Bug#307085: incorrect patch
The patch you attached appears to have been mixed up. For the afterworld, could you please send the right one to the BTS? -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! a kiss may ruin a human life. -- oscar wilde signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307749: gettext-base: ligettextpo.so.0.1.0, in the wrong package?
Package: gettext-base Version: 0.14.1-10 Severity: serious Justification: incomplete dependencies Tags: sid sarge The package blender recently failed to build on hppa due to a strange gettext-related error: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=blenderver=2.36-1arch=hppastamp=1115183059file=logas=raw Tracking this down, it appears that /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so is contained in the 'gettext' package, whereas /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so.0.1.0 is contained in the 'gettext-base' package; and /usr/lib/libgettextsrc-0.14.x.so and /usr/lib/libgettextlib-0.14.x.so are also contained in the 'gettext' package. This means that: - the library /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so.0.1.0 in gettext-base is not usable without also installing the gettext package, yet there is no dependency from gettext-base - gettext (and probably shouldn't be) - such a dependency would need to be strictly versioned, because ABI changes in libgettextsrc or libgettextlib break the runtime dependency (as happened here). The right fix is probably to move all the libraries into a single package, with an appropriate Replaces: line; I imagine gettext, rather than gettext-base, is the right package, since no one's complained about gettext-base being broken before now. This bug affects both 0.14.1-10 in sarge and 0.14.4-1 in sid, and probably needs to be fixed separately for each version on account of the freeze. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307750: gcc-3.3: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault ./binobj --help 2/dev/null
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
gcc-3.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. (With the segmenetation fault line having 16604 rather than
23793 on it.)
if grep '^[^-]' needed-options /dev/null; then echo needed-options: `cat
needed-options` 2; rm -f needed-options; false; else true; fi
../.././xgpc -B../.././ -L../.. -I../rts --automake --executable-file-name -W
-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -O2 --executable-path=.
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/rts
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/units `cat needed-options`
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/binobj.pas
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/mk-t-inc
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc tree.inc
../.././xgpc -B../.././ -L../.. -I../rts --automake --executable-file-name -W
-Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -O2 --executable-path=.
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/rts
--unit-path=/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/units `cat needed-options`
-I. -I /build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/gcc/p/utils/gpidump.pas
[ -r no-man ] || if [ xsparc-unknown-linux-gnu != xsparc-unknown-linux-gnu
]; then \
echo *** cross-compiling; man pages for the GPC utilities will not be built
2; \
echo cross-compile no-man; \
elif help2man --version /dev/null 21; then \
help2man -N ./binobj binobj.1 || { rm -f binobj.1; false; } \
else \
echo *** help2man not found; man pages for the GPC utilities will not be
built 2; \
echo no-help2man no-man; \
fi
sh: line 1: 23793 Killed ./binobj --help 2/dev/null
help2man: can't get `--help' info from ./binobj
make[5]: *** [binobj.1] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc/p/utils'
make[4]: *** [pascal.utils] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc'
make[3]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build/gcc'
make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/build'
s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307752: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6: root exploit based on do_brk attack found and exploitable
Package: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6 Version: 2.4.18-5 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Hello I have send a email with the exploid found on my server 3 days ago to Herbert Xu but no response. The exploit for a based on do_brk attack work always still on this kernelversion. uname 2.4.18-k6 md5sum 2d5b9f02f2af7a0b9362f07c6053898a /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-k6 Thank you Raphael Lechner -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux berlin050 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.18-k6 depends on: ii fileutils 4.1-10GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.32woody.3 Tools to generate an initrd image. ii modutils 2.4.15-1 Linux module utilities. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306261: ppp: same problem with pptp
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Please test http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ . Seems to work: 2005-05-04T11:56:38+0200 ppp0 up 2005-05-04T20:20:43+0200 ppp0 up 2005-05-04T21:49:25+0200 ppp0 up 2005-05-04T22:07:21+0200 ppp0 up 2005-05-05T04:24:08+0200 ppp0 up and no CPU load. Christoph pgpK6VU8jF0kh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: tagging 307752
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307752 security Bug#307752: kernel-image-2.4.18-k6: root exploit based on do_brk attack found and exploitable There were no tags set. Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299386: marked as done (libgnokii2-dev: The shared library must be linked against libXpm and libbluetooth.)
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 18:03:34 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closed in new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 22:18:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 13 14:18:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (mulder.hem.za.org) [84.217.19.97] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DAbQ7-00055E-00; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:18:47 -0800 Received: from skinner.hem.za.org ([192.168.0.2]) by mulder.hem.za.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DAbQ5-00044s-BY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:18:45 +0100 Received: from mikael by skinner.hem.za.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DAbQ4-0005tL-UA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:18:44 +0100 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:18:44 +0100 From: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgnokii2-dev: The shared library must be linked against libXpm and libbluetooth. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgnokii2-dev Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.2 The shared library must be linked against libXpm and libbluetooth since it uses symbols from them, according to the Debian Policy 10.2. cc -Wall -g gnokii-expr.c -lgnokii -o gnokii-expr /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/../../../libgnokii.so: undefined reference to `XpmWriteFileFromXpmImage' /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/../../../libgnokii.so: undefined reference to `str2ba' /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/../../../libgnokii.so: undefined reference to `XpmReadFileToXpmImage' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status /Mikael -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (950, 'testing'), (900, 'testing'), (150, 'unstable'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libgnokii2-dev depends on: ii libgnokii20.6.4-1Gnokii library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 299386-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 08:03:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 01:03:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTbKd-0003N8-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 01:03:39 -0700 Received: from eta.gumby.humbug.org.au (ppp113-62.lns1.bne3.internode.on.net [59.167.113.62]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4583ZwH007114 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 May 2005 17:33:36 +0930 (CST) Received: from brad by eta.gumby.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DTbKZ-0003zY-60 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 18:03:35 +1000 Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 18:03:34 +1000 From: Bradley Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Closed in new version Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi, This bug is closed in the recently uploaded version of gnokii, 0.6.5-1. Please let me know if you have any problems with it. Thanks, Brad -- Brad Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://quark.humbug.org.au/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Happy merging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 307707 304124 Bug#304124: FTBFS: missing build-depends Bug#307707: unison: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge Merged 304124 307707. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Hi, On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: The build dependency on p2c can't be fulfilled in sarge. Thanks for reporting this problem. I decided to switch to p2c since the alternative (using free pascal) doesn't produce quality binaries as I would expect (only statically linked, no glibc utilization - potential kernel issues regarding free kernel choice). It's very unfortunate that p2c is currently in a bad shape but I guess that another change in the build environment isn't right at that point in the release process. If a fix to p2c/#305412 should make it into sarge, everything's fine. Otherwise, I would need to propose m-tx to be removed from the release. Thanks. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
Hi Roland, On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:26:55AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:02 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: The build dependency on p2c can't be fulfilled in sarge. Thanks for reporting this problem. I decided to switch to p2c since the alternative (using free pascal) doesn't produce quality binaries as I would expect (only statically linked, no glibc utilization - potential kernel issues regarding free kernel choice). It's very unfortunate that p2c is currently in a bad shape but I guess that another change in the build environment isn't right at that point in the release process. If a fix to p2c/#305412 should make it into sarge, everything's fine. Otherwise, I would need to propose m-tx to be removed from the release. AIUI, a patch for 305412 is available; feel free to NMU p2c to fix it, under the current 0-day NMU policy. I would be willing to allow this recently-removed package back into sarge to fix 307706 if someone is willing to upload the fix. Or, if you prefer, we can go ahead and remove m-tx from testing right now. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#292478: bug duplicated
I duplicated the bug on my athalon xp 2000+ system running the latest 2.6.8 k7 sid kernel 2.6.8-15. System information attached. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. Script started on Thu 05 May 2005 01:14:20 AM PDT obfuscate:~# uname -a Linux obfuscate 2.6.8-2-k7 #1 Tue Mar 22 14:14:00 EST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux obfuscate:~# lspv ci ; lspci -n :00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600 AGP] Host Bridge :00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 PCI Bridge :00:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video Capture (rev 11) :00:08.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture (rev 11) :00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20) :00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 24) :00:0d.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20376 (FastTrak 376) (rev 02) :00:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 46) :00:0f.0 Multimedia audio controller: C-Media Electronics Inc CM8738 (rev 10) :00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) :00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) :00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) :00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82) :00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge :00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] :00:00.0 0600: 1106:3189 :00:01.0 0604: 1106:b168 :00:08.0 0400: 109e:036e (rev 11) :00:08.1 0480: 109e:0878 (rev 11) :00:0a.0 0200: 11ad:0002 (rev 20) :00:0b.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 24) :00:0d.0 0104: 105a:3376 (rev 02) :00:0e.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 46) :00:0f.0 0401: 13f6:0111 (rev 10) :00:10.0 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80) :00:10.1 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80) :00:10.2 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80) :00:10.3 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 82) :00:11.0 0601: 1106:3177 :00:11.1 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06) :01:00.0 0300: 1002:5157 obfuscate:~# lsusb Bus 004 Device 002: ID 1189:6006 Bus 004 Device 001: ID : Bus 003 Device 001: ID : Bus 002 Device 001: ID : Bus 001 Device 001: ID : obfuscate:~# lsusb -v Bus 004 Device 002: ID 1189:6006 Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x1189 idProduct 0x6006 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 0 iProduct1 USB 2.0 Storage Device iSerial 2 0004702400414661 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 39 bNumInterfaces 1 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower0mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 8 Mass Storage bInterfaceSubClass 2 SFF-8020i, MMC-2 (ATAPI) bInterfaceProtocol 80 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x02 EP 2 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0008 1x 8 bytes bInterval 4 Device
Bug#299814: Bug#300859: gnupg RC bugs
On Wed, 04 May 2005 14:08:05 +, Brian M Carlson said: * Update to 1.4.1. I'd really prefer that. 1.4.1 has been released more than 6 weeks ago and fixes quite some bugs we figured out in 1.4.0. The case with 1.4.0 was that people don't care anymore about RC releases and start complaining only after a real release; thus we expected 1.4.1 to be released soon after 1.4.0 (it actually took more time but this should be common to Debian folks ;-) Important things fixed in 1.4.1: * New --rfc2440-text option which controls how text is handled in signatures. This is in response to some problems seen with certain PGP/MIME mail clients and GnuPG version 1.4.0. More details about this are available at http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2005-January/024408.html. * When running a --card-status or --card-edit and a public key is available, missing secret key stubs will be created on the fly. Details of the key are listed too. * Added countermeasures against the Mister/Zuccherato CFB attack http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/033. * Update to 1.2.8. This would either require an epoch, or it would There is no 1.2.8 Shalom-Salam, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 304124
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 304124 - fixed Bug#304124: FTBFS: missing build-depends Tags were: fixed sarge Bug#307707: unison: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306981: marked as done (rsync -b --sufix does not keep a copy of deleted files)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 04:32:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306981: fixed in rsync 2.6.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 19:27:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 29 12:27:39 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from jgi.ecm.ub.es [161.116.81.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRb9H-00047g-00; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:27:39 -0700
Received: from guasch by jgi.ecm.ub.es with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DRb5A-0006IS-Og
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:23:24 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jaume Guasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsync -b --sufix does not keep a copy of deleted files
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:23:24 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Debian Developers
With (old) rsync 2.6.3-2 I used the following options to syncronize
different computers:
DATA=`date '+%Y-%m-%d'`
RSYNCGET=rsync -abxHzu --progress -v --suffix=.~${DATA} --exclude=*.a
--exclude=*.o --exclude=*~* --exclude=*.exe --exclude=.nfs*
--exclude=msg.* --exclude=lock --exclude=*\# --exclude=.\#*
--exclude=Backup --exclude=pine-bin.linux --delete --delete-after -e
ssh
${RSYNCGET} server:dir dir
This makes a full copy, and leaves a backup copy of every changed and
deleted file in the client, with a name which contains the date
of the transfer.
Since I installed 2.6.4, the same command does not perform the
same:
If a file is deleted in the server, it will be deleted in the client,
WITHOUT leaving a backup copy.
Expected behaviour: a backup copy should be left in the client
I have checked that the same behaviour happens with sid 2.6.4-4.
The files disapear from the client, therefore it causes data loss.
Best regards, and thank you for your work.
Jaume
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (110, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages rsync depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 306981-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 08:46:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 01:46:43 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTc0J-Kk-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 01:46:43 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTbmE-0007oD-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:32:10 -0400
From: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306981: fixed in rsync 2.6.4-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 04:32:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: rsync
Source-Version: 2.6.4-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rsync, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rsync_2.6.4-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rsync/rsync_2.6.4-5.diff.gz
rsync_2.6.4-5.dsc
to pool/main/r/rsync/rsync_2.6.4-5.dsc
rsync_2.6.4-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rsync/rsync_2.6.4-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#306840: Quagga+Openssl, not that easy...
Hello Steve On 2005-05-04 Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: I'm currently preparing a new upload to unstable which has SNMP disabled and an explanation about the reasons as well as a small hint how to compile it oneself in README.Debian. Everything else is post-sarge stuff. Did you also mean to drop libsnmp5-dev from the build-deps of quagga with this upload? You also seem to have a duplicate Build-Dep on texinfo now, fwiw. Well, that could have been done, too :) It's useless now but doesn't introduce any problems. I'll do it in the further uploads, thanks for pointing out. Anyway, I've approved -6 to go into sarge, so there's no need to email debian-release about it. thanks, uh, wait, it was -7 that fixed the problem. -6 only removed a Recommends: to kernel-image-2.4 (which caused problems with aptitude trying to propose installing an kernel image for an arbitrary arch as I was told. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306901: Bug confirmation
I am in the same situation and have the same problem. I want to PURGE revelation but this is not possible as the OP has already noted. Also because of this apt-get -f install wants to install a number of packages which I do not want and are prerequisites of revelation: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libgtkhtml2-0 python-crypto python-gnome2 python-gtk2 python-xml python2.3-crypto python2.3-gnome2 python2.3-pyorbit python2.3-xml Recommended packages: python-gnome2-extras python2.3-gnome2-extras The following NEW packages will be installed: libgtkhtml2-0 python-crypto python-gnome2 python-gtk2 python-xml python2.3-crypto python2.3-gnome2 python2.3-pyorbit python2.3-xml 0 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. Need to get 645kB/1491kB of archives. After unpacking 6021kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Please tell us what can be done to resolve the issue. Thank you very much, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292478: bug duplicated
On Thu, 05 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: I duplicated the bug on my athalon xp 2000+ system running the latest 2.6.8 k7 sid kernel 2.6.8-15. System information attached. could you post your oops? i guess with the kernel-image-2.6.11 that problem disappears? -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. thanks for your feedback. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: NMU patch revelation 0.4.3-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package revelation Ignoring bugs not assigned to: revelation tags 307764 +patch Bug#307764: FTBFS subsequent builds There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 306901 +patch Bug#306901: revelation: can not be upgraded due to an error on removal Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306901: NMU patch revelation 0.4.3-1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package revelation
tags 307764 +patch
tags 306901 +patch
thanks mate
revelation (0.4.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high due to RC bug fix.
* etc/gconf/schemas - usr/share/gconf/schemas (Closes: #306901)
* gconftool || true (don't fail if gconftool fails, also closes #306901)
* -$(MAKE) distclean in clean target of debian/rules (Closes: #307764)
-- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 5 May 2005 12:54:20 +0200
Patch attached.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCegAE5UTeB5t8Mo0RAiZpAJkBHnOw/qVHrR2jLCViF8PtiTD8MACgwdMm
BU5woCH+57Lo6VjoYAb+668=
=z2P3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/changelog
revelation-0.4.3/debian/changelog
--- revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/changelog2005-05-05
13:07:40.763944520 +0200
+++ revelation-0.4.3/debian/changelog 2005-05-05 12:54:37.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+revelation (0.4.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Urgency high due to RC bug fix.
+ * etc/gconf/schemas - usr/share/gconf/schemas (Closes: #306901)
+ * gconftool || true (don't fail if gconftool fails, also closes #306901)
+ * -$(MAKE) distclean in clean target of debian/rules (Closes: #307764)
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 5 May 2005 12:54:20 +0200
+
revelation (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #304420)
diff -Nru revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/revelation.prerm
revelation-0.4.3/debian/revelation.prerm
--- revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/revelation.prerm 2005-05-05
13:07:40.767943912 +0200
+++ revelation-0.4.3/debian/revelation.prerm2005-05-05 12:22:25.038797496
+0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
PACKAGE=`basename $0 .prerm`
export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=$(gconftool-2 --get-default-source)
-gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule /etc/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas
+gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule
/usr/share/gconf/schemas/revelation.schemas||true
dpkg --listfiles $PACKAGE |
awk '$0~/\.py$/ {print $0c\n $0o}' |
diff -Nru revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/rules revelation-0.4.3/debian/rules
--- revelation/revelation-0.4.3/debian/rules2005-05-05 13:07:40.766944064
+0200
+++ revelation-0.4.3/debian/rules 2005-05-05 12:28:28.0 +0200
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
CFLAGS = -Wall -g
-SCHEMAS=$(CURDIR)/debian/revelation/etc/gconf/schemas
+SCHEMAS=$(CURDIR)/debian/revelation/usr/share/gconf/schemas
PREFIX=/usr
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
-
+ -$(MAKE) distclean
dh_clean
rm -rf build pixmaps revelation.1
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed. Is someone working on those? If not, I can have a look this friday (tomorrow). libjfreereport-java is fixed now, but you can take a look at jetty, it has another grave bug. Nothing seems to use jakarta-log4j anymore so I've hinted it for removal from testing. Should also a bug be filed against ftp.debian.org to remove it completly? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of figfonts 2.2.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306414 + fixed Bug#306414: figfonts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 306621 is RC.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306621 grave Bug#306621: chown: cannot access `/var/cache/approx': No such file or directory Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306266: marked as done (djvulibre_3.5.14-4(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: can't find header files)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 07:32:09 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306266: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.14-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 11:16:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 04:16:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQ1Ze-0001Jq-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:16:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583A923F3A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22036-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F85123F36; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:16:16 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: djvulibre_3.5.14-4(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: can't find header files Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: djvulibre Version: 3.5.14-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of djvulibre_3.5.14-4 on voltaire by sbuild/powerpc 27 Build started at 20050423-2026 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4), xlibs-dev, libqt3-mt-dev | libqt-mt-dev | libqt3-dev | libqt-dev, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff3g-dev | libtiff-dev [...] for d in jb2cmp; do ( cd $d /usr/bin/make depend ); done make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14/tools/jb2cmp' make[3]: Circular Makefile.dep - Makefile.dep dependency dropped. powerpc-linux-g++ -MM -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../.. -I. -DNDEBUG -Wall -O3 -pthread -DTHREADMODEL=POSIXTHREADS ./*.cpp Makefile.dep classify.cpp:60:22: mdjvucfg.h: No such file or directory cuts.cpp:67:22: mdjvucfg.h: No such file or directory frames.cpp:101:22: mdjvucfg.h: No such file or directory patterns.cpp:64:22: mdjvucfg.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [depend] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14/tools/jb2cmp' make[2]: *** [depend] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14/tools' make[1]: *** [depend] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=powerpcpkg=djvulibrever=3.5.14-4 Seems to do the same thing on all architectures. You should be able to reproduce the problem by unpacking the source from the archive, removing the binary packages from your system and then running: dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -B --- Received: (at 306266-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 11:42:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 04:42:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTekI-0005q2-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:42:22 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTeaP-00058F-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 07:32:09 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barak A. Pearlmutter) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#306266: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.14-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 07:32:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source:
Bug#307258: Components.idl missing
Stefan Strasser a écrit : Package: libciao-dev Version: 5.4.2.1.0-3 Severity: grave Components.idl is not provided with this package which renders it useless because it is included in any cidl file. Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ace-devel/2005-May/000485.html and more specifically for the fix: http://einstein.speech-design.de/webtools/cvs/debian/package/ace/debian/libciao-dev.install?r1=1.1r2=1.2 Thanks, Thomas
Bug#306258: libnss-ldap libpam-ldap need to be linked against same lib
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or 'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not. Linking against ldap_r fixed an issue in nss-ldap previously, so my intent is to change libpam-ldap to also link against ldap_r (like libnss-ldap). I hope to upload a fixed package this evening. Was this fixed in 178-1 ? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:23:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: Since it does not happen here, with tonight's sid, I am downgrading to normal for now, and tagging. Let me know if you can dig out any additional information that may be pertinent. I woul dsuggest rebuilding the package with debugging symbols enabled, except that all of the libraries installed will also be stripped, so it will be largely useless. FWIW, I can fully reproduce both SEGV mentioned in this bug report. Any hints for where to start digging into this? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306258: libnss-ldap libpam-ldap need to be linked against same lib
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or 'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not. Linking against ldap_r fixed an issue in nss-ldap previously, so my intent is to change libpam-ldap to also link against ldap_r (like libnss-ldap). I hope to upload a fixed package this evening. Ignore my previous mail, I confused the upload date. What has happened to that upload? Did you just have no time or is there a problem with it that needs to be fixed? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306299
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306299 moreinfo Bug#306299: postfix: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306577
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306577 moreinfo Bug#306577: postfix-tls: Unable to install package with postfix due to unsatisfied dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 305122
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 305122 - fixed Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse error Tags were: patch fixed Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 305122
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 305122 + patch Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse error Tags were: fixed Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305518: marked as done (evolution-data-server1.2 reintroduces bug #277668 from evolution-data-server)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 07:47:09 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305518: fixed in evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2005 13:32:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 06:32:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOFJG-0005cm-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:32:06 -0700 Received: from port-195-158-168-232.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.168.232] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx01.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DOFIk-0007gI-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:31:34 +0200 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DOEf4-0002B4-Vx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:50:35 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:50:34 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evolution-data-server1.2 reintroduces bug #277668 from evolution-data-server Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: evolution-data-server1.2 Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: Impedes security support evolution-data-server1.2 reintroduces a the use of a private copy of libdb4.1 (which happens to lack at least some debian patches, and leads to FTBFS on mips/mipsel). It should use the dynamic library instead. For a discussion of the bug see #277668. Thiemo --- Received: (at 305518-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 11:55:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 04:55:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTex1-0007Sj-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:55:31 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTeov-0005TA-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 07:47:09 -0400 From: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#305518: fixed in evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 07:47:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: evolution-data-server1.2 Source-Version: 1.2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of evolution-data-server1.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: evolution-data-server1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/evolution-data-server1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3.diff.gz evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3.dsc evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/evolution-data-server1.2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libcamel1.2-0_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libcamel1.2-0_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libcamel1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libebook1.2-3_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libebook1.2-3_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libebook1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libebook1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libecal1.2-2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libecal1.2-2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libecal1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libecal1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libedata-book1.2-2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution-data-server1.2/libedata-book1.2-2_1.2.2-3_i386.deb libedata-book1.2-dev_1.2.2-3_i386.deb to
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:32PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: Andreas == Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas This bug can now be reproduced in a current i386/testing Andreas environment (openafs version 1.3.81-3 is now in sarge). Oops yeah. This is not so good. I will need to deal with this post haste. I should get to it in the next day or so. Obviously that didn't happen. Would welcome an NMU for this issue or do you think you can upload soon? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307275: marked as done (phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 08:02:05 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307275: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 09:23:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 02 02:23:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ogd.nl (aap.ogd.nl) [195.86.242.122] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSX98-0002Gj-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 02:23:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aap.ogd.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA29932B2829 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 May 2005 11:23:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aap.ogd.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aap [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10097-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 May 2005 11:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by aap.ogd.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 938AD32B27F8; Mon, 2 May 2005 11:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jelmer Jaarsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 11:23:15 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ogd.nl Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: phpmyadmin Version: 4:2.6.2-1 Severity: important Upon the upgrade of phpmyadmin the apache2.conf was rewritten to only include *.conf files from the conf/ subdir. Other packages such as gallery and amavis-stats put a symlink there to include their config file but they do not end in .conf. As a result their config files will be ignored. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages phpmyadmin depends on: ii apache2 2.0.54-2next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.0.54-2traditional model for Apache2 ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii php4 4:4.3.10-12 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-mysql 4:4.3.10-12 MySQL module for php4 ii ucf 1.17Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information: * phpmyadmin/reconfigure-webserver: apache2 * phpmyadmin/restart-webserver: false --- Received: (at 307275-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 12:11:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 05:11:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTfCL-0001pI-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 05:11:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTf3N-0006Sg-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 08:02:05 -0400 From: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307275: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.6.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 08:02:05 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: phpmyadmin Source-Version: 4:2.6.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of phpmyadmin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2.diff.gz phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2.dsc to pool/main/p/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2.dsc phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin_2.6.2-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you
Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
This one time, at band camp, Frank Lichtenheld said: On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 09:23:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: Since it does not happen here, with tonight's sid, I am downgrading to normal for now, and tagging. Let me know if you can dig out any additional information that may be pertinent. I woul dsuggest rebuilding the package with debugging symbols enabled, except that all of the libraries installed will also be stripped, so it will be largely useless. FWIW, I can fully reproduce both SEGV mentioned in this bug report. Any hints for where to start digging into this? Well, the original crash (on save) is in kcdlabel/kcdlabel.cpp, in the function KCDLabel::slotFileSave, and the write begins on about line 477. It should be possible to figure out the cause by changing statements of the type foo-do; (or foo.do;) to err = foo-do; if (err) printf something went wrong in foo.do: %s,err; But my c++ is terribly rusty these days. The cddb crash is kcdlabel/cddbaccessdialog.cpp, I believe, and if it crashes for you when you click OK, then the problem is in CDDBAccessDialog::CmOk, starting on line 53. Thanks so much for anything you can come up, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgpcUqMDL5fjN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#306621: 306621 is RC.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:42:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Eric, this makes the package uninstallable and unremovable, so i am upping the severity. I had two problems with it, it tried to do stuff with /var/cache/approx, while i had it configured in my approx.conf to use another dir, and removing failed because of the missing approx user. This should be fixed in the version I last committed to svn, if you can please upload it. Thanks. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306878: #306878: security hole in ldapdiff.conf path construction
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Allan Lyons wrote: Package: ldapdiff Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: critical Tags: security fixed-upstream The change logs for ldapdiff report that a security hole in ldapdiff.conf path construction was fixed in version 1.1.1 Upgrading to the current upstream version would both fix this security hole as well as other bugs according to the upstream change logs. I just downloaded the sources of 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 and the diff shows that the upstream author fixed the handling of the char *fname in function ldifinitconf(), which was unsafe in 1.1.0. But if you compare the contents of ldifinitconf() in 1.1.0, 1.1.1 and 0.9.2 (which is in Debian), you will notice, that fname isn't used in 0.9.2 and I cannot see any other security problem in the string handling in this function in 0.9.2. So I suggest closing this bug report, because the security bug, which was fixed in 1.1.1, was introduced _after_ 0.9.2. Tscho Roland pgpYFGkbInOxc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#307770: marked as done ([amd64] Can't access to non-free at sid.)
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 13:58:29 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307770: [amd64] Can't access to non-free at sid. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 11:52:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 04:52:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp11.m2.home.ne.jp [220.152.32.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTeth-00071d-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:52:06 -0700 Received: from localhost ([61.25.83.36]) by smtp11.m2.home.ne.jp with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 May 2005 20:51:34 +0900 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTetC-0002WM-9n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 20:51:34 +0900 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 20:51:34 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [amd64] Can't access to non-free at sid. From: Kyuma Ohta [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: amd64.debian.net Severity: Grave Tags: sid Now, access to http://amd64.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/non-free/ , replyed 403 Forbidden. Permission of this directory is d---,should be dr-x. Please fix. Ohta. --- Received: (at 307770-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 12:58:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 05:58:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTfvu-0008Ta-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 05:58:26 -0700 Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp (return-path [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1DTfvs-0005p6-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 13:58:24 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1DTfvx-0002vo-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 13:58:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 13:58:29 +0100 From: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#307770: [amd64] Can't access to non-free at sid. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:51:34PM +0900, Kyuma Ohta wrote: Package: amd64.debian.net Severity: Grave Tags: sid Now, access to http://amd64.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/non-free/ , replyed 403 Forbidden. Permission of this directory is d---,should be dr-x. Please fix. There is no facility to file bugs on this in the bug tracking system. Please contact the site administrators directly. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 276103 patch Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save Tags were: help Tags added: patch tags 276103 - help Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save Tags were: patch help Tags removed: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 306512 is grave, merging 306512 305122
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 severity 306512 grave Bug#306512: bad libc-2.3.2.so causes segfaults Severity set to `grave'. merge 306512 305122 Bug#305122: /usr/bin/ld:/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libc.so:1: parse error Bug#306512: bad libc-2.3.2.so causes segfaults Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #305122 has `ia32-libs-dev'; #306512 has `ia32-libs' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307567: Forecast
Is there a schedule for the next delivery ? The server used to work with the previous release of Apache (2.0.53) and it is now down ;-( I do not how to revert to the previous release - will it work with the new libc upgraded the same day than 2.0.54-2 ? I'm looking for ANY solution to be able to bring the server back to life: with the current release, it cannot support more than 10 requests before going deadlocked... Any advice will be good. Even recompiling from source is ok, as long as I can bring the server up back. Thanks, Emmanuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
Package: pam-pgsql Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to Bug#230875 regarding sql injection problem with changing password (easy impact would be changing uid to 0 ... root compromise). Primoz Bratanic - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCeiJ5HOuqnSwJthERAiigAJ0WclQhayauLF6qUHr05qdvuWpFuACgzrFQ EILLu3ovr/HW3W08sUij+n8= =a+R3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#276103: kcdlabel: crash on save
This one time, at band camp, Frank Lichtenheld said: Actually a gdb backtrace on a unstripped kcdlabel pointed me to the right locations. The following patch seems to fix both segfaults: Also good :) But given the quality of the code I've seen during my search I would really recommend to remove this package instead. The whole thing just screems for segfaults and I doubt this were the lasts to be found... Yeah - it's full of unchecked actions, that could lead to a segfault if something goes wrong. OTOH, it was my first Debian package, and I do feel a little sentimental :) Thanks very much for your checking into this. I'll upload the fixed version, forward the patch upstream, and have a hard think about removing it. Take care, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgpcEKPBgS9nC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#307567: Forecast
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:30:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Blot wrote: Is there a schedule for the next delivery ? The server used to work with the previous release of Apache (2.0.53) and it is now down ;-( I do not how to revert to the previous release - will it work with the new libc upgraded the same day than 2.0.54-2 ? You can get the old debs from snapshot.debian.net, in your case: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/02/26/debian/pool/main/a/apache2/ Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306258: libnss-ldap libpam-ldap need to be linked against same lib
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: Just following up for those playing along at home. libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap need to be linked against the same ldap (either 'ldap' or 'ldap_r'). I thought I had done this for both, but apparently not. Linking against ldap_r fixed an issue in nss-ldap previously, so my intent is to change libpam-ldap to also link against ldap_r (like libnss-ldap). I hope to upload a fixed package this evening. Ignore my previous mail, I confused the upload date. What has happened to that upload? Did you just have no time or is there a problem with it that needs to be fixed? It got a bit more complicated. Basically, libldap2 is bad for shipping two different libraries in one package. NSS sucks because when using libnss-ldap and an LDAP-using application it's possible both of these (conflicting) libraries can end up being loaded into memory. The end solution as discussed with Steve Langasek (our illustrious RM) is to: a) recompile libpam-ldap against ldap_r and upload (will happen soon) b) rebuild libldap2, remove 'libldap' and replace it with a symlink to 'libldap_r', which has the same ABI. Thus, there will be only one LDAP library left on the system which everything will link against, hopefully avoiding the situation where two different LDAP libraries are loaded into memory. Let me know if you can think of any reason why this might be a bad idea. :) Thanks, Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:32PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Andreas == Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas This bug can now be reproduced in a current i386/testing
Andreas environment (openafs version 1.3.81-3 is now in sarge).
Oops yeah.
This is not so good. I will need to deal with this post haste. I
should get to it in the next day or so.
Obviously that didn't happen. Would welcome an NMU for this issue or
do you think you can upload soon?
I won't speak for Sam on that, but incidentally, I've tested that the
following patch does indeed fix the compilation problem. It appears to be
correct so far as I can tell, although I alas don't have a suitable
environment for testing it completely.
--- openafs-krb5-1.3/src/asetkey.c 2000-11-07 07:52:57.0 -0800
+++ openafs-krb5-1.3.fixed/src/asetkey.c2005-05-01 10:50:41.0
-0700
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
exit(1);
}
- code = afsconf_AddKey(tdir, kvno, key-contents);
+ code = afsconf_AddKey(tdir, kvno, key-contents, 1);
if (code) {
printf(setkey: failed to set key, code %d.\n, code);
exit(1);
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307788: hplip FTBFS, if python2.2 is installed.
Package: hplip Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch the configury gets the wrong python installation, for which no python qt modules are available. See the diffs to configure and configure.in for a patch to get the default python version. http://people.ubuntu.com/patches/hplip.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe
Package: xosd Version: 2.2.14-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, building the package xosd in a clean sarge build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes configure: creating libtool appending configuration tag CXX to libtool checking for ld used by g++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes appending configuration tag F77 to libtool checking for X... no checking for gtk-config... /usr/bin/gtk-config checking for GTK - version = 1.2.2... yes checking for XInitThreads in -lX11... no configure: error: *** X11 not threadsafe *** make: *** [config.status] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307796: xtradius: sql injection in authmysql
Package: xtradius Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There is no user input verification whatsoever. In /contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c username supplied by user is fed directly to database. Primoz Bratanic - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCejFCHOuqnSwJthERAgNJAKDqjliJOmulQDHg9Vxrj0a5fJ+txwCg6SOc D/mIwzGEe12kEM77RDK+h+o= =gTD3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295060: wwwoffle: installing 2.8e-2 still overwrites config
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:18:38PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
...
However, running with a uid an gid other than proxy is not supported.
Also the spool-dir shouldn't really be changed, especially to /var/tmp
as it it unpredictable what may happen if all sorts of non-wwwoffle
files are encountered in its cache area. Use a symlink (to a subdir) if
you really have to...
that was just a silly example - I config'd 2.7 changing everything in the
.conf to see what gets mangled by update. I think and expect everything in
the config file should be preserved. What gets changed for whatever reason
in the new rel should give proper warnings, and whatever 'not supported'
shouldn't really stay in the config file.
Can you please send me /var/log/wwwoffle-upgrade.log, and
/etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf and /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf.bak (i.e.
the config file before the upgrade). Please also show the output of
debconf-show wwwoffle
I don't have /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf.bak, here's ls -l /etc/wwwoffle
after upgrade:
total 112
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 66 May 5 15:06 debian-replacement.gif -
/usr/share/wwwoffle/html/en/local/dontget/standard.replacement.gif
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 65 May 5 15:06 debian-replacement.js -
/usr/share/wwwoffle/html/en/local/dontget/standard.replacement.js
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 66 May 5 15:06 debian-replacement.png -
/usr/share/wwwoffle/html/en/local/dontget/standard.replacement.png
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 5 15:30 htdig
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 May 5 15:30 html
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 5 15:30 mnogosearch
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 5 15:30 namazu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root322 Sep 7 2002 robots.txt
-rw-r- 1 proxy proxy 42767 May 5 15:30 wwwoffle.conf
-rw-r- 1 proxy proxy 4634 May 5 15:18 wwwoffle.conf.2.7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5157 May 5 15:45 wwwoffle.conf.2.8
-rw-r- 1 proxy proxy 5104 May 5 15:30 wwwoffle.conf.old
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root908 Apr 7 20:36 wwwoffle.cron-fetch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root116 May 5 15:06 wwwoffle.options
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root492 Aug 5 2002 wwwoffle.pac
*.2.[78], which I'm attaching here, come from
egrep -v ^#|^$ /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf
Pls see attachments.
--
paolo
GPG/PGP id:0x21426690 kfp:EDFB 0103 A8D8 4180 8AB5 D59E 9771 0F28 2142 6690
Indeed, it does come with warranty: it *will* fail, sometimes, somehow...
- software vendor
StartUp
{
bind-ipv4 = 127.0.0.1
http-port = 5865
wwwoffle-port = 5867
spool-dir = /var/tmp/wwwoffle
run-uid= nobody
run-gid= nogroup
use-syslog= no
password = mysecret
max-servers = 4
max-fetch-servers = 1
}
Options
{
log-level = info
socket-timeout= 90
dns-timeout = 40
connect-timeout = 15
connect-retry = no
ssl-allow-port= 443
ssl-allow-port=
dir-perm = 0754
file-perm = 0640
lock-files= yes
reply-compressed-data = yes
}
OnlineOptions
{
request-changed = 12m
request-changed-once = no
request-expired = yes
request-no-cache = yes
request-redirection = yes
try-without-password = no
intr-download-keep= yes
intr-download-size= 2
intr-download-percent = 70
timeout-download-keep = yes
request-compressed-data = no
}
OfflineOptions
{
pragma-no-cache = no
confirm-requests = yes
}
FetchOptions
{
stylesheets = no
images = no
frames = no
scripts = yes
objects = yes
webbug-images = no
}
IndexOptions
{
no-lasttime-index= yes
}
ModifyHTML
{
enable-modify-html= yes
enable-modify-online = yes
add-cache-info= yes
disable-script= yes
disable-applet= yes
disable-style = yes
disable-blink = yes
disable-meta-refresh = yes
disable-meta-refresh-self = yes
disable-dontget-links = yes
replace-dontget-images= yes
replacement-dontget-image = /local/dontget/r.gif
replace-webbug-images = yes
replacement-webbug-image = /local/dontget/r.gif
demoronise-ms-chars = yes
disable-animated-gif = yes
}
LocalHost
{
localhost
127.0.0.1
192.168.0.53
:::127.0.0.1
ip6-localhost
::1
}
LocalNet
{
192.168.0.0/24
}
AllowedConnectHosts
{
192.168.0.0/24
}
AllowedConnectUsers
{
user1:pwd1
user2:pwd2
}
DontCache
{
*://*.google.*
}
DontGet
{
location-error = yes
}
DontCompress
{
mime-type = image/gif
mime-type = image/jpeg
mime-type = image/png
mime-type = image/tiff
mime-type = video/x-msvideo
mime-type = video/quicktime
mime-type = video/mpeg
mime-type = audio/basic
mime-type = audio/x-wav
mime-type = application/x-dvi
mime-type = application/pdf
mime-type = application/zip
mime-type = application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig
file-ext = .gz
file-ext = .bz
file-ext = .bz2
file-ext = .Z
file-ext =
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply() function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the fix from krb5 seems applicable as well. It's attached, but please double check with Security Team, who might have a better fix. Is there a specific reason you didn't also include the patch for CAN-2005-0468? AFAICT it seems to apply as well. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305412: NMU: #305412: p2c segfaults on specific input
Hi,
in a minute, I will upload the attached changes to p2c. Josip (or the
respective p2c maintainer), please incorporate them into the next
maintainer upload.
Thanks.
bye,
Roland
--
diff -ruN ../p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog
--- ../p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog 2005-05-05 16:11:23.035036055 +0200
+++ p2c-1.21alpha2/debian/changelog 2005-05-05 16:06:55.635108119 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+p2c (1.21alpha2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload (0-day)
+ * Applied patch by Peter De Wachter that fixes double memory free()'s
+(Closes: #305412, #307706)
+
+ -- Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 5 May 2005 16:04:37 +0200
+
p2c (1.21alpha2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added debhelper to build-depends, closes: #190499.
diff -ruN ../p2c-1.21alpha2/src/decl.c p2c-1.21alpha2/src/decl.c
--- ../p2c-1.21alpha2/src/decl.c 1993-12-08 06:36:50.0 +0100
+++ p2c-1.21alpha2/src/decl.c 2005-05-05 16:04:31.319971801 +0200
@@ -789,8 +789,10 @@
mpp2 = mp2-snext;
if (mp2)
*mpp2 = mp2-snext;
+#if 0
if (mp-kind == MK_CONST)
free_value(mp-val);
+#endif
freeexpr(mp-constdefn);
if (mp-cbase)
forget_ctx(mp, 1);
diff -ruN ../p2c-1.21alpha2/src/parse.c p2c-1.21alpha2/src/parse.c
--- ../p2c-1.21alpha2/src/parse.c 1993-12-08 06:36:49.0 +0100
+++ p2c-1.21alpha2/src/parse.c 2005-05-05 16:04:31.339968355 +0200
@@ -4642,8 +4642,10 @@
}
}
if (conserve_mem) {
+#if 0
free_stmt((Stmt *)func-val.i); /* is this safe? */
func-val.i = 0;
+#endif
forget_ctx(func, 0);
}
outsection(spacing);
Processed: retitle 306141 to CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add()
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 retitle 306141 CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add() Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply() Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306141
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306141 woody sarge sid Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add() Tags were: security patch Tags added: woody, sarge, sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of p2c 1.21alpha2-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 305412 + fixed Bug#305412: p2c segfaults on specific input Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 307706 + fixed Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge Tags were: sarge Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply()
function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in
krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the
fix from krb5 seems applicable as well. It's attached, but please
double check with Security Team, who might have a better fix.
Attached is a full patch for these issues for the woody version of
krb4. A patch for testing/unstable will follow later.
Note that I have not actually tested this package (and I wouldn't
know how to do that), I can only enssure that the patch applies and
that it builds...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur krb4-1.1-8.bak/debian/changelog krb4-1.1-8/debian/changelog
--- krb4-1.1-8.bak/debian/changelog 2003-03-20 07:49:04.0 +0100
+++ krb4-1.1-8/debian/changelog 2005-05-05 16:34:43.303476192 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+krb4 (1.1-8-2.4) stable-security; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Backport patches for krb5 for CAN-2005-0469
+and CAN-2005-0468. Fixes buffer overflows in
+slc_add_reply() and env_add_opt() in telnet code
+(Bug#306141)
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 5 May 2005 16:32:17 +0200
+
krb4 (1.1-8-2.3) stable-security; urgency=high
* Backport of patches from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2
diff -Naur
krb4-1.1-8.bak/debian/patches/024_security_telnet_CAN-2005-0468_CAN-2005-0469_upstream
krb4-1.1-8/debian/patches/024_security_telnet_CAN-2005-0468_CAN-2005-0469_upstream
---
krb4-1.1-8.bak/debian/patches/024_security_telnet_CAN-2005-0468_CAN-2005-0469_upstream
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
krb4-1.1-8/debian/patches/024_security_telnet_CAN-2005-0468_CAN-2005-0469_upstream
2005-05-05 16:31:18.060677840 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+--- krb4-1.1/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c.orig 2005-05-05 16:25:53.390035280
+0200
krb4-1.1/appl/telnet/telnet/telnet.c 2005-05-05 16:28:49.944194968
+0200
+@@ -1306,6 +1306,8 @@
+ void
+ slc_add_reply(unsigned char func, unsigned char flags, cc_t value)
+ {
++ if ((slc_replyp - slc_reply) + 6 sizeof(slc_reply))
++ return;
+ if ((*slc_replyp++ = func) == IAC)
+ *slc_replyp++ = IAC;
+ if ((*slc_replyp++ = flags) == IAC)
+@@ -1319,11 +1321,12 @@
+ {
+ int len;
+
+-*slc_replyp++ = IAC;
+-*slc_replyp++ = SE;
+ len = slc_replyp - slc_reply;
+-if (len = 6)
++if (len = 4 || (len + 2 sizeof(slc_reply)))
+ return;
++*slc_replyp++ = IAC;
++*slc_replyp++ = SE;
++len += 2;
+ if (NETROOM() len) {
+ ring_supply_data(netoring, slc_reply, slc_replyp - slc_reply);
+ printsub('', slc_reply[2], slc_replyp - slc_reply - 2);
+@@ -1455,6 +1458,7 @@
+ env_opt_add(unsigned char *ep)
+ {
+ unsigned char *vp, c;
++ unsigned int len, olen, elen;
+
+ if (opt_reply == NULL) /*XXX*/
+ return; /*XXX*/
+@@ -1471,14 +1475,13 @@
+ env_opt_add(ep);
+ return;
+ }
+- vp = env_getvalue(ep);
+- if (opt_replyp + (vp ? strlen((char *)vp) : 0) +
+- strlen((char *)ep) + 6 opt_replyend)
++ elen = 2 * (vp ? strlen((char *)vp) : 0) +
++ 2 * strlen((char *)ep) + 6;
++ if ((opt_replyend - opt_replyp) elen)
+ {
+- int len;
+ void *tmp;
+- opt_replyend += OPT_REPLY_SIZE;
+- len = opt_replyend - opt_reply;
++ len = opt_replyend - opt_reply + elen;
++ olen = opt_replyp - opt_reply;
+ tmp = realloc(opt_reply, len);
+ if (tmp == NULL) {
+ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ printf(env_opt_add: realloc()
failed!!!\n);
+@@ -1486,7 +1489,7 @@
+ return;
+ }
+ opt_reply = tmp;
+- opt_replyp = opt_reply + len - (opt_replyend - opt_replyp);
++ opt_replyp = opt_reply + olen;
+ opt_replyend = opt_reply + len;
+ }
+ if (opt_welldefined((char *)ep)) {
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: CAN-2005-0469 describes a buffer overflow in the slc_add_reply() function. It has already been fixed in krb5, but is present in krb4 as well. I'm not familiar with the krn4 code base, but the fix from krb5 seems applicable as well. It's attached, but please double check with Security Team, who might have a better fix. Is there a specific reason you didn't also include the patch for CAN-2005-0468? AFAICT it seems to apply as well. I hadn't checked it yet, it was still on the list of TODOs along with netkit-telnet and netkit-telnet-ssl. I just checked and it is in fact vulnerable for CAN-2005-0469 as well. I can send a patch later if you haven't prepared one yet. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304367: Is openldap2 ready for sarge?
The bug 304367 appears to have been fixed for 21 days, but it has not
been pushed into testing. This package is priority important. The fix
(already done) is not to build certain packages that are also in
openldap2.2, as this would make security support impossible.
Torsten, et al., is this ready to go into testing?
--
($_,$a)=split/\t/,join'',map{unpack'u',$_}DATA;eval$a;print;__DATA__
M961H[EMAIL PROTECTED];!UF%OG-U(#QUF%OG-U0=D:75MUC8VUL=G)U;6LN
MFUL+F=Y/@H)2QA8F-D969G:EJ:VQM;F]P7)S='5V=WAYBQN=V]R8FMC
5:75Q96AT9V1YF%L=G-P;6IX9BP)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#291478: marked as done (Openwebmail: insecure temporary filename usage in many CGI scripts)
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:22:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 00:25:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 16:25:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Crmcf-0004Ry-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:25:57 -0800
Received: (qmail 27814 invoked by uid 1013); 21 Jan 2005 00:25:56 -
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:25:56 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Openwebmail: insecure temporary filename usage in many CGI scripts
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg
Content-Disposition: inline
--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: openwebmail
Priority: grave
Version: 2.41-10
Tags: patch security
Openwebmail has multiple unsafe usages of temporary files (in /tmp) which=
=20
lead to race conditions and symlink attacks. There are actually a lot of=20
Perl scripts that, instead of using Perl's builtin File::Temp module use=20
the (insecure) /tmp/SOMETHING.$$$ construct to define temporary files.
Attached is a patch fixing some of these issues, it doesn't fix all of=20
them, however. To find remaining issues please run 'grep -r /tmp .' on=20
the source directory. The patch should provide hints on how to properly fix=
=20
all of these.
IMHO these bugs together with #290848 show that there has been no effort to
prevent security bugs and makes this package unsuitable for release with
sarge. I don't think this package should be included in a Debian release
unless a full audit has been conducted in the sources for common web=20
programming mistakes.
Regards
Javier
--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=openwebmail.tmp.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff -Nru openwebmail-2.41.orig/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/mkcurren=
t.sh openwebmail-2.41/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/mkcurrent.sh
--- openwebmail-2.41.orig/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/mkcurrent.sh
2=
004-08-05 05:07:27.0 +0200
+++ openwebmail-2.41/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/mkcurrent.sh2005-0=
1-21 01:12:54.0 +0100
@@ -3,9 +3,8 @@
# this is used by author to create the tarball of openwebmail
#
=20
-tmpdir=3D/tmp/openwebmail.mkrelease.tmp
-rm -Rf $tmpdir
-mkdir $tmpdir
+tmpdir=3D`mktemp -d openwebmail.mkrelease.XX` || { echo $0: Cannot cr=
eate temporary directory 2 ; exit 1; }
+trap rm -rf $tmpdir 0 1 2 3 13 15
cd $tmpdir
=20
q /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/etc/defaults/openwebmail.conf
@@ -193,10 +192,11 @@
echo copy current to snapshot $version-$releasedate...
cd /usr/local/www/data/openwebmail/download/snapshot
cp /usr/local/www/data/openwebmail/download/current/openwebmail-current.=
tar.gz openwebmail-$version-$releasedate.tar.gz=20
- grep -v $releasedate MD5SUM /tmp/.md5.tmp.$$
- md5 -r openwebmail-$version-$releasedate.tar.gz /tmp/.md5.tmp.$$
- cp /tmp/.md5.tmp.$$ MD5SUM
- rm /tmp/.md5.tmp.$$
+ md5file=3D`mktemp -t .md5.tmp.XX` || { echo $0: Cannot create tempo=
rary file 2; exit 1; }
+ grep -v $releasedate MD5SUM $md5file
+ md5 -r openwebmail-$version-$releasedate.tar.gz $md5file
+ cp $md5file MD5SUM
+ rm -f $md5file=20
fi
=20
#
diff -Nru openwebmail-2.41.orig/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/notify.s=
h openwebmail-2.41/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/notify.sh
--- openwebmail-2.41.orig/cgi-bin/openwebmail/misc/mkrelease/notify.sh 2004=
-09-21 18:09:31.0 +0200
+++
Bug#283487: marked as done (libservlet2.2-java: FTBFS: Compiler errors)
Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 16:19:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2004 11:55:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 29 03:55:37 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CYk81-0005O9-00; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:55:37 -0800
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1CYk80-H0-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:55:36 -0500
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CYk7z-0001gA-RN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:55:35 -0800
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libservlet2.2-java: FTBFS: Compiler errors
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 03:55:35 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libservlet2.2-java
Severity: serious
Version: 3.3.1a-2
From my build log (replicated under an i386 chroot):
...
[javac] Found 3 semantic errors compiling
/tmp/buildd/libservlet2.2-java-3.3.1a/src/share/javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.java:
[javac]944. public void setStatus(int sc, String sm)
[javac] ^--^
[javac] *** Semantic Error: The overridden method void setStatus(int sc,
java.lang.String sm); is deprecated in type
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.
[javac]993. public String encodeUrl(String url)
[javac] ^---^
[javac] *** Semantic Error: The overridden method java.lang.String
encodeUrl(java.lang.String url); is deprecated in type
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.
[javac] 1010. public String encodeRedirectUrl(String url)
[javac] ^---^
[javac] *** Semantic Error: The overridden method java.lang.String
encodeRedirectUrl(java.lang.String url); is deprecated in type
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse.
...
BUILD FAILED
file:/tmp/buildd/libservlet2.2-java-3.3.1a/build.xml:31: Compile failed; see
the compiler error output for details.
Total time: 0 seconds
make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
---
Received: (at 283487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 15:20:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 08:20:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTi8v-0008Bg-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 08:20:01 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id F169C64D4F; Thu, 5 May 2005 15:19:59 + (UTC)
Received: by derision.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AB2E0780D0; Thu, 5 May 2005 16:19:47 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 16:19:47 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This package has been removed from Debian: superseded by
libservlet2.{3,4}-java
--
Martin
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
Thu, 5 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed. Is someone working on those? If not, I can have a look this friday (tomorrow). libjfreereport-java is fixed now, but you can take a look at jetty, it has another grave bug. Nothing seems to use jakarta-log4j anymore so I've hinted it for removal from testing. Should also a bug be filed against ftp.debian.org to remove it completly? Yes, please. I've been too busy to take care of jetty, I'll try to do it asap. -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307167 patch Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply()
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: I hadn't checked it yet, it was still on the list of TODOs along with netkit-telnet and netkit-telnet-ssl. I just checked and it is in fact vulnerable for CAN-2005-0469 as well. I can send a patch later if you haven't prepared one yet. I've already prepared a complete patch, thanks. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 263870 RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted by jakarta-log4j1.2 Bug#263870: ITA: jakarta-log4j -- Logging library for Java Changed Bug title. reassign 263870 ftp.debian.org Bug#263870: RM: jakarta-log4j -- RoQA; RC bug, obsoleted by jakarta-log4j1.2 Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. tag 306739 wontfix Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier Tags were: patch Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307749: marked as done (gettext-base: ligettextpo.so.0.1.0, in the wrong package?)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 11:32:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307749: fixed in gettext 0.14.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 07:42:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 00:42:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTazy-TD-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 00:42:18 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D799E172843; Thu, 5 May 2005 00:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:42:17 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gettext-base: ligettextpo.so.0.1.0, in the wrong package? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gettext-base Version: 0.14.1-10 Severity: serious Justification: incomplete dependencies Tags: sid sarge The package blender recently failed to build on hppa due to a strange gettext-related error: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dblenderver=3D2.36-1arch=3Dhppa= stamp=3D1115183059file=3Dlogas=3Draw Tracking this down, it appears that /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so is contained in the 'gettext' package, whereas /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so.0.1.0 is contained in the 'gettext-base' package; and /usr/lib/libgettextsrc-0.14.x.so and /usr/lib/libgettextlib-0.14.x.so are also contained in the 'gettext' package. This means that: - the library /usr/lib/libgettextpo.so.0.1.0 in gettext-base is not usable without also installing the gettext package, yet there is no dependency from gettext-base - gettext (and probably shouldn't be) - such a dependency would need to be strictly versioned, because ABI changes in libgettextsrc or libgettextlib break the runtime dependency (as happened here). The right fix is probably to move all the libraries into a single package, with an appropriate Replaces: line; I imagine gettext, rather than gettext-base, is the right package, since no one's complained about gettext-base being broken before now. This bug affects both 0.14.1-10 in sarge and 0.14.4-1 in sid, and probably needs to be fixed separately for each version on account of the freeze. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCec5VKN6ufymYLloRAj1JAJwOAXAOiHigi+QNKzidE43/kFLUpACgkSrS WFM7jWfOs02YPPdZzHUUtGY= =KIp1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz-- --- Received: (at 307749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 15:53:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 08:53:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTifO-00047b-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 08:53:34 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTiKs-0006HW-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 11:32:22 -0400 From: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307749: fixed in gettext 0.14.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:32:22 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gettext Source-Version: 0.14.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version
Bug#302677: qmail: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' and missing users and groups
Quoting Tomas Hoger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! I think it is an FTBFS bug. The following should generally work: apt-get source qmail cd qmail-* dpkg-buildpackage For qmail, this does not work because of the missing Build-Depends on groff-base and because of the missing users/groups. Those are needed to create 'qmail-src'. It should be possible to build the 'qmail-src' package. Yes, you're right. I missed one point: it's also FTBFS for qmail-src, not only for qmail (and caused by qmail). My mistake! Hopefully, someone will be able to upload new version soon. I will be uploading a new version that should keep everyone happy in the next day or so. Cheers! Jon --- This mail sent through Click2E-Mail http://www.click2e-mail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 304933
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 304933 patch Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey' There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#217678: marked as done (broken by new libconfigfile-perl version)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 12:17:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#217678: fixed in apt-file 2.0.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2003 17:34:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 26 11:34:19 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ADomR-0003HK-00; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:34:19 -0600 Received: from p5083979d.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.151.157] helo=djpigpb.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1ADolu-0002LK-00; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:33:47 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpigpb.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ADowE-0007Pk-00; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:44:26 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broken by new libconfigfile-perl version X-Mailer: reportbug 2.35 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:44:26 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: apt-file Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Tags: sid patch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/patches$ apt-file update Can't call method read_config_file without a package or object reference at /usr/bin/apt-file line 312. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/apt-file line 357. libconfigfile-perl version 1.1 doesn't export read_config_file by default any longer so please consider this patch: --- apt-file~ 2003-10-26 18:35:25.0 +0100 +++ apt-file2003-10-26 18:35:51.0 +0100 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ # use strict; -use ConfigFile; +use ConfigFile read_config_file; use Getopt::Long qw/:config no_ignore_case/; use Data::Dumper; use File::Basename; -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux djpigpb.djpig.de 2.4.22-ben2 #1 Do Okt 16 13:44:48 CEST 2003 ppc Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages apt-file depends on: ii gzip 1.3.5-7The GNU compression utility ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.11 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii libconfigfile-perl1.1Parses simple configuration files ii perl 5.8.1-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 217678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 16:29:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 09:29:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTjEF-0003aZ-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 09:29:35 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTj2E-00020N-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 12:17:10 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastien J. Gross) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#217678: fixed in apt-file 2.0.5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 12:17:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: apt-file Source-Version: 2.0.5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-file, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-file_2.0.5.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-file/apt-file_2.0.5.dsc apt-file_2.0.5.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-file/apt-file_2.0.5.tar.gz apt-file_2.0.5_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-file/apt-file_2.0.5_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the
Bug#303860: I can't reproduce this bug on i386
Hi Blars, I wasn't able to reproduce this bug you reported (celestia: ftbfs [sparc] no KDE libraries installed) on i386. Please: - send your config.log - test whether version 1.3.0-1 in sarge has the same issue TIA Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
Package: cweb Severity: grave Sid: cweb is a dummy package. cweb depends on tetex-bin. tetex-bin conflicts with cweb. cweb is therefore not installable Sarge: cweb is a real package. cweb recommends tetex-bin. tetex-bin conflicts with cweb. cweb is therefore hardly usable. It might be the best to simply remove the cweb package since the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in tetex-bin should be enough. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1
Hello On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:34:47AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: I think the following will work: 1. Seting Woodies debconf answer to false once MySQL 4.0 or 4.1 gets installed so that his danger is voided once for all. sounds like a good idea for woody. 2. To prevent 4.0, 4.1 and soon 5.0, which asks the Debconf question only immediately before purging in the postrm script, from removing each others files I check with dpkg -l mysql-server* if there is more than one package in hold or installed state. that seems really hackish. what about keeping the default false, and changing the template to have a scary warning saying do not select this option if you have other versions of mysql installed? The default was already false and the template has been changed to a bit more scary wording. The dpkg check was just thought as an additional check that prevents the user from something obviously stupid. So it's: if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge(); I will commit changes for 4.1, too and then test a bit. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307749: gettext-base: ligettextpo.so.0.1.0, in the wrong package?
Hi. gettext_0.14.4-2, just uploaded for unstable, fails to build from source on at least the following archs: mipsel hppa sparc arm mips The error is always the same: jikes-classpath: Depends: classpath but it is not going to be installed Seems like a serious bug somewhere, but not in gettext, who just assumes that their build dependencies may be installed. [ Hmm, I wish autobuilders ran sarge for packages that are going to be part of sarge, at least during the freeze ]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307820: anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages (use GPL)
Package: anon-proxy Severity: serious The use of GDFL is questionable for manual pages. Please change the licence to GPL, because GFDL is known to caus elot of problem when texts are changed (embedded / copied). My use of Severity: serious derives from my attempt to interpret Debian Guidelines and the present discussion to avoid GFDL as much as possible. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/msg00451.html [Nathanael Nerode] ... You do realize that GFDL'ed documentation with a GPL'ed program means that moving stuff between the documentation and the program is possible *only* for the copyright holder. This is tedious in the extreme when the program or documentation has multiple copyright holders. http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html This document is being put together to attempt to address some concerns that members of the Debian legal team have about the GNU Free Documentation License. This document attempts to present the reasoning behind the conclusion that the GNU FDL is not regarded as a license that can easily satisfy the Debian Free Software Guidelines. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch. Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency. There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
tags 307683 +sarge +moreinfo thanks Funnily enough, it builds here just fine without gawk installed. Are you sure you have all of build-essential installed in your chroot, including an awk interpreter (mawk is Priority: required, and thus not listed in b-e but should be present nonetheless)? On 5/4/05, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: r-cran-maps Version: 2.0-27-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: gawk -f convert.awk world.line world2.line /bin/sh: gawk: command not found make[1]: *** [world2.line] Error 127 You should add a build dependency on gawk. Chris -- Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Bug#76918: Looking for popular sfotware, but tight on budget?
Looking for popular sfotware, but tight on budget? We are selilng world bestseslers at the chaepest prcices around! Why so csheap? We don't sel'll progrmas in a fancy box, with printed documentation, etc., meaning we do not shell out on CD manufacturing. The sosft is only what you get - available for dwonload right after purcshase. Fast servers with 100mb conection. Instant Dwonload! Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional 44.95 Microsoft Office System Professional 2003 54.95 DVD X Copy Platinum 4.0.38 19.95 Microsoft Windows XP Professional with SP2 Corporate Edition 54.95 Adobe PhotoShop CS 8.0 44.95 AutoCAD 2005 69.95 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 54.95 Adobe Photoshop CS and ImageReady CS 39.95 Norton SystemWorks 2005 Premier plus Internet Security 2005 39.95 Pinnacle Liquid Edition 6.0 39.95 Microsoft FrontPage 2003 Pro plus 200 Templates 29.95 http://realbestoffer.com/?You will soon break the bow if you keep it always stretched. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: So it's: if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge(); okay, that makes sense. the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm thinking of it. since this is in the postrm, the package's files are already gone, right? so if /usr/sbin/mysqld is still on the filesystem... sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#304786: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf causes other packages to break
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 304786 phpmyadmin Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Bug reassigned from package `apache2-common' to `phpmyadmin'. severity 304786 critical Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Severity set to `critical'. close 304786 Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 307275 304786 Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Bug#307275: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages Merged 304786 307275. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306261: marked as done (pppd persist eats up all cpu after reconnect)
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 14:47:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306261: fixed in ppp 2.4.3-20050321+2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 10:34:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 03:34:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 153-133-088-212.ip-addr.teresto.net (Redstar.dorchain.net)
[212.88.133.153]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQ0vW-0002gj-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:34:55 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by Redstar.dorchain.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) id j3PAYqc5000980
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:34:52 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:34:52 +0200
From: Joerg Dorchain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pppd persist eats up all cpu after reconnect
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=uWAbeGC4mMoqIxdF
Content-Disposition: inline
X-message-flag: Formating hard disk. please wait... 10%... 20%...
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--uWAbeGC4mMoqIxdF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.3-20050321+1
Hi,
My setup is pppoe with the rp-pppoe-plugin. I am alwalys on with the
persist option, although forcibly disconnected by my provider every 24h.
Thank to the persist option pppd reconnects automatically after a
disconnect.
Now the problem: The first connects succeeds and all behaves as
exspected. After the the first dis- and reconnect (i.e. after 24h) pppd
eats up all cpu time. The reconnect itself works as expected, but the
systems becomes notably slow with pppd playing cpu-hog.
An strace looks like this:
read(14, 0x808f7a2, 1502) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
read(13, 0x808f7a2, 1502) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR2 TERM CHLD], NULL, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [HUP INT USR2 TERM CHLD], NULL, 8) = 0
gettimeofday({1114424467, 453717}, NULL) = 0
select(15, [12 13 14], NULL, [12 13 14], {6, 267221}) = 1 (in [12], left
{6, 268000})
gettimeofday({1114424467, 454119}, NULL) = 0
read(14, 0x808f7a2, 1502) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
read(13, 0x808f7a2, 1502) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
temporarily unavailable)
with fd 13 and 14 being connected to /dev/ppp.
Bye,
Joerg
--uWAbeGC4mMoqIxdF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbMfMjY4+4PdzvOARAvZZAJ0eNq+52A6IJz1tF8t0zmM+N07tkQCgjqwI
4Yr74qlleV4S5eyyRseg02Q=
=DcAs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--uWAbeGC4mMoqIxdF--
---
Received: (at 306261-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 18:50:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 11:50:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTlQG-00016b-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 11:50:08 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTlNH-0002Y8-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 14:47:03 -0400
From: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306261: fixed in ppp 2.4.3-20050321+2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 14:47:03 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: ppp
Source-Version: 2.4.3-20050321+2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ppp, which is due to be installed in the Debian
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300432 normal Bug#300432: Spontaneously reboots server... Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300432: Sorry
Sorry, somehow I forgot to answer. While I agree that the runlevel may be too early I do not agree on this part of the bug report: for now I can only say that it should not restart computer in a case of single failure (upgrade of deamons) I want my system to be rebooted on a single failure. I was planning and actually started implementing a different config system that would enable you to define special exceptions but haven't found the time to work on this sorry. Also I strongly object to this bug being release critical. Thus I will downgrade it. Did it before already but apparently that mail got lost. I will leave it open for the runlevel change though. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307838: unsecure temp file
Package: fai Version: 2.8.1 Severity: serious The script lib/updatebase creates unsecure temp file when called from task softupdate. This violates the policy. -- regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: not rc, not a security issues
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307632 normal Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307632: not rc, not a security issues
severity 307632 normal thanks This bug is not RC and is not a security issue. The piece of policy quoted is intended to warn against attacks such as symlink attacks that can be performed on unsafely created temp files. The program in question is run during a fai install, before the system is multiuser, and so its unsafe temp files cannot be created. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1
Hi On 2005-05-05 Sean Finney wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: So it's: if ( dh_answer==true and no_other_installed_server ) purge(); okay, that makes sense. the no_other_installed_server could probably be simplified, now that i'm thinking of it. since this is in the postrm, the package's files are already gone, right? so if /usr/sbin/mysqld is still on the filesystem... Hm, right you are... :-) bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307820: marked as done (anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages (use GPL))
Your message dated Thu, 05 May 2005 15:47:53 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307820: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 17:22:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 10:22:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep19-0.kolumbus.fi (fep19-app.kolumbus.fi) [193.229.0.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTk37-0003OR-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 10:22:09 -0700 Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.3.110]) by fep19-app.kolumbus.fi with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 May 2005 20:22:08 +0300 Received: from fw.cante.net ([192.168.1.3]:1118 helo=cante.cante.net) by bongo.cante.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTk34-0005en-W3; Thu, 05 May 2005 20:22:07 +0300 Received: from jaalto by cante.cante.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DTk1m-on-PS; Thu, 05 May 2005 20:20:46 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages (use GPL) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 20:20:46 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: anon-proxy Severity: serious The use of GDFL is questionable for manual pages. Please change the licence to GPL, because GFDL is known to caus elot of problem when texts are changed (embedded / copied). My use of Severity: serious derives from my attempt to interpret Debian Guidelines and the present discussion to avoid GFDL as much as possible. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/msg00451.html [Nathanael Nerode] ... You do realize that GFDL'ed documentation with a GPL'ed program means that moving stuff between the documentation and the program is possible *only* for the copyright holder. This is tedious in the extreme when the program or documentation has multiple copyright holders. http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html This document is being put together to attempt to address some concerns that members of the Debian legal team have about the GNU Free Documentation License. This document attempts to present the reasoning behind the conclusion that the GNU FDL is not regarded as a license that can easily satisfy the Debian Free Software Guidelines. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) --- Received: (at 307820-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 19:55:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 12:55:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTmRf-0003xU-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 12:55:39 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTmK9-00013x-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 15:47:53 -0400 From: David Spreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307820: fixed in anon-proxy 00.02.39-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 15:47:53 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: anon-proxy Source-Version: 00.02.39-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of anon-proxy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: anon-proxy_00.02.39-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/anon-proxy/anon-proxy_00.02.39-7.diff.gz anon-proxy_00.02.39-7.dsc to pool/main/a/anon-proxy/anon-proxy_00.02.39-7.dsc
Processed: tagging 307820
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307820 sarge-ignore Bug#307820: anon-proxy: [manual] GFDL license is unsuitable for manual pages (use GPL) There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge-ignore End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307042: fix?
Just a reminder that it's been 5 days since you promised a fix for this RC bug shortly. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
On 5/5/05, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: It seems the environment variable AWK is set somewhere to gawk, I just have no idea where. I'm seeing this only in my amd64 chroot it seems. When I try the same in my i386 chroot, it uses mawk. All the buildd logs also use mawk, and I have no idea why it's different on amd64. Could be something in how r-base is built on amd64... Dirk, any ideas? I think it has something to do with /usr/lib/R/etc/Renviron. Please feel free to lower the severity of this bug. I'd rather see it fixed for sarge ;-) Chris -- Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
Bug#306878: downgrade
severity 306878 normal thanks I'll leave closing the bug up to the maintainer, but based on Allan Lyons's review, this bug is not RC so I'm downgrading it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of affix-kernel 2.1.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 307167 + fixed Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 230875, severity of 307784 is grave, merging 230875 307784
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 230875 - fixed Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security Tags were: fixed security Tags removed: fixed severity 307784 grave Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366 Severity set to `grave'. merge 230875 307784 Bug#230875: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366 Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #230875 has `libpam-pgsql'; #307784 has `pam-pgsql' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307591: referring to examples files in postinst scripts is a policy violation and..
libapache-mod-php4.postinst:cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini libapache2-mod-php4.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini php4-cgi.postinst: cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini php4-cli.postinst:cp /usr/share/doc/php4-common/examples/php.ini $phpini Besides apparently breaking the installation of libapache2-mod-php4, all of the above violate policy 12.6. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#305122: ia32-libs: Patch to make 'ia32-libs' work again on amd64/sarge
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32' does not work tags 307521 +patch thanks I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e. without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package from sarge. Or just use the patch from the BTS that is already there. Oops, sorry. I overlooked #305122, maybe because it was tagged 'fixed' which was not true. Thanks for correcting the tag. However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-release'. However, lsb-release has been fixed in unstable, and this fixed version has been marked for approval into sarge. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: Package: pam-pgsql Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to Bug#230875 regarding sql injection problem with changing password (easy impact would be changing uid to 0 ... root compromise). It looks like the upload that reverted these changes was a botched attempt at orphaning the package. Bug #303198, however, is currently titled RFA, not O. Joerg, was your intention here to continue maintaining pam-pgsql until someone else comes along to do so, or were you trying to orphan the package immediately so that you're no longer responsible for it? If it is indeed the maintainer's intention to orphan this package, I would recommend removing it from sarge on account of the progressive security issues. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307316: mypasswordsafe: FTBFS: Makefile:45: *** Recursive variable `USER' references itself (eventually)
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: ifndef HOST HOST=$(shell hostname).$(shell domainname) Also, /bin/domainname is provided by the 'nis' package, how is this supposed to work? I wonder why this doesn't cause a FTBFS too, considering that $HOST isn't generally set. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Could be something in how r-base is built on amd64... Dirk, any ideas?
I think it has something to do with /usr/lib/R/etc/Renviron.
It says:
## Use configure values
AWK=${AWK-'gawk'}
While on i386 it says:
## Use configure values
AWK=${AWK-'mawk'}
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 307706
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307706 - fixed Bug#307706: m-tx: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge Tags were: fixed sarge Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 307632 is critical, tagging 307632
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 307632 critical Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) Severity set to `critical'. tags 307632 security Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) Tags were: patch Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 307816
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307816 sid Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
