Bug#1029134: RM: mricron [mipsel powerpc ppc64] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures
Control: retitle -1 RM: mricron [mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures Am Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:31:27PM -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: > Can you retitle to match the arches you're intending to RM on? Done. Thanks for watching me Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#1029134: RM: mricron [mipsel powerpc ppc64] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:24:52PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > According to >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mricron > the package builds on ppc64el and I left it in the architecture list. > I had to remove ppc64 from the list of architectures since it did not > built there. > > Thanks for asking for clarification anyway Great, I'm happy I asked! Can you retitle to match the arches you're intending to RM on? As a hint, I don't see anything in unstable for powerpc or ppc64; hence the confusion :) $ dak ls mricron -a mipsel mricron| 1.2.20211006+dfsg-1+b1 | testing| mipsel mricron| 1.2.20211006+dfsg-1+b1 | unstable | mipsel $ dak ls mricron -a powerpc $ dak ls mricron -a ppc64 Should the title be just [mipsel]? If so, could you please change the title to reflect the targets of the rm? If no debs are in that arch, I can't remove it :) Thank you! paultag -- :wq
Bug#1029134: RM: mricron [mipsel powerpc ppc64] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures
Am Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:27:43PM -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: > From the title: [mipsel powerpc ppc64] > > Is ppc64 right or should it be ppc64el? I suspect you mean/want ppc64el > but I don't want to take an rm action here until I've got a lot of > positive confirmation. According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mricron the package builds on ppc64el and I left it in the architecture list. I had to remove ppc64 from the list of architectures since it did not built there. > If that's right, would you please re-title this bug? Thank you very > much! Thanks for asking for clarification anyway Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#1029134: RM: mricron [mipsel powerpc ppc64] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures
Hey Andreas, >From the title: [mipsel powerpc ppc64] Is ppc64 right or should it be ppc64el? I suspect you mean/want ppc64el but I don't want to take an rm action here until I've got a lot of positive confirmation. If that's right, would you please re-title this bug? Thank you very much! Paul -- :wq
Bug#1029134: RM: mricron [mipsel powerpc ppc64] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported architectures
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: mric...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:mricron Hi, it turns out that mricron is not supported on some architectures. I have uploaded a new package with a restricted set of architectures. Please remove the remaining architectures to enable testing migration. Kind regards and thanks for your work as ftpmaster Andreas.
