Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Il giorno gio 22 set 2022 alle 22:23:55 +02:00:00, Anton Gladky ha scritto: it is "in work". We will definitely need people for testing, filing and fixing bugs during transition. Wonderful; I'll be sure to test it against my packages as soon as it'll be ready. Thanks for your work :D
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
> We will definitely need people > for testing, filing and fixing bugs during transition. How can I help with testing? Is there a .deb I can download and install? On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:27 PM Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > it is "in work". We will definitely need people > for testing, filing and fixing bugs during transition. > > Thanks for the proposal! > > Best regards > > Anton > > > Am Do., 22. Sept. 2022 um 19:47 Uhr schrieb Andrea Pappacoda > : >> >> On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:39:35 +0200 Anton Gladky >> wrote: >> > I did some work a couple of months ago, packaging 1.78. >> > It worked, but I did not have time to finish it. I would probably >> > continue this work soon to prepare 1.79 or even 1.80 for the >> > next stable Debian version. >> >> Hi Anton, what's the status of your boost 1.80 packaging? I'm currently >> having issues with a couple of packages depending on Boost because 1.74 >> contains a few bugs, and I'd be happy to help you with preparing the >> next version if needed. >> >>
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Hi Andrea, it is "in work". We will definitely need people for testing, filing and fixing bugs during transition. Thanks for the proposal! Best regards Anton Am Do., 22. Sept. 2022 um 19:47 Uhr schrieb Andrea Pappacoda < and...@pappacoda.it>: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:39:35 +0200 Anton Gladky > wrote: > > I did some work a couple of months ago, packaging 1.78. > > It worked, but I did not have time to finish it. I would probably > > continue this work soon to prepare 1.79 or even 1.80 for the > > next stable Debian version. > > Hi Anton, what's the status of your boost 1.80 packaging? I'm currently > having issues with a couple of packages depending on Boost because 1.74 > contains a few bugs, and I'd be happy to help you with preparing the > next version if needed. > > >
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:39:35 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > I did some work a couple of months ago, packaging 1.78. > It worked, but I did not have time to finish it. I would probably > continue this work soon to prepare 1.79 or even 1.80 for the > next stable Debian version. Hi Anton, what's the status of your boost 1.80 packaging? I'm currently having issues with a couple of packages depending on Boost because 1.74 contains a few bugs, and I'd be happy to help you with preparing the next version if needed.
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Hi, I did some work a couple of months ago, packaging 1.78. It worked, but I did not have time to finish it. I would probably continue this work soon to prepare 1.79 or even 1.80 for the next stable Debian version. Cheers Anton Am Fr., 22. Apr. 2022 um 10:03 Uhr schrieb Giovanni Mascellani < g...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > Il 14/04/22 04:24, strager ha scritto: > > Is there anything I can do to help get a newer version of Boost into > > the Debian repository? > > Unfortunately I am not having a lot of time to care about Boost right > now, even if I'll get to it as soon as possible. I don't know what is > your experience with Debian packaging, but Boost if you're a beginner I > don't feel it's the right package to start with. > > As you say, vendoring code is usually not considered a good idea in > Debian, but in can be a reasonable interim solution, I'd say, as long as > you're happy to switch back to the packaged dependency once it is > available. I would suggest you to investigate this road for > quick-lint-js. I won't be able to provide much help, though. > > Thanks, Giovanni. > -- > Giovanni Mascellani > >
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Hi, Il 14/04/22 04:24, strager ha scritto: Is there anything I can do to help get a newer version of Boost into the Debian repository? Unfortunately I am not having a lot of time to care about Boost right now, even if I'll get to it as soon as possible. I don't know what is your experience with Debian packaging, but Boost if you're a beginner I don't feel it's the right package to start with. As you say, vendoring code is usually not considered a good idea in Debian, but in can be a reasonable interim solution, I'd say, as long as you're happy to switch back to the packaged dependency once it is available. I would suggest you to investigate this road for quick-lint-js. I won't be able to provide much help, though. Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Is there anything I can do to help get a newer version of Boost into the Debian repository? On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:27:31 +0100 Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Hi, > > Il 31/12/20 10:20, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto: > > Could Boost 1.75 be packaged? > > Eventually it will be (either 1.75 or a newer version), but I don't know > when. 1.74 will be in bullseye, there is no point rushing a new > transition now. > > Giovanni. > -- > Giovanni Mascellani > >
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Boost 1.75 introduced the Boost JSON library [1]. I am trying to package some software [2] which depends on Boost JSON. Boost JSON is interesting because it has a standalone mode which allows it to be used outside Boost. Should I wait for Boost 1.75 to be in Debian, or should I make a Boost JSON standalone-mode package for Debian? (A third option is to use the Boost JSON vendored in the software I'm trying to package. I understand that this is frowned upon in Debian.) Thanks, Matthew "strager" Glazar [1] https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/#lib-json [2] https://quick-lint-js.com/ On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 14:27:31 +0100 Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Hi, > > Il 31/12/20 10:20, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto: > > Could Boost 1.75 be packaged? > > Eventually it will be (either 1.75 or a newer version), but I don't know > when. 1.74 will be in bullseye, there is no point rushing a new > transition now. > > Giovanni. > -- > Giovanni Mascellani > >
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Hi, Il 31/12/20 10:20, Olaf van der Spek ha scritto: Could Boost 1.75 be packaged? Eventually it will be (either 1.75 or a newer version), but I don't know when. 1.74 will be in bullseye, there is no point rushing a new transition now. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani
Bug#978748: libboost-dev: Boost 1.75
Package: libboost-dev Version: 1.74.0.3 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: olafvds...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Could Boost 1.75 be packaged? Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages libboost-dev depends on: ii libboost1.74-dev 1.74.0-6 libboost-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libboost-dev suggests: pn libboost-doc -- no debconf information
