Bug#1068174: Debian FPGA toolchain update and testing (Was: Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release)
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 04:15:08PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: [...] > Are you open to doing some testing for the new package version once I get > around to putting it together? I can do end-to-end testing on ICE40(HX) and > (probably) GW1N (if I can figure out how to flash this thing) maybe > @Jonathan (in CC) can cover ECP5 and you could do ICE40UP and GateMate? Count me in! > I've been meaning to look into what we could use for testing beyond simple > blinkies. Perhaps some CPU? I'd like to have something that can run > internal consistency checks. If anyone has any ideas let me know. That's a good question. If you find a good answer, let me know, and it's probably a good idea to write it down as a recommendation somewhere, so it doesn't get lost in time. https://github.com/olofk/corescore might be an interesting option, but I haven't looked at it in depth. -jn signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1034087: afl++: Include afl-clang-lto(++) in package
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:15:15PM +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote: > Hello, > > On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:47:19 +0200 =?utf-8?q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?= > wrote: > > > Package: afl++ > > Version: 4.04c-3 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hello, > > > > the AFL++ documentation recommends using afl-clang-lto(++) if possible[1]. > > > > Based on local tests, "PREFIX=/usr make" will produce an afl-clang-lto > > binary, if lld-14 is also installed (which should be the case, according > > to debian/rules). Not sure what's missing from the Debian package in > > order to get afl-clang-lto. > > > > Best regards, > > jn > > > > > > [1]: > > https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/docs/fuzzing_in_depth.md#1-instrumenting-the-target > > > at this point it seems that afl-clang-lto(++) are parts of the package: > > $ apt show afl++ | grep ^Version: > Version: 4.09c-1+b1 > > $ apt-file show afl++ | grep bin/afl-clang-lto > afl++: /usr/bin/afl-clang-lto > afl++: /usr/bin/afl-clang-lto++ > > Can we close this bug report then? Or did I misunderstand the bug report? Sounds good. Thanks for looking into this, -jn signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1061533: cmake: CMake doesn't find googletest
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:20:03AM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > Package: cmake > Version: 3.28.1-1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org, hal...@debian.org > > > Hello, I have installed cmake 3.28.1-1 and googletest 1.14.0-1 from > Debian testing, and I'm trying to use GTest with CMake as follows: Sorry for the noise, I found the problem: For this to work, I need to install libgtest-dev. Perhaps the googletest package could include a hint to that effect in the description.