Bug#885414: base-files: lack of quoting in shell variable expansions in /etc/profile

2024-05-04 Thread cacin
Package: base-files
Version: 13.2
Followup-For: Bug #885414

Dear Maintainer,

I'd like to point out that the "fix" doesn't actually fix the reported
problem. Variables that must be quoted in order to have a well-defined
behavior are still not quoted, namely the "$i" is not quoted. See the
very first message in this thread for patch.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.7.12-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii  mawk [awk]  1.3.4.20240123-1

base-files recommends no packages.

base-files suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#1068702: atool: use_tar_lzip_option in /etc/atool.conf breaks atool

2024-04-09 Thread cacin
Package: atool
Version: 0.39.0-14
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

the manpage for atool describes the option use_tar_lzip_option

However if you add use_tar_lzip_option to /etc/atool.conf, you get the error:

atool: /etc/atool.conf:12: unrecognized directive `use_tar_lzip_option'

and atool fails to work at all.





-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.7.9-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages atool depends on:
ii  perl  5.38.2-3.2

Versions of packages atool recommends:
ii  bash-completion  1:2.11-8
ii  binutils 2.42-4
ii  file 1:5.45-3
ii  lbzip2   2.5-2.3
ii  unzip6.0-28
ii  xz-utils 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1
ii  zip  3.0-13

Versions of packages atool suggests:
ii  7zip 23.01+dfsg-8
ii  arc  5.21q-12
ii  arj  3.10.22-27
ii  cpio 2.15+dfsg-1
ii  lzip 1.24.1-1
ii  lzma 9.22-2.2
ii  lzop 1.04-2
pn  nomarch  
ii  rar  2:7.00-1
pn  rpm  
ii  unace1.2b-23
ii  unalz0.65-9
ii  unrar1:7.0.7-1
ii  xz-utils [lzma]  5.6.1+really5.4.5-1
ii  zstd 1.5.5+dfsg2-2

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/atool.conf changed:
use_tar_lzip_option 1
use_rar_for_unpack  1


-- no debconf information



Bug#1068700: file: wrong MIME type for RAR files

2024-04-09 Thread cacin
Package: file
Version: 1:5.45-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

`file -i archive.rar` currently reports a MIME type of: application/x-rar

However, according to sources like 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/vnd.rar

the correct MIME type should be application/vnd.rar

and the deprecated MIME type was application/x-rar-compressed

It has never been application/x-rar as far as I can tell.



Bug#1068607: coreutils: Please publish VCS/git package sources

2024-04-08 Thread cacin
Package: coreutils
Followup-For: Bug #1068607

It was asked for 12 years ago in #694105 hence a duplicate.



Bug#189252: gzip: z* should be in /usr/bin

2024-03-14 Thread cacin
Package: gzip
Followup-For: Bug #189252

this is now fixed thanks to usrmerge and #1059533



Bug#1064798: kmod: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-03-09 Thread cacin
Package: kmod
Version: 32-1
Followup-For: Bug #1064798

I believe the fix is incomplete, because both /usr/bin/lsmod and
/usr/sbin/lsmod are still being created.

This is likely the result of kmod.links having both:
/usr/bin/kmod /usr/sbin/lsmod
/usr/bin/kmod /usr/bin/lsmod

and so one of those two would need to go away.



Bug#1065422: kamailio: Please use /bin/bash

2024-03-05 Thread cacin
Source: kamailio
Version: 5.7.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #1065422

fixed upstream by

https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/8d3d53f5f698da1357c3475ae136677099b2f702



Bug#1064835: zfsutils-linux: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Package: zfsutils-linux
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filenames `arc_summary` and `arcstat` and `zfs` and 
`zilstat` and `zpool` and `zvol_wait` to both bin and sbin as opposed to just 
one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064834: wpagui: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Package: wpagui
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `wpa_gui` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064833: tor: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Package: tor
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `tor` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064832: snort: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Package: snort
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filenames `u2boat` and `u2spewfoo` to both bin and 
sbin as opposed to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064831: sagan: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Source: sagan
Version: 1.2.0-1.2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `sagan` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064830: runc: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Package: runc
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `runc` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064828: rpcbind: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Source: rpcbind
Version: 1.2.6-7
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `rpcbind` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

This bug is independent of #1060358

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064827: powermgmt-base: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Source: powermgmt-base
Version: 1.37
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `on_ac_power` to both bin and sbin as 
opposed to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064785: brltty: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Source: brltty
Followup-For: Bug #1064785

> I haven't checked yet, but are these two versions of file:brltty 
> actually the same?

Yes, /sbin/brltty is a symlink to /bin/brltty

> But in Debian we're not there yet.

You are correct, but it is a direction that is being explored right now,
and debootstrap allows testing such a filesystem layout to find out what
would break.

Fedora did a nice writeup on this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin

> Suggesting a move from /bin to /usr/bin is not without danger

That is true, and that's part of the usrmerge efforts and packages will
hopefully move the affected files in time for debian trixie release.

However, merging bin and sbin is not part of the current usrmerge, it is
something that could be called usrmerge2.0 or sbinmerge or something
else.

The reason why the file loss in usrmerge happens is exactly because the
filesystem layout was merged *before* packages moved their files to the
new canonical locations. It is therefore preferable to get rid of file
conflicts as a result of the same file being in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin
before bin and sbin are merged, and that is why this bug was filed.



Bug#1064783: apt-listbugs: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-26 Thread cacin
Source: apt-listbugs
Followup-For: Bug #1064783

> The command 'apt-listbugs' is installed to /usr/bin and a symbolic link
> to it is installed to /usr/sbin .

You are correct, and on a filesystem where those locations are the same
it causes unpacking errors.

> This layout is not currently supported by Debian, as far as I can tell.

It is not yet supported on debian, but using debootstrap instead of
debian-installer makes it possible to create such a filesystem layout.
This is currently useful for testing how adding /usr/sbin to default
user $PATH would break, and how merging /usr/sbin and /usr/bin would
break.

> Which distributions?

Archlinux has had merged bin and sbin for a number of years. Fedora is
going in that direction soon and made a nice writeup on 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin

> I am not aware of any plans in Debian to move in that direction.

So far it has been briefly discussed in the -devel channel on IRC and
the idea has been received mostly well. There are bigger problems with
it, such as different packages having undeclared file conflicts if the
sbinmerge happenen, however it is a nice low-hanging fruit to first fix
the few packages where the one package unpacks the same file (or
symlink) to both bin and sbin.

> See the [usrmerge FAQ], which includes, in part:

You are correct, this is not about the current usrmerge. It could be called
usrmerge2.0 or sbinmerge or some other term.

> Could you please elaborate a bit more on why you think this feature of
> the apt-listbugs Debian package could be an issue?

On a filesystem where bin and sbin are merged, it causes an unpacking
error during installation of the package, due to the symlink trying to
overwrite the real file, or the real file overwriting the symlink. It is
in a way a file conflict - it can be silenced by passing the right flags
to the commands, but it is better to fix it properly.

> Which other distributions (Debian-derivatives or otherwise) include
> apt-listbugs?

I don't know of any.

> I am a bit hesitant to do so (risking to break random custom scripts),
> unless there's a good reason.

The idea of merging bin and sbin is exactly to help with random custom
scripts, because if bin and sbin are the same directory, then it doesn't
matter if only bin or only sbin is in $PATH, or if the executable is
called directly using hardcoded /usr/bin/apt-listbugs or /usr/sbin/listbugs,
because both ways will then work instead of giving "command not found"
errors.

However I agree that in the meantime some random script somewhere could
break, and so such a change might warrant a NEWS entry.



Bug#1064805: postfix: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: postfix
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `rmail` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064804: policycoreutils: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: policycoreutils
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `sestatus` to both bin and sbin as opposed 
to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064803: open-iscsi: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: open-iscsi
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `iscsiadm` to both bin and sbin as opposed 
to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064802: oggvideotools: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: oggvideotools
Version: 0.9.1-6
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `mkThumbs` to both bin and sbin as opposed 
to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064801: nsscache: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: nsscache
Version: 0.49-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `nsscache` to both bin and sbin as opposed 
to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064800: menu: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: menu
Version: 2.1.50
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filenames `install-menu` and `su-to-root` to both bin 
and sbin as opposed to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064798: kmod: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: kmod
Version: 31+20240202-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `lsmod` to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064795: iproute2: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.7.0-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename `ip` to both bin and sbin as opposed to just 
one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064794: inadyn: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: inadyn
Version: 2.11.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename inadyn to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064793: i2pd: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: i2pd
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename i2pd to both bin and sbin as opposed to just 
one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064792: hylafax-client: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: hylafax-client
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename textfmt to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064790: reportbug: regression when max reports per hour reached

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: reportbug
Version: 13.0.0
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

reportbug crashes when maximum number of reports per hour is reached. This is a 
regression from previous version where reportbug instead offered to try again 
instead of crashing. Traceback attached.

Connecting to reportbug.debian.org via SMTP...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reportbug/submit.py", line 484, in 
send_report
refused = conn.sendmail(fromaddr, toaddrs, message)
  ^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/smtplib.py", line 901, in sendmail
raise SMTPRecipientsRefused(senderrs)
smtplib.SMTPRecipientsRefused: {'sub...@bugs.debian.org': (451, b'sorry, only 5 
reports per hour for submission')}

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2386, in 
main()
  File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1094, in main
return iface.user_interface()
   ^^
  File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2369, in user_interface
submit.send_report(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reportbug/submit.py", line 499, in 
send_report
if ui.yes_no(f'SMTP send failure: {x}. You can retry, or save the report 
and exit. Do you want to retry?',
   ^
UnboundLocalError: cannot access local variable 'x' where it is not associated 
with a value



Bug#1064788: haproxy: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: haproxy
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename halog to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064787: courier-imap: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Package: courier-imap
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename imapd to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064785: brltty: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: brltty
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename brltty to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064784: backup2l: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: backup2l
Version: 1.6-6
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename backup2l to both bin and sbin as opposed to 
just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064783: apt-listbugs: installs same filename to both bin and sbin

2024-02-25 Thread cacin
Source: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.1.41
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package installs the filename apt-listbugs to both bin and sbin as opposed 
to just one of those locations.

This causes a problem on a filesystem layout where bin and sbin are merged into 
a single real directory, typically by sbin being a symlink to bin. Such a 
filesystem layout has become standard on some distributions now, and others are 
moving onto in their next releases.

Please pick one location and install it only there. /usr/bin is preferred over 
any other location.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1064227: ark: Ark cannot open 7z archives.

2024-02-18 Thread cacin
Source: ark
Version: 4:23.08.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #1064227

duplicate of #1055970, and #1063545 is related



Bug#1063867: engrampa: Depends on non-free package

2024-02-13 Thread cacin
Source: engrampa
Version: 1.26.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

Dear Maintainer,

the commit fixing #1063564 introduced a direct Depends on 7zip-rar,
which is in the non-free area.

It should have been Depends: on 7zip and then Suggests: for 7zip-rar

Patch attached.
---
 debian/control | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 0dba580..4641fda 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ Depends: bzip2 (>= 1.0.1),
  engrampa-common (= ${source:Version}),
  gzip (>= 1.3.2),
  7zip,
- 7zip-rar,
  tar (>= 1.13.25),
  ${misc:Depends},
  ${shlibs:Depends},
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ Suggests: arj,
   sharutils,
   unace,
   unalz,
-  unar | unrar | p7zip-rar,
+  unar | unrar | 7zip-rar,
   zoo,
 Breaks: engrampa-common (<< 1.8.0),
 Description: archive manager for MATE
-- 


Bug#1063811: android-framework-23: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-12 Thread cacin
Source: android-framework-23
Version: 6.0.1+r72-6
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Build-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other 
relation to the p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become 
transitional packages in debian trixie and will eventually be removed from 
debian. They have been replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063810: libio-compress-lzma-perl: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-12 Thread cacin
Source: libio-compress-lzma-perl
Version: 2.206-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Build-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other 
relation to the p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become 
transitional packages in debian trixie and will eventually be removed from 
debian. They have been replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063809: nexuiz-data: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-12 Thread cacin
Source: nexuiz-data
Version: 2.5.2-12
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Build-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other 
relation to the p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become 
transitional packages in debian trixie and will eventually be removed from 
debian. They have been replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063807: rpm: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-12 Thread cacin
Source: rpm
Version: 4.18.2+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Build-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other 
relation to the p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become 
transitional packages in debian trixie and will eventually be removed from 
debian. They have been replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063805: spring: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-12 Thread cacin
Source: spring
Version: 106.0+dfsg-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Build-Depends/Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other 
relation to the p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become 
transitional packages in debian trixie and will eventually be removed from 
debian. They have been replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063627: zipper.app: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: zipper.app
Version: 1.5-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063625: xarchiver: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: xarchiver
Version: 1:0.5.4.22-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063623: winetricks: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: winetricks
Version: 20240105-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063619: unp: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: unp
Version: 2.0~pre10
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063618: sabnzbdplus: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: sabnzbdplus
Version: 4.2.2+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063616: runescape: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: runescape
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063615: rocksndiamonds: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: rocksndiamonds
Version: 4.3.6.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063614: qnapi: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: qnapi
Version: 0.2.3-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063613: python-rarfile: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: python-rarfile
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063611: python3-datalad: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Package: python3-datalad
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063610: python3-binwalk: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Package: python3-binwalk
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063608: playonlinux: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: playonlinux
Version: 4.3.4-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063606: pax: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: pax
Version: 1:20201030-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063594: patool: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: patool
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063593: megaglest: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: megaglest
Version: 3.13.0-9
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063592: mcomix: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: mcomix
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063586: lxqt-archiver: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: lxqt-archiver
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063585: lutris: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: lutris
Version: 0.5.14-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063583: krusader: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: krusader
Version: 2:2.8.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063582: kinect-audio-setup: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: kinect-audio-setup
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063581: gnumed-client: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: gnumed-client
Version: 1.8.18+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063580: game-data-packager: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Package: game-data-packager
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063578: forensics-extra: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: forensics-extra
Version: 2.49
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063573: flatpak-builder: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: flatpak-builder
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1042447: file-roller: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: file-roller
Version: 43.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #1042447

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063566: fgallery: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: fgallery
Version: 1.9.1+ds-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063564: engrampa: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: engrampa
Version: 1.26.1-4
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063561: dtrx: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: dtrx
Version: 8.5.3-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063559: diffoscope: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: diffoscope
Version: 255
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063557: deepin-boot-maker: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: deepin-boot-maker
Version: 5.7.8+dfsg-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063555: crunch: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: crunch
Version: 3.6-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063548: check-all-the-things: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: check-all-the-things
Version: 2017.05.20+nmu1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063547: avfs: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: avfs
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063546: atool: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: atool
Version: 0.39.0-13
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063545: ark: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: ark
Version: 4:23.08.1-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063544: android-platform-external-libunwind: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: android-platform-external-libunwind
Version: 10.0.0+r36-4
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972041 is related

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063543: amavisd-new: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: amavisd-new
Version: 1:2.13.0-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063541: acetoneiso: transition from p7zip to 7zip

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Source: acetoneiso
Version: 2.4-4
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

your package Depends/Recommends/Suggests or has some other relation to the 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar packages, which have become transitional packages in 
debian trixie and will eventually be removed from debian. They have been 
replaced by 7zip and 7zip-rar packages.

If necessary, please modify your package to use the executables from the 7zip 
package instead. If everything everything behaves as expected, then remove 
p7zip/p7zip-full/p7zip-rar from the control file and replace it with 7zip 
and/or 7zip-rar.

This bug is currently filed with normal priority but the priority will be 
increased as the release date of debian trixie gets closer.

Thank you for maintaining software in debian.



Bug#1063518: console-setup: setupcon: 1386: Syntax error: Missing '))'

2024-02-09 Thread cacin
Package: console-setup
Followup-For: Bug #1063518

Consider making all scripts provided by console-setup shellcheck-clean, there 
are lots of tiny issues that can turn into big issues under the right 
conditions.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shellcheck



Bug#1062216: xq: update to latest version

2024-01-31 Thread cacin
Package: xq
Version: 1.0.0-2+b8
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

please update to latest version of xq from upstream, the current version in 
debian contains bugs that make it unusuable over here, fixed upstream already.

Thank you.



Bug#1061302: coreutils: md5sum.textutils backward compatibility no longer needed

2024-01-22 Thread cacin
Source: coreutils
Version: 9.4-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

md5sum.textutils is not needed anymore, debian codesearch shows that no package 
uses it. It can therefore be removed.

The main benefit is that typing md5s will now result in 'md5sum ' (with 
the space after it) instead of just 'md5sum' (without the space).

Compare it to sha1s which already autocompletes to 'sha1sum ' (with the 
space after it).

As an added benefit, it removes the misspelled word 'compatability'.

---
 debian/rules | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 3e14f8e..0594d73 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -41,10 +41,6 @@ override_dh_install-arch:
mv $(d)/usr/bin/$$f $(d)/bin/$$f; \
done

-   # backward compatability
-   ln -s /usr/bin/md5sum $(d)/usr/bin/md5sum.textutils
-   ln -s /usr/share/man/man1/md5sum.1 
$(d)/usr/share/man/man1/md5sum.textutils.1
-
# remove stuff provided by other packages
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS),linux)
# kill from procps is linux-specific
--
2.43.0



Bug#1060324: kbd: update homepage URL in control file

2024-01-09 Thread cacin
Package: kbd
Version: 2.5.1-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

the debian control file has kbd homepage as:

Homepage: http://www.kbd-project.org/

This gives an error if HTTPS-only is enabled in browsers like firefox or 
chromium, because the redirect to https://kbd-project.org/ doesn't happen 
automatically.

I attach a patch to change the homepage to the correct address:

Homepage: https://kbd-project.org/

---
 debian/control | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f8fbe74..6c07578 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Uploaders: Michael Schutte , Anton Zinoviev 
= 1.16.1), debhelper-compat (= 13),
 linuxdoc-tools, gettext, flex, bison, pkg-config, check
 Standards-Version: 4.1.5
-Homepage: http://www.kbd-project.org/
+Homepage: https://kbd-project.org/
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/kbd.git
 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/kbd
 
-- 
2.43.0



Bug#1060156: acl: move files to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-07 Thread cacin
Source: acl
Followup-For: Bug #1060156

Hi,

I'm wondering why you decided to keep the acl.postinst and acl.postrm files, 
their contents appear to be of no use on a usrmerged system (to the best of my 
knowledge). Is that intentional? Trixie only supports usrmerged layouts.



Bug#1060171: dosfstools: move files to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-06 Thread cacin
Source: dosfstools
Version: 4.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2

Dear Maintainer,

Patch attached to move files to /usr/sbin instead of /sbin in accordace with 
usrmerge

---
 debian/dosfstools-udeb.install | 6 +++---
 debian/dosfstools.install  | 1 -
 debian/rules   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/dosfstools-udeb.install b/debian/dosfstools-udeb.install
index 770b86d..09dc734 100644
--- a/debian/dosfstools-udeb.install
+++ b/debian/dosfstools-udeb.install
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-sbin/fatlabel
-sbin/fsck.fat
-sbin/mkfs.fat
+usr/sbin/fatlabel
+usr/sbin/fsck.fat
+usr/sbin/mkfs.fat
diff --git a/debian/dosfstools.install b/debian/dosfstools.install
index 6811ecd..73752c9 100644
--- a/debian/dosfstools.install
+++ b/debian/dosfstools.install
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-sbin
 usr
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 126d903..161e79f 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
dh ${@}
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --sbindir=/sbin --enable-compat-symlinks
+   dh_auto_configure -- --enable-compat-symlinks
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install
-- 
2.43.0



Bug#1060156: acl: move files to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-06 Thread cacin
Source: acl
Followup-For: Bug #1060156

better patch attached
---
 debian/acl-udeb.install |  2 +-
 debian/acl.install  |  2 +-
 debian/acl.postinst | 12 
 debian/acl.postrm   | 12 
 debian/rules|  3 ---
 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 debian/acl.postinst
 delete mode 100644 debian/acl.postrm

diff --git a/debian/acl-udeb.install b/debian/acl-udeb.install
index e660fd9..c703cf8 100644
--- a/debian/acl-udeb.install
+++ b/debian/acl-udeb.install
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bin/
+usr/bin/
diff --git a/debian/acl.install b/debian/acl.install
index 519c581..3d70f27 100644
--- a/debian/acl.install
+++ b/debian/acl.install
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-bin/
+usr/bin/
 usr/share/locale/
 usr/share/man/man1/
 usr/share/man/man5/
diff --git a/debian/acl.postinst b/debian/acl.postinst
deleted file mode 100644
index ea33a8d..000
--- a/debian/acl.postinst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = 'configure' ]; then
-  for file in chacl getfacl setfacl; do
-if [ ! -e /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-  ln -s /bin/$file /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-  done
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/debian/acl.postrm b/debian/acl.postrm
deleted file mode 100644
index 8ec03fc..000
--- a/debian/acl.postrm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = 'remove' ]; then
-  for file in chacl getfacl setfacl; do
-if [ -L /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-  rm /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-  done
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 9f7759e..fb3c415 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ endif
 %:
dh $@
 
-override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --bindir=/bin
-
 override_dh_auto_test:
 ifeq ($(TESTS_FLAKY),yes)
@echo "Notice: Running tests in flaky mode, errors will be ignored."
-- 
2.43.0



Bug#1060156: acl: move files to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-06 Thread cacin
Source: acl
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2

Dear Maintainer,

I attach a patch to make sure all files are moved to /usr/bin and instead of 
/bin

---
 debian/acl-udeb.install |  2 +-
 debian/acl.install  |  2 +-
 debian/acl.postinst | 12 
 debian/acl.postrm   | 12 
 debian/rules|  2 +-
 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 debian/acl.postinst
 delete mode 100644 debian/acl.postrm

diff --git a/debian/acl-udeb.install b/debian/acl-udeb.install
index e660fd9..c703cf8 100644
--- a/debian/acl-udeb.install
+++ b/debian/acl-udeb.install
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bin/
+usr/bin/
diff --git a/debian/acl.install b/debian/acl.install
index 519c581..3d70f27 100644
--- a/debian/acl.install
+++ b/debian/acl.install
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-bin/
+usr/bin/
 usr/share/locale/
 usr/share/man/man1/
 usr/share/man/man5/
diff --git a/debian/acl.postinst b/debian/acl.postinst
deleted file mode 100644
index ea33a8d..000
--- a/debian/acl.postinst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = 'configure' ]; then
-  for file in chacl getfacl setfacl; do
-if [ ! -e /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-  ln -s /bin/$file /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-  done
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/debian/acl.postrm b/debian/acl.postrm
deleted file mode 100644
index 8ec03fc..000
--- a/debian/acl.postrm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
-if [ "$1" = 'remove' ]; then
-  for file in chacl getfacl setfacl; do
-if [ -L /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-  rm /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-  done
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 9f7759e..640759e 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ endif
dh $@
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- --bindir=/bin
+   dh_auto_configure -- --bindir=/usr/bin
 
 override_dh_auto_test:
 ifeq ($(TESTS_FLAKY),yes)
-- 
2.43.0



Bug#1060074: kbd: move files to /usr for DEP17

2024-01-05 Thread cacin
Package: kbd
Version: 2.5.1-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2
X-Debbugs-Cc: ca...@allfreemail.net

Dear Maintainer,

I attach a patch to make sure all files are moved to /usr/bin and /usr/sbin 
instead of /bin or /sbin

also fixes #919275
---
 debian/kbd.dirs |  2 --
 debian/kbd.postinst | 18 --
 debian/kbd.postrm   | 17 -
 debian/rules|  6 +-
 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 42 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 debian/kbd.postinst
 delete mode 100644 debian/kbd.postrm

diff --git a/debian/kbd.dirs b/debian/kbd.dirs
index 6ac6526..ca882bb 100644
--- a/debian/kbd.dirs
+++ b/debian/kbd.dirs
@@ -1,4 +1,2 @@
-bin
-sbin
 usr/bin
 usr/sbin
diff --git a/debian/kbd.postinst b/debian/kbd.postinst
deleted file mode 100644
index 6c5bc50..000
--- a/debian/kbd.postinst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-
-set -e
-
-case "$1" in
-configure)
-# see #261801
-for file in dumpkeys loadkeys; do
-if [ ! -e /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-ln -s /bin/$file /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-done
-;;
-esac
-
-#DEBHELPER#
-
-# vim:sw=4:sts=4:et:
diff --git a/debian/kbd.postrm b/debian/kbd.postrm
deleted file mode 100644
index 43c7827..000
--- a/debian/kbd.postrm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-
-set -e
-
-case "$1" in
-remove)
-for file in dumpkeys loadkeys; do
-if [ -L /usr/bin/$file ]; then
-rm /usr/bin/$file
-fi
-done
-;;
-esac
-
-#DEBHELPER#
-
-# vim:sw=4:sts=4:et:
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index be15c39..4d98ce3 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -13,9 +13,7 @@ EXTRA_BINARIES = screendump setlogcons setvesablank
 CONTRIB_BINARIES = codepage splitfont vcstime
 
 # we don’t want these in /usr/bin
-MOVE_TO_BIN = kbd_mode setfont fgconsole openvt chvt dumpkeys unicode_start 
loadkeys
-MOVE_TO_SBIN = kbdrate
-MOVE_TO_USR_SBIN = vcstime setvesablank
+MOVE_TO_USR_SBIN = vcstime setvesablank kbdrate
 
 include /usr/share/dpkg/architecture.mk
 
@@ -70,8 +68,6 @@ override_dh_auto_install:
install -m755 $(addprefix contrib/,$(CONTRIB_BINARIES)) $(KBD)/usr/bin/
install -m755 data/keymaps/i386/mk_modmap $(KBD)/usr/bin
 # move everything where it belongs
-   mv $(addprefix debian/kbd/usr/bin/,$(MOVE_TO_BIN)) $(KBD)/bin/
-   mv $(addprefix debian/kbd/usr/bin/,$(MOVE_TO_SBIN)) $(KBD)/sbin/
mv $(addprefix debian/kbd/usr/bin/,$(MOVE_TO_USR_SBIN)) $(KBD)/usr/sbin/
 # prepare udeb
 ifeq (, $(filter noudeb, $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)))
-- 
2.39.2