Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 15:03:50 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2023-10-22 14:51:42 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 14:08:20 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > Hi Bastien
> > > 
> > > On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > > > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ?
> > > 
> > > As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did
> > > any new build failures in reverse dependencies appear? What's the
> > > status?
> > 
> > Reverse build are ok (just tested in pbuilder), so for me it is a green 
> > light
> 
> Please go ahead.
Done
> 
> Cheers
> 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2023-10-22 14:51:42 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 14:08:20 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > Hi Bastien
> > 
> > On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ?
> > 
> > As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did
> > any new build failures in reverse dependencies appear? What's the
> > status?
> 
> Reverse build are ok (just tested in pbuilder), so for me it is a green light

Please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2023, 14:08:20 UTC Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> Hi Bastien
> 
> On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ?
> 
> As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did
> any new build failures in reverse dependencies appear? What's the
> status?

Reverse build are ok (just tested in pbuilder), so for me it is a green light
> 
> Cheers
> 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Bastien

On 2023-10-21 20:10:47 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ?

As a year has past since the last mail to the transition bug report: did
any new build failures in reverse dependencies appear? What's the
status?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#994540: Go ahead with imagemagick/experimental ?

2023-10-21 Thread Bastien Roucariès
Hi,

Can I go ahead with imagemagick experimental ?

Thanks

Bastien

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.