Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:10:24PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> If you know who to ask and are willing, I appreciate it.
> 
> Otherwise, I'll figure it out eventually.

It's only about opening a bug against ftp.debian.org with the
appropriate subject, in this case I'd say
RM: jablicator -- ROM; RC-buggy; unused; low popcon
and an appropriate text describing in few words why the package should
be removed.
See
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#removing-pkgs

Also reportbug has a template for this, IIRC.


Anyhow, I can do if you prefer so.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-23 Thread Jeff Breidenbach 
If you know who to ask and are willing, I appreciate it.

Otherwise, I'll figure it out eventually.

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:29:01PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Yes, I concur. I also checked with upstream (myself) and he agrees too.

Ok.
Would you ask for removal or shall I?

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-19 Thread Jeff Breidenbach 
Yes, I concur. I also checked with upstream (myself) and he agrees too.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mattia Rizzolo  wrote:

> Source: jablicator
> Version: 1.0.1
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> The package doesn't seem to have much popularity these days, with a
> popcon of only 20 (recent: 0).
>
> There has been an open RC bug for 1 year, and a patch since January.
> Also there is another unacknowledged bug since 2006.
>
> What would you think about removing it from the archive?
>
> --
> regards,
> Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
> more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
>

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo 
Source: jablicator
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer,

The package doesn't seem to have much popularity these days, with a
popcon of only 20 (recent: 0).

There has been an open RC bug for 1 year, and a patch since January.
Also there is another unacknowledged bug since 2006.

What would you think about removing it from the archive?

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature