Bug#404025: file conflict between libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev
Package: libmeep-mpi-dev Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc', which is also in package libmeep-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/libmeep-dev_libmeep-mpi-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Package: id-utils Version: 3.2d-11 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz', which is also in package id-utils Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/id-utils_libuser for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404023: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl
Package: libbusiness-ups-perl Version: 1.13-4 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libbusiness-ups-perl_1.13-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz', which is also in package interchange Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libbusiness-ups-perl_1.13-4_all.deb see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/interchange_libbusiness-ups-perl for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404022: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl
Package: interchange Version: 5.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libbusiness-ups-perl_1.13-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz', which is also in package interchange Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libbusiness-ups-perl_1.13-4_all.deb see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/interchange_libbusiness-ups-perl for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Package: libuser Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz', which is also in package id-utils Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libuser_1%3a0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/id-utils_libuser for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404024: file conflict between libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev
Package: libmeep-dev Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libmeep-dev and libmeep-mpi-dev ship `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/meep.pc', which is also in package libmeep-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/libmeep-dev_libmeep-mpi-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404028: file conflict between synce-kde and vdccm
Package: synce-kde Version: 0.9.1-1+b1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vdccm_0.9.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vdccm', which is also in package synce-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/vdccm_0.9.3-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/synce-kde_vdccm for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404029: file conflict between synce-kde and vdccm
Package: vdccm Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both synce-kde and vdccm ship `/usr/bin/vdccm' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vdccm_0.9.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vdccm', which is also in package synce-kde Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/vdccm_0.9.3-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/synce-kde_vdccm for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404027: file conflict between openmpi-dev and pgapack
Package: pgapack Version: 1.0.0.1-4.2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pgapack_1.0.0.1-4.2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/mpi.h', which is also in package openmpi-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/pgapack_1.0.0.1-4.2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/openmpi-dev_pgapack for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404026: file conflict between openmpi-dev and pgapack
Package: openmpi-dev Version: 1.1-2.2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both openmpi-dev and pgapack ship `/usr/include/mpi.h' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pgapack_1.0.0.1-4.2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/mpi.h', which is also in package openmpi-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/pgapack_1.0.0.1-4.2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/openmpi-dev_pgapack for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 403874 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # wrong unsatisfiable dependencies severity 403874 serious Bug#403874: ghextris: depends on python, uses #! /usr/bin/python2.3 Severity set to `serious' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404023: interchange should not ship Business::UPS but depend on it
hi, after some investigation it seems like interchange ships Business::UPS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/qa$ dpkg -c interchange_5.4.1-1_amd64.deb | grep Business drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/UPS/ -rw-r--r-- root/root91 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/auto/Business/UPS/autosplit.ix -rw-r--r-- root/root 9352 2005-01-24 15:38 ./usr/lib/interchange/Vend/Payment/BusinessOnlinePayment.pm drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/Business/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 8909 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/Business/UPS.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 15151 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/lib/interchange/Business/Fedex.pm -rw-r--r-- root/root 1676 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root 1711 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/share/man/man3/Vend::Payment::BusinessOnlinePayment.3pm.gz -rw-r--r-- root/root 1679 2006-06-07 15:07 ./usr/share/man/man3/Business::Fedex.3pm.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/qa$ dpkg -c libbusiness-ups-perl_1.13-4_all.deb | grep Business drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-02-17 21:35 ./usr/share/perl5/Business/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 9278 1999-02-22 17:03 ./usr/share/perl5/Business/UPS.pm drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-02-17 21:35 ./usr/share/perl5/auto/Business/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-02-17 21:35 ./usr/share/perl5/auto/Business/UPS/ -rw-r--r-- root/root91 2005-02-17 21:35 ./usr/share/perl5/auto/Business/UPS/autosplit.ix -rw-r--r-- root/root 4185 2005-02-17 21:35 ./usr/share/man/man3/Business::UPS.3pm.gz is there any particular reason for this? If not, please be sure to remove this files from your package and add libbusiness-ups-perl to your Dependencies. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to ndisc6, tagging 404007
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 package ndisc6 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ndisc6 tags 404007 + pending Bug#404007: file conflict between ndisc6 and sofia-sip-bin There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403974 normal Bug#403974: loop-aes-source: build error on kernel 2.6.20-rc1 Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS
hi, please take a look at another related bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403797 to resume: Some changes have been done in theme handling. Please take a look at /usr/share/doc/kdm/README.Debian desktop-base installs /etc/default/kdm.d/10_desktop-base . It overrides kdm values. You can comment values inside 10_desktop-base or add your own overrided values in /etc/default/kdm.d/20_my-values for example. As explained by sune, configuration files are in /etc/kde3/kdm/ directory and we read overrides /etc/default/kdm.d/ directory. kdm doesn't violate FHS as you seem to claim. cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: found 403952 in 0.28-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 found 403952 0.28-1 Bug#403952: rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)] Bug marked as found in version 0.28-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast
Le jeudi 21 décembre 2006 07:55, Michael Ablassmeier a écrit : hi, Hi ! both gnome-peercast and ibpeercast0-dev ship usr/lib/libpeercast.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: Gnome peercast ship a customised peercast server code, which is bad. I have filed a bug on this times ago, but lack of cooperation from the maintainer did not improved.. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpeercast0-dev_0.1217.toots.20060314-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libpeercast.a', which is also in package gnome-peercast dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpeercast0-dev_0.1217.toots.20060314-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ok, I'll add a conflict on libpeercast0-dev ASAP. But to me, gnome-peercast should not ship any libpeercast.a since no one is supposed to link staticaly on libpeercast using gnome-peercast... Romain
Bug#403937: marked as done (tkinfo: contains a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403937: fixed in tkinfo 2.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tkinfo Version: 2.8-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 11.8.7 tkinfo installs the following file into /usr/X11R6/include/X11: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps/TkInfo.xpm This is prohibited by the Debian policy, section 11.8.7: The installation of files into subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ and /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/ is now prohibited; package maintainers should determine if subdirectories of /usr/lib/ and /usr/share/ can be used instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-amd64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: tkinfo Source-Version: 2.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tkinfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tkinfo_2.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tkinfo/tkinfo_2.8-2.diff.gz tkinfo_2.8-2.dsc to pool/main/t/tkinfo/tkinfo_2.8-2.dsc tkinfo_2.8-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/tkinfo/tkinfo_2.8-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tkinfo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:11:26 +0100 Source: tkinfo Binary: tkinfo Architecture: source all Version: 2.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tkinfo - tk/tcl info browser Closes: 403937 Changes: tkinfo (2.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Move some files around to conform to current policy (closes: #403937) Files: 2f0c4be14b46ba091b025829edb0815d 551 doc optional tkinfo_2.8-2.dsc 90818b957223cf1e74ec19edbdb2e2aa 3846 doc optional tkinfo_2.8-2.diff.gz be80211ccbaf8c8d69146daddf41327b 62924 doc optional tkinfo_2.8-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFilG95GwONXmN2VwRAntKAKCY29mE9j0bliB6IQNC7xFCfTOM/gCdF42k BU9wmGBtUpXVfVMNR2WUr80= =KZyr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: severity of 403896 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 403896 important Bug#403896: screen: copyright file is not up-to-date Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast
hi, On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:33:42AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: Ok, I'll add a conflict on libpeercast0-dev ASAP. But to me, gnome-peercast should not ship any libpeercast.a since no one is supposed to link staticaly on libpeercast using gnome-peercast... indeed, if there is no reason for gnome-peercast to ship this library by itself it should be fixed there. Feel free to reassign / merge this bugreport. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404012: file conflicts between z80asm and z88dk-bin
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:20:21AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: Package: z88dk-bin Version: 1.6.ds1-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both z80asm and z88dk-bin ship `/usr/share/man/man1/z80asm.1.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/z88dk-bin_1.6.ds1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/z80asm.1.gz', which is also in package z80asm Selecting previously deselected package z88dk. Unpacking z88dk (from .../z88dk_1.6.ds1-1_all.deb) ... Errors were encountered while processing: see http://people.debian.org/~abi/testing_install_logs/z80asm_z88dk-bin for the full log. Thanks for bugreport. It be fixed in upload. -- Krystian Wlosek pgpmdw6BI7iR6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#403999: file conflict between ggzd and gz-game-servers
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 07:53 schrieb Michael Ablassmeier: both ggz-game-servers and ggzd ship etc/ggzd/rooms/entry.room but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: Neither a conflict nor a diversion is the right solution. Instead, this file should only end up in the 'ggzd' package. The reason for the conflict is that ggzd.install specifies debian/tmp/etc/ggzd/rooms/entry.room whereas ggz-game-servers.install contains debian/tmp/etc/ggzd/rooms without explicitly excluding entry.room. Is there a way to request from debhelper to handle this intelligently? If not we'll probably need to work around this but I certainly don't know how to do this in the under-documented cdbs. Josef -- Free online games for everybody: http://www.ggzgamingzone.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404036: gzip does not install
Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Unpacking replacement gzip ... Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 87 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# install-info /usr/share/info/gzip.info install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# exit exit -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages gzip depends on: ii debianutils 2.17.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries gzip recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#401530: confirm that 401530 is fixed
Hi, I have tested the package on ppc and can confirm that 401530 is indeed fixed, thanks! regards, Holger pgpHjBXzvDDp4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#403728: marked as done (Needs Replaces: openoffice.org-common ( 2.1~rc2-1))
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:21:22 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: openoffice.org-style-default Version: 2.1~rc2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable When I try to upgrade to openoffice.org in experimental, I get dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-style-default_2.1~rc2-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite /usr/lib/openoffice/share/config/images.zip', which is also in package openoffice.org-common You need to add Replaces: openoffice.org-common ( 2.1~rc2-1) to openoffice.org-style-default to fix this. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 2.1-1 .. now in incoming. Closing. Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 ---End Message---
Bug#399329: 3 security issues: PMASA-2006-7, PMASA-2006-8, PMASA-2006-9
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 00:02 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: The solution is that the behaviour is changed and an extra configuration parameter has been added. Is this suitable for sarge? See also patch. What functionality is referred to by Bad IP Allow/Deny checking? It is a black list protection against potentially malicious clients or brute force attacks? The former - it allows to define in the phpMyAdmin configuration which clients (IPs) have access to the application, indeed to lock out anyone that doesn't have business being there. Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Don't forget that graphicsmagick suffers from libpng problem as well.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 401047 -1 Bug#401047: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng. Bug 401047 cloned as bug 404043. reassign -1 graphicsmagick Bug#404043: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng. Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to `graphicsmagick'. close -1 1.1.7-10 Bug#404043: imagemagick: [AMD64] FTBFS with recent libpng. 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.1.7-10, send any further explanations to Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 403611 etch-ignore Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#354355: sympa Soap configuration and other things
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
I don't necessarily need a patch on the soap configuration, just a pointer
to the places where I find it in Jean latest package.
debian/template :
Template: wwsympa/fastcgi
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Do you want WWSympa to run with FastCGI?
FastCGI is an Apache module that makes WWSympa run much faster. This
option will be activated only if the `libapache-mod-fastcgi' package is
installed on your system. Please first make sure you installed this
package. You will need FastCGI if you plane tu use the sympa soap server.
Template: sympa/use_soap
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: Do you want the sympa SOAP server to be used?
Sympa SOAP server allows to access a Sympa service from within another
program, written in any programming language and on any computer. The SOAP
server provides a limited set of high level functions including login,
which,lists,subscribe,signoff. Other functions might be implemented in the
future.
.
The SOAP server uses libsoap-lite-perl package and a webserver like apache.
Template: sympa/soap_url
Type: string
_Description: Once installed, you will be able to access the SOAP server at the
following address.
Template: sympa/soap_configured
Type: boolean
Default: false
Description: internal use only
I choose false for the default value of fastcgi because it's in non-free
and sympa can run without it.
Upstream disagree.
debian/config :
# Ask for spool directories removal
db_input medium wwsympa/remove_spool || [ $? -eq 30 ]
db_go
if [ $fastcgi = true ]; then
# Ask for soap usage
db_input medium sympa/use_soap || [ $? -eq 30 ]
db_go
db_get sympa/use_soap
use_soap=$RET
if [ use_soap=true ]; then
soap_url=http://${host}/sympasoap;
if [ -f /etc/sympa/sympa.conf ]; then
# Get the soap url from sympa.conf
orig_soap_url=`perl -nle 'if (/^\s*soap_url\s+(\d)$/) {print $1;
}' /etc/sympa/sympa.conf`
if [ -z $orig_soap_url ]; then
db_get sympa/soap_url
orig_soap_url=$RET
else
soap_url=$orig_soap_url;
fi
db_set sympa/soap_url $soap_url
db_input medium sympa/soap_url || [ $? -eq 30 ]
db_go
fi
fi
fi
debian/postinst :
if [ $fastcgi = 1 ]; then
db_get sympa/use_soap
use_soap=$RET
# Use SOAP
if [ $use_soap = true ]; then
chown sympa:sympa /usr/lib/cgi-bin/sympa/sympa_soap_server.fcgi
chmod 6755 /usr/lib/cgi-bin/sympa/sympa_soap_server.fcgi
db_get sympa/soap_url
soap_url=$RET
perl -i -pe s%^(soap_url\s+).*%soap_url ${soap_url}% /etc/sympa/sympa.c
onf
# Tell Debconf SOAP has been configured
db_set sympa/soap_configured true
fi
fi
# WebServer configuration
if [ $use_soap = true -o $use_wwsympa = true ]; then
[...]
# Check whether the Web server is installed
if [ -f /etc/$webserver/httpd.conf ]; then
echo $webserver: installation seems OK ...
else
webserver=none
fi
if [ $webserver = none ]; then
echo Not configuring Web server.
else
mkdir -p /etc/$webserver/conf.d
if [ $use_wwsympa = true ]; then
# Activate wwsympa
if [ ! -f /etc/$webserver/conf.d/sympa -a ! -h /etc/$webserver/conf.d
/sympa ]; then
ln -sf /etc/sympa/apache-wwsympa /etc/$webserver/conf.d/sympa
fi
fi
if [ $use_soap = true ]; then
# Activate soap
if [ ! -f /etc/$webserver/conf.d/sympa-soap -a ! -h /etc/$webserver/c
onf.d/sympa-soap ]; then
ln -s /etc/sympa/apache-soap /etc/$webserver/conf.d/sympa-soap
fi
fi
fi
fi
As you can see, I didn't choose the same heuristic as you for configuring the
webserver, I'm using links to conffile in /etc/sympa while you are using
conffile in /etc/$webserver/conf.d/
Both heuristic have their own problems.
debian/conf/sympa-soap :
# FastCgiServer /usr/lib/cgi-bin/sympa/sympa_soap_server.fcgi -processes 1
ScriptAlias /sympasoap /usr/lib/cgi-bin/sympa/sympa_soap_server.fcgi
Location /sympasoap
SetHandler fastcgi-script
/Location
debian/postrm:
#!/bin/sh -e
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
# case $1 in
#remove)
# Check whether the syslog configuration file is present
# in case another system log daemon is used instead of syslog
[...]
[ executed for both remove and purge ]
# Don't fail here, the package might not be configured yet
db_get sympa/use_wwsympa || true
use_wwsympa=$RET
db_get sympa/use_soap || true
use_soap=$RET
if [ $use_wwsympa = true -o $use_soap = true ]; then
## Remove Web server configuration
db_get wwsympa/webserver_type
webserver=$RET
Bug#404046: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package
Package: gnome-peercast Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.4 gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a. This is bad for the following reasons: * It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000 * No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it states in his name or in the section that the package is meant for devel. Hence section 8.4 is violated. Romain -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.5-mactel Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403998: No such package version
severity 403998 wishlist retitle 403998 Please package newer version thanks Hello, From: Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: It is not installable Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:53:09 +0900 Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave I do not see version 1.3.9-1 of gzip anywhere on the Debian archive. Current version is 1.3.5-15 and the install-info portion of postinst for that version works fine. Hence the severity is wishlist as perhaps the submitter wishes that there was a version 1.3.9-1 :-) (I only see 1.3.8 on the primary site so perhaps the submitter mis-typed the number). Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404013: marked as done (file conflict between zope2.9 and zope2.9-sandbox)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:32:09 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404013: fixed in zope2.9 2.9.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: zope2.9 Version: 2.9.5-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both zope2.9 and zope2.9-sandbox ship `/usr/share/doc/zope2.9/README.Debian.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: Unpacking zope2.9-sandbox (from .../zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/zope2.9/README.Debian.gz', which is also in package zope2.9 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/testing_install_logs/zope2.9_zope2.9-sandbox for the full log. bye, - michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: zope2.9 Source-Version: 2.9.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope2.9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-2_all.deb to pool/main/z/zope2.9/zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-2_all.deb zope2.9_2.9.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope2.9/zope2.9_2.9.6-2.diff.gz zope2.9_2.9.6-2.dsc to pool/main/z/zope2.9/zope2.9_2.9.6-2.dsc zope2.9_2.9.6-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/z/zope2.9/zope2.9_2.9.6-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope2.9 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:18:23 +0100 Source: zope2.9 Binary: zope2.9-sandbox zope2.9 Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.9.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: zope2.9- Open Source Web Application Server zope2.9-sandbox - sandbox instance for the zope2.9 web application server Closes: 404013 Changes: zope2.9 (2.9.6-2) unstable; urgency=high . * debian/rules: fixed file conflict between zope2.9 and zope2.9-sandbox. (Closes: #404013) Files: 0eb7ddc60b79dc649285e8f9decec045 860 web optional zope2.9_2.9.6-2.dsc 87594ef85a84523de9339eccdf1dcb4b 11979 web optional zope2.9_2.9.6-2.diff.gz 75017bf89438b575dad45d8bcb16108a 6951528 web optional zope2.9_2.9.6-2_amd64.deb 95450a5384a24de7fe85b51cbd65520c 11404 web optional zope2.9-sandbox_2.9.6-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFil/DK/juK3+WFWQRAoRVAJ0V1NVjHbHbEazktr70pf6xKFXt5ACdGleH OOTHBblHiBAelxHC/sjbWvc= =Uq/B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: Merge and reassign bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 404000 gnome-peercast Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast Bug reassigned from package `peercast' to `gnome-peercast'. retitle 404000 gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package Bug#404000: file conflict between libpeercast0-dev and gnome-peercast Changed Bug title. merge 404000 #404046 Bug#404000: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package Bug#404046: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package Merged 404000 404046. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: No such package version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403998 wishlist Bug#403998: It is not installable Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' retitle 403998 Please package newer version Bug#403998: It is not installable Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
reassign 404020 libuser thanks Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: id-utils Version: 3.2d-11 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both id-utils and libuser ship `/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz' but do not conflict $ findpkg -b bin/lid unstable usr/bin/lid devel/id-utils usr/sbin/lidadmin/libuser This means that libuser should install the manpage as ../man8/lid.8.gz Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Processed: Re: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 404020 libuser Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug reassigned from package `id-utils' to `libuser'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 403932, tagging 403934, tagging 403935, tagging 403938
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 tags 403932 etch-ignore Bug#403932: xgammon: install a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ Tags were: patch pending Tags added: etch-ignore tags 403934 etch-ignore Bug#403934: xvier: contains a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore tags 403935 etch-ignore Bug#403935: toolbar-fancy: contains files in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ Tags were: pending patch Tags added: etch-ignore tags 403938 etch-ignore Bug#403938: tenmado: contains a file in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/ There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 402259
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 402259 patch Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: fails to install or remove There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402259: sysv-rc-bootsplash: Pablo's patch fails to apply
Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash Version: 1.0.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #402259 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 $ patch --dry-run ../rc-bootsplash.patch patching file rc.sysv-rc Hunk #1 succeeded at 12 with fuzz 2. Hunk #4 FAILED at 85. Hunk #9 succeeded at 337 (offset 1 line). Hunk #10 succeeded at 349 (offset 1 line). 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file rc.sysv-rc.rej $ This is because, since the Etch freeze started, sysvinit was updated again. Anyhow, as recommended before, those hooks really should be implemented as userspace commands. See Bug#388838 for the explanation. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFimraeXr56x4Muc0RAnvVAJ4sfxcaUdorZD5PgOYQoWZE+2cKnwCfVrBh JCtKYj0ctCD2cXFl0TBnNSg= =7qYs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions to GPL
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under plain GPL. This is apparently wrong as for example src/cfft.h state (other files too): [... GPL boilerplate ...] ** Software using this code must display the following message visibly in or ** on each copy of the software: ** FAAD2 AAC/HE-AAC/HE-AACv2/DRM decoder (c) Nero AG, www.nero.com ** in, for example, the about-box or help/startup screen. This is an additional restriction over the GPL that makes this code IMHO GPL incompatible and as thus linking to the library might be a bit funny licensing-wise. Please correct this in debian/copyright... However, it may be the case that the copyright holder legitimately intends to place the work under the GPL, and believes that the follow-up comments are merely a clarification of the GPL's requirements. The GPL does include several provisions regarding displaying copyright information, and it's possible that the author believed this requirement was the same as GPL 2c). I would consider this an etch-ignorable issue while the matter was taken up with the upstream for clarification. It would probably have been better to package the older 2.0 version or some CVS snapshot before this ugly paragraph was added to the license as for example the gstreamer plugin using this library is unable to fullfil the license requirements... Second problem I see is that the copyright holder is not mentioned in debian/copyright. Please add this. Should probably be Copyright (C) 2003-2005 M. Bakker, Nero AG, http://www.nero.com; That's not etch-ignorable, though. debian/copyright does need to include the actual copyright statement. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Processed: merging 404020 404021
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 merge 404020 404021 Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Merged 404020 404021. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#392357: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 392357 Bug#392357: fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404049: file conflict between lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev
Package: libmotif-dev Version: 2.2.3-1.5 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz', which is also in package lesstif-doc dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/lesstif-doc_libmotif-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 404020 to libuser
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 reassign 404020 libuser Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug#404021: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Bug reassigned from package `libuser' to `libuser'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392357: fixed in pcsc-lite 1.3.2-3
reopen 392357 thanks On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:47:15PM -0700, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: * debian/pcscd.init: really commit a local patch that should already be in 1.3.2-2. Closes: #392357 fails to stop; postinst goes into infinite loop Sorry, this still does not work (I missed the close message, so I assumed it was still open, I guess): fugl:~/nmu sudo /etc/init.d/pcscd restart Stopping PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd. Starting PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd already running, Stopping PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd. Starting PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd already running, Stopping PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd. Starting PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd already running, Stopping PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscd. Even better, if I'm stupid enough to close the xterm at that point, it turns into a forkbomb and kills my machine :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404047: gzip: fails to install due to install-info complaining about gzip.info
Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave gzip fails to install and when you try to install other packages with apt-get it first tries to setup gzip and fails. As not every one is install-info expert grave seams to be adequate. # apt-get install gzip Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-vserver-k7 Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gzip depends on: ii debianutils 2.17.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries gzip recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- =*= Łukasz Pankowski =*=
Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root
severity 403955 important thanks On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Package: spamassassin Version: 3.1.7-1 Severity: serious The daemon trys to create and use a logfile /razor-agent.log which should go to /var/log! But presumably it fails to create it, therefore it's not actually an FHS violation ;) and failing to log this data is not necessarily RC. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404052: file conflict between lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev
Package: lesstif-doc Version: 1:0.94.4-2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both lesstif-doc and libmotif-dev ship `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/Composite.3.gz', which is also in package lesstif-doc dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmotif-dev_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/lesstif-doc_libmotif-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 404020 file conflict with id-utils: Must rename lid.1.gz - lid.8.gz Bug#404020: file conflicts between libuser and id-utils Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403955 important Bug#403955: Try to create logfile razor-agent.log in root Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS
ok I understand : it's coherent, it's just a strange and unpleasant behavior. Now, to test the effect of what you've just changed to the appearance, you have to restart kdm using /etc/init.d (and losing your session), starting a new session from the menu is not enough any more, very discouraging. But I still don't understand why you have to use the override file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403454: mindi does rm -Rf /home !
tags 403454 + pending thanks Hi Matija, Thank you for reporting this bug and for giving the pointers below. Looking at the mailing list thread it looks like the patch listed in both the mailing list thread and in trac ticket 100 is the same and did not work because you wrote in the mailinglist thread in response to the patch: [...] Mondo doesn't run now, but at least it does not destroy the /home. Last version that I had used before, and which had created backups successfully was 2.06-4 (Andree's debian package, rebuilt for sarge) [...] So, I need to look into this in a bit more detail. In the latest stable mindi SVN revision [1005] it looks like the code has just been commented out: FindIsolinuxBinary FindLiloBinary fi # BERLIOS: Remove as too dangerous and now useless #grep -F $MINDI_TMP /proc/mounts | grep -F tmpfs /dev/null 2 /dev/null MINDI_TMP=/home/tmpmondo mkdir -p $MINDI_TMP LogIt Changing MINDI_TMP to $MINDI_TMP because you're using tmpfs for /tmp \n ; # tmpfs doesn't like Mindi and /tmp, for some reason trap Aborted SIGTERM DONE=\r\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDone. I am just not sure whether commenting this out depends on other changes or not. [Bruno: Would you be able to shed some light on this?] I might send you a patch to try against mindi-2.20-1. Would you be able to test it? I intend to get this fixed over the weekend, i.e. no later than 24 Dec 06. Best regards, Andree On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 11:22 +0100, Matija Nalis wrote: Package: mindi Version: 2.20-1 Severity: critical Sometimes mindi decides to set TMP_ROOT to /home (if /tmp is mounted as tmpfs), and then at the cleanup phase does rm -Rf $TMP_ROOT. In practice, this resulted in losing whole /home directory. thread describing the problem in detail can be found at http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=37329155 The bug has since been fixed upstream, see http://trac.mondorescue.org/ticket/100 -- Andree Leidenfrost @ Debian Developer Sydney - Australia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#404054: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev
Package: libasm-dev Version: 0.123-2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship `/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libasm.a', which is also in package libasm-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/libasm-dev_libelfsh0-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403998: No such package version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403998 serious Bug#403998: Please package newer version Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404051: libapache2-mod-perl2: Typo in Apache2::SizeLimit causes crash under some conditions
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-2.2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch, fixed-upstream
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
There is a typo on line 113 in /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/SizeLimit.pm,
mod_perl 2.0.2, which under some conditions, i.e. Apache2::SizeLimit
is used and configured to use Linux::Smaps (not a very common
configuration, admittedly, since it also depends on a recent kernel),
causes server crash. If used, it will give the following error:
[Thu Dec 21 10:20:52 2006] [error] [client 10.20.21.93] Can't locate
object method shared_cleani via package Linux::Smaps::VMA at
/usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/SizeLimit.pm line 113.\n, referer:
http://my.virginia.oslo.opera.com/kjetilk/blog/
The fix is extremely trivial:
--- SizeLimit.pm~ 2005-10-21 02:04:43.0 +0200
+++ SizeLimit.pm2006-12-21 11:01:39.0 +0100
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
sub linux_smaps_size_check {
my $s = Linux::Smaps-new($$)-all;
-return ($s-size, $s-shared_cleani + $s-shared_dirty);
+return ($s-size, $s-shared_clean + $s-shared_dirty);
}
# return process size (in KB)
It is just a single character, it was just a simple typo.
This should have been fixed in upstream 2.0.3 allthough it was not
mentioned in the changelog. The changelog of 2.0.3 indicates it is
pretty much a pure bugfix release, so I think Debian should seriously
consider including it.
But I realise that's a long shot now that etch is frozen, so
alternatively, I ask that this bug is corrected, it is the most
trivial bug possible, and even though it affects relatively few users,
it is extremely annoying and renders the package unusable for those
who wants to optimize the server's memory use.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libapache2-mod-perl2 depends on:
ii apache2. 2.2.3-3.1 Next generation, scalable,
extenda
ii libapr1 1.2.7-8 The Apache Portable Runtime
Librar
ii libaprut 1.2.7+dfsg-2The Apache Portable Runtime
Utilit
ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared
libraries
ii libdevel 2.03-3 Perl module for inspecting
perl's
ii libperl5 5.8.8-7 Shared Perl library
ii liburi-p 1.35-2 Manipulates and accesses
URI strin
ii libuuid1 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 universally unique id
library
ii libwww-p 5.805-1 WWW client/server library
for Perl
ii netbase 4.27Basic TCP/IP networking
system
ii perl [li 5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical
Extraction
ii perl-bas 5.8.8-7 The Pathologically Eclectic
Rubbis
libapache2-mod-perl2 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403804: net.agent check for lo= in /etc/network/run/ifstate is broken on unclean shutdown; interface not brought up
On Dec 19, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is up, that seems less likely to have false positivies. Looks like a good idea. I would also be more comfortable in making a background process wait for it without a timeout. Can you suggest a way to check for this without depending on grepping the output of ifconfig or iproute? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev
Package: libelfsh0-dev Version: 0.65rc1-1 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship `/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libasm.a', which is also in package libasm-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/libasm-dev_libelfsh0-dev for the full log. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.2.2-3
Severity: important
snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
Here's a sample testcase, running snmpwalk from another box ('dogma'):
Could you retest this with 5.2.3-5? One bug was fixed in this version which
could cause crashes in certain cases (duplicate IP address present, this
might as well be a duplicate IPv6 address which is common on p-t-p links or
VLAN interfaces).
Thanks,
Jochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFinM10fhX0Y/ocz0RAiFPAJ0VQIht2sqR/TtIiX2ddOVNvgymgwCgkUDV
zL43laERdlKF11Eax+8a6UI=
=h9ur
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403454: mindi does rm -Rf /home !
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 403454 + pending Bug#403454: mindi does rm -Rf /home ! There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403426: kernel corrupts LUKS partition header on arm
We're seeing corruption of LUKS partition headers on ARM. I've confirmed this on two different ARM platforms (IXP4xx and IOP32x) and with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18. Basically, when you create a LUKS partition on a PC and then connect it to an ARM box and open it, you get an automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggered message and afterwards the LUKS partition header is corrupted. Here are steps to reproduce this: On the PC: 27340:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ] sudo cryptsetup luksFormat /dev/sda6 WARNING! This will overwrite data on /dev/sda6 irrevocably. Are you sure? (Type uppercase yes): YES Enter LUKS passphrase: Verify passphrase: Command successful. 27348:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] sudo cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sda6 x Enter LUKS passphrase: key slot 0 unlocked. Command successful. 27351:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] sudo cryptsetup luksClose x 27352:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] Connect the drive to the ARM box: debian:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb6 x Enter LUKS passphrase: automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggered [here it appears to hang; I press ctrl-c] debian:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb6 x Enter LUKS passphrase: unknown hash spec in phdrEnter LUKS passphrase: unknown hash spec in phdrEnter LUKS passphrase: unknown hash spec in phdrCommand failed: No key available with this passphrase. debian:~# The original bug report with some more info: * Brian Brunswick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-17 02:29]: Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-ixp4xx Version: 2.6.18-8 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss This is on an NSLU2, I wanted to use it to access some disks that I had used previously on another system that had encrypted partitons. However, when I tried cryptsetup luksOpen, I got a automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggered message, and then an infinite loop. Trying the same partition on the other system, now I get the same thing - its header is corrupted. Luckily, I'm paranoid and had a backup of the LUKS header! If I didn't have this, the whole partition's data would probably be lost. Here's the result of some tests - and its stranger than you think... Used cryptsetup luksFormat on another system to set up a partition.. LKG8A754B:~# uname -a Linux LKG8A754B 2.6.18-3-ixp4xx #1 Mon Dec 11 17:20:00 UTC 2006 armv5tel GNU/Linux !!! ... after some experiments corrupting it... now I restore it again and decide to strace things... !!! LKG8A754B:~# dd sde4-luks-header-backup /dev/sde4 150+0 records in 150+0 records out 76800 bytes (77 kB) copied, 0.0148216 seconds, 5.2 MB/s LKG8A754B:~# strace 2trace cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sde4 sde4 Enter LUKS passphrase: key slot 0 unlocked. !!! Hey, that just worked !!! LKG8A754B:~# ls -l /dev/mapper/sde4 brw-rw 1 root disk 254, 0 Dec 17 02:00 /dev/mapper/sde4 LKG8A754B:~# cmp -l /dev/sde4 sde4-luks-header-backup cmp: EOF on sde4-luks-header-backup !!! But: !!! LKG8A754B:~# cryptsetup remove sde4 !!! no strace !!! LKG8A754B:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sde4 sde4 Enter LUKS passphrase: automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggered ctrl-c LKG8A754B:~# cmp -l /dev/sde4 sde4-luks-header-backup 168 0 12 513 114 0 514 125 0 515 113 0 516 123 0 517 272 0 518 276 0 520 1 0 521 141 0 522 145 0 523 163 0 539 0 3 540 0 10 543 0 17 544 0 240 553 143 0 554 142 0 555 143 0 556 55 0 557 145 0 558 163 0 559 163 0 560 151 0 561 166 0 562 72 0 563 163 0 564 150 0 565 141 0 566 62 0 567 65 0 568 66 0 585 163 0 586 150 0 587 141 3 588 61 210 591 0 17 592 0 240 cmp: EOF on sde4-luks-header-backup LKG8A754B:~# !!! Its done something like overwrite the second sector of the header with the first one. I had a look at the cryptsetup code, and the conversion message is triggered by it finding the wrong state code for the passphrase slot - so the data has been overwritten by the time its got there. This is reliable - it always seems to corrupt it without strace, always works with!??? Err According to the orignal bug reporter, cryptsetup hangs when it shows automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggered. However, I tried it with a small partition now (ca 90 MB) and it doesn't hang. I got: foobar:~# cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sda5 x Enter LUKS passphrase: automatic header conversion from 0.99 to 0.991 triggereddevice-mapper: crypt: Device lookup failed device-mapper: error adding target to table device-mapper: device doesn't appear to be in the dev hash table. Failed to setup dm-crypt key mapping. Check kernel for support for the aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 cipher spec and verify that /dev/sda5 contains at least 133 sectors. Failed to read from key storage Enter LUKS passphrase: unknown hash spec in phdrEnter LUKS passphrase: -- Martin Michlmayr
Bug#403091: haskell-uulib still FTBFS due to missing Build-Depends-Indep on hugs
Hi, The bug in cpphs is fixed but haskell-uulib still FTBFS because the package is missing a Build-Depends-Indep on hugs. I will upload a fixed version later today. Greetings Arjan signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#403611: xemacs21-basesupport: xsl mode interprets delete key inconsistently
tags 403611 etch-ignore thanks On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:32:20AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: On December 18, 2006 at 2:09PM +0100, peter_e (at gmx.net) wrote: Package: xemacs21-basesupport Version: 2006.05.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: release criterion 5.(e) The xsl mode (xslide) supplied in this package interprets the delete key as a backspace. This is inconsistent with other emacs modes and the rest of the system. The xsl-mode isn't enabled by default and isn't problematic in my normal use. I feel the severity can be downgraded for Etch. Hmm, tentatively agreed; this is ultimately a reference to policy 9.8 defining how keys should be understood, and this is primarily about standardizing terminal behavior so that applications know how to interact. It does diminish the quality of implementation for an application (or emacs mode) to unnecessarily diverge from these rules, but I don't think a single emacs mode handling delete differently is a reason to remove all of xemacs21-packages from the release. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404057: axyl: fails to install in clean chroot: find: /etc/apache: No such file or directory
Package: axyl Version: 2.1.11 Severity: serious hi, axyl fails to install if /etc/apache is missing: Setting up axyl (2.1.12) ... mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl' mkdir: created directory `/var/lib/axyl/system' mkdir: created directory `/var/log/axyl' Unix user account axyl successfully added (100). Adding group `wwwadmin' (GID 1000) ... Done. find: /etc/apache: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing axyl (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: axyl E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) test was done installing axyl in a clean cowbuilder chroot. see: http://people.debian.org/~abi/testing_chroot_logs/axyl http://people.debian.org/~abi/testing_chroot_logs/axyl-doc http://people.debian.org/~abi/testing_chroot_logs/axyl-lucene for full logs. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403998: No such package version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 403998 Package is not installable Bug#403998: Please package newer version Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403998: No such package version
retitle 403998 Package is not installable thanks Hello, On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: severity 403998 serious thanks On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:41:22PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: From: Jonny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: It is not installable Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:53:09 +0900 Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave I do not see version 1.3.9-1 of gzip anywhere on the Debian archive. Look closer. :) It's in the most recent mirror pulse. Oops. I suppose our local unofficial mirror is out-of-date! Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 404048 grave Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error Severity set to `grave' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error
severity 404048 grave thanks Hi, this bug is actually grave because gzip is uninstallable in sid now. Andreas pgp5ZHBuzZSwS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#396636: Fix for using eclipse with xulrunner
Hi, so I decided to fetch eclipse from the debian-svn and build it locally as I thought I saw a xulrunner.dpatch. It turned out that patch just changed the dependecy, but there is the firefox and firefox2 patches which include a fix to use the new API from xulrunner. I just copied over parts of the dpatch files (namely the jni-diffs) and rebuilt eclipse with xulrunner and this new patch. A first start and opening the documentation browser while xulrunner-dev is installed works perfectly, so I guess one part of the fix is using those firefox-patches. The other part would be to actually link against the library that is not in xulrunner-dev (libgtkembedmoz.so.0d IIRC), so one doesn't need the xulrunner-dev package. Andreas -- You should go home. pgpGOCb0Vgm9Y.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev
severity 404055 important thanks Hi, I've added a conflict in libasm-dev, so this atleast isn't RC anymore. It seems you only have libasm.a on a few arches? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
On 12/21/06, Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.2.2-3
Severity: important
snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
Here's a sample testcase, running snmpwalk from another box ('dogma'):
Could you retest this with 5.2.3-5? One bug was fixed in this version which
could cause crashes in certain cases (duplicate IP address present, this
might as well be a duplicate IPv6 address which is common on p-t-p links or
VLAN interfaces).
I'll try this weekend. This bug was totally ia64-specific though.
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 404055 important Bug#404055: file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev Severity set to `important' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402951: libapache-mod-ssl: restart leaves /var/cache/apache/__db.ssl_cache.db there
Hi Mark, On St, 2006-12-13 at 10:08 -0800, Mark Symonds wrote: Possible DoS attack in the wild? I wouldn't think so but it's been the same thing on four different servers in a week... I'm going to post to some lug mailing lists later today to see if anyone else is seeing this. Did you manage to get any more information concerning this? Regards, -- Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404054: marked as done (file conflict between libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404054: fixed in elfutils 0.123-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libasm-dev Version: 0.123-2 Severity: serious Justfication: file conflicts between packages hi, both libasm-dev and libelfsh0-dev ship `/usr/lib/libasm.a' but do not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libasm.a', which is also in package libasm-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libelfsh0-dev_0.65rc1-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) see http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/libasm-dev_libelfsh0-dev for the full log. bye, - michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: elfutils Source-Version: 0.123-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of elfutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: elfutils_0.123-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elfutils/elfutils_0.123-3.diff.gz elfutils_0.123-3.dsc to pool/main/e/elfutils/elfutils_0.123-3.dsc elfutils_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/elfutils_0.123-3_amd64.deb libasm-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libasm-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb libasm1_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libasm1_0.123-3_amd64.deb libdw-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libdw-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb libebl-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libebl-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb libelf-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libelf-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb libelf1_0.123-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/e/elfutils/libelf1_0.123-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated elfutils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:07:17 +0100 Source: elfutils Binary: libasm-dev libdw-dev elfutils libelf1 libasm1 libelf-dev libebl-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.123-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: elfutils - collection of utilities to handle ELF objects libasm-dev - libasm development libraries and header files libasm1- library with a programmable assembler interface libdw-dev - library that provides access to the DWARF debug information libebl-dev - static library providing higher-level ELF access functionality libelf-dev - libelf1 development libraries and header files libelf1- library to read and write ELF files Closes: 404054 Changes: elfutils (0.123-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Make libasm-dev conflict with libelfsh0-dev. libelfsh0-dev. also ships an libasm.a on i386. (Closes: #404054) Files: ccd795e2907abc64405c361d3d51e34a 741 libs optional elfutils_0.123-3.dsc 36838391960237a21a538a822c9f6cc9 158826 libs optional elfutils_0.123-3.diff.gz c94d0ed8ec2c157bc34c7cbe59579281 499660 utils optional elfutils_0.123-3_amd64.deb d4ae1a5813f6de806ae643505012d591 39712 libs optional libelf1_0.123-3_amd64.deb 4e5b64e10c5d111a2e5a4296619357ed 57092 libdevel optional libelf-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb b32904ff74cce4510b8a10775190d715 62052 libdevel optional libebl-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb 1bcbc8dec2463a36c20e730ac218624d 83534 libdevel optional libdw-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb aca71d4e05b9a9588811f18208bc0599 18842 libs optional libasm1_0.123-3_amd64.deb 5d14c392c7210053e427f33177ee57cc 21616 libdevel optional libasm-dev_0.123-3_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFinuIQdwckHJElwsRAig8AKC+/A4DUKR4z852Vl/JX06L6inLggCdF1mL 0RGNTpUND4XtwELDBX5d0Kk= =LRSC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#403804: net.agent check for lo= in /etc/network/run/ifstate is broken on unclean shutdown; interface not brought up
Marco d'Itri wrote: On Dec 19, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The whole check for lo being up based on /etc/network/run/ifstate seems less than ideal; it could instead check whether the actual interface is up, that seems less likely to have false positivies. Looks like a good idea. I would also be more comfortable in making a background process wait for it without a timeout. Can you suggest a way to check for this without depending on grepping the output of ifconfig or iproute? Well, if moreutils were on the base system, you could use ifdata -pf lo | grep -q Off Up Sorry, couldn't resist.. :-) With our base system, fiddling with /sys may be the best way. Maybe check for /sys/class/net/lo/operstate != down? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#403091: marked as done (haskell-uulib: FTBFS: dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs:dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs: 163:21: Parse error)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:17:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403091: fixed in haskell-uulib 0.9.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: haskell-uulib Version: 0.9.2-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package failed to build on i386. Relevant parts: Building setup... Running: ghc6 -package Cabal Setup.hs -o setup compilation IS NOT required ./setup haddock setup: Warning: The field hs-source-dir is deprecated, please use hs-source-dirs. dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs:dist/build/tmp/src/UU/Parsing/Offside.hs: 163:21: Parse e rror Warning: cannot use package base: HTML directory /usr/share/ghc-6.6/html/libraries/base does not exist. Warning: cannot use package haskell98: HTML directory /usr/share/ghc-6.6/html/libraries/haskell98 does not exist. Preprocessing library uulib-0.9.2... Running Haddock for uulib-0.9.2... make: *** [install-indep] Error 1 The full build log is available from http://blop.info/bazaar/buildlogs/20061214/ About the archive rebuilt: The rebuilt was done on about 30 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing an etch i386 environment (not unstable). Internet was not accessible from the build systems. The builds were processed as root. About Grid'5000: Grid'5000 is an highly reconfigurable experimental Grid platform gathering 9 sites and featuring a total of 5000 CPUs. It serves as a testbed for research in Grid Computing. See https://www.grid5000.fr/ -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: haskell-uulib Source-Version: 0.9.2-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of haskell-uulib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: haskell-uulib-doc_0.9.2-6_all.deb to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/haskell-uulib-doc_0.9.2-6_all.deb haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.diff.gz to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.diff.gz haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.dsc to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.dsc libghc6-uulib-dev_0.9.2-6_i386.deb to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/libghc6-uulib-dev_0.9.2-6_i386.deb libghc6-uulib-prof_0.9.2-6_i386.deb to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/libghc6-uulib-prof_0.9.2-6_i386.deb libhugs-uulib_0.9.2-6_all.deb to pool/main/h/haskell-uulib/libhugs-uulib_0.9.2-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Arjan Oosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated haskell-uulib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:49:10 +0100 Source: haskell-uulib Binary: haskell-uulib-doc libhugs-uulib libghc6-uulib-dev libghc6-uulib-prof Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.9.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Arjan Oosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Arjan Oosting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: haskell-uulib-doc - API documentation for uulib Haskell library libghc6-uulib-dev - parser and pretty print combinator library for GHC 6 libghc6-uulib-prof - profiling parser and pretty print combinator library for GHC 6 libhugs-uulib - parser and pretty print combinator library for hugs98 Closes: 403091 Changes: haskell-uulib (0.9.2-6) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix FTBFS (Closes: #403091) hence urgency high: - A fixed cpphs (0.7-4) was uploaded which should fix the parse errors. - Added hugs to Build-Depends-Indep needed to build libhugs-uulib. Files: 44c8dcd86fff8f3e008f254829659a74 853 devel optional haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.dsc 2b0f3de4b89ec247ab22079c58a06ece 7427 devel optional haskell-uulib_0.9.2-6.diff.gz e43102ff6a63d8b3118f3e8c2267b6d5 639426 devel optional libghc6-uulib-dev_0.9.2-6_i386.deb 3d6d19303c043477b9b7dc5e448c1065 736626 devel optional libghc6-uulib-prof_0.9.2-6_i386.deb 85fe8078848f97448f631653d6a67394
Processed: downgrade of severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: #as discussed in the IRC channel. retitle 403776 kdm: Theme option doesn't work Bug#403776: kdm seems to violate FHS Changed Bug title. severity 403776 normal Bug#403776: kdm: Theme option doesn't work Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403952: marked as done (rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)])
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.28-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
Hi,
as seen on packages.debian.org [1], the rlwrap package version 0.28-1
only contains /usr/share/doc on alpha, mips and mipsel. These are the
buildds that use sudo instead of fakeroot, and the problem is installing
into $(PWD), which gets unset by sudo.
The fix is to replace $(PWD) with $(CURDIR), which is set by make.
The issue is only dormant in etch (0.24-1), since the packages were
built before the sudo environment cleaning change in early 2006. Still,
by my reading of the etch RC policy ('Packages must be buildable within
the same release'), I assume this is RC for etch too.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/rlwrap
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: rlwrap
Source-Version: 0.28-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rlwrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rlwrap_0.28-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.28-2.diff.gz
rlwrap_0.28-2.dsc
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.28-2.dsc
rlwrap_0.28-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.28-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rlwrap package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:00:21 +0100
Source: rlwrap
Binary: rlwrap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.28-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
rlwrap - readline feature command line wrapper
Closes: 403952
Changes:
rlwrap (0.28-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Changed debian/rules to use $(CURDIR) instead of $(PWD) so package
building works in sudo based environments. (Closes: #403952).
Files:
18e10d7ea21aed966965841351dbd46f 707 utils optional rlwrap_0.28-2.dsc
42c726d4ceb1b35ab4c5f69c67c303d1 2138 utils optional rlwrap_0.28-2.diff.gz
3f3057334f7a977d12b2679930d079cf 35060 utils optional rlwrap_0.28-2_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBRYqUbn7hqgLJpbVOAQLbawP/c8XibVOE4H352HsXBMEU0xqveJ8Tk0wz
GPVse4sQPjcktqmQCjH0vkE09TgqqC6Mtm+P0//YcGUS9rhB7G1QFS3e7RBgQPHb
UDocT1k+oix1E1XYOf73TD4BjKtp5kbm60OiS6oITNQRcC5+FZ1Anw2krE/0zOq3
EQl7pjHyxbM=
=EeIo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Bug#402482: RC?
On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:46, Steve Langasek wrote: You could argue that the package is unfit for release (= sev: serious), but then I don't see how that's consistent with asking for an etch-ignore tag. If it's ignorable for etch, I don't see why it wouldn't also be ignorable for lenny if it didn't get fixed in time. It has severity serious, so we agree about that. The reason it is ignorable for Etch is IMO that the problem has already been in busybox for a long time and that is was only discovered very shortly before the release. These facts make it unrealistic to delay the release for the issue. However, that does not mean it should also be ignored for a release that is 1.5 years away. Keeping it at serious with tag etch-ignore basically means please fix asap, if possible even in time for Etch. The issue is serious as people may not always know exactly what to expect when extracting data from a zipped file and thus may not know they are missing anything. pgppfHTxUG5ml.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Patch for RC gzip bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 404048 patch Bug#404048: unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#403952: marked as done (rlwrap: empty package on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)])
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:02:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403952: fixed in rlwrap 0.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
Hi,
as seen on packages.debian.org [1], the rlwrap package version 0.28-1
only contains /usr/share/doc on alpha, mips and mipsel. These are the
buildds that use sudo instead of fakeroot, and the problem is installing
into $(PWD), which gets unset by sudo.
The fix is to replace $(PWD) with $(CURDIR), which is set by make.
The issue is only dormant in etch (0.24-1), since the packages were
built before the sudo environment cleaning change in early 2006. Still,
by my reading of the etch RC policy ('Packages must be buildable within
the same release'), I assume this is RC for etch too.
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/rlwrap
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: rlwrap
Source-Version: 0.24-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rlwrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rlwrap_0.24-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.24-2.diff.gz
rlwrap_0.24-2.dsc
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.24-2.dsc
rlwrap_0.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rlwrap/rlwrap_0.24-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rlwrap package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:18:56 +0100
Source: rlwrap
Binary: rlwrap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.24-2
Distribution: testing
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Oyvind Gronnesby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
rlwrap - readline feature command line wrapper
Closes: 403952
Changes:
rlwrap (0.24-2) testing; urgency=medium
.
* Changed debian/rules to use $(CURDIR) instead of $(PWD) so package
building works in sudo based environments. (Closes: #403952).
Files:
97f787f2f5b2b681d71b68e3942b8aab 707 utils optional rlwrap_0.24-2.dsc
6676c2d7453e203ede01fcafc65c081d 2075 utils optional rlwrap_0.24-2.diff.gz
352958b48cd7662b7755a6cc2a800885 30156 utils optional rlwrap_0.24-2_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBRYqTI37hqgLJpbVOAQLALAQAiNVDqyqXn7AQZgsI1yrARa62Qi59rkj4
OsTzxcpUNRAFzgd0El5lq7t6gmql9xdSvKGOMK+S7xZMLhiQ0ZaM0RDPavL6+Quo
BfNdB59JGGQTSEn6mBhTD8x52tE6ukYCuNk/+FZYkXZ7V+tGVa6CX+gQwCM96aic
+8X0PHe4BUU=
=8Zru
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Bug#404046: gnome-peercast: Badly ships a static library file in a non-devel package
Re: Romain Beauxis 2006-12-21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-peercast ships a static library file libpeercast.a.
This is bad for the following reasons:
* It conflicts with libpeercast0-dev and hence trigered bug #404000
* No package should be built against gnome-peercast unless it states in
his name or in the section that the package is meant for devel.
Hi,
I'll upload a NMU to delayed/3 in a minute.
debdiff gnome-peercast_0.5.4-1.dsc
/srv/pbuilder/result/gnome-peercast_0.5.4-1.1.dsc
control|2 +-
control.in |2 +-
changelog | 11 +++
rules |4
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gnome-peercast-0.5.4.orig/debian/control
+++ gnome-peercast-0.5.4/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: gnome-peercast
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: PeerCast user interface for GNOME includes peercast core
PeerCast is a free way to listen to radio and watch video on the Internet.
It uses P2P technology to let anyone become a broadcaster without
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gnome-peercast-0.5.4.orig/debian/control.in
+++ gnome-peercast-0.5.4/debian/control.in
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: gnome-peercast
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: PeerCast user interface for GNOME includes peercast core
PeerCast is a free way to listen to radio and watch video on the Internet.
It uses P2P technology to let anyone become a broadcaster without
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gnome-peercast-0.5.4.orig/debian/changelog
+++ gnome-peercast-0.5.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+gnome-peercast (0.5.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Removed static libpeercast.a and libpeercast.la from the package
+ (Closes: #404046)
+ * Added a ${misc:Depends} to imply dependency on gconf2. It is important
+because maintainer scripts need it. See lintian warning
+maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-gconf2 prerm
+
+ -- Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:15:18 +0100
+
gnome-peercast (0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- gnome-peercast-0.5.4.orig/debian/rules
+++ gnome-peercast-0.5.4/debian/rules
@@ -17,3 +17,7 @@
DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV := LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
+
+# No static libs are needed for gnome-peercast to run
+install/gnome-peercast::
+ rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gnome-peercast/usr/lib/*.a
$(CURDIR)/debian/gnome-peercast/usr/lib/*.la
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#404048: Patch for RC gzip bug
tags 404048 patch thanks Hi, here's a simple patch that fixes this problem: diff -Nur gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi --- gzip-1.3.9.old/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-08 19:45:37.0 +0100 +++ gzip-1.3.9/doc/gzip.texi2006-12-21 15:04:50.0 +0100 @@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ @c Debian install-info (up through at least version 1.9.20) uses only the @c first dircategory. Put this one first, as it is more useful in practice. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Individual utilities [EMAIL PROTECTED] Utilities @direntry -* gzip: (gzip)Invoking gzip.Compress files. +* Gzip: (gzip). The gzip command for compressing files. @end direntry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Utilities [EMAIL PROTECTED] Individual utilities @direntry -* Gzip: (gzip). The gzip command for compressing files. +* gzip: (gzip)Invoking gzip.Compress files. @end direntry @titlepage In other words, just swap the two entries. The full stop after the parentheses makes the difference. I think gzip.info is regenerated if gzip.texi is newer, but I'm not 100% sure, please test before uploading. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
Jochen Friedrich a écrit : tags 370132 + help moreinfo thanks Hi Aurelien, snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query. I have got the same exact problem on s390. Given that this bug renders I tested this in a chroot on merulo and raptor by running snmpd as user and using a different port number, but this way i couldn't reproduce the crash. Questions: 1. Did you do any modifications of /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf? Yes, I uncommented the disk / 1 line. This is actually the change that trigger the segfault. 2. Could you remove /var/lib/snmp/snmpd.conf and retest? Same problem 3. Is snmpd still crashing if you rename the /usr/share/snmp/mibs/ directory? Same problem 4. Could you run snmpd using gdb (using -f to make snmpd run in foreground)? Here is the backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (gdb) (gdb) bt #0 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x77c20738 in getmntent () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x77e9f196 in init_disk () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so.9 #3 0x77d9849a in run_config_handler () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #4 0x77d98748 in read_config () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #5 0x77d9a50c in read_config_files () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #6 0x77d9ab4c in read_configs () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #7 0x77d805d2 in init_snmp () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #8 0x00403898 in SnmpdReconfig () #9 0x77b6d0c2 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #10 0x004025d0 in ?? () I haven't the time to dig more into the problem, but it *may* be a bug in the glibc. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404047: marked as done (gzip: fails to install due to install-info complaining about gzip.info)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave gzip fails to install and when you try to install other packages with apt-get it first tries to setup gzip and fails. As not every one is install-info expert grave seams to be adequate. # apt-get install gzip Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-vserver-k7 Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gzip depends on: ii debianutils 2.17.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries gzip recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- =*= Łukasz Pankowski =*= ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I have uploaded gzip 1.3.9-2 with a workaround for the bug in install-info that caused the installation failures. Bdale ---End Message---
Bug#403998: marked as done (Package is not installable)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave The following messages are outputted: Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--install): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I have uploaded gzip 1.3.9-2 with a workaround for the bug in install-info that caused the installation failures. Bdale ---End Message---
Bug#404036: marked as done (gzip does not install)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:01:43 -0700 (MST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Unpacking replacement gzip ... Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 87 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# install-info /usr/share/info/gzip.info install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up r-ptxp-ceva6380:/home/ceva6380# exit exit -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages gzip depends on: ii debianutils 2.17.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries gzip recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I have uploaded gzip 1.3.9-2 with a workaround for the bug in install-info that caused the installation failures. Bdale ---End Message---
Bug#403935: Patch is slightly wrong
Gunnar seems to have been a little sleepy yesterday. For his patch to work you also need to manually create debian/compat with the single line: --snip-- 4 --snap-- -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
Aurelien Jarno a écrit : Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (gdb) (gdb) bt #0 0x77c20e60 in getmntent_r () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #1 0x77c20738 in getmntent () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x77e9f196 in init_disk () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so.9 #3 0x77d9849a in run_config_handler () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #4 0x77d98748 in read_config () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #5 0x77d9a50c in read_config_files () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #6 0x77d9ab4c in read_configs () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #7 0x77d805d2 in init_snmp () from /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.9 #8 0x00403898 in SnmpdReconfig () #9 0x77b6d0c2 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #10 0x004025d0 in ?? () using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390 there is in the build log: checking for mount table location... unknown whereas on architecture there is: checking for mount table location... /etc/mtab -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 400627 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 400627 serious Bug#400627: apache2 refuse to start when kolab-webadmin is installed Severity set to `serious' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
Hi Aurelien, using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390 there is in the build log: checking for mount table location... unknown whereas on architecture there is: checking for mount table location... /etc/mtab Thanks for catching this! The relevant part of configure.in looks like this: # # Check for mount table location # AC_CACHE_CHECK(for mount table location,ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB, [ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=unknown for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems do if test -f $i; then ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i break; fi done ]) My *guess* is that the buildd server for s390 has no /etc/mtab or /etc/mtab might be a symlink. So maybe a fix could be to use -e instead of -f in the above test case. However, i'll ask this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you by any chance have the possibility to recompile net-snmp on s390 and check if the crash disappears when configure finds the correct mount table location? Thanks, Jochen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404048: marked as done (unstable, gzip, apt-get dist-upgrade - error)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#404048: fixed in gzip 1.3.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gzip Version: 1.3.9-1_i386 Problem: When using apt-get dist-upgrade on unstable, the result will appear like this: Transcript: Setting up gzip (1.3.9-1) ... install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): warning, ignoring confusing INFO-DIR-ENTRY in file. No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/gzip.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing gzip (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gzip E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm running, Debian Linux kernel 2.6.17.13 and (trying) to run unstable, but until that, Debian 4.0? -- Mikkel Blankholm ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gzip Source-Version: 1.3.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gzip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gzip_1.3.9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gzip/gzip_1.3.9-2.diff.gz gzip_1.3.9-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gzip/gzip_1.3.9-2.dsc gzip_1.3.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gzip/gzip_1.3.9-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gzip package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:16:16 -0700 Source: gzip Binary: gzip Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gzip - The GNU compression utility Closes: 404048 Changes: gzip (1.3.9-2) unstable; urgency=low . * change direntry ordering in gzip.texi to work around bug in install-info, closes: #404048 Files: f43c41b9670644d3341493c2f49cacfc 550 utils required gzip_1.3.9-2.dsc f75d8dc6f3e19b635ffddf4c8868ddad 11594 utils required gzip_1.3.9-2.diff.gz 440eb4aab09c900971ca5dd6a969eb1d 75734 utils required gzip_1.3.9-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFirPgZKfAp/LPAagRAloxAJ9axcl2L8PDGKZ4T7uxkIi7sgBXwgCfQmpM E2goGMetD/5cV26w4RAXCaE= =AJfr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#370132: [Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#370132: snmpd segfaults on ia64 upon first query
Jochen Friedrich a écrit : Hi Aurelien, using the libc6-dbg package, I have seen that the getmntent() function is called with a NULL pointer. This may be due to the fact that on s390 there is in the build log: checking for mount table location... unknown whereas on architecture there is: checking for mount table location... /etc/mtab Thanks for catching this! The relevant part of configure.in looks like this: # # Check for mount table location # AC_CACHE_CHECK(for mount table location,ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB, [ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=unknown for i in /etc/mnttab /etc/mtab /etc/filesystems do if test -f $i; then ac_cv_ETC_MNTTAB=$i break; fi done ]) My *guess* is that the buildd server for s390 has no /etc/mtab or /etc/mtab might be a symlink. So maybe a fix could be to use -e instead of -f in the above test case. However, i'll ask this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you by any chance have the possibility to recompile net-snmp on s390 and check if the crash disappears when configure finds the correct mount table location? It's what I am doing currently. At least the output from configure is correct. I have to go now, so the result will be later today. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined
Hi, A question. Isn't it possible to solve this issue by a m4_ifdef( [AM_PROG_MKDIR_P], [AM_PROG_MKDIR_P],// automake = 1.8 [...old solution...] // automake = 1.7 ) Maybe you could forward this to upstream. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#401416: pending upload of digikam-0.8.2
Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Given the discussion has died down. I am proposing to release digikam[imageplugins] 0.8.2 to unstable in the next couple of days to overcome the lack of an libexiv2 transition. From what I can see, this is fine. bugs.d.o doesn't report anything unusual, but I would love to know if #393505 and #396249 are fixed in 2:0.8.2-2. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 137: Cisco Microsoft im Routermarkt (Simone Demmel) pgpqTa3VHR9nL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#402179: [Bug-tar] Race condition in GNU tar test-suite
Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote: This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch. It's not clear to me that we need to disturb etch to fix this. It's just a race in a regression test, and I *think* 1.16 is built for all the architectures that matter for etch release, isn't it? If not, I'm certainly willing to apply the patch and upload this. Packaging 1.16.1 for unstable clearly makes sense, and I'll try to do that tonight or tomorrow. I've looked at the diff between tar 1.16 and 1.16.1, I'm not really happy to approve this to etch. I would prefer to get a fixed version of tar (with the patch from tar 1.16.1 or the one from the bug report) into etch through tpu. If you don't have the time to do that, there is probably some eager NMUer willing to do it :-) Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 18: Vorbereitet für den Multimediaeinsatz Es sind noch zwei Slots auf dem Motherboard frei. (Peter Berlich) pgpO2gt9Oh29j.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#379628: marked as done (ntfsresize: resizing a Vista NTFS partition leads to corrupted partition)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:02:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#379628: fixed in linux-ntfs 1.13.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ntfsprogs Version: 1.12.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Tags: d-i After a resize using Debian Installer of an NTFS partition created with Windows Vista Beta 2, I found that the partition was no longer usable. I have checked that this really is an issue by doing manual resizes of: - an NTFS (1.2) partition created by installing Windows 2000 - an NTFS (3.1) partition created by installing Windows Vista Beta 2 The two are completely similar, except that the first is successful and the second leads to corruption. The corruption only becomes clear _after_ the physical partition is resized too; resizing the partition back to its original size does not get the partition back. ntfsfix does not help either. Note that during the manual resize operation I used fdisk, but the installer uses libparted; the corruption occurs with both. Logs for the resize of both NTFS partitions are attached and clearly show the problem. I noticed that a 1.13.1 release is available, but cannot tell from the changelog if that would fix this issue. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ntfsprogs depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfuse22.5.3-2.1 Filesystem in USErspace library ii libntfs81.12.1-1 library that provides common NTFS ntfsprogs recommends no packages. -- no debconf information debian:~# ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1 ntfsresize v1.12.1 (libntfs 8:1:0) Device name: /dev/sda1 NTFS volume version: 1.2 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 20974428672 bytes (20975 MB) Current device size: 20974431744 bytes (20975 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... 100.00 percent completed Accounting clusters ... Space in use : 410 MB (2.0%) Collecting resizing constraints ... You might resize at 409182208 bytes or 410 MB (freeing 20565 MB). Please make a test run using both the -n and -s options before real resizing! debian:~# ntfsresize -s 9G /dev/sda1 ntfsresize v1.12.1 (libntfs 8:1:0) Device name: /dev/sda1 NTFS volume version: 1.2 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 20974428672 bytes (20975 MB) Current device size: 20974431744 bytes (20975 MB) New volume size: 893856 bytes (9000 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... 100.00 percent completed Accounting clusters ... Space in use : 410 MB (2.0%) Collecting resizing constraints ... Needed relocations : 99052 (406 MB) WARNING: Every sanity check passed and only the dangerous operations left. Make sure that important data has been backed up! Power outage or computer crash may result major data loss! Are you sure you want to proceed (y/[n])? y Schedule chkdsk for NTFS consistency check at Windows boot time ... Resetting $LogFile ... (this might take a while) Relocating needed data ... 100.00 percent completed Updating $BadClust file ... Updating $Bitmap file ... Updating Boot record ... Syncing device ... Successfully resized NTFS on device '/dev/sda1'. You can go on to shrink the device for example with Linux fdisk. IMPORTANT: When recreating the partition, make sure that you 1) create it at the same disk sector (use sector as the unit!) 2) create it with the same partition type (usually 7, HPFS/NTFS) 3) do not make it smaller than the new NTFS filesystem size 4) set the bootable flag for the partition if it existed before Otherwise you won't be able to access NTFS or can't boot from the disk! If you make a mistake and don't have a partition table backup then you can recover the partition table by TestDisk or Parted's rescue mode. debian:~# ntfsresize -i -f /dev/sda1 ntfsresize v1.12.1 (libntfs 8:1:0) Device name: /dev/sda1 NTFS volume version: 1.2 Cluster size : 4096 bytes Current volume size: 893856 bytes (9000 MB) Current device size: 20974431744 bytes (20975 MB) Checking filesystem consistency ... 100.00 percent completed Accounting clusters ... Space in use : 409 MB (4.5%) Collecting resizing constraints ... You might resize at 408817664 bytes
Bug#404104: unnecessary depends on ca-certificates
Package: libcurl3-gnutls Version: 7.15.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated, no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user to trust everything in ca-certificates. I suggest setting this Depends to Recommends or Suggests, like many other packages do. -- -Cedar Cox -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404105: CVE-2006-6628: Integer overflow in OpenOffice.org
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole openoffice.org crashes when loading the exploit from [1]. There is inconclusive information whether this may be used to execute arbitrary code [2,3]. If this is a mere DoS you may of course downgrade the severity. [1] http://www.securityfocus.com/data/vulnerabilities/exploits/12122006-djtest.doc [2] http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21618/discuss [3] http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/454545/30/0/threaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#404103: unnecessary depends on ca-certificates
Package: libcurl3 Version: 7.15.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Given that trustworthiness of certificate authorities is not evaluated, no package should depend on ca-certificates. To do so forces the user to trust everything in ca-certificates. I suggest setting this Depends to Recommends or Suggests, like many other packages do. -- -Cedar Cox -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#402179: [Bug-tar] Race condition in GNU tar test-suite
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:32:30AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 15:46 +, Alex Owen wrote: This patch should fix the problem. I guess the opotions are to aply this patch to 1.16 or package 1.16.1. I guess applying the patch is the better option if we wnat to fix this for etch. It's not clear to me that we need to disturb etch to fix this. It's just a race in a regression test, and I *think* 1.16 is built for all the architectures that matter for etch release, isn't it? If not, I'm certainly willing to apply the patch and upload this. I would very much like that patch to be applied in Etch. Non-deterministic packages build failures cause large waste of time. Thanks in advance, Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
