Bug#690288: task: please respect LC_TIME
You can specify your own date formats that task will use in different situations through the .taskrc configuration file. you will find more information in the taskrc(5) man page. /Federico On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.orgwrote: Package: task Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: normal Hi, I started using taskwarrior, and my locales are set like this: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 LANGUAGE= LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_TIME=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 LC_PAPER=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_NAME=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_MEASUREMENT=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_ALL= so basically everything is french except messages. In particular, CTIME is fr_FR. But in task warrior, setting and displaying due dates, they are displayed the english way (mm/dd/) instead of the french way (dd/mm/). It'd be nice to respect the user locale, especially since it can be really confusing and make people miss due dates if they rely on taskwarrior. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-grsec-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages task depends on: ii libc62.13-35 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-4 ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-4 ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-4 ii libuuid1 2.20.1-5.2 task recommends no packages. task suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#682864: task: Corruption of data file
Henry, Would you please come over to taskwarrior.org, register and submit a bugreport (Issue) there. It will help in analysing your problems as all the detailed task-related discussions are done on the upstream projects site. Thanks. /F PS If you don't mind, please include snippets from your data files that contains the wrong formatted lines. But, please, replace the content with some other, neutral text. We don't need to see your private information. On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Henry Bremridge henry+...@xobie.comwrote: Package: task Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? On start ran the command xterm -geom 100x120 -e task overdue;bash Then ran task list * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? Taskwarrior no longer supports file format 1, originally used between 27 November 2006 and 31 December 2007. in /home/henry/.task/pending.data at line 28 If I look at pending.data there does not appear to be any order in the text file Lines 28 read ] Lines 29 looks as if there are 20 tasks all in one line I have had similar problems with the .completed.data file * What outcome did you expect instead? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages task depends on: ii libc62.13-33 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-2 ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-2 ii libstdc++6 4.7.1-2 task recommends no packages. task suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#680353: task: Priority High and Low are wrongly displayed in project summary
This has already been fixed upstream and will be included in the upcoming 2.1.0 See issue #964 on the projects website http://taskwarrior.org/issues/964 Thanks for reporting the bug. /F On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) deb...@kulisz.netwrote: Package: task Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When adding priority H into task by: task 1 mod pri:H and this task is in project ex. test and then run: task pro you're going to receive: ProjectTasks Pri:None Pri:H Pri:M Pri:L test 10 0 0 1 even if task, task ls or task long will show it correctly: ID ProjectPri Description 1 test H -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'precise') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages task depends on: ii libc62.13-33 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-2 ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-2 ii libstdc++6 4.7.1-2 ii libuuid1 2.20.1-5.1 task recommends no packages. task suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#573066: wontfix
Package: task Version: 1.9.0-3 Tags:wontfix Frpm http://taskwarrior.org/issues/show/394 Updated by Paul Beckingham about 3 hours ago * Status changed from Assigned to Rejected This is a waste of time. This isn't a bug. I have no concerns about task UUIDs colliding with other MAC, DCE, MD5 or SHA-1 based UUIDs, because task UUIDs are not intermingled in a common namespace. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573066: task: does not emit rfc4122 conforming uuids
I will upload a Debian-Package with libuuid-support, thanks for the hint. Please do not yet as we might fix this internally in task. But more important we don't want to release a bug fix without having passed all our 3800 regression tests first and have coordinated with other bug fixes first. Thank you. /Fredde
Bug#531587: ITP: task -- An open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Great, Alexander. Just do it. Please be aware that we are currently preparing the relase of 1.9.0 (beta2 was released yesterday and we plan to have 1.9.0 out before the end of the month). Which is why I haven't prepared the 1.8.5 for you. Sorry that I missed to inform you, I realize now. How would that influence the upload of the packages? Would you also prepare official packages for x86? I appreciate your help. /Fredde On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 09:27, Alexander Neumann alexan...@debian.orgwrote: Hello everyone, * Fernando C. Estrada fcestr...@fcestrada.com wrote: On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 21:46 +0100, Federico Hernandez wrote: Nevertheless, I think we should wait for mid-to-end February for a new review and upload. Since I need task for my daily work, I prepared packages on my own. You can find the source and compiled packages at http://people.debian.org/~alexander/task/http://people.debian.org/%7Ealexander/task/, the git-repository I use for development has been published at http://github.com/fd0/task Can you all please have a look at these packages? Federico, is it ok for you, if I upload these packages to the archive? :) Cheers, - Alexander
Bug#531587: ITP: task -- An open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Ok, I will prepare an upload (and close this bug). Did you have a look at my package? I looked at the package. What about the contrib files that are released together with task like the example scripts for vim, bash etc. I think they should as well be installed. What about the bash completion? I think it should be installed by default - unless there is a policy in Debain against it. Please be aware that we are currently preparing the relase of 1.9.0 (beta2 was released yesterday and we plan to have 1.9.0 out before the end of the month). You don't need to apologize :). Due to the upcoming freeze (in March or April), I would really like to have task in Debian ASAP, so that at least the current version is included in the next stable release. Great. Just do proceed then when you think it is appropiate to do it. How would that influence the upload of the packages? As soon as the new version is released, I will upgrade the package and upload the new version. Perfect. Would you also prepare official packages for x86? Sure, I will upload the package and the Debian buildd infrastructure does the rest (compile binary packages for all supported architectures). I will then also point from the tw.org website to the build. /Fredde
Bug#531587: request ownership for task itp
That is correct! /Fredde On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:38, Alexander Neumann alexan...@debian.orgwrote: owner 531587 ! thanks I request ownership of this bug, Federico agreed. Regards - Alexander
Bug#531587: ITP: task -- An open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name : task Version : 1.7.0 Upstream Author : Paul Beckingham p...@beckingham.net URL : http://www.beckingham.net/task.html License : GPLv2+ Description : Task is an open source, command-line, TODO list manager. It is scope-limited to GTD functionality and features: tags, colorful tabular output, reports and graphs, lots of commands, low-level API, abbreviations for all commands and options, multiuser file locking, recurring tasks. Task is based on ideas presented in the todo.sh script found on: http://todotxt.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
