Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Package: src:liblo Version: 0.26~repack-3 Severity: serious Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 06:05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt h...@ftwca.de wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. liblo 0.26~repack-3 has been uploaded a few hours ago. Doesn't build on mips* now, I fear you will need to do another upload: | dpkg-buildpackage: source package liblo | dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.26~repack-3 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mipsel | /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean | debian/rules:22: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/copyright-check.mk: No such file or directory | make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/copyright-check.mk'. Stop. | dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 283: whoami Whoami ist nur was für Leute mit Alzheimer! (Begründung von Microsoft Deutschland für das Entfernen des Befehls aus Windows NT) pgp1YCalSc2sb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 06:05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt h...@ftwca.de wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. liblo 0.26~repack-3 has been uploaded a few hours ago. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. Marc -- BOFH #271: The kernel license has expired pgpzHTbuvtK6s.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:05:23AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. Excellent! Thanks for checking it, and for your great release management work in general. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? csound dssi fluidsynth-dssi freej hexter jackbeat* jamin ll-scope nekobee qtractor rosegarden* sineshaper* whysynth wsynth-dssi xsynth-dssi * These packages need sourceful uploads because they build-depend on a versioned liblo0-dev. Bugs have already been filed for these (530852, 530859 and 571961). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it. liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages. However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible with the old one. Ping? Again? Someone in here? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it. liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages. However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible with the old one. Ping? Direct reverse dependencies: ardour csound dssi fluidsynth-dssi freej hexter jamin ll-scope nekobee qtractor rosegarden* sineshaper* whysynth wsynth-dssi xsynth-dssi -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#548642: transition: liblo
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it. liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages. However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible with the old one. Direct reverse dependencies: ardour csound dssi fluidsynth-dssi freej hexter jamin ll-scope nekobee qtractor rosegarden* sineshaper* whysynth wsynth-dssi xsynth-dssi -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
