Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 17:05 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: Quoting Arthur de Jong adej...@debian.org: I've updated the Trac packaging in svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac/trunk to 0.12 and done some migration and cleaning up (see debian/changelog for details). Btw. could you please remove my now unused path svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac-0.12/trunk please? Done. - Is the run-time dependency on python-setuptools required (or should it only be Build-Depends)? python-setuptools is indeed used by Trac (at least in 0.11), maybe for the plugins. Don't touch it :~) Thanks for the clarification. - There is a debian/package-it script that seems to do something similar to svn-buildpackage. Should it be removed? I assume that this script has been used by former maintainers. Just remove it. Done. I've tested the package and some basic things seem to work OK. As a test I've also upgraded a 0.11 environment and that also seemed to work OK, including a few plugins. I haven't tested all plugins or all functionality but that can be done in unstable shortly. Anyone want to provide a backport for squeeze? -- -- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Quoting Arthur de Jong adej...@debian.org: I've updated the Trac packaging in svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac/trunk to 0.12 and done some migration and cleaning up (see debian/changelog for details). Btw. could you please remove my now unused path svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac-0.12/trunk please? - Is the run-time dependency on python-setuptools required (or should it only be Build-Depends)? python-setuptools is indeed used by Trac (at least in 0.11), maybe for the plugins. Don't touch it :~) - There is a debian/package-it script that seems to do something similar to svn-buildpackage. Should it be removed? I assume that this script has been used by former maintainers. Just remove it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
- Is the run-time dependency on python-setuptools required (or should it only be Build-Depends)? python-setuptools is indeed used by Trac (at least in 0.11), maybe for the plugins. Don't touch it :~) Are you sure the full python-setuptools is required, not only python-pkg-resources? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Quoting Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: Are you sure the full python-setuptools is required, not only python-pkg-resources? Look in debian/changelog :~) I replaced python-setuptools once with python-pkg-resources and had to revert the change. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
I've updated the Trac packaging in svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac/trunk to 0.12 and done some migration and cleaning up (see debian/changelog for details). There are a few questions remaining: - Is the run-time dependency on python-setuptools required (or should it only be Build-Depends)? - There is a debian/package-it script that seems to do something similar to svn-buildpackage. Should it be removed? The package hasn't been tested yet and the trac plugins also need to be checked to see if they still work (maybe add Breaks where needed). Any help with testing is appreciated. If anyone could take a look at the packaging (I changed quite a lot) that would also be nice. -- -- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Hi! I am using http://deb.bearstech.com/trac/ and it works well for me. Only md5sum of jquery library is seen wrong as it makes a symlink to another file. Be careful, it is highly recommended not to use other version of jquery than that supplied with it. Mitar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
As we really use trac a lot, we have begun to prepare packages (src and binary) for trac-0.12.1 on squeeze. You can find it on http://deb.bearstech.com/trac/ We test it, of course,but be carefull, it's the first verion. -- Olivier ANDRE http://bearstech.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
any news? trac was released 5 months ago =\
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
I suggest, whoever has time for this, should package a trac-0.12 package that conflicts with trac and upload it to experimental. As soon as Debian 6.0/Squeeze is out (RSN?), it can go to unstable and a backport to 6.0 can be prepared, maybe even to 5.0/Lenny. Al, you wrote, that you did a dirty packaging attempt. Could you go ahead with that? When the trac-0.12 package exists, the trac plugins must be tested for compatibility with it. In that case their trac dependency can be changed to trac-0.12|trac. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Al Nikolov cl...@debian.org writes: Hi, Sorry for the late reply. nor do we have a suitable version of Genshi in Debian. Trac 0.12 seems to need Genshi trunk, while Debian has the latest official release 0.5.1. We have to wait until Genshi 0.6 is out. I fear, this won't happen before Squeeze freeze and the quality of the Trac 0.12 package would be qustionable without sufficient testing time. According to http://genshi.edgewall.org/ticket/369 the Genshi trunk considered to be quite stable for 0.6.0 release (but haven't even tagged though). I'm not aware of genshi' maintainers plans to package it (this is why i'm putting them to CC). Probably guys need our help as well? According to this ticket, it states that it can be used in production, __at least in the context of Trac__, but as it hasn't been released yet, it may still contain regressions or bugs[0]. Therefore, I am not sure it would be a good idea to upload genshi 0.6 to unstable just for Trac 0.12 (which has not been released either) because it would affect all users... Maybe I can upload it to experimental for now, so you can upload trac to experimental as well. In case genshi 0.6 has not been released before the freeze, then I could upload it to unstable anyway if there hasn't been any complain from users with the package in experimental. What do you think? Regards, Arnaud Fontaine [0] http://genshi.edgewall.org/query?status=assignedstatus=newstatus=reopenedgroup=statusmilestone=0.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
On Monday 29 March 2010 17:06:13 Arnaud Fontaine wrote: Maybe I can upload it to experimental for now, so you can upload trac to experimental as well. In case genshi 0.6 has not been released before the freeze, then I could upload it to unstable anyway if there hasn't been any complain from users with the package in experimental. What do you think? I think it's worth. I've already done a 'dirty' packaging attempt for both tracgenshi but i really can't provide with any testing machines. And i suppose it's impossible to install any packages to Debian machines with schroot without asking admins to install from repositories (fix me). If you agree i will put my Trac 0.12 package to Alioth. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
On Saturday 20 March 2010 14:04:48 W. Martin Borgert wrote: But so far there is neither a downloadable Trac 0.12 source archive, Ok, so let's svn-export it. nor do we have a suitable version of Genshi in Debian. Trac 0.12 seems to need Genshi trunk, while Debian has the latest official release 0.5.1. We have to wait until Genshi 0.6 is out. I fear, this won't happen before Squeeze freeze and the quality of the Trac 0.12 package would be qustionable without sufficient testing time. According to http://genshi.edgewall.org/ticket/369 the Genshi trunk considered to be quite stable for 0.6.0 release (but haven't even tagged though). I'm not aware of genshi' maintainers plans to package it (this is why i'm putting them to CC). Probably guys need our help as well? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
On 2010-03-19 22:29, Al Nikolov wrote: I hereby vote for (3a) and i'm glad to help. OK, let's try 3a. I will start packaging here: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/trac-0.12 But so far there is neither a downloadable Trac 0.12 source archive, nor do we have a suitable version of Genshi in Debian. Trac 0.12 seems to need Genshi trunk, while Debian has the latest official release 0.5.1. We have to wait until Genshi 0.6 is out. I fear, this won't happen before Squeeze freeze and the quality of the Trac 0.12 package would be qustionable without sufficient testing time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Hi, Martin. I badly interested in seeing Trac 0.12 in Squeeze. The option (1) is far from being adequate since the lacking of i18n in current Trac release hinders it from being used in local solutions and this can be a great (x1000) improvement in it's distibution weight. Since there are indeed big concerns about existing trac-hacks compatibility, the option (2) may become devastating. I only see the option (3) having a point. The (3a) is pretty ok to me. I hereby vote for (3a) and i'm glad to help. On Saturday 02 January 2010 18:01:18 you wrote: 1. Stay with Trac 0.11 only. Trac 0.11 is well-tested, many plugins might only work with this version. But: No (official) Trac 0.12 package for Squeeze! 2. Update to Trac 0.12 before freeze. This might break a lot of locally installed plugins, maybe even the Debian packages. IMHO a little bit dangerous. 3. Package Trac 0.12 in addition to Trac 0.11. This is, of course, more work, as both packages must be maintained for one Debian release cycle. a) Easier: Let 0.11 and 0.12 conflict. b) More work: Allow 0.11 and 0.12 side-by-side. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#563391: Package Trac 0.12 as well
Package: trac Version: 0.11.6-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: help Currently Trac 0.12 is under development and might be ready soon, i.e. before Debian freezes 6.0/Squeeze. This version will have important features, such as multi-lingual UI and accessing multiple repositories inside of one Trac project. There are some options how to deal with this: 1. Stay with Trac 0.11 only. Trac 0.11 is well-tested, many plugins might only work with this version. But: No (official) Trac 0.12 package for Squeeze! 2. Update to Trac 0.12 before freeze. This might break a lot of locally installed plugins, maybe even the Debian packages. IMHO a little bit dangerous. 3. Package Trac 0.12 in addition to Trac 0.11. This is, of course, more work, as both packages must be maintained for one Debian release cycle. a) Easier: Let 0.11 and 0.12 conflict. b) More work: Allow 0.11 and 0.12 side-by-side. It is not yet clear to me, wether Debian packaged Trac plugins will have to be duplicated or will work with both versions etc. Help wanted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
