Re: AppStream / DEP-11 support now available in the Debian archive

2015-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:24:38AM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 
> Coming from a science background myself, I like this idea very much!

:-)

> However, we shouldn't add each and every metadata to the AppStream
> document, so we would need to go through what the UpstreamMetadata
> project offers and see if we can integrate it with AppStream.
> The main purpose of AppStream is to provide data to have people decide
> if they want to install the software, its secondary purpose is to
> contain data which the users might find useful to know when browsing
> applications.

:-)

> I think having a  tag or something similar would be
> pretty cool - searching in the AppStream data pool for applications
> associated with a publication, or just have the publications at hand
> when looking atthe application would be awesome!
> 
> Even if there is useful data which we don't include in the AppStream
> data, we can probably link it and load it on-demand. I have some ideas
> for this for parts of AppStream (like the  tag) already, but
> haven't worked out the details - so far, this is just early
> experimentation to see whether something like that makes sense.
> 
> So, in summary: I'll look at the wiki page to familiarize a bit with
> your upstream-metadata project, so I can say something more
> meaningful. But I think adding most of the data to the AS metadata
> would be a good and viable idea :-)

Just to give some additional technical background:  The bibliographic
data are gathered in UDD in the table bibref.  I just noticed that there
is some problem with the umegaya importer[1] but I plan to tackle this
soon.  Once this is done the bibref example which can be seen here:

   http://blends.debian.net/packages-metadata/

will be updated again.  This is actually my test case for the importer
success (which has some flaws as discussed in [1]) and just an example
what can be currently done with the available data.  I guess there is
way more possible usage like a debhelper script doing some sensible
things with the bibliographic data (but so far not even a definition
what would be sensible).

Thanks for the AppStream initiative in general which has a big
potential also for Blends

  Andreas.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2015/12/msg00105.html

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Re: AppStream / DEP-11 support now available in the Debian archive

2015-12-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-12-15 1:45 GMT+01:00 Charles Plessy :
> Hi Matthias,
>
> congratulation for this release !
>
> In the upstream-metadata project (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) we
> document some information, some of which is redundant with what is now found 
> in
> AppStream, and some of which is not.
>
> For example, we document bibliographic reference to the scientific litterature
> where a given sofwtware has been published. This particular data has been the
> driving need behind the creation of upstream-metadata project. But the moment,
> I do not have enough free time to take care of the upstream-metadata project
> properly.
>
> Given that the scope of AppStream has grown, do you think that it could be
> further extended to support the kind of information that we distribute in the
> debian/upstream/metadata files ?

Coming from a science background myself, I like this idea very much!
However, we shouldn't add each and every metadata to the AppStream
document, so we would need to go through what the UpstreamMetadata
project offers and see if we can integrate it with AppStream.
The main purpose of AppStream is to provide data to have people decide
if they want to install the software, its secondary purpose is to
contain data which the users might find useful to know when browsing
applications.

I think having a  tag or something similar would be
pretty cool - searching in the AppStream data pool for applications
associated with a publication, or just have the publications at hand
when looking atthe application would be awesome!

Even if there is useful data which we don't include in the AppStream
data, we can probably link it and load it on-demand. I have some ideas
for this for parts of AppStream (like the  tag) already, but
haven't worked out the details - so far, this is just early
experimentation to see whether something like that makes sense.

So, in summary: I'll look at the wiki page to familiarize a bit with
your upstream-metadata project, so I can say something more
meaningful. But I think adding most of the data to the AS metadata
would be a good and viable idea :-)

Cheers & sorry for the delay in replying!
Matthias

-- 
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/



Re: AppStream / DEP-11 support now available in the Debian archive

2015-12-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi Matthias,

congratulation for this release !

In the upstream-metadata project (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) we
document some information, some of which is redundant with what is now found in
AppStream, and some of which is not.

For example, we document bibliographic reference to the scientific litterature
where a given sofwtware has been published. This particular data has been the
driving need behind the creation of upstream-metadata project. But the moment,
I do not have enough free time to take care of the upstream-metadata project
properly.

Given that the scope of AppStream has grown, do you think that it could be
further extended to support the kind of information that we distribute in the
debian/upstream/metadata files ?

Have a nice day,

(Please Cc me, I am not subscribed).

—
Charles