when we are over, it must attract the eye as it does currently. (I especially talk about the bottom one which is heavier than the vertical ones and is realy visible between the window and the gnome-panel when the window is maximized).
Re: [Cooker] question on APM
James Sparenberg wrote: question, Is MDK trying to eliminate apm, replacing it with acpi? The rpm suspend scripts makes it impossible for me suspend my laptop. The latest kernels are built without apm support etc. In my case I really do need to use apm instead of acpi. Why? Because Compaq with the Armada series (and I'm told some of the Presario series as well) doesn't support acpi. the DSDT scripts are apparently mucked up in bios and since you can't do anything in bios but enter your name and passwords you are kinda outa luck. I'm quite sure not everyone is able to use brand new 1800 dollar laptops and some compromises may need to be made. in /etc/lilo.conf, add append=acpi=off and run lilo (or add the paramater in grub if you use it) Works fine on my HP OmniBook500
Re: [Cooker] Re: UNIX Lore
Götz Waschk wrote: ATM whe have the comfortable solution of moving everything offensive to PLF, but there have been complaints about PLF too, e.g. about the logo. Someone already wanted hot-babe to be removed from PLF because it made it unprofessional :) Difference is PLF doesn't care about being unproffesionnal or offensive. If people don't want to use PLF because of that, great, mirrors will be faster. But I agree that's not a solution, else we'll soon have more packages in PLF than in regular mdk... Did someone already complain about BitchX ?
