Bug#694368: libfuzzy{2,-dev}: missing Breaks+Replaces: ssdeep ( 2.6)

2012-12-06 Thread Christophe Monniez
Hi Salvatore,

the fix was just uploaded.
Do we need a release excpetion for this to be accepeted ?

-- 
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#633789: xfce4-notifyd

2011-08-30 Thread Christophe Monniez
Hi,

I found (here: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24054) that installing
xfce4-notifyd could solve the problem.

I tryed and it seems to solve the problem too.


-- 
Christophe Monniez d-fe...@swing.be
www.d-fence.be - www.lnx4n6.be




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#637818: aimage: FTBFS with wrong check for libssl

2011-08-16 Thread Christophe Monniez
aimage was removed from Debian testing.
The upstream author stopped working on this tool.

So, unless someone else create a fork of the upstream, it will not
come back into Debian.


-- 
Christophe Monniez



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#574544: [afflib] contains files released under a non-free license

2010-04-02 Thread Christophe Monniez
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Michael Prokop m...@debian.org wrote:


 Christophe, do you want me to upload it based on current git tree?

 thanks  regards,
 -mika-


I forgot pushing tags.

yes, you can upload, thank you Mika.

-- 
Christophe Monniez


Bug#574544: [afflib] contains files released under a non-free license

2010-03-20 Thread Christophe Monniez
Here is the answer of the upstream author about this problem:

Those files are public domain, which means that they are distributed
without a license. This is the least restrictive way of distributing
content on the planet. You can do anything you want with that. 

You are correct, however. The last sentence is not in the spirit of the
PD. This verbiage is from NIST and it is clearly not legal. We will
remove it from the next release.


So, I will close this bug when packaging the next release (I will skip
the current 3.5.8).

Untill then, I'm not sure of what to do and what is the Debian way to
handle this problem.

-- 
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#574544: [afflib] contains files released under a non-free license

2010-03-19 Thread Christophe Monniez
Hi Cristian,

I didn't noticed this last sentence.
I will send this to the uptream author and see if he is able to give
more freedom.

If not, the only solution that I see is to remove afflib from Debian.

-- 
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#549638: afflib-tools and simh: error when trying to install together

2009-10-05 Thread Christophe Monniez
Le lundi 05 octobre 2009 à 13:46 +0200, Vince Mulhollon a écrit :
 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:35:22AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
  Package: simh,afflib-tools
  Version: simh/3.8.1-1
  Version: afflib-tools/3.3.6+dfsg-3
  Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
  
  This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail. Possible
  solutions are to have the two packages conflict, to rename the common
  file in one of the two packages, or to remove the file from one
  package and have this package depend on the other package. File
  diversions or a Replace relation are another possibility.
  
  Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
  (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
  slightly out of sync):
  
usr/bin/s3
  
 
 OK my interpretation of the situation, is you afflib guys really need 
 the name s3 because that is the full name of the amazon s3 service
 you're trying to access, and the simh s3 is merely the short name for 
 the System/3 emulator.
 
 afflib folks please confirm or deny the accuracy of my interpretation.
 
 If I'm correct I think the logical solution is I extend the name of the 
 System/3 emulator from s3 to system3 (err I have to verify that is not
 otherwise in use... maybe I'll go sys3, who knows)
 
 Current status, waiting on your comments, afflib folks ...

As the s3 tool is only a testing tool in the afflib package and that
it's not essential to afflib users, I renamed the tool s3-afflib this
morning in git:
http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/afflib.git;a=commitdiff;h=5b870b00b2c62dc94648178f0de1e9573cab60fa

Anyway, I'm waiting comments from other debian-forensics members, if no
one complains, it will be uploaded.

Finally, I think that it's a good idea to change both utilities names
because, one day or another, I suspect that a real Amazon s3 tool
could come up with the same name. And since tab completion exists, such
a short name is not needed anymore :-)

-- 
Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org