Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes: I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1 transition. But I give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now, together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse build-deps or depends of ruby1.9): I ended up with the following hint: remove capistrano/2.5.5-1 erubis/2.6.2-3 htree/0.7-3 libabstract-ruby/1.0.0-2 libdifflcs-ruby/1.1.2-3 libgruff-ruby/0.3.6-2 libmecab-ruby/0.98-3 libnet-scp-ruby/1.0.2-1 libnet-sftp2-ruby/2.0.2-1 libnet-ssh2-ruby/2.0.13-1 libnet-ssh-gateway-ruby/1.0.1-1 libprawn-ruby/0.7.1+dfsg-1 librspec-ruby/1.2.9-1 libstomp-ruby/1.0.4-1 merb/1.0.12+dfsg-3 ohcount/3.0.0-2 samidare/0.7-1 wfo/0.1-2 I did not yet add it, as it contains a few packages you didn't list: capistrano librspec-ruby merb ohcount samidare wfo I arrived at that list by repeated dak rm -Rns testing @packages runs, starting with @packages = (ruby1.9) and then adding all broken packages to @packages until reaching a fixpoint. This means I also considered broken build-depends. Do you still want to get all of these packages removed? Marc -- BOFH #94: Internet outage pgp37PiYDGZXF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
On 05/04/10 at 17:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes: I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1 transition. But I give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now, together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse build-deps or depends of ruby1.9): I ended up with the following hint: remove capistrano/2.5.5-1 erubis/2.6.2-3 htree/0.7-3 libabstract-ruby/1.0.0-2 libdifflcs-ruby/1.1.2-3 libgruff-ruby/0.3.6-2 libmecab-ruby/0.98-3 libnet-scp-ruby/1.0.2-1 libnet-sftp2-ruby/2.0.2-1 libnet-ssh2-ruby/2.0.13-1 libnet-ssh-gateway-ruby/1.0.1-1 libprawn-ruby/0.7.1+dfsg-1 librspec-ruby/1.2.9-1 libstomp-ruby/1.0.4-1 merb/1.0.12+dfsg-3 ohcount/3.0.0-2 samidare/0.7-1 wfo/0.1-2 I did not yet add it, as it contains a few packages you didn't list: capistrano librspec-ruby merb ohcount samidare wfo I arrived at that list by repeated dak rm -Rns testing @packages runs, starting with @packages = (ruby1.9) and then adding all broken packages to @packages until reaching a fixpoint. This means I also considered broken build-depends. Do you still want to get all of these packages removed? Yes please. I hope that they will be fixed before the release, but having a clean state in testing (without ruby1.9) now is better. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes: On 05/04/10 at 17:39 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: [ruby1.9 and r-deps] Do you still want to get all of these packages removed? Yes please. Removal hint added. Marc -- BOFH #347: The rubber band broke pgpvkDXnTXWaK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
Hi, I initially planned to track the ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1 transition. But I give up. I think that ruby1.9 should be removed from testing now, together with the following list of packages (which are all the reverse build-deps or depends of ruby1.9): Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org libgruff-ruby (U) libi18n-ruby (U) libnet-scp-ruby (U) libnet-sftp2-ruby (U) libnet-ssh-gateway-ruby (U) libnet-ssh2-ruby (U) libnokogiri-ruby (U) libprawn-ruby (U) libwww-mechanize-ruby (U) Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org libdifflcs-ruby Christopher Lunsford binarymut...@gmail.com libnet-scp-ruby libnet-sftp2-ruby libnet-ssh-gateway-ruby libnet-ssh2-ruby Bryan McLellan b...@loftninjas.org erubis libabstract-ruby libstomp-ruby Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com libprawn-ruby (U) libwww-mechanize-ruby Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org libnokogiri-ruby Athena Capital Research acr-deb...@athenacr.com libi18n-ruby Roberto C. Sanchez robe...@connexer.com libi18n-ruby (U) TANIGUCHI Takaki tak...@debian.org libmecab-ruby Paul van Tilburg pau...@debian.org libgruff-ruby (U) Gunnar Wolf gw...@debian.org libgruff-ruby libnet-scp-ruby (U) libprawn-ruby libwww-mechanize-ruby (U) NIIBE Yutaka gni...@fsij.org htree It is clear that we are not able to maintain so many ruby libs with the current packaging system, but it is too late to fix that for squeeze, and the fact that maintainers do not test their changes properly doesn't help. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:19:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez robe...@connexer.com libi18n-ruby (U) So, this package does not depend on ruby1.9 any longer. It seems as though an NMU [0] closed #569875. However, that closure note in the changelog never carried through to the bug. (However, I am sending this note to the 569875-done as well, so that bug will close). Given that, I do not think that it needs to be removed. Regards, -Roberto [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libi18n-ruby/news/20100319T093718Z.html -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
clone 573272 -1 reassign -1 src:ruby1.9 1.9.0.5-1 retitle -1 ruby1.9: must go away before squeeze severity -1 serious thanks This package should not be released with Debian squeeze. A transition is underway to migrate all reverse dependencies. On 20/03/10 at 13:54 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes: What needs to happen is: - remove the ruby1.9 source package from testing. - make sure all the library packages have been transitioned and migrated to testing. This has not happened yet. I think you should file an explicit rc bug against ruby1.9 indicating that it needs to be removed, this absolutely ensures that it will happen before the release. (done) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes: What needs to happen is: - remove the ruby1.9 source package from testing. - make sure all the library packages have been transitioned and migrated to testing. This has not happened yet. I think you should file an explicit rc bug against ruby1.9 indicating that it needs to be removed, this absolutely ensures that it will happen before the release. How do you want to proceed? I could provide migration hints for those packages, so we don't have to wait for the 10 days delay, and also a removal hint for ruby1.9. I don't think we are at that point already, but there's also nothing the release team can do in the meantime. So I guess you should just continue your work :-) Marc -- BOFH #173: Recursive traversal of loopback mount points pgpuVNacdeSkx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#573272: transition: ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, In squeeze, we plan to ship two ruby versions: - 1.8(.7.249): current stable branch, used by most packages/applications - 1.9.1: development branch, already declared stable by upstream developers, but not considered as such by most ruby users Most of the packages have already been transitioned (see http://wiki.debian.org/Ruby191Transition and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby190transition;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org), but some packages haven't migrated to testing yet. What needs to happen is: - remove the ruby1.9 source package from testing. - make sure all the library packages have been transitioned and migrated to testing. The following UDD query gives the source packages that provide ruby1.9(.1) packages and have different versions in testing and unstable: select unst.source, unst.version as unstable, test.version as testing from (select * from sources_uniq where distribution='debian' and release='sid') unst left join (select * from sources_uniq where distribution='debian' and release='squeeze') test on unst.source = test.source where unst.source in (select source from packages where distribution='debian' and release='sid' and package ~ 'ruby1.9' or depends ~ 'ruby1.9') and (test.version is null or test.version != unst.version); How do you want to proceed? I could provide migration hints for those packages, so we don't have to wait for the 10 days delay, and also a removal hint for ruby1.9. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
