Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-13 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 12:19:53AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
  On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com 
  wrote:
  
   Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ?
  
  Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name.
 
 Will do. Thanks. -edrz

Done: https://lists.debian.org/debconf-infra/

I think we've now answered all of Don's questions.

-edrz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes:
  On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
  On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org 
  wrote:
   I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
   lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
   list infrastructure anyway.
  Yes.
   I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
  Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
 
 That sounds even better.
 
 Gaudenz

Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ?

-edrz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 03:36:33AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:
 
  Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ?
 
 Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name.

Will do. Thanks. -edrz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:

 Are we settled on debconf-in...@lists.debian.org ?

Maybe wait over the weekend; if there's no opposition then that's the name.


Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-06 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com writes:

 On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
  I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
  lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
  list infrastructure anyway.
 Yes.
 
  I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.

 Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?

That sounds even better.

Gaudenz


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:

 On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
  1) name of the psuedopackage
 
  Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case.
 
 Correct.
 
  2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for
  (suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)
 
 Problems and requests related to the DebConf Summit instance

 OK.

  3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage

 Unsure; the general list may be too spammy, yet we would ideally want
 to avoid Yet Another Mailing List. Can we just add ourselves with
 personal addresses for now?
 
 Initially:
 cate@d.o
 e...@zhevny.com
 richih@d.o
 stefanor@d.o

 I'd really prefer not to; that would require me editing the maintainer
 list manually any time someone wanted it changed. [And it also doesn't
 scale very well; a mailing list also enables anyone who wants to join
 your team without having to bug me.]

 I should note as well that whatever the mailing list is, it needs to be
 configured to allow BTS mail. Currently debconf-team does not appear to
 be properly configured.

I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
list infrastructure anyway. I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
A list also makes it easier for other interested persons to join the
team or just watch what's going on.

debconf-team does not seem like the right list of this is also about
implementation discussions and the like.

Gaudenz


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
 I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
 lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
 list infrastructure anyway.

Yes.


 I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.

Fine by me.

I would prefer not to need a new ML, but it seems as if we need one, so...


Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:
  I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.

 Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?

I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use something else
in a few years?


 Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters
 accept new list requests from mere users.

It probably makes most sense if tumbleweed and/or me make the request.
Or you do it and point to here once we know what we want/need. Either
way is fine.


Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
  I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
  lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
  list infrastructure anyway.
 Yes.
 
  I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.

Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
 
 Fine by me.
 
 I would prefer not to need a new ML, but it seems as if we need one, so...

Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters
accept new list requests from mere users.

-edrz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#776982: [Debconf-team] Bug#776982: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package

2015-02-05 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:
   I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
 
  Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
 
 I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
 to talk about summit specifically?

Then that's on -team? or those teams perhaps need a designated
infra-liason? I don't know.

 OTOH, what if we use something else
 in a few years?

You mean if the current re-org structure doesn't pan out? Then what
about debconf-devel@ ? Surely DebConf will never evolve beyond having
development needs.

  Who should make the request? I'll do it if you want and the listmasters
  accept new list requests from mere users.
 
 It probably makes most sense if tumbleweed and/or me make the request.
 Or you do it and point to here once we know what we want/need. Either
 way is fine.

Ok. You seem to have a lot on your plate, and are some kind of manager
or something, so I'll take it on.

-edrz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org