Bug#395169: Overriding debian-storage-policy-fixed-drives.fdi solves this problem

2006-11-04 Thread Daniel Rodriguez Garcia
Hello,

I have also experienced the same problem with new HAL version.

The modification above does not solve the issue. On the other hand, I
have modified the file: 

/etc/hal/fdi/policy/preferences.fdi

To override the policy contained in:

/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/debian-storage-policy-fixed-drives.fdi


Therefore, i have added these lines
to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/preferences.fdi:

device
  match key=@block.storage_device:storage.hotpluggable bool=false
match key=@block.storage_device:storage.removable bool=false
  merge key=volume.ignore type=boolfalse/merge
/match
  /match
/device

And (after restarting dbus) it solves the problem for me.


Just a question for package maintainers: 

what's the rationale for setting the property volume.ignore=true for
local devices as a security measure ?


Perhaps it would good to improve coordination between
gnome-volume-manager and hal packages (just to make sure maintainers for
either package are aware of new modifications, or to agree on a global
policy for managing / showing / hiding volumes / devices...)

You may also add a README explaining this kind of modifications (which
may conflict with other packages and current desktop behaviour) and
how to override or solve them (if possible).


Thank you,


Daniel R.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#395169: Overriding debian-storage-policy-fixed-drives.fdi solves this problem

2006-11-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Daniel Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
[..]
 
 what's the rationale for setting the property volume.ignore=true for
 local devices as a security measure ?

If we don't set volume.ignore=true for local devices, each partition
will be mountable by everyone who gets access to HAL (everyone in group
plugdev). But I already wrote that in an earlier email.


 Perhaps it would good to improve coordination between
 gnome-volume-manager and hal packages (just to make sure maintainers for

It's not an g-v-m issue, as I already wrote earlier. It's a gnome-vfs
issue. Did you notice that the g-v-m and hal maintainer is the same person?

 either package are aware of new modifications, or to agree on a global
 policy for managing / showing / hiding volumes / devices...)
 
 You may also add a README explaining this kind of modifications (which
 may conflict with other packages and current desktop behaviour) and
 how to override or solve them (if possible).

You are kidding me. Nobody reads README.Debian nowadays anymore.
If something is not working people complain instantly.

Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature