Bug#386525: Update or Fix?

2011-08-30 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Nick

Generally the rule of thumb for this package is that services that
do not have ssl enabled by default (and as only service) should
be rejected. Do you know if that is the case for uw-imap?

I see that dovecot-imapd and courier-imap should probably be
restricted as well. And cyrus imap have changed its name...

// Ola

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:04:11PM -0500, Nick Daly wrote:
 Hi, this bug has been unattended for 5 years now.  Is there any reason
 uw-imapd still conflicts with the harden-servers package?
 
 The Panda-IMAP website suggests that UW-IMAP 2007f has one security fix
 that vanilla 2007e does not have (but perhaps that fix was packaged in
 the 4 intervening years?):
 
 http://panda.com/imap/changes.html
 
 Thanks for your time,
 Nick
 -- 
 GPG: 0x4C682009 | 084E D805 31D8 5391 1D27  0DE1 9780 FD4D 4C68 2009
 
 
 

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  o...@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  o...@inguza.com  654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  http://inguza.com/  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#386525: Update or Fix?

2011-08-23 Thread Nick Daly
Hi, this bug has been unattended for 5 years now.  Is there any reason
uw-imapd still conflicts with the harden-servers package?

The Panda-IMAP website suggests that UW-IMAP 2007f has one security fix
that vanilla 2007e does not have (but perhaps that fix was packaged in
the 4 intervening years?):

http://panda.com/imap/changes.html

Thanks for your time,
Nick
-- 
GPG: 0x4C682009 | 084E D805 31D8 5391 1D27  0DE1 9780 FD4D 4C68 2009



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org